I actually doubt so- majority of the people participating into this campaign are the ones who have alt accounts who were previously negatively tagged due to an infarction to the forum rules. Since most of their accounts are just lying around, they took advantage of this "scheme" to participate into 1xbit campaign purely for profits and money.
To be honest, I also do think that the people advertising 1xbit believes that the latter is a scam gambling website. But just because they are paying users in attractive rates, they are just taking advantage of this pay at the end.
Topic: I Have a Question ~ Are 1xbit Campaigners Playing on 1xbit? - page 9. (Read 7692 times)
No signature campaign are require to campaign participates to play casono on there platform. It cannot be part of the signature campaign rules. The purpose of the signature campaign is to promote only one project within the forum. So I think signature participants never gamble at 1xbet with there signature reword
There's no requirement, but of course it doesn't make sense if you're the participant but you never play at the project you've advertised. You will have no idea with your casino and you can't know what the advantages of the casino you've promoted.I'm confused did you mean signature campaign only promote for one project or each signature participant only able to promote on project? Both of them were wrong, there's many signature campaign with various project and there's few users have advertised 2 projects (one project on their avatar and the another project on their signature).
Most but not all users that has joined a signature campaign on the forum can only promote one project at a time but if the campaign manager says otherwise then they are free to do so. This especially applies if you are promoting a gambling platform on your signature and would like to promote another gambling platform which might conflict the first one.
Anyways, I still haven't seen any replies from the participants of 1xbit campaign on this thread which only shows their true nature on why they've joined the campaign.
No signature campaign are require to campaign participates to play casono on there platform. It cannot be part of the signature campaign rules. The purpose of the signature campaign is to promote only one project within the forum. So I think signature participants never gamble at 1xbet with there signature reword
There's no requirement, but of course it doesn't make sense if you're the participant but you never play at the project you've advertised. You will have no idea with your casino and you can't know what the advantages of the casino you've promoted.I'm confused did you mean signature campaign only promote for one project or each signature participant only able to promote on project? Both of them were wrong, there's many signature campaign with various project and there's few users have advertised 2 projects (one project on their avatar and the another project on their signature).
If they didn't require the campaign participants to play on the 1xbit casino then they are not playing on their own casino. The signature participants know the casino is shady, they are just promoting to make BTC weekly at least but not playing. They probably even suspect they will not get their BTC back if they deposited on 1xbit while they win big.
No signature campaign are require to campaign participates to play casono on there platform. It cannot be part of the signature campaign rules. The purpose of the signature campaign is to promote only one project within the forum. So I think signature participants never gamble at 1xbet with there signature reword 
If they didn't require the campaign participants to play on the 1xbit casino then they are not playing on their own casino. The signature participants know the casino is shady, they are just promoting to make BTC weekly at least but not playing. They probably even suspect they will not get their BTC back if they deposited on 1xbit while they win big.
Most likely that. Bit doesn't even bother since their ROI greatly exceed the advertising costs
If they didn't require the campaign participants to play on the 1xbit casino then they are not playing on their own casino. The signature participants know the casino is shady, they are just promoting to make BTC weekly at least but not playing. They probably even suspect they will not get their BTC back if they deposited on 1xbit while they win big.
I am just curious to know 
.
With all the complaints, scam accusations against 1xbit, and Bitcointalk blacklisting this casino, I am surprised that some users of this forum still went ahead to sell their reputation for peanuts, in deciding to promote 1xbit.
I have two simple questions to ask to all, but not limited to 1xbit promoters alone ~
I am quite sure it is money and the lack of ability to join other campaigns. if you noticed when they launched their first campaign majority of the people who post their applications are accounts that were previously inactive or already have a negative tag. .With all the complaints, scam accusations against 1xbit, and Bitcointalk blacklisting this casino, I am surprised that some users of this forum still went ahead to sell their reputation for peanuts, in deciding to promote 1xbit.
I have two simple questions to ask to all, but not limited to 1xbit promoters alone ~
- 1. What is your driving force, motivation in promoting 1xbit?, knowing fully well that the casino is blacklisted on Bitcointalk due to numerous complaints and scam accusations that remains unattended to by those in charge of the casino.
- 1.1. Is the money you are being paid, your motivation?
- 1.2. Is your lack of ability to join or get accepted in other signature campaigns belonging to more reputable businesses, your motivation in deciding to promote 1xbit?
1xbit accepted users with neg trust and some of the participants had red trust prior to joining the campaign. Others that did not have neg trust received it shortly after joining. I really doubt any of them are gambling a penny of the money they earn as well. It's quite possible that there are some multi accounts in the campaign as well.
yep, I agree, I am pretty sure that a lot of them are just alts of someone or owned by the same person. it also made my suspicion increase when a lot of them suddenly woke up hours after the first 1xbit campaign was launched.[/list]
This is a good question like other user said above what ever campaign you've promoted is not compulsory to take part of the team. Some campaign promoters choose other casino to play with. but other promoters enter or play in the casino they promote and its a good practice to join in the casino on what you've promoted to know everything about the casino you've promoted.
Like 1xbit team maybe some promoters playing 1xbit casino. But you those promoters who already know what is 1xbit is I think they are only promote to earn but not playing.
Like 1xbit team maybe some promoters playing 1xbit casino. But you those promoters who already know what is 1xbit is I think they are only promote to earn but not playing.
The question of whether 1xbit promoters bet in 1xbit doesn't really matter or hold weight. It is not compulsory for a participant of a campaign to partake in the services of the campaign.
There is nothing more motivating people to join the campaign apart from the initial time they came with high paying amount upto $150 per week for legendary accounts. Some people who were hungry for money went in with their account. They are making the money but lost reputation.
Another reason is spamming and post bursting. 1x bit managers or should I say payers (because the campaign isn't managed) doesn't care about the quality of post, in as much as you can complete your post quota, you would be paid.
There is nothing more motivating people to join the campaign apart from the initial time they came with high paying amount upto $150 per week for legendary accounts. Some people who were hungry for money went in with their account. They are making the money but lost reputation.
Another reason is spamming and post bursting. 1x bit managers or should I say payers (because the campaign isn't managed) doesn't care about the quality of post, in as much as you can complete your post quota, you would be paid.
With all the complaints, scam accusations against 1xbit, and Bitcointalk blacklisting this casino, I am surprised that some users of this forum still went ahead to sell their reputation for peanuts, in deciding to promote 1xbit.
They are not blacklisted I wish they are, they still have an active thread here and they still have an ongoing signature campaign, those who participate in their campaign are members with bad reputations and are not likely to get accepted by reputable bounty managers, they take a shot risking their reputation and so far they are making a lot because 1XBIT proved to be a long term campaign they are on the run as the longest signature campaign, they sometimes do 2 to 4 campaigns at the same time.
The answers are straight forward, 1xbit campaign participants can not give you the true answers, but we know the reasons they join 1xbit.
Many of the participants in the past are spammers and low quality posters. Psychologically speaking, some people even make use of their alts that have been abandoned to join. It was easy to get accepted in 1xbit campaign because no reputed accounts wants to join, no competition, people that re applying are accepted.
Basically they joined for the money.
Even though they have a trust issues, it looks like they are still effective since some newbies fall on their trap and we've seen a lot of accusation recently.Many of the participants in the past are spammers and low quality posters. Psychologically speaking, some people even make use of their alts that have been abandoned to join. It was easy to get accepted in 1xbit campaign because no reputed accounts wants to join, no competition, people that re applying are accepted.
Basically they joined for the money.
If we could have a way to totally ban their thread especially that signature campaign, that could be a big help to reduce scam projects. They are here for the money, and scamming gamblers is their main objective, those signature participants don't really care if they market a scam project, as long as they get paid they will still join.
1xbit accepted users with neg trust and some of the participants had red trust prior to joining the campaign. Others that did not have neg trust received it shortly after joining. I really doubt any of them are gambling a penny of the money they earn as well. It's quite possible that there are some multi accounts in the campaign as well.
With how you explained it, it is easy to join 1xbit campaign, definitely there are disused accounts that become useful when 1xbit campaign came again to this forum, many of the accounts also are alts and multi accounts. Some people will see it as a bonus and not minding the negative trust given.Would be better to ask the campaign participants (better mention those in the campaign spreadsheet list) straight forward than making assumptions. Well, only if they will post here and tell the truth.
Plus, the campaign don't required them to make an account so i doubt they did.
Either they remain mute about it or they may speak what is not true, but I have seen one of them posted before that he has struggled to join a reputable campaign in the past that he was unable to, that 1xbit accepted him. They do not care if others are scammed as long as they are paid.Plus, the campaign don't required them to make an account so i doubt they did.
I am 100% certain that even 1xBit Bitcointalk signature campaigners aka promoters do not trust 1xBit enough to depost their funds there. Its just about the money for them.
Definitely they joined the campaign for the money and nothing else than promoting a gambling site that many people are complaining that they were scammed by 1xbit. They know people are complaining about the the betting site, they will not want to risk their money to play, only people that do not know about 1xbit would join and probably complain again that they won and not able to withdraw. 
I am just curious to know .
With all the complaints, scam accusations against 1xbit, and Bitcointalk blacklisting this casino, I am surprised that some users of this forum still went ahead to sell their reputation for peanuts, in deciding to promote 1xbit.
I have two simple questions to ask to all, but not limited to 1xbit promoters alone ~
.With all the complaints, scam accusations against 1xbit, and Bitcointalk blacklisting this casino, I am surprised that some users of this forum still went ahead to sell their reputation for peanuts, in deciding to promote 1xbit.
I have two simple questions to ask to all, but not limited to 1xbit promoters alone ~
- 1. What is your driving force, motivation in promoting 1xbit?, knowing fully well that the casino is blacklisted on Bitcointalk due to numerous complaints and scam accusations that remains unattended to by those in charge of the casino.
- 1.1. Is the money you are being paid, your motivation?
- 1.2. Is your lack of ability to join or get accepted in other signature campaigns belonging to more reputable businesses, your motivation in deciding to promote 1xbit?
- 2. As a 1xbit promoter, are you playing/gambling on 1xbit casino platform?
- 2.1. If "Yes" is your answer to the question above ~ then what is your experience like? Please tell us..
- 2.2. If "No" is your answer to the question above ~ then why?
I am 100% certain that even 1xBit Bitcointalk signature campaigners aka promoters do not trust 1xBit enough to depost their funds there. Its just about the money for them. Some people need it desperately, others just do not care about the damage they cause to the community as long as they earn a few more bucks each week. I for one would have to be extremely desperate to join their campaign. And even then it would leave a bitter taste in my mouth, knowing that I will harvest a lot of negative trust and my image with the community would be quite negative as well...
There are other ways to make money though. No matter how desperate you get, you should never support scammers.
So far none of the 1Xbit participant has drop here to participate in the discussion, but its unlikeley that they are going to use 1XBIT platform because if they do that, and they got an issue they cannot file a complaint, imagine you are promoting 1XBIT then you are filing a complaint, they will just let it pass or not file a complaint or they will be taken out of the campaign, they are aware of 1XBIT's reputation.
I am just curious to know
I was expecting a lot of answers from those users (easy way to fill quota, you know), but, surprisingly, none has come yet.I'm expecting the same and I'm really curious too because if they play in their betting platform it means that they trust in them, but if they gamble somewhere else, but not there, it would be suspicious.
Maybe they have gambled there without problems and that's the reason they trust and promote their sportsbook. And negative trust would be fair in these cases? Anyway, I don't think 1xbit would risk to not pay to any participant in their signature campaign.
I am just curious to know
I was expecting a lot of answers from those users (easy way to fill quota, you know), but, surprisingly, none has come yet.
But I am curious what you expect to see as answers. I mean, we already know that the campaign in question has taken problematic accounts and shitposters. Would you really expect honest answers from those? Do you expect a meaningful discussion with those?
I think this question isn't for 1xbit alone but to all who promote casinos on their signature profiles. For me, I will surely get the gist first about the site because it would be a shame if I'll be question how's the site and why do I choose to play their, that's just my take for a legitimate casino and by far has few accusations and whatnots.
For 1xbit, I doubt if most of the user plays on their site. I think it wouldn't be close to 50% if I'll be asked on how many users who participated on their campaign that plays as well in their casino. They may try but with the payment goes directly on their personal wallets, I really doubt if they happen to play there.
For 1xbit, I doubt if most of the user plays on their site. I think it wouldn't be close to 50% if I'll be asked on how many users who participated on their campaign that plays as well in their casino. They may try but with the payment goes directly on their personal wallets, I really doubt if they happen to play there.
I'm pretty sure that these people promoting 1xbit are being paid in some way.
They are indeed, it's a weekly for signature campaign. If you're talking about the people outside bitcointalk promoting this casino, then again, it is. Knowing it's a casino, gambling niche rate for promotion is different from other niche, which is much more costly. And even those gambling/casino reviews sites are most probably paid, no one will give an almost 5/5 star review without being paid especially if the casino is a shit like this one. For f*ck sake, i don't know if there are people here still using this casino except for the newbies knowing what kind of service they provide.
From on your questions i will love to answer it parabolically which says 'Flood doesn't know farm, crops, weeds and trees', when it comes it covers everywhere.
Which means if the 1xbit site could scam people and forum have blacklisted them doesn't mean it won't harm it promoters because same process others goes same process the promoters would also faced. It's quiet bad seeing people still promoting them.
Though it may be for some other reason like, if a user got Reflagged they may decides to join the campaign since no other managers accept them for their campaign so they may decides to rent out their sig space to them and be receiving some payment from the site without minding the effect of promoting the site around the forum. I think basically they are being paid directly to their btc address and is not certain they must used the site, all less their payment is being sent directly to 1xbit site.
Which means if the 1xbit site could scam people and forum have blacklisted them doesn't mean it won't harm it promoters because same process others goes same process the promoters would also faced. It's quiet bad seeing people still promoting them.
Though it may be for some other reason like, if a user got Reflagged they may decides to join the campaign since no other managers accept them for their campaign so they may decides to rent out their sig space to them and be receiving some payment from the site without minding the effect of promoting the site around the forum. I think basically they are being paid directly to their btc address and is not certain they must used the site, all less their payment is being sent directly to 1xbit site.
Probably not.
They know the reputation of the platform that they are campaigning for, and since most of them had already been red tagged due to advertisement of an obvious scam, they can't use the account to apply on other campaigns hence they are stuck with 1xbit. They'd probably just staying for the weekly benefits that they are getting from the campaign, but aren't brave enough to go play on the actual casino since they know what will happen to their hard-earned funds once they tried.
They know the reputation of the platform that they are campaigning for, and since most of them had already been red tagged due to advertisement of an obvious scam, they can't use the account to apply on other campaigns hence they are stuck with 1xbit. They'd probably just staying for the weekly benefits that they are getting from the campaign, but aren't brave enough to go play on the actual casino since they know what will happen to their hard-earned funds once they tried.
Jump to: