I am also having my own dicing strategy but I'm getting mixed results with my strategy. Still, I am very well aware of consistency of gambling strategies. I never come across any gambler is sharing their strategies is working all the times. But people are talking about/ in search of such consistent strategies.
Probably gamblers are finding a new kind of entertainment in searching of gambling strategies. I guess gambling will work in this way too.
i shared the delayed parachute version not my version which is different.
Was that the shittiest YouTube channel you could find? A bunch of random videos of him winning some money? How do you know he is not just advertising those casinos? He should be world known by now for reinventing math.
Over the years, many people have tried to beat the casino, and turn roulette—a game designed to turn a profit for the house—into one on which the player expects to win. Most of the time this comes down to the use of betting systems, strategies which say that the house edge can be beaten by simply employing a special pattern of bets, often relying on the "Gambler's fallacy", the idea that past results are any guide to the future (for example, if a roulette wheel has come up 10 times in a row on red, that red on the next spin is any more or less likely than if the last spin was black).
All betting systems that rely on patterns, when employed on casino edge games will result, on average, in the player losing money.[8] In practice, players employing betting systems may win, and may indeed win very large sums of money, but the losses (which, depending on the design of the betting system, may occur quite rarely) will outweigh the wins. Certain systems, such as the Martingale, described below, are extremely risky, because the worst-case scenario (which is mathematically certain to happen, at some point) may see the player chasing losses with ever-bigger bets until he runs out of money.
Stay in school kids or you will think that you can win money gambling.
Your answer was so predictable, i can see you really want to win this arguement and are not that smart, again, a PHYSICAL game like roulette is physics based, the probabilities of streaks of red and black doesn't matter, 10 black is not 35 black is it? they are on different places on the wheel, and the odds of hitting a number CHANGE when physics is involved.
Did edward thorpe not solve single deck blackjack thus destroying that game forcing casinos to add a cutting card and add more and more decks? And what are professional poker players a doing what ?
It seems you are still on page 1 of logic for dummies. Im not replying to anymore of your rubbish. Use your brains kids.
