Topic: i quit - page 69. (Read 142559 times)
And here first 6 addresses currently was all that time on block explorer chain because it's shown in history. That 6 addresses ( minimum 6) make around 40% of total amount of coins. Why they are not be forked?
you had a seed running can i have a ip i will put that inside also as 3rd node. im still looking if listen=0 is needed at this moment.
don't know where spooky is in blocks now but my wallet/fix is equal with explorer still
i am on 41752 but will remove my fork as there is no point in having 2, so post source as soon as you are readythe version im running now stays on explorer chain as far i can see now
don't know where spooky is in blocks now but my wallet/fix is equal with explorer still
i am on 41752 but will remove my fork as there is no point in having 2, so post source as soon as you are readythe version im running now stays on explorer chain as far i can see now
Why Bittrex and others not closed markets on that time? It's strange and anyway here would be any issues with balance. I'm was with Bittrex on same chain but not with block explorer. How much clients now on chain? And why you not stop it on that time? You are guys simple want now to make one of the many railways main and continue trip,but it's chain can be not original too and here anyway needs update with maintaince. On that case anyway block for fork needs to choose around 40K for start on clear way.
don't know where spooky is in blocks now but my wallet/fix is equal with explorer still
i am on 41752 but will remove my fork as there is no point in having 2, so post source as soon as you are ready
don't know where spooky is in blocks now but my wallet/fix is equal with explorer still
...
snip
...
I think the best is to go with the block explorer chain.. Minerftw and I and got it working and it also syncs nice with the block explorer. I feel goin with this chain is the best solution if there is one in this case.. If we roll back to 40001 then all the transaction that occurred on exchanges are a mess.. Not sure what everyone thinks but I for one support goin with the chain the block explorer has been on all along..
If you all agree we can get new wallet made up shortly
Best Regards
d57heinz
snip
...
I think the best is to go with the block explorer chain.. Minerftw and I and got it working and it also syncs nice with the block explorer. I feel goin with this chain is the best solution if there is one in this case.. If we roll back to 40001 then all the transaction that occurred on exchanges are a mess.. Not sure what everyone thinks but I for one support goin with the chain the block explorer has been on all along..
If you all agree we can get new wallet made up shortly
Best Regards
d57heinz
Yes. Stick with block explorer. Do not roll back. Roll back will be huge clusterfuck.
+1 block explorer has the fork everyones been trying to get on
This makes the most sense, unless there's is something were overlooking
...
snip
...
I think the best is to go with the block explorer chain.. Minerftw and I and got it working and it also syncs nice with the block explorer. I feel goin with this chain is the best solution if there is one in this case.. If we roll back to 40001 then all the transaction that occurred on exchanges are a mess.. Not sure what everyone thinks but I for one support goin with the chain the block explorer has been on all along..
If you all agree we can get new wallet made up shortly
Best Regards
d57heinz
snip
...
I think the best is to go with the block explorer chain.. Minerftw and I and got it working and it also syncs nice with the block explorer. I feel goin with this chain is the best solution if there is one in this case.. If we roll back to 40001 then all the transaction that occurred on exchanges are a mess.. Not sure what everyone thinks but I for one support goin with the chain the block explorer has been on all along..
If you all agree we can get new wallet made up shortly
Best Regards
d57heinz
Yes. Stick with block explorer. Do not roll back. Roll back will be huge clusterfuck.
+1 block explorer has the fork everyones been trying to get on
Who is running the block explorer? That person should be in on this so that the explorer is on the corrected wallet version right out of the gate.
...
snip
...
I think the best is to go with the block explorer chain.. Minerftw and I and got it working and it also syncs nice with the block explorer. I feel goin with this chain is the best solution if there is one in this case.. If we roll back to 40001 then all the transaction that occurred on exchanges are a mess.. Not sure what everyone thinks but I for one support goin with the chain the block explorer has been on all along..
If you all agree we can get new wallet made up shortly
Best Regards
d57heinz
snip
...
I think the best is to go with the block explorer chain.. Minerftw and I and got it working and it also syncs nice with the block explorer. I feel goin with this chain is the best solution if there is one in this case.. If we roll back to 40001 then all the transaction that occurred on exchanges are a mess.. Not sure what everyone thinks but I for one support goin with the chain the block explorer has been on all along..
If you all agree we can get new wallet made up shortly
Best Regards
d57heinz
Yes. Stick with block explorer. Do not roll back. Roll back will be huge clusterfuck.
+1 block explorer has the fork everyones been trying to get on
Unless there is a wallet that will prevent this massive forking from happening again I guess choosing a fork (and the winners of the fork lotto) is kind of secondary.
With block rewards under 10k, only about 13.5 million LDOGE are created a day. There are nearly 2.75 Billion LDOGE out there right now so while shitty, it really is a minor detail. Also, its not like there is active scamming going on here. It would have to be the least lucrative and most pointless scam in crypto history. Some people are just going to be lucky and have their blocks accepted as valid. Some are going to lose a whole day of staking. Finally there is the issue that the LDOGE market was open to trading, deposits, and withdrawals for a time before the forking was being widely acknowledged. This will turn into an epic clusterfuck if bittrex is asked to roll back the market. Best thing for LDOGE is just get this issue fixed as soon as possible and move on.
Give me your LDOGE address and I will send you 1 million once the network is chugging along again.
There is no getting around it, exchanges were not on same chain as explorer and no reason to believe exchanges were on the same chain as each other. No matter what chain is selected as winner, exchanges and others will have to deal with lost transactions. How they deal with rolling back transactions on their exchange is their issue but there is no way to select a fork and not have this happen.
seednode1 and 2 didn't work for me, but 104.236.102.172 did.
Only have 1 connection now and on block 41752
They are coded in my fork, you will need my source for them to work like expectedOnly have 1 connection now and on block 41752
Ok I'll recompile
not me but look at explorer. thats the 1 i am holding on to.
thats why i said also that it would be best if ppl hold of from staking or trying to stake etc etc. it mess up a lot.
seednode1 and 2 didn't work for me, but 104.236.102.172 did.
Only have 1 connection now and on block 41752
They are coded in my fork, you will need my source for them to work like expectedOnly have 1 connection now and on block 41752
Ok I'll recompile
we on 41900 already
Who mined the past 1k blocks on your fork? seednode1 and 2 didn't work for me, but 104.236.102.172 did.
Only have 1 connection now and on block 41752
They are coded in my fork, you will need my source for them to work like expectedOnly have 1 connection now and on block 41752
Ok I'll recompile
seednode1 and 2 didn't work for me, but 104.236.102.172 did.
Only have 1 connection now and on block 41752
They are coded in my fork, you will need my source for them to work like expected Only have 1 connection now and on block 41752
we on 41900 already
seednode1 and 2 didn't work for me, but 104.236.102.172 did.
Only have 1 connection now and on block 41752
Only have 1 connection now and on block 41752
i recompiled daemon with block chain version.
changed vseeds in chainparams.cpp to my own node.
also changed version to 60016 and think best to give new release version also.
i didn't add checkpoints and set listen=0 to conf to stay on explorer chain.
tests running now rest of code i didn't touch.
also thinking its smart to change time with protocol change.
changed vseeds in chainparams.cpp to my own node.
also changed version to 60016 and think best to give new release version also.
i didn't add checkpoints and set listen=0 to conf to stay on explorer chain.
tests running now rest of code i didn't touch.
also thinking its smart to change time with protocol change.
also would be great if spooky share his findings 
so we are not messing up each other code
I downloaded chain from surnova node, switched seednodes in code with 2 mine and changed protocol version so only new version will be accepted and added few checkpoints so we are not messing up each other code Jump to: