i quit - page 71. | Bitcointalksearch.org

not.you

legendary

Activity: 1726

Merit: 1018

Quote from: xPooky on April 15, 2015, 09:02:02 AM

Quote from: not.you on April 15, 2015, 09:00:55 AM

Are you planning to roll back to block 40k? I think no matter which fork you call the correct fork it will provide an unfair advantage to whoever was on it since they will have mined all of the blocks on it.

someone will have extra luck

That doesn't really address the problem. In two days I had staked 200% of what I had in my wallet to begin with and I already had quite a lot. If the fix is just a giveaway to a few then this coin is fucked.

MinerFTW

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 250

i took explorer version as guide point. it is working and not hanging how i changed code and staking working like it should be.

i hope dev want to stay on same chain also. otherwise we fixed nothing

xPooky

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 250

Quote from: not.you on April 15, 2015, 09:00:55 AM

Are you planning to roll back to block 40k? I think no matter which fork you call the correct fork it will provide an unfair advantage to whoever was on it since they will have mined all of the blocks on it.

someone will have extra luck

not.you

legendary

Activity: 1726

Merit: 1018

Are you planning to roll back to block 40k? I think no matter which fork you call the correct fork it will provide an unfair advantage to whoever was on it since they will have mined all of the blocks on it.

xPooky

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 250

Quote from: MinerFTW on April 15, 2015, 08:51:30 AM

i changed also code to other nodes and testing as we speak.

dirty fix but a fix. was talking to d57heinz also he is testing with me.

well you can also add my nodes, i just finished testing and its ok

MinerFTW

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 250

i changed also code to other nodes and testing as we speak.

dirty fix but a fix. was talking to d57heinz also he is testing with me.

xPooky

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 250

Quote from: Zeta0S on April 15, 2015, 08:32:47 AM

Hello, is the wallet working? Can i safely download it and transver my Litedoge to it?

no, please wait for update

Zeta0S

legendary

Activity: 1890

Merit: 1031

Hello, is the wallet working? Can i safely download it and transver my Litedoge to it?

xPooky

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 250

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: mellon on April 15, 2015, 08:03:01 AM

Lol Peter you are ok? Im not speak with you now lol,better say why when you here that you start nervious?. Its now show all connection like local network with different internal IP. But with the same local adress.

lol

Check these: litedoge / src / chainparams.cpp

vSeeds.push_back(CDNSSeedData("198.105.125.233", "198.105.125.233"));
vSeeds.push_back(CDNSSeedData("198.105.125.234", "198.105.125.234"));
vSeeds.push_back(CDNSSeedData("198.105.122.174", "198.105.122.174"));

they are dead, i just made a fork with new seednodes and checkpoints so if community is in i will post it in my github

mellon

legendary

Activity: 1014

Merit: 1002

Quel marth Melloneamin

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: mellon on April 15, 2015, 07:25:55 AM

Quote from: Furio on April 15, 2015, 07:03:46 AM

Quote from: MinerFTW on April 14, 2015, 09:13:53 AM

is that why you have doge(D) in your sig?

You seriously have to ask, yeah exactly, there are allready to many doges Wink

, why another one

Looks like to be true Wink

But im not see it by that moment/

Mellon, you suppose to be busy recompiling the wallet - stop talking and start compiling Wink

I suggest Looking at the DNS seeds and IP address seeds in the net.cpp file.

This should be run on a VPS or any always on internet connection with a static IP address. eg index.html with the IP-address of a seed node (like node.servername.com).

The DNS seed node resolves to multiple IP addresses that are all running their own *coind instance on the appropriate port. To validate this perform an nslookup on one of the seed nodes. eg C:\Windows\System32>nslookup dnsseed.xxxxxx.yyy

Lol Peter you are ok? Im not speak with you now lol,better say why when you here that you start nervious?. Its now show all connection like local network with different internal IP. But with the same local adress.

mellon

legendary

Activity: 1014

Merit: 1002

Quel marth Melloneamin

Im not think that here helps nodes now its stuck.

ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK 751, prev=dba5d0ae4ca874bfdb574451dc009a57efd434bfd0ba2ff90cf67ebb6afec0f6
socket recv error 10054
receive version message: version 60015, blocks=40100, us=128.71.83.193:52708, them=24.15.13.38:17014, peer=24.15.13.38:17014
Added time data, samples 45, offset +3 (+0 minutes)
nTimeOffset = +1 (+0 minutes)
receive version message: version 60015, blocks=40825, us=[2001:0:5ef5:79fd:2041:d4:7fb8:ac3e]:17014, them=78.69.188.169:17014, peer=[2001:0:9d38:6abd:4b:cb2:b1ba:4356]:64107
Added time data, samples 46, offset +1 (+0 minutes)
ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED
ProcessBlock: ORPHAN BLOCK 751, prev=e67fe8f8520bcafb9908ed1c77989737a0bf48228a2438624be2381b81c8c213

mellon

legendary

Activity: 1014

Merit: 1002

Quel marth Melloneamin

Quote from: MinerFTW on April 15, 2015, 06:46:28 AM

The biggest problem is that we don't know what chain is the right 1. if we can verify who has the good 1 i can fork the code and make sure all get online with same again if needed.

but the 3 seeds the dev took are not on same chain as explorer for example.

always safer anyway to have checkpoint build with halvings etc.

I can help here im save logs from my wallet. Synchronisation from 1 block till fork. Interesting thing lol. Im cannot backup my wallet.dat Guys can anyone help here its corrupt. Im not why,because im not dumpwallet.

mellon

legendary

Activity: 1014

Merit: 1002

Quel marth Melloneamin

Quote from: loszhor on April 15, 2015, 04:51:14 AM

Good news, the Spreadcoin thread has replied to my post and says that there is a fix for our problem. It is here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.11093170

From what I understand we need one "For PoS, you need one node that acts as a checkpoint, I think. Its the nature of PoS that they have to be centralized." and a link was posted that is a bit beyond me. I ask for the developer to follow up on the information as soon as possible.

And thanks to the Spreadcoin people for the assistance.

For PoS always need minimum one connections. But why only for PoS lol hybrid and PoW nets after launch need only one stable node to continue work. I think here need do exactly step by step hardfork that do Spreadcoin on block 2016. Dev when compile it (Copy paste from Spreadcoin code and make a mistake and copy with that hardfork lol.)

litedoge

sr. member

Activity: 280

Merit: 250

wow much coin such love

Quote from: xPooky on April 15, 2015, 06:49:09 AM

Quote from: MinerFTW on April 15, 2015, 06:46:28 AM

The biggest problem is that we don't know what chain is the right 1. if we can verify who has the good 1 i can fork the code and make sure all get online with same again if needed.

but the 3 seeds the dev took are not on same chain as explorer for example.

always safer anyway to have checkpoint build with halvings etc.

i just added some checkpoints and changed 2 of the 3 seednodes with mine, will run them now and post

Rotate seednodes till you get best one - see the bottom of http://litedoge.org/ webpage for images and icons to update in the wallet.

mellon

legendary

Activity: 1014

Merit: 1002

Quel marth Melloneamin

Quote from: Furio on April 15, 2015, 07:03:46 AM

Quote from: MinerFTW on April 14, 2015, 09:13:53 AM

is that why you have doge(D) in your sig?

You seriously have to ask, yeah exactly, there are allready to many doges Wink

, why another one

Looks like to be true Wink

But im not see it by that moment/

Furio

legendary

Activity: 938

Merit: 1000

BTC | LTC | XLM | VEN | ARDR

Quote from: MinerFTW on April 14, 2015, 09:13:53 AM

is that why you have doge(D) in your sig?

You seriously have to ask, yeah exactly, there are allready to many doges Wink

, why another one

xPooky

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 250

Quote from: MinerFTW on April 15, 2015, 06:46:28 AM

The biggest problem is that we don't know what chain is the right 1. if we can verify who has the good 1 i can fork the code and make sure all get online with same again if needed.

but the 3 seeds the dev took are not on same chain as explorer for example.

always safer anyway to have checkpoint build with halvings etc.

i just added some checkpoints and changed 2 of the 3 seednodes with mine, will run them now and post

MinerFTW

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 250

The biggest problem is that we don't know what chain is the right 1. if we can verify who has the good 1 i can fork the code and make sure all get online with same again if needed.

but the 3 seeds the dev took are not on same chain as explorer for example.

always safer anyway to have checkpoint build with halvings etc.

xPooky

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 250

Quote from: loszhor on April 15, 2015, 04:51:14 AM

Good news, the Spreadcoin thread has replied to my post and says that there is a fix for our problem. It is here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.11093170

From what I understand we need one "For PoS, you need one node that acts as a checkpoint, I think. Its the nature of PoS that they have to be centralized." and a link was posted that is a bit beyond me. I ask for the developer to follow up on the information as soon as possible.

And thanks to the Spreadcoin people for the assistance.

i will try and post if i am able to fix it

loszhor

sr. member

Activity: 369

Merit: 250

Good news, the Spreadcoin thread has replied to my post and says that there is a fix for our problem. It is here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.11093170

From what I understand we need one "For PoS, you need one node that acts as a checkpoint, I think. Its the nature of PoS that they have to be centralized." and a link was posted that is a bit beyond me. I ask for the developer to follow up on the information as soon as possible.

And thanks to the Spreadcoin people for the assistance.

Topic: i quit - page 71. (Read 142559 times)