Let us address some of the responses we missed on our last post.
This reminds me of btcgosu created by efialtis but with an investment scheme.
It's not just btcgosu but there are many casino review websites out there. What matter is the difference we will make. In the long run a quality service survives. Everyone gives their best and it's the same to us. We will not compromise our work ethics. To keep the reviews unbiased and BOLD we applied a solution which you can
read from our one pager at solution paragraph.
some of their team members are also endorsing some of the casinos found in the forum. but we will see how they will give their constructive criticism towards these casinos.
A review that will be finally published in our platform is not coming from a single hand. It will come from a group of people. An individual will be responsible only for maximum 2 sections of 15 to 20 pre-setup parameters we consider when review a casino. In person someone can have a weakness for a certain casino but together when we will make an exclusive summary then the influence will not make much difference. We hope it make sense. You can read our
onepager for more clear understanding. Thank you AmoreJaz.
interesting maybe this will be the first or just me not knowing anyone has done this before.
You are smart enough to choose members from this forum to make your project look good, but why choose team members who in this forum have been banned because of plagiarism into your team?
https://bpip.org/Profile?id=1187984I would like to ask this again.
as a blog/review service, you really have to have original content. there cannot be any risk with plagiarism.
We wanted to maintain an order but considering examplens asked the same question we thought let's answer it.
Thanks examplens and Strongkored for this nice question.
When we were partnershipping with team members we considered several factors not just their skills in the sections they are.
The first one was their interest in the project followed by the motivation to be with us.
Are they able to see the big picture that we want to achieve?
Do they have the steam to give their free time even when the project is not making any money for us?
Are they from a long gambling background?
All of these are more important than the skills we considered for the sections they are. Skills can be improved overtime when right people work together.
We needed hungry people with entrepreneurship mindset, hungry in a sense of dedication.
So, the money is to pay for the developers and the team, but the investors will only get 10% of the revenue, that doesn't sound as a good deal to me. The investors are an important part of the team, and they should get a bigger piece of the cake.
Most of the funds we will spend in Marketing and in content creation. It's 70% to 71.6% of the total collection.
We explained it here, please read.10% for the Chip offerers is not a small amount of return considering they will enjoy the reward for LIFETIME. The rewards will be sent every month. Our goal is to be the best and the best in the industry are making over $200k if not half a million. Industry is HUGE. Even if we make a $100k a month once we are able to brand our name,
it's still $10k per month.Thank you.
Soft cap revenue share is 60% out of the allocated 10% of the total revenue sharing pool.
Hard cap revenue share is 40% out of the allocated 10% of the total revenue sharing pool.
Fail to meet hard cap in a sense of after meeting the Soft cap if the remaining Chip to reach Hard cap has not meet then half from the hard cap allocation will be moved and added to Soft cap Chip offerers. Soft cap offerers will then share 80% instead of 60% and Hard cap offerers will share 20% instead of 40% from the allocated 10% revenue sharing pool.
The text file undated with our PGP signature. Thanks for bringing it to our attention.
We will address remaining responses later again. Thanks for understanding :-)
