Pages:
Author

Topic: ICO analysis demands - page 2. (Read 2479 times)

legendary
Activity: 2730
Merit: 1288
February 02, 2017, 11:22:31 AM
#26
We need founders to deliver products(or at least MVP),and not only marketing
I agree but how it can be measured?
I've already mentioned a github activity monitoring. What else can be used to monitor product development activities?

ICOs are for so different projects that you cant compare them. IT is like comparing apples and pears.


Usually developers present timeline. You can at least measure how realistic they were.   But again projects many times totally turn sideways.   Lets look at Spells of Genesis. They basically finished half year ago all that they promised in ICO , but in year and a half of development there come new ideas how game should look like. And they develop those.
I dont think u can automate timeline comparing, Its very subjective


You can. Some deliver on time other dont. It is easy. Well there is also third category. those that dont deliver on time and even fail to provide new timeline till that date.  ICONOMI investment found platform should be out at end of December, now is February and I still ( well i dont monitor that closely) dont know when will be out.

This is one thing that can be easily measured. But if it is really relevant I have no ideas. I guess they will measure some more relevant things and some less relevant. sometimes those small things makes a change.
newbie
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
February 02, 2017, 10:29:41 AM
#25
We need founders to deliver products(or at least MVP),and not only marketing
I agree but how it can be measured?
I've already mentioned a github activity monitoring. What else can be used to monitor product development activities?

ICOs are for so different projects that you cant compare them. IT is like comparing apples and pears.


Usually developers present timeline. You can at least measure how realistic they were.   But again projects many times totally turn sideways.   Lets look at Spells of Genesis. They basically finished half year ago all that they promised in ICO , but in year and a half of development there come new ideas how game should look like. And they develop those.
I dont think u can automate timeline comparing, Its very subjective
newbie
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
February 02, 2017, 10:19:51 AM
#24
1.Total coins
2.Emission curve
3.Point of difference
Could you elaborate on what you meant?
legendary
Activity: 910
Merit: 1000
February 02, 2017, 02:53:50 AM
#23
There are some problem related ICO are like the founders say that they will build the structure of the company after the acquisition of financing.
IMHO this is the main problem
as usual there is no any financial plan or structure…
but

I think must there are rules for developers of ICO.
The main problem is that ICOs are unregulated and most data can be easily manipulated.

I hope that market can correct this situation, if we will invest into logical ICO
How do you think, if we will have any standard form (not state legislation), for example ICO dashboard, which will consist of different fields and if any field is not filled, then @thepo1m should include his skepticism
Yes at least the markets have the data about developers of ICO, amount of ICO
or if be needed they can control the ICO on markets,
so wayl make better for Investment in ICO and it is not like new scam way.
newbie
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
February 02, 2017, 02:07:12 AM
#22
There are some problem related ICO are like the founders say that they will build the structure of the company after the acquisition of financing.
IMHO this is the main problem
as usual there is no any financial plan or structure…
but

I think must there are rules for developers of ICO.
The main problem is that ICOs are unregulated and most data can be easily manipulated.

I hope that market can correct this situation, if we will invest into logical ICO
How do you think, if we will have any standard form (not state legislation), for example ICO dashboard, which will consist of different fields and if any field is not filled, then @thepo1m should include his skepticism
legendary
Activity: 2730
Merit: 1288
February 01, 2017, 03:42:01 PM
#21
We need founders to deliver products(or at least MVP),and not only marketing
I agree but how it can be measured?
I've already mentioned a github activity monitoring. What else can be used to monitor product development activities?

ICOs are for so different projects that you cant compare them. IT is like comparing apples and pears.


Usually developers present timeline. You can at least measure how realistic they were.   But again projects many times totally turn sideways.   Lets look at Spells of Genesis. They basically finished half year ago all that they promised in ICO , but in year and a half of development there come new ideas how game should look like. And they develop those.
legendary
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
February 01, 2017, 08:36:19 AM
#20
1.Total coins
2.Emission curve
3.Point of difference
hero member
Activity: 854
Merit: 500
February 01, 2017, 01:54:19 AM
#19
All that ICO bullshit will collapse soon, We need founders to deliver products(or at least MVP),and not only marketing,like chronobank does

hahah chronobank,i dont even understand the concept and they have no product


With big hype and little investors, the investors must pay 0.01 for every token in the ico phase and after the ico will end and they must receive their destiny like icobid's investor.

Pay 1000 satoshi for every token and the current price is 50 satoshi.  Cheesy
Sure. It is a disaster since every the prices are always lower than the prices they have to buy in the ICO. Well, maybe in the future, in a long term, ICObid may increase it prices and will be listed on some famous trading platform. ICO is a long term investment and we all have to be patient
legendary
Activity: 3136
Merit: 1024
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
February 01, 2017, 01:17:28 AM
#18
All that ICO bullshit will collapse soon, We need founders to deliver products(or at least MVP),and not only marketing,like chronobank does

hahah chronobank,i dont even understand the concept and they have no product


With big hype and little investors, the investors must pay 0.01 for every token in the ico phase and after the ico will end and they must receive their destiny like icobid's investor.

Pay 1000 satoshi for every token and the current price is 50 satoshi.  Cheesy
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
Market Mover
January 31, 2017, 09:22:57 PM
#17
What is the purpose of this? What are you trying to achieve/hoping to accomplish?
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
January 31, 2017, 08:19:05 PM
#16
very interesting idea, nice
sr. member
Activity: 286
Merit: 250
January 31, 2017, 05:21:51 PM
#15
The main problem is that ICOs are unregulated and most data can be easily manipulated.
member
Activity: 62
Merit: 10
January 31, 2017, 04:47:58 PM
#14
We need founders to deliver products(or at least MVP),and not only marketing
I agree but how it can be measured?
I've already mentioned a github activity monitoring. What else can be used to monitor product development activities?
sr. member
Activity: 308
Merit: 250
January 31, 2017, 01:16:05 PM
#13
All that ICO bullshit will collapse soon, We need founders to deliver products(or at least MVP),and not only marketing,like chronobank does

hahah chronobank,i dont even understand the concept and they have no product
member
Activity: 62
Merit: 10
January 31, 2017, 01:05:35 PM
#12
I think must there are rules for developers of ICO.
I agree but we appreciate a decentralization benefits. So we can only have some best practice check-list.
Some of checks can be automated and some is to be filled by experts according to their opinions.
Best practices would be defined and become common only with maturing of the industry.
So up to you what check-list positions are to be filled for an ICO? And which of them can be automated and which is not?
member
Activity: 62
Merit: 10
January 31, 2017, 08:50:48 AM
#11
what you bring to the table that is different from what those ICO youtube channels do.
Thanks for reply! In this topic I just want to determine what should be brought to the table. I have some understanding but don't want to move a discussion to tools/product-oriented because it would be my bias.
Videos at ICO youtube channels is a result of analysis but I'm trying to discuss how to streamline analysis of ICO. So an ICO analysis could be done faster and youtube video appears earlier.
So let's talk about demand of people who is on the other side of a youtube channel.
legendary
Activity: 910
Merit: 1000
January 31, 2017, 07:35:52 AM
#10
There are some problem related ICO are like the founders say that they will build the structure of the company after the acquisition of financing. However, when it comes to the actual ICO, founders or promoters are left Bitcoins and Ether receive a portfolio they control and there is no legal entity that the buyer buys the tokens.
I think must there are rules for developers of ICO.
newbie
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
January 31, 2017, 07:30:46 AM
#9
I'm also sceptical of this because all the three post so far are all newbie accounts
and yes, I have a newbie account, because I'm newbie
I don’t recommend you buy or sell
Like a zidorov I just want to understand, how ICO investment can be effectively
what exactly are you skeptical?
newbie
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
January 31, 2017, 07:23:58 AM
#8
This is a nice idea but I don't really understand what you bring to the table that is different from what those ICO youtube channels do. I'm also sceptical of this because all the three post so far are all newbie accounts
What ICO youtube channels are you talking about?
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 500
January 31, 2017, 07:22:37 AM
#7
ico demand can down because

1 scam coin, ico selling without escrow
2 distribution coin is very long time
2 added to exchanger very long time
Pages:
Jump to: