Topic: ICO analysis demands - page 3. (Read 2479 times)
This is a nice idea but I don't really understand what you bring to the table that is different from what those ICO youtube channels do. I'm also sceptical of this because all the three post so far are all newbie accounts
The creators of ICO don't always think about the fact that the token is supposed to bring us money. Investor don't have enough financial planned performance
How are you planning to help investors exactly?
You mentioned the tasks you're trying to solve, but no particular instruments.
What kind of service are we talking?
It will be a decision support service. Exact tools and instruments depend on ICO investors requirements. So this post is made to gather main problems and discuss on how to solve them.You mentioned the tasks you're trying to solve, but no particular instruments.
What kind of service are we talking?
We don't want to constuct a service by using available tools (despite we have ML background), we want to construct it to meet investor's requirements.
The most time-consuming is the study of white papers, search for the final addresses if they are not specified in the document or on the website. The creators of ICO should be more open. 
Hello, zidorov!
How are you planning to help investors exactly?
You mentioned the tasks you're trying to solve, but no particular instruments.
What kind of service are we talking?
How are you planning to help investors exactly?
You mentioned the tasks you're trying to solve, but no particular instruments.
What kind of service are we talking?
Hi guys!
We are a team of enthusiasts of crowfunding.
We believe that funding free from legacy institutions can bring a life to completely new products and services that will change the world to be a better place!
But a lot of scam and low quality projects will waste the resources and discredit the ideas.
So we're conducting a research on how a typical crypto-asset investor usually find, analyze and use information on ICOs during all of its steps (pre-ICO, ICO, post-ICO stages). We're planning to revise our current development plan to reorder features releases. The most wanted functions and services will be released ASAP in our service to help investors rate ICOs efficiently.
All tasks could be grouped into some categories:
1. information retrieval (monitoring and participating: slack, tweets, forums, news sites, github activity, blockchain data collection etc)
2. information processing and analysis (automated text analysis, data mining etc)
3. reporting and alerting
4. portfolio management
5. social interactions and knowledge sharing
A lot of these tasks are done nowadays manually or with inefficient tools.
Some of topics to discuss:
1) what is the most painful or time-consuming tasks when analyzing an ICO?
2) what should be done by a human and what could be automated?
3) how to encourage experts to share knowledge or results of analysis?
4) how to divide an ICO analysis work among experts to speed up analysis of one ICO?
5) how to prevent a scam or conflict of interests from an expert?
6) should an expert earn by sharing its profitable portfolio with [paid] followers?
and any other related topics.
If we find a strong demand we will start an ICO to be funded by early adopters which will receive service access tokens (probably a Waves Platform will be used to issue tokens).
We are welcome you to discuss what your need when dealing with ICOs!
We are a team of enthusiasts of crowfunding.
We believe that funding free from legacy institutions can bring a life to completely new products and services that will change the world to be a better place!
But a lot of scam and low quality projects will waste the resources and discredit the ideas.
So we're conducting a research on how a typical crypto-asset investor usually find, analyze and use information on ICOs during all of its steps (pre-ICO, ICO, post-ICO stages). We're planning to revise our current development plan to reorder features releases. The most wanted functions and services will be released ASAP in our service to help investors rate ICOs efficiently.
All tasks could be grouped into some categories:
1. information retrieval (monitoring and participating: slack, tweets, forums, news sites, github activity, blockchain data collection etc)
2. information processing and analysis (automated text analysis, data mining etc)
3. reporting and alerting
4. portfolio management
5. social interactions and knowledge sharing
A lot of these tasks are done nowadays manually or with inefficient tools.
Some of topics to discuss:
1) what is the most painful or time-consuming tasks when analyzing an ICO?
2) what should be done by a human and what could be automated?
3) how to encourage experts to share knowledge or results of analysis?
4) how to divide an ICO analysis work among experts to speed up analysis of one ICO?
5) how to prevent a scam or conflict of interests from an expert?
6) should an expert earn by sharing its profitable portfolio with [paid] followers?
and any other related topics.
If we find a strong demand we will start an ICO to be funded by early adopters which will receive service access tokens (probably a Waves Platform will be used to issue tokens).
We are welcome you to discuss what your need when dealing with ICOs!
Jump to: