[ICO ENDED] Jarvis - Fx, crypto, stocks | DApp browser | Revenue token - page 70.

patz22

full member

Activity: 1176

Merit: 104

Quote from: Jarvis Edge on December 29, 2018, 07:15:13 PM

Quote from: bitcoin-shark on December 29, 2018, 03:28:28 PM

the costs for the realization of a project as jarvis are still many even if done in stages, the cost of development, advertising, the liquidity of the exchange i think are at least a few million, maybe they(team) should really open up to fiat investments for investors...

Well it is

we receive mainly fiat actually

At the moment we have raised a bit more than 60k usd since a month.

Is that the current raised funds? I believe that TGE will end by march 2019 right? What are the plans after that? Are you planning to list the token in big exchanges? Hoping that it will and please make a difference from other projects with same concept.

Jarvis Edge

jr. member

Activity: 864

Merit: 3

Interoperable finance | https://jarvis.network

Quote from: bitcoin-shark on December 29, 2018, 03:28:28 PM

the costs for the realization of a project as jarvis are still many even if done in stages, the cost of development, advertising, the liquidity of the exchange i think are at least a few million, maybe they(team) should really open up to fiat investments for investors...

Well it is

we receive mainly fiat actually

At the moment we have raised a bit more than 60k usd since a month.

Rigorous

full member

Activity: 574

Merit: 115

Quote from: pynetx on December 29, 2018, 09:30:25 AM

What do you mean by ETC closed down?

Some developers quit working on ETC because they were running out of funds.

https://www.newsbtc.com/2018/12/04/crypto-bear-market-strikes-ethereum-classic-etc-development-group-folds/

belechau

full member

Activity: 686

Merit: 100

Quote from: bitcoin-shark on December 29, 2018, 03:28:28 PM

the costs for the realization of a project as jarvis are still many even if done in stages, the cost of development, advertising, the liquidity of the exchange i think are at least a few million, maybe they(team) should really open up to fiat investments for investors...

realy, same with a product ready, yet have many coasts I'm the journey

bitcoin-shark

hero member

Activity: 3066

Merit: 605

the costs for the realization of a project as jarvis are still many even if done in stages, the cost of development, advertising, the liquidity of the exchange i think are at least a few million, maybe they(team) should really open up to fiat investments for investors...

Jarvis Edge

jr. member

Activity: 864

Merit: 3

Interoperable finance | https://jarvis.network

Quote from: Frank37 on December 28, 2018, 06:08:38 AM

Quote from: Jarvis Edge on December 26, 2018, 12:25:46 PM

Quote from: magisterr on December 26, 2018, 09:20:54 AM

Why you dont have any conferences, events for attract people to ICO? Are you going to have some after token sale for attract people to your exchange?

We have done one and will probably do more in the future

Oh ... only one? This one?

Quote from: Jarvis Edge on December 06, 2018, 10:54:09 AM

I invite you to our conference next thursday

It will be on youtube (check our FB).

So the other ones you mentioned were only from you and not your whole team?

Quote from: Jarvis Edge on November 22, 2018, 05:29:03 PM

True, you are so right. I have held many conference this year and last year in Sofia; all what I saw were beginner with no trading experience, and no clue about risk management.

Yes most seminar are done by Andrew or myself. We intend to be more present next year because at every event we are meeting new partners

Jarvis Edge

jr. member

Activity: 864

Merit: 3

Interoperable finance | https://jarvis.network

Quote from: viljy on December 29, 2018, 05:40:42 AM

Quote from: Jarvis Edge on December 26, 2018, 12:24:31 PM

Software no, but if you add the support, the legal aspect, the server cost, the licensing cost, the innovation cost etc. finally you end up to need few millions

Not to mention the liquidity! The more an exchange have its own liquidity, the more it makes money.

But you will develop in stages.
And if the project really becomes successful, the money for further development will be.

Yes we will take our time.

First a crypto exchange that works, then CFD and Forex, then semi-decentralization with a Dapps wallet, etc.

Roadmaps can change sometimes according to some aleas that can happen of course.

martinholly167

sr. member

Activity: 658

Merit: 250

Quote from: o48o on December 27, 2018, 04:45:45 AM

Quote from: Jarvis Edge on December 23, 2018, 08:55:33 AM

By the way, this is the article we spoke about last time : https://medium.com/jarvis-edge/how-multimillion-ico-projects-made-us-lose-our-sense-of-reality-a91aef3efae9

To be honest i don't blame people for asking 100 millions if they just get more by asking it. But the investors were also greedy to think that it would be easy to rise value after so huge market caps.

Yes, its way more harder to raise 1 billion from 100 millions than raise 10 millions from 1 million because the market is limited.

Quote from: Token Williams on December 28, 2018, 07:30:53 PM

Strangest is how some of these ICO's that managed 100m+ are already going bankrupt by now. How do you spend 100m in a year (not counting the price decrease)

What are these ICO's that you mean?

pynetx

sr. member

Activity: 798

Merit: 262

Quote from: omwibya on December 29, 2018, 08:54:53 AM

Quote from: dubignyp on December 29, 2018, 06:28:00 AM

No, the ICOs if they are intelligent they transfer investors' harvests from crypto to fiat.
And, leave only to speculation what they are capable of losing

a lot of projects don't do that. look at ETC, they closed down because of the market.

What do you mean by ETC closed down?

dubignyp

newbie

Activity: 260

Merit: 0

Quote from: omwibya on December 29, 2018, 08:54:53 AM

Quote from: dubignyp on December 29, 2018, 06:28:00 AM

No, the ICOs if they are intelligent they transfer investors' harvests from crypto to fiat.
And, leave only to speculation what they are capable of losing

a lot of projects don't do that. look at ETC, they closed down because of the market.

So they were irresponsible scammers, who played the investors' funds, when this was not indicated in their ICO. It is very important to know the people who work, their mentality.

omwibya

member

Activity: 434

Merit: 10

Quote from: dubignyp on December 29, 2018, 06:28:00 AM

No, the ICOs if they are intelligent they transfer investors' harvests from crypto to fiat.
And, leave only to speculation what they are capable of losing

a lot of projects don't do that. look at ETC, they closed down because of the market.

dubignyp

newbie

Activity: 260

Merit: 0

Quote from: mandibleclaw on December 29, 2018, 06:26:07 AM

Quote from: Token Williams on December 28, 2018, 07:30:53 PM

Quote from: o48o on December 27, 2018, 04:45:45 AM

Quote from: Jarvis Edge on December 23, 2018, 08:55:33 AM

By the way, this is the article we spoke about last time : https://medium.com/jarvis-edge/how-multimillion-ico-projects-made-us-lose-our-sense-of-reality-a91aef3efae9

To be honest i don't blame people for asking 100 millions if they just get more by asking it. But the investors were also greedy to think that it would be easy to rise value after so huge market caps.

Strangest is how some of these ICO's that managed 100m+ are already going bankrupt by now. How do you spend 100m in a year (not counting the price decrease)

If you got $100M when ETH was at 1,000 and you sold it when it was $100 it's pretty simple to know how they ended up in bankrupt, make the count as an ICO raised $1M and you get why (besides broken business plans of course)

No, the ICOs if they are intelligent they transfer investors' harvests from crypto to fiat.
And, leave only to speculation what they are capable of losing

mandibleclaw

member

Activity: 532

Merit: 50

ONe Social Network.

Quote from: Token Williams on December 28, 2018, 07:30:53 PM

Quote from: o48o on December 27, 2018, 04:45:45 AM

Quote from: Jarvis Edge on December 23, 2018, 08:55:33 AM

By the way, this is the article we spoke about last time : https://medium.com/jarvis-edge/how-multimillion-ico-projects-made-us-lose-our-sense-of-reality-a91aef3efae9

To be honest i don't blame people for asking 100 millions if they just get more by asking it. But the investors were also greedy to think that it would be easy to rise value after so huge market caps.

Strangest is how some of these ICO's that managed 100m+ are already going bankrupt by now. How do you spend 100m in a year (not counting the price decrease)

If you got $100M when ETH was at 1,000 and you sold it when it was $100 it's pretty simple to know how they ended up in bankrupt, make the count as an ICO raised $1M and you get why (besides broken business plans of course)

viljy

hero member

Activity: 1736

Merit: 857

Quote from: Jarvis Edge on December 26, 2018, 12:24:31 PM

Software no, but if you add the support, the legal aspect, the server cost, the licensing cost, the innovation cost etc. finally you end up to need few millions

Not to mention the liquidity! The more an exchange have its own liquidity, the more it makes money.

But you will develop in stages.
And if the project really becomes successful, the money for further development will be.

king_of_alts

member

Activity: 476

Merit: 10

Quote from: Token Williams on December 28, 2018, 07:30:53 PM

Quote from: o48o on December 27, 2018, 04:45:45 AM

Quote from: Jarvis Edge on December 23, 2018, 08:55:33 AM

By the way, this is the article we spoke about last time : https://medium.com/jarvis-edge/how-multimillion-ico-projects-made-us-lose-our-sense-of-reality-a91aef3efae9

To be honest i don't blame people for asking 100 millions if they just get more by asking it. But the investors were also greedy to think that it would be easy to rise value after so huge market caps.

Strangest is how some of these ICO's that managed 100m+ are already going bankrupt by now. How do you spend 100m in a year (not counting the price decrease)

What projects would that be? I'm curious if these turned out to be scams or if they really blew 100 millions. Grin

Dimosscolorist

full member

Activity: 826

Merit: 103

Quote from: D1jay on December 28, 2018, 11:03:27 PM

Quote from: Token Williams on December 28, 2018, 07:30:53 PM

Quote from: o48o on December 27, 2018, 04:45:45 AM

Quote from: Jarvis Edge on December 23, 2018, 08:55:33 AM

By the way, this is the article we spoke about last time : https://medium.com/jarvis-edge/how-multimillion-ico-projects-made-us-lose-our-sense-of-reality-a91aef3efae9

To be honest i don't blame people for asking 100 millions if they just get more by asking it. But the investors were also greedy to think that it would be easy to rise value after so huge market caps.

Strangest is how some of these ICO's that managed 100m+ are already going bankrupt by now. How do you spend 100m in a year (not counting the price decrease)

Free money that where gotten in place of some promise and hope in future with some whitepaper Grin

is very easy to spend, imagine an ico raising up to 100m for just a whitepaper and some fake promise Shocked

obviously with such amount of money in their pocket, there will be too many pressure and temptation, making the wrong decisions will be very easy, and mostly the feeling of being so freaking rich Grin

. Damn!

I agree with you. Perhaps today we would see the work of some projects, if they had not collected too much. These were crazy financing. As the man said above, now it is becoming more healthy.

D1jay

copper member

Activity: 294

Merit: 5

Quote from: Token Williams on December 28, 2018, 07:30:53 PM

Quote from: o48o on December 27, 2018, 04:45:45 AM

Quote from: Jarvis Edge on December 23, 2018, 08:55:33 AM

By the way, this is the article we spoke about last time : https://medium.com/jarvis-edge/how-multimillion-ico-projects-made-us-lose-our-sense-of-reality-a91aef3efae9

To be honest i don't blame people for asking 100 millions if they just get more by asking it. But the investors were also greedy to think that it would be easy to rise value after so huge market caps.

Strangest is how some of these ICO's that managed 100m+ are already going bankrupt by now. How do you spend 100m in a year (not counting the price decrease)

Free money that where gotten in place of some promise and hope in future with some whitepaper Grin

is very easy to spend, imagine an ico raising up to 100m for just a whitepaper and some fake promise Shocked

obviously with such amount of money in their pocket, there will be too many pressure and temptation, making the wrong decisions will be very easy, and mostly the feeling of being so freaking rich Grin

. Damn!

coin_1122

full member

Activity: 1134

Merit: 102

Quote from: Token Williams on December 28, 2018, 07:30:53 PM

Quote from: o48o on December 27, 2018, 04:45:45 AM

Quote from: Jarvis Edge on December 23, 2018, 08:55:33 AM

By the way, this is the article we spoke about last time : https://medium.com/jarvis-edge/how-multimillion-ico-projects-made-us-lose-our-sense-of-reality-a91aef3efae9

To be honest i don't blame people for asking 100 millions if they just get more by asking it. But the investors were also greedy to think that it would be easy to rise value after so huge market caps.

Strangest is how some of these ICO's that managed 100m+ are already going bankrupt by now. How do you spend 100m in a year (not counting the price decrease)

During private sale they managed to reach more than 1 million and where comes the 100m+ fund, now the market situation is not up to the market. Maybe once the market starts recovering we might easily expect that Jarvis platform will raise more money.

PS92

full member

Activity: 644

Merit: 101

Quote from: lobat999 on December 27, 2018, 04:25:04 AM

Quote from: PS92 on December 26, 2018, 07:55:17 PM

Quote from: the_donald on December 26, 2018, 01:46:24 AM

Quote from: Rigorous on December 25, 2018, 06:38:52 PM

Jarvis is definitely a standout among the usually greedy and delusional ICOs, setting a realistic fundraising target and focusing on the development of the exchange.

that way they have something to show after the ICO. and people's confidence grows.

Let's hope they won't have to delay like lots of other projects

I hope not because all development milestones are adequately scheduled to meet its deadline in the roadmap and I trust the team's capability to deliver this on time.

"all development milestones are adequately scheduled to meet its deadline in the roadmap"

That doesn't mean shit of course. every project has a roadmap and deadlines, unfortunately almost none can keep those.

Token Williams

newbie

Activity: 310

Merit: 0

Quote from: o48o on December 27, 2018, 04:45:45 AM

Quote from: Jarvis Edge on December 23, 2018, 08:55:33 AM

By the way, this is the article we spoke about last time : https://medium.com/jarvis-edge/how-multimillion-ico-projects-made-us-lose-our-sense-of-reality-a91aef3efae9

To be honest i don't blame people for asking 100 millions if they just get more by asking it. But the investors were also greedy to think that it would be easy to rise value after so huge market caps.

Strangest is how some of these ICO's that managed 100m+ are already going bankrupt by now. How do you spend 100m in a year (not counting the price decrease)

Topic: [ICO ENDED] Jarvis - Fx, crypto, stocks | DApp browser | Revenue token - page 70. (Read 44799 times)