Just found your amazing project.
according to your ann thread your Hard Cap is 21M USD.
Is there no soft cap?
Topic: [ICO ENDED] Jarvis - Fx, crypto, stocks | DApp browser | Revenue token - page 72. (Read 44779 times)
December 26, 2018, 05:53:28 PM
December 26, 2018, 12:25:46 PM
Why you dont have any conferences, events for attract people to ICO? Are you going to have some after token sale for attract people to your exchange?
We have done one and will probably do more in the future
December 26, 2018, 12:24:31 PM
By the way, this is the article we spoke about last time : https://medium.com/jarvis-edge/how-multimillion-ico-projects-made-us-lose-our-sense-of-reality-a91aef3efae9
I just read your article. And in General I agree with the arguments given in your article. Indeed, people are used to the huge amounts of money collected in the ICO. But now the situation is completely different and not only in cryptocurrency, but in General in all markets. Half a million is really quite a significant amount, which is enough to start the project.
Especially with the traditional market going to shit. People are less likely to invest in risky assets like crypto
Software based products do not need tens of millions of dollars. They need to code and deliver a project. Everything else can be added as they grow.
Software no, but if you add the support, the legal aspect, the server cost, the licensing cost, the innovation cost etc. finally you end up to need few millions
Not to mention the liquidity! The more an exchange have its own liquidity, the more it makes money.
December 26, 2018, 12:10:44 PM
mber and than will be pause until March and main sale? Why ICO planned for MArch as kost of people expecting market grow in January?
Hello, https://medium.com/@jarvisedge/announcement-changes-to-bounty-and-extended-pre-sale-d902ad280c5
A lot of people asked us to wait 2019 because they will earn a "end-of-the-year" prime or something similar.
January is often a good month for stocks market, not sure for crypto
Anyway, we have decided to extend the presale period for a month to let the one who wouldn't be able to join us in december, to do it in january.Then, why March, well we want to make a pause in the fundraising process, to focus more on the product: running an ICO is very time consumming and take most of our ressources.
We would like to launch a product, even in beta, to announce all the partnership we are not authorized to mention at the moment (they all want us first to launch something, even a mobile wallet).
Beta version will be launched in March or early? It will be launched until the end of pre-sale or no? I want to participate as well, but want to see for a product before investing too
We did not hear anything about the platform to be launched any specific dates about it. We wait to have to wait until they release an announcement from them. Whether they will release the beta platform before the crowdsale or not.
The platform will be launch step after step; the beta will be launched at the same time as the exchange, but you will need to wait few months before to have almost the full featured platform.
December 26, 2018, 10:56:35 AM
The competition of better and more user friendly and less expensive is really getting high on the crypto market which is a good thing, now user's will have so many good options among the available to choose from like wise project will find it much easier to get listed some how
Jarvis is one great exchange project and will definitely own it's place in this industry, i like the idea.
Jarvis is one great exchange project and will definitely own it's place in this industry, i like the idea.
Yes, most exchanges compete on:
> UI (but they all propose the same UI)
> fees
> offering (vaste array of crypto)
> support
> liquidity
> security
For me this is not a good competition; I mean, every exchange will propose the same thing, killing innovation, and we will end up in the same market as smartphone: they all look the same, and the only way to gain new market shares is to propose better price or better camera, but that's all.
It is a very boring market...
This is why we do not compete on that; dropping fees? OK let's do it... a good support? OK let's hire... a good liquidity? Ok let's partner... a good security? Sure, let's do it...
Jarvis value proposition is not this; it is a multi-asset hybrid exchange, with a wallet that can support Dapps access, leverage from open API partners app, and supports fiat, crypto and token. So it is a Revolut App from where you can access thousands of other apps and dapps, and from where you can trade or invest on several market.
It is revolutionnary in the user experience in many way. It is like having Saxo Banque, Coinbase, Zopa, Amazon, etc. accessible from your Revolut account... and helped by an AI.
It is developper friendly.
It has a token which is distributed to incentivize people joining our network, and creating value.
It is done by passionnate people.
It can have an impact on people's life; as soon as you give the proper tool to help people investing, trading, managing their money, and you give them a proper education, then you change how the world think and works.
Jarvis is not just an exchange; it is a lifestyle. It is also a way of doing things. We want our client to become better, smarter, and for that, AI, education, is one of the key!
December 26, 2018, 09:43:08 AM
Guys, let me share with you a very good Technical analysis !
It clearly shows where BTC is going, take a look
It clearly shows where BTC is going, take a look
So always sell BTC for Jarvis?
What makes you so sure Jarvis won't fall down once it's listed? Best to spread
I am not sure, I am not the market; JRT will fall, rise, fall, rise, it does not matter actually. What I know is that we will do our best to show that the token have a great value and need to be kept, nice communication, launching the token AFTER the product, etc. and find all the way to incentivize people to keep their token (like airdrop of anotther token we will launch, based on the amount of token you have).
Plus, even if the token drop too much, we will redistribute enough value to token holder so that even wit ha drop of 20, 30 or 60% it is still more interesting to buy the token during the ICO.
But we will not be able to control the price; in the traditionnal world some stocks can be suspended to do not allow anyone to trade, to avoid to big fall.
During the pre-sale ICO we have 4% more in income. This is already something not to be overlooked.
And, it would be nice if those who do not participate in the ICO do not receive the 20%, but less. Style 5%....
Because it is the people in ICO who are the most important, which allows you to start the project. It would not be fair if those waiting after the ICO have the same base % rates.
And only those who participated in the ICO can receive the 20% base of the JRT by re-purchasing after the ICO.
This would also compensate for the decrease Wink
Then, personally, that the price goes down very low, it is beneficial for those who want to make their Wallet grow. Because it is the quantity that counts in an income token. The price doesn't really matter. It is true that the day we no longer want income and want to sell, we are happy if it is higher than the starting price. And who's going to sell? We're looking for income, we're not looking to speculate in this kind of token. The volume will still be much lower than the other token utilities.
December 26, 2018, 09:40:00 AM
Why you dont have any conferences, events for attract people to ICO? Are you going to have some after token sale for attract people to your exchange?
He has already had conferences and will do many. It is written in the previous pages. It's true that this line of discussions is a little flooded, but if you've been following it since full pages before, you could have answered your questions.
December 26, 2018, 09:20:54 AM
Why you dont have any conferences, events for attract people to ICO? Are you going to have some after token sale for attract people to your exchange?
December 26, 2018, 07:15:15 AM
Jarvis is definitely a standout among the usually greedy and delusional ICOs, setting a realistic fundraising target and focusing on the development of the exchange.
I think the same about the disparity of vision between jarvis and other projects, many words thrown into the wind in previous projects without something concrete even after collecting money. I see in Jarvis the differential of labor applied even before and during the sale and aspiration of confidence enough to take the project far beyond
So how can EOS tell what will they do with 4 billion dollars
And most of the ico's raised way more money they initially required.Two lambo for our beloved ceo, a small island for our cfo.
You are more than right by the way.
December 26, 2018, 05:30:22 AM
If projects are aiming for transparency and if they want to gain trust of their investors, they should be willing to reveal this information without any regulations. This could be the needed difference for project to gain popularity.
I agree. Every project that is super transparent will have a competitive advantage over others as in this bear market trust is a precious good.
pretty much how free markets work. you want my money you gotta give something back
December 26, 2018, 04:19:10 AM
If projects are aiming for transparency and if they want to gain trust of their investors, they should be willing to reveal this information without any regulations. This could be the needed difference for project to gain popularity.
I agree. Every project that is super transparent will have a competitive advantage over others as in this bear market trust is a precious good.
December 26, 2018, 04:09:51 AM
Jarvis is definitely a standout among the usually greedy and delusional ICOs, setting a realistic fundraising target and focusing on the development of the exchange.
I think the same about the disparity of vision between jarvis and other projects, many words thrown into the wind in previous projects without something concrete even after collecting money. I see in Jarvis the differential of labor applied even before and during the sale and aspiration of confidence enough to take the project far beyond
If projects are aiming for transparency and if they want to gain trust of their investors, they should be willing to reveal this information without any regulations. This could be the needed difference for project to gain popularity.
December 26, 2018, 01:52:18 AM
Jarvis is definitely a standout among the usually greedy and delusional ICOs, setting a realistic fundraising target and focusing on the development of the exchange.
I think the same about the disparity of vision between jarvis and other projects, many words thrown into the wind in previous projects without something concrete even after collecting money. I see in Jarvis the differential of labor applied even before and during the sale and aspiration of confidence enough to take the project far beyond
December 26, 2018, 01:46:24 AM
Jarvis is definitely a standout among the usually greedy and delusional ICOs, setting a realistic fundraising target and focusing on the development of the exchange.
that way they have something to show after the ICO. and people's confidence grows.
December 25, 2018, 07:43:29 PM
By the way, this is the article we spoke about last time : https://medium.com/jarvis-edge/how-multimillion-ico-projects-made-us-lose-our-sense-of-reality-a91aef3efae9
https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/2000/1*6FOuEF3YCOeqKo5T6iBkxA.jpeg
https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/2000/1*6FOuEF3YCOeqKo5T6iBkxA.jpeg
I just read your article. And in General I agree with the arguments given in your article. Indeed, people are used to the huge amounts of money collected in the ICO. But now the situation is completely different and not only in cryptocurrency, but in General in all markets. Half a million is really quite a significant amount, which is enough to start the project.
Especially with the traditional market going to shit. People are less likely to invest in risky assets like crypto
Software based products do not need tens of millions of dollars. They need to code and deliver a project. Everything else can be added as they grow.
EOS cheated, they artificially inflated the amount raised !
December 25, 2018, 07:02:43 PM
Jarvis is definitely a standout among the usually greedy and delusional ICOs, setting a realistic fundraising target and focusing on the development of the exchange.
I think the same about the disparity of vision between jarvis and other projects, many words thrown into the wind in previous projects without something concrete even after collecting money. I see in Jarvis the differential of labor applied even before and during the sale and aspiration of confidence enough to take the project far beyond
December 25, 2018, 06:38:52 PM
Jarvis is definitely a standout among the usually greedy and delusional ICOs, setting a realistic fundraising target and focusing on the development of the exchange.
December 25, 2018, 03:51:29 PM
By the way, this is the article we spoke about last time : https://medium.com/jarvis-edge/how-multimillion-ico-projects-made-us-lose-our-sense-of-reality-a91aef3efae9
I just read your article. And in General I agree with the arguments given in your article. Indeed, people are used to the huge amounts of money collected in the ICO. But now the situation is completely different and not only in cryptocurrency, but in General in all markets. Half a million is really quite a significant amount, which is enough to start the project.
Especially with the traditional market going to shit. People are less likely to invest in risky assets like crypto
Software based products do not need tens of millions of dollars. They need to code and deliver a project. Everything else can be added as they grow.
December 25, 2018, 06:33:07 AM
By the way, this is the article we spoke about last time : https://medium.com/jarvis-edge/how-multimillion-ico-projects-made-us-lose-our-sense-of-reality-a91aef3efae9
I just read your article. And in General I agree with the arguments given in your article. Indeed, people are used to the huge amounts of money collected in the ICO. But now the situation is completely different and not only in cryptocurrency, but in General in all markets. Half a million is really quite a significant amount, which is enough to start the project.
Especially with the traditional market going to shit. People are less likely to invest in risky assets like crypto
Software based products do not need tens of millions of dollars. They need to code and deliver a project. Everything else can be added as they grow.
December 25, 2018, 06:21:07 AM
By the way, this is the article we spoke about last time : https://medium.com/jarvis-edge/how-multimillion-ico-projects-made-us-lose-our-sense-of-reality-a91aef3efae9
https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/2000/1*6FOuEF3YCOeqKo5T6iBkxA.jpeg
https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/2000/1*6FOuEF3YCOeqKo5T6iBkxA.jpeg
I just read your article. And in General I agree with the arguments given in your article. Indeed, people are used to the huge amounts of money collected in the ICO. But now the situation is completely different and not only in cryptocurrency, but in General in all markets. Half a million is really quite a significant amount, which is enough to start the project.
Especially with the traditional market going to shit. People are less likely to invest in risky assets like crypto
Jump to: