Topic: Ico fund raising - page 11. (Read 2493 times)
In my opinion, the amount of money raised in ICOS campaigns is very important to success as well as the development scale of the project. There are many ICOS strategies that can expand and maintain long-strategies long of the project because of founding raise.
surely this is due to a long-term fall in the market and investors are starting to make funding to help the market go up and everything is going well.
Money raised in an ICO project is very important and is the result of a good promotion of the project. A project creates ICO to raise funds to solve a problem. The way the project is presented, but also the trust that the investors have in the team and in the project, attract funds. Unfortunately, there are many ICO projects that are based on people's naivety and are just for SCAM.
to work on initiation as DOGEM projects to prepare offers with future reference of service for pupils of indonesia
as managing use with deductive evaluation to gives with notables as returns of data and information gathering to prepare with submission of strings with the chance as referring queries.
as managing use with deductive evaluation to gives with notables as returns of data and information gathering to prepare with submission of strings with the chance as referring queries.
It is always a great sign that a project has collected a lot of money. It shows that people are interested in this ICO, but it does not guarantee that a project would be kept at such level, because everything depends on the team members.
yes,because they would need that one to develop the project and for the team also..
if the ceo / founder has a budget then he can do even without ico, but it depends on the project
if the ceo / founder has a budget then he can do even without ico, but it depends on the project
This is the result. If the fund is not raised, it means that the project will not be successful. Now there is almost no new ICO project release, because ICO has lost a lot of investors and no one will invest in ICO projects. There are too many scammers here.
It's time to forget that you can earn money on ICO. The risks are too high. The market is bearish, around many scam projects. It is better to invest in existing projects.
Thats right! As most new coins that enter the market doesnt have any chance to double the amount of its ICO price and thats the reality. Better to hodl coins that are existing and being developed. Take a look on INS(insolar) which is one of the most developed project in 2018. Currently undervalued but surely it will give you fortune this year.
It's time to forget that you can earn money on ICO. The risks are too high. The market is bearish, around many scam projects. It is better to invest in existing projects.
Does the amount of money raised in an ico determine the success of the project??
Is a necessity to do a fund raiser in order to start up a project??
Did satoshi nakamoto and vitalik also started a fund raised??
Those are essential things. Yes, Satoshi and Vitalik had previously called for capital and they succeeded. But those are ICO projects implemented with a lot of enthusiasm. The amount of attraction will have a significant impact on the development of the project. If no softcap is achieved, the project fails. Is a necessity to do a fund raiser in order to start up a project??
Did satoshi nakamoto and vitalik also started a fund raised??
The money raised from projects is an important factor in success. If fundraising fails, the project will be difficult to continue to develop and the project will soon end when the team doesn't have the motivation and money to maintain the project.
Of course, the amount of funds raised affects the success of the project, because if the project does not collect money, it will not be able to start!
Absolutely not. I have already seen projects that have raised over 40 million USD and are still not live on exchanges or they have lost around 50 percent from the ICO price. It is sad but the amount of money raised does not guarantee anything.
Exactly. The amount collected is far from a guarantee that the project will go public and that you can earn something from it. Today this is a really difficult process, because the risk of getting involved in a scam project is always high.
Does the amount of money raised in an ico determine the success of the project??
Is a necessity to do a fund raiser in order to start up a project??
Did satoshi nakamoto and vitalik also started a fund raised??
Is a necessity to do a fund raiser in order to start up a project??
Did satoshi nakamoto and vitalik also started a fund raised??
Based on my understanding, crowdfunding an ICO does not mean the devs does not have enough funds to run their platforms. It's just that they want to make sure their project will be up to the public and that many would know the function of their platform. Also, it is how crypto works, where the coins start as zero and then after the crowdfunding the amount raised is what is paid for the next step on their roadmap.
- the amount of funds collected greatly influences the success of the project rather than determining only influence, it is capital and if capital is met well then at least the constraints due to lack of capital can be overcome, it also greatly affects the speed of the project to develop, just imagine if the project is financially the project will be hampered to develop and their road map will jam
-is very dependent on the developer, if the developer already has enough funds to maintain the project, there is no need to raise funds
- Apparently not, but their team is a good team which of course has enough capital
-is very dependent on the developer, if the developer already has enough funds to maintain the project, there is no need to raise funds
- Apparently not, but their team is a good team which of course has enough capital
- Not necessarily, unless the project answers all future needs.
-Of course, because the fundraising process also concerns the popularity of coins
-Vitalik and Sathosi Nakamoto are already rich, I don't think they need to raise funds, and they are the founders of Crypto
Vitalik and Satoshi are rich now, but it was not always before the creation of their unique projects, they could hardly boast of their wealth and glory. But in any case, they have achieved it themselves, without the need for any fees. And unfortunately today such startups are getting smaller every day. -Of course, because the fundraising process also concerns the popularity of coins
-Vitalik and Sathosi Nakamoto are already rich, I don't think they need to raise funds, and they are the founders of Crypto
Does the amount of money raised in an ico determine the success of the project??
Is a necessity to do a fund raiser in order to start up a project??
Did satoshi nakamoto and vitalik also started a fund raised??
Is a necessity to do a fund raiser in order to start up a project??
Did satoshi nakamoto and vitalik also started a fund raised??
For success, you need a product. The team collects money in order to pogatitsya on it. Or hire those who will develop their project for them.
Of course it does. Indeed, it depends on the amount of funds raised how the team will act in order to realize their product!
I think the amount of funds raised does not objectively reflect the success of the project, but it very well determines the success of the marketing company! 
I agree, I think most likely the amount of funds raised reflects the demand for the project, and of course the marketing course.
in part, of course, yes it’s the amount of money that determines how much investors trust this project
Jump to: