Topic: Ico fund raising - page 13. (Read 2493 times)
Absolutely not. I have already seen projects that have raised over 40 million USD and are still not live on exchanges or they have lost around 50 percent from the ICO price. It is sad but the amount of money raised does not guarantee anything.
Does the amount of money raised in an ico determine the success of the project??
Not necessarily. In most cases they are trying to raise more funds than they actually need and with some good optimization project can be successful even if they don't reach hard cap.Is a necessity to do a fund raiser in order to start up a project??
If you don't have very rich parents or Santa Claus really likes you, you would need to raise some funds.Does the amount of money raised in an ico determine the success of the project??
Not necessarily. In most cases they are trying to raise more funds than they actually need and with some good optimization project can be successful even if they don't reach hard cap.Is a necessity to do a fund raiser in order to start up a project??
If you don't have very rich parents or Santa Claus really likes you, you would need to raise some funds.
Vitalik made an ICO as well, here is an ANN thread - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-ethereum-welcome-to-the-beginning-428589
About funds raised and success of the project, in 70% of cases probably yes. But not always.
For example Dragon Coins, DRG. Raised about 400m$, and I can't tell that project is really successful now.
Im feeling doubt about if DRG gets more than 400 millions for real? DRG has been scamming a lot of investors and this time it has been changing its business into the exchange site business. There was a lot of exchange sites that don't even need any pennies to create its own exchange site. About funds raised and success of the project, in 70% of cases probably yes. But not always.
For example Dragon Coins, DRG. Raised about 400m$, and I can't tell that project is really successful now.
I doubt as well. But, by official info they raised that. Most investors were Macau casinos with millions of investments, that could clarify law trading volumes.
And was one of biggest ICO last year.
Got some bounty tokens from them, that's why hope it is true, and someday they will rocket up.
Funds today for some reason are beginning to increase their opportunities. Today, for some reason, this market is beginning to prepare for a big breakthrough, there are many predictions about it on the forum, but all this is just people's dreams and nothing more.
While most ICO projects claim to raise funds to implement the project, I think it's a lie, because manufacturing crypto doesn't require high prices, and most projects are not complicated.
A lot of projects that did not submit anything to the market. According to statistics, 80% of projects are closed during the first 6 months after listing on the stock exchange. Therefore, the amount that the project collects on ico does not directly affect the implementation of the plan. First of all, people are important, if they are not compliant, then wait for troubles.
I don't think the amount collected in an ICO is the main indication that a project is success, that is just the starting point of the real project.
Afte the funding, the real fight is begin for the project to be success or not in a real way.
Afte the funding, the real fight is begin for the project to be success or not in a real way.
Initial coin offering (ICO) is failing at this point in cryptocurrency market. So many people have associate ICO with scam and this is affecting the genuine ICO as well. The recent ICO offering have seen many failures in regards to raising funds as people are tired of investing!
Vitalik was one of the first to hold his ICO. But the amount of money collected in the ICO Raud does not determine success. The project team and its capabilities are much more important. Of course, if the team is strong and has a lot of experience, it is much more reliable to invest in such a project.
[/color] 
Vitalik made an ICO as well, here is an ANN thread - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-ethereum-welcome-to-the-beginning-428589
About funds raised and success of the project, in 70% of cases probably yes. But not always.
For example Dragon Coins, DRG. Raised about 400m$, and I can't tell that project is really successful now.
Im feeling doubt about if DRG gets more than 400 millions for real? DRG has been scamming a lot of investors and this time it has been changing its business into the exchange site business. There was a lot of exchange sites that don't even need any pennies to create its own exchange site. About funds raised and success of the project, in 70% of cases probably yes. But not always.
For example Dragon Coins, DRG. Raised about 400m$, and I can't tell that project is really successful now.
Right now, the daily volume is less than $100,000, it does not reflect its amount raise if people are actively trading, and I'm sure they can afford to get listed in big exchange such us Binance and Houbi.
Price is diving down as you can see on the picture above.
fundraising at the ICO is a manifestation of support for ICO to be getting bigger. But even many projects without the Fund raising ICO also became large and can be successful. It just may be a lot more looking for certainty to enter in the ICO because of a more serious look. even that became dubious of this also because of the scam, too.
Vitalik made an ICO as well, here is an ANN thread - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-ethereum-welcome-to-the-beginning-428589
About funds raised and success of the project, in 70% of cases probably yes. But not always.
For example Dragon Coins, DRG. Raised about 400m$, and I can't tell that project is really successful now.
Im feeling doubt about if DRG gets more than 400 millions for real? DRG has been scamming a lot of investors and this time it has been changing its business into the exchange site business. There was a lot of exchange sites that don't even need any pennies to create its own exchange site. About funds raised and success of the project, in 70% of cases probably yes. But not always.
For example Dragon Coins, DRG. Raised about 400m$, and I can't tell that project is really successful now.
Bitcoin does not have an ICO but ETH has one. IMO, fund raising depends on the business model of the project. Some project requires funding which will help to achieve the project milestone easily and faster.
the amount of money that there certainly indicates that the project has a lot of interest and support. This makes the project showed great success potential. but see from the wallet in the real of this would be necessary because the existing amount could be just a hoax and not in accordance with what is in the wallet.
Yes, the amount of money raised in an ICO to a vety large extent determine the success of a project. To your second question, you need capital to start a project or consumate an idea! Vitalik held IPO and it was successful. You can see the effect on ethereum today!
Does the amount of money raised in an ico determine the success of the project??
Is a necessity to do a fund raiser in order to start up a project??
Did satoshi nakamoto and vitalik also started a fund raised??
Is a necessity to do a fund raiser in order to start up a project??
Did satoshi nakamoto and vitalik also started a fund raised??
Not really, the amount of raised fund of ico projects can be fabricated by the owner of the project to attract more peoples.
But if the amount of raised fund is real, then it is either a good project or peoples believe their project because the company is already exist before they using cryptocurrency to crwodfunding.
In fact, in the early development stage of crypto, we can find that Bitcoin does not have any ICO. For Ethereum, although it is the earliest ICO, in fact vitalik only got a $500,000 investment. Very few compared to the current ICO, but Ethereum has been successful. In 2017, many ICOs received more than $10 million in financing but still failed.
Does the amount of money raised in an ico determine the success of the project??
Is a necessity to do a fund raiser in order to start up a project??
Did satoshi nakamoto and vitalik also started a fund raised??
Is a necessity to do a fund raiser in order to start up a project??
Did satoshi nakamoto and vitalik also started a fund raised??
The amount of funds collected is not an indicator of the success of the project. After that, the developers may disappear, and this project will be a Scam. Or just abandon the project. A successful one can be one that strictly follows its road map and does not deal with the constant postponement.
Answering the first question, it can be said that the amount of funds collected through ico does not determine the success of the projects now, the reason is that the last time a lot of scammers spend ico and they simply collect the funds and don’t develop their product or platform. In my practice, there have already been such ico, which collected more than 100 000 000 USD and so did not launch their product. Answering the second question, we can say for sure that projects need to raise funds for the launch, but I do not think that such large sums should be collected. As for the third question, Nakamoto did not conduct ico to raise funds, and Acne did it all the way.
Jump to: