Topic: Ico fund raising - page 3. (Read 2438 times)
Your question is the reality now. At this current situation, People measures a project by its raising fund! But that is absolutely wrong. Most of the ICO projects are being dead because of their false hopes and fake words! They promised a big and high technology but they did nothing except some listing! For example, Online ICO raised their hard cap 50 Million USD but no one knows well about them and there are no major updates in Online project except a google chrome extension! But look at the ICONIQ Holding, they raised only 3 Million EURO but doing some extraordinary developments! I really want to see that people are avoiding big cap's ICO projects!
Satoshi did not start cryptocurrency crowdfunding, Ethereum founder did. I think vitalik started ICO, I am not sure though.
It is not necessary to go through crowdfunding but it does make funding projects faster for developers. There is another method that has been proven to be successful in the past , that is air drops. But no project does it these days. I guess it doesn't work very well anymore?
It is not necessary to go through crowdfunding but it does make funding projects faster for developers. There is another method that has been proven to be successful in the past , that is air drops. But no project does it these days. I guess it doesn't work very well anymore?
Does the amount of money raised in an ico determine the success of the project??
Is a necessity to do a fund raiser in order to start up a project??
Did satoshi nakamoto and vitalik also started a fund raised??
Not always the collected funds can guarantee the success of the project , there are so many projects that collected hardcap and are in the top cryptocurrency , such as stratisIs a necessity to do a fund raiser in order to start up a project??
Did satoshi nakamoto and vitalik also started a fund raised??
People consider this as success to an crypto project but the real success can be only found after few month later from that coin or token listed on exchanges.Because if the coin is really worth to hold then people will hold their coins for the future purpose not just for the trading,but if it is just shit then project won't withstand for months even.
shitcoins may exist for more than a few months. Such coins can live for years and no one will even understand that these coins will be shitcoinsDoes the amount of money raised in an ico determine the success of the project??
Is a necessity to do a fund raiser in order to start up a project??
Did satoshi nakamoto and vitalik also started a fund raised??
Not always the collected funds can guarantee the success of the project , there are so many projects that collected hardcap and are in the top cryptocurrency , such as stratis Is a necessity to do a fund raiser in order to start up a project??
Did satoshi nakamoto and vitalik also started a fund raised??
People consider this as success to an crypto project but the real success can be only found after few month later from that coin or token listed on exchanges.Because if the coin is really worth to hold then people will hold their coins for the future purpose not just for the trading,but if it is just shit then project won't withstand for months even.
Fundraising to launch a project is always necessary, as it requires a lot of funds for its development and implementation. But the amount of fees will always be different and investors need to explain everything to attract their attention and convince them of the success of the project. Ethereum also conducted ICO, like many other projects, but as for Bitcoin, it was launched only on Satoshi's enthusiasm.
Funding is needed for each ICO project. With the results of fundraising, of course this project will continue to run and develop. Because the goal of the ICO project is to be successful and have valuable coins on the market.
I think yes, because with the accumulation of money from investors, the project will develop the project, ICO is their way to get money and their capital is an idea how the use of money can be an advantage for investors and team
I think the fund rising is necessary but the amount raised in 2017 was extremely outrageous, the money needed is start developing a working product, startups only required certain amount of funds but for sure not in tens or hundreds of million. Maybe they need to follow the angel investing model, making fund rising according to their development roadmap.
Many ICOs that used the accused to stay anonymous just like satoshi nakamoto is flawed, now ICO is to develop business projects unlike all the previous blockchain. Another healthy trend is the IEO, where most ICO will launch on exchange or special ICO platform.
Hope to see a positive development this year.
Many ICOs that used the accused to stay anonymous just like satoshi nakamoto is flawed, now ICO is to develop business projects unlike all the previous blockchain. Another healthy trend is the IEO, where most ICO will launch on exchange or special ICO platform.
Hope to see a positive development this year.
The amount raised not not necessarily determine how successful a project is going to be. In fact many projects team do the funding themselves and not through the ICO fund raising. I feel that the success of a project depends on the readiness, activeness, competent and experiences of the team handling it.
ICO projects that achieve softcap or harcap not necessarily they will succeed and succeed, this all depends on the dev who will be able or not to manage the project with the funds that have been collected. if it doesn't work they are called scam projects and that is fatal. Dev should be able to maximize the funds from these investors to develop the project but they might at that time have been blinded by money
if indeed the innovation or their products can be received by the public, they will be useless success with hardcap or softcap. now the people's own trust in ico is also decreasing We know that many ICO projects fail because they have difficulty in raising funds. So that ICO is very important in a project and the Team will work hard to attract investors. Now many people determine projects based on fundraising. If funds can reach Soft Cap, I think more people will join.
Some will fail and some will succeed. But let's admit that right now, the market is bearish so there's only few investors who are willing to invest.
Not only ICO are affected but the entire market, even if they will succeed in ICO, the big challenge then is on how to make the value to remain over ICO price.
I don't think Bitcoin does ICO. A project that does not use ICO can still function if they already have sufficient funds to develop the project. But now many projects fail because fundraising does not reach the minimum target set. So investors who have invested money will be returned.
I am agree. Reaching hard cap target doesnt mean the price in market will rising and the project will success. Many coin dont have a solid developers team and after listing in exchanger, the price drop below ICO price. I think investing in ICOs is speculation and we should make a research first before make investment
This is not the case. I think that most ICO projects this year are raising money to make project developers rich, rather than better developing high-tech crypto and products.
I agree. We have seen many projects in the past couple of months that raised money and now they are inactive. They either don't take any steps to expand their objectives, or they do any for the investors. That's why that altcoins price are now very very low and investors are in huge losses. So ICO objectives should be fulfilled after raising money and develop their products so that investors will not face hesitation to further involve with the project.
I don't think Bitcoin does ICO. A project that does not use ICO can still function if they already have sufficient funds to develop the project. But now many projects fail because fundraising does not reach the minimum target set. So investors who have invested money will be returned.
ICO projects that achieve softcap or harcap not necessarily they will succeed and succeed, this all depends on the dev who will be able or not to manage the project with the funds that have been collected. if it doesn't work they are called scam projects and that is fatal. Dev should be able to maximize the funds from these investors to develop the project but they might at that time have been blinded by money
We know that many ICO projects fail because they have difficulty in raising funds. So that ICO is very important in a project and the Team will work hard to attract investors. Now many people determine projects based on fundraising. If funds can reach Soft Cap, I think more people will join.
The amount of money raised has low effect in determining if a project will be successful. I think the most important thing for a project to be successful is the sincerity and resolute of the team. Envion raised more than 100 million dollars, yet it is no where to be found today.
I saw ICO in the success of various projects. But I feel confident that the success of this project really requires a lot of capital, especially in need of many investors. It could be different from other people's opinions.
Have you seen genesis vision token and it doesn't raise a lot of money but it has traded above the ico price. it's not about how much your amount but it's about how smart you are for managing your money. how much raised is not everything. Jump to: