Topic: Ico fund raising - page 4. (Read 2491 times)
Certainly not, there were projects these that already successfully raised the hardcap and softcap, but proved to be scam later, Datareum is one of them, which I participated upon and got tokens, but later proved to be scammed, which earned a huge amount over ICO token sale and went away with money collected.
I saw ICO in the success of various projects. But I feel confident that the success of this project really requires a lot of capital, especially in need of many investors. It could be different from other people's opinions.
Ico fund raising is making such achievement to the developer whether they gonna make such an opportunity or not.
The number in one ico will of course determine a result that is awaited by the players in this ico or bitcoin role
The issue of fundraising is certainly not so important in ico if that is to me personally
Satoshi Nakamoto certainly hopes that he will more easily collect all funds from other parties
The issue of fundraising is certainly not so important in ico if that is to me personally
Satoshi Nakamoto certainly hopes that he will more easily collect all funds from other parties
the total amount of funds raised is used for the development of the project and for the marketing even if funds that have been collected are low, it is possible to go on and developer the project trying to financing it in a second time, in any case ico is not the only way to finance a project / idea...
What I know is that if the project starts with ICO, of course, waiting for ICO is a success or not. If success is certainly better because the project can run according to the roadmap. If the ICO is reached by hardcap, of course the process is very likely to be very fast. Unlike the achievement of softcap, of course the project continues to run according to the existing roadmap.
We believe that 2019 is a year of settlement, established for a strong recovery in crypto prices broadly in 2020. Any improvement in the supply / demand dynamics is positive for prices and therefore, the slowdown in ICO funding is positive net. mute, positive.
Why could it be positive? the development of the ico will make markets also move good. but when the market is quiet it will also ico effect on crypto market generally, where the effects of impact on the ico scam investor confidence.
We believe that 2019 is a year of settlement, established for a strong recovery in crypto prices broadly in 2020. Any improvement in the supply / demand dynamics is positive for prices and therefore, the slowdown in ICO funding is positive net. mute, positive.
Does the amount of money raised in an ico determine the success of the project??
Is a necessity to do a fund raiser in order to start up a project??
Did satoshi nakamoto and vitalik also started a fund raised??
Is a necessity to do a fund raiser in order to start up a project??
Did satoshi nakamoto and vitalik also started a fund raised??
Not really, i have seen some success projects but they didn't raised too much funds, only about 1 million USD.
to starting a project, of course funds are needed to build it. But if you already have enough funds, it won't be necessary to raise more funds.
I think Ethereum was running ICO, selling their ETH at certain rate.
Does the amount of money raised in an ico determine the success of the project??
Is a necessity to do a fund raiser in order to start up a project??
Did satoshi nakamoto and vitalik also started a fund raised??
Is a necessity to do a fund raiser in order to start up a project??
Did satoshi nakamoto and vitalik also started a fund raised??
Not really, i have seen some success projects but they didn't raised too much funds, only about 1 million USD.
to starting a project, of course funds are needed to build it. But if you already have enough funds, it won't be necessary to raise more funds.
I think Ethereum was running ICO, selling their ETH at certain rate.
Did satoshi nakamoto and vitalik also started a fund raised??
I don’t think Satoshi Nakamoto and vitalik did any fund raising for bitcoin, cause if they did, then he will have to show himself off. And I’ve never heard any story that says they did any fundraising. And his main intention was just to create a tool for peer-to-peer transaction. The ones you see now are just doing business, that’s why they will abandon their projects. Honestly, the bounty is not helpful for projects in 2018. Most accounts involved in bounty are bots so it does not help many people know their projects.
Majority of them are just looking for money and not after building the project. That’s why you will hardly see any unique project these days, they just copy what others have done already. Most of them wants to make money and that’s all they after, and nothing else. When it is not working they will run away with the little they have got.
Only good ICOs still have a chance to raise a lot of money from investors. No scam no fake persons behind the project.
legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 2100
Marketing Campaign Manager |Telegram ID- @LT_Mouse
For your info, ETH was the first ICO project in cryptocurrency history. So, Vitalik raised fund. A project requires a lot of fund to be established and that's why ICO is there. However, not all the time with a big fund raise, project can successful but you know the more fund you have, the more you have the chance to develop your project.
During this time I participated in Crypto and participated in the ICO project. The projects that I follow always do fundraising. Because ICO is very important and of course they have sales targets. And if you can achieve Hard Cap, I think this project will succeed. But all that also depends on the Team behind the project.
Yes this is true. If you have a great team and a strong project, you will be able to attract investors who would invest in your ICO and in this way it will help you make money and advance your project further as well. But people have almost lost interest and confidence in the ICOs and they might not take the risk of investing it in any ICO but in some cryptocurrency that promises return. Unfortunately, the funds collected by the project are not a guarantee of success. Since most projects can not perform their communications and provide the product that was announced. It is a fact. I have seen quite a lot of projects that raised a lot of investments but could not do anything.
Before one invest in a project, you should have some sort of belief in that particular project. Should the project not live up to your expectations as an investor, you need to think critically about the future prospects of that project. 
Does the amount of money raised in an ico determine the success of the project??
Is a necessity to do a fund raiser in order to start up a project??
Did satoshi nakamoto and vitalik also started a fund raised??
Amount raised does not in anyway determine the success of the project because if the project have no use case or product, it has no meaning. Also fund raising is never necessary as many projects are self funded. I don't know about satoshi but vitalik had a token saleIs a necessity to do a fund raiser in order to start up a project??
Did satoshi nakamoto and vitalik also started a fund raised??
I agree to this statement not all icos project that raised a huge amount are become success in the market those project that have no real product or a strong fundamental will became a nonesense project because you can say a project that have a real product can be possible to success in the future.
Fundraising does not determine the success of the project. The success of the project is determined by the idea and the team.
Does the amount of money raised in an ico determine the success of the project??
Is a necessity to do a fund raiser in order to start up a project??
Did satoshi nakamoto and vitalik also started a fund raised??
Amount raised does not in anyway determine the success of the project because if the project have no use case or product, it has no meaning. Also fund raising is never necessary as many projects are self funded. I don't know about satoshi but vitalik had a token sale Is a necessity to do a fund raiser in order to start up a project??
Did satoshi nakamoto and vitalik also started a fund raised??
Does the amount of money raised in an ico determine the success of the project??
Is a necessity to do a fund raiser in order to start up a project??
Did satoshi nakamoto and vitalik also started a fund raised??
the money collected now does not determine the success of the project, which determines the success of the project is the hard work of the team. nowadays there are so many ico who get big money but scam and this will only be detrimental and we need to be careful. Is a necessity to do a fund raiser in order to start up a project??
Did satoshi nakamoto and vitalik also started a fund raised??
It does not matter if they reach soft cap or hard cap. The goal of this fundraiser is to achieve a money that will help them grow their company and as a reward the investor will likely earn in the long run. The important thing first is to reach soft cap because some company will start their development even if they don't reach hard cap. Sometimes if the ico did not reach softcap the project will be stop because no funds will support their development. The success of a company will depend on how they will develop their product and without product you know some company fail because of this.
Jump to: