Yes, that's right. The honest ICOs they still work well until the bad guys turn ICO into scams. ICO still has a chance to do it again. It must enact more laws to protect investors' information.
We still have lots of great projects giving their shot in the market also, but they are not being seeing because we now have many investors that would not look at them again and just classify them as scam, and that is why they don’t meet that softcap again, they go halfway and then stop to refund people of their money since they could not meet up.
Many projects and investors are quite focusing on IEO right now which is why you see so many project rising up through IEO and so many investors trooping into IEO platforms massively but unfortunately, I learnt that scammers are now beginning to use IEO also to scam investors again through some of these low quality exchanges that don’t care about doing due diligence before accepting them.
IEO is a scam by itself even if it happens on binance. Only the exchange and very few early investors benefit from it.
And the issue is not even the high costs to list up to 30 btc in many cases
Most exchanges take a large amount of tokens (around 5-8%) from the proceeds and another batch - up to 30% of the proceeds as insurance fund that marketmaking will fail.
If the project fails to maintain the token price higher than a certain level for 4-6 weeks, the project will lose this insurance fund.
And then, there is mandatory allocation of funds for marketmaking, where the project is obligated to spend money invested in them in artificial pump of the price of their token
And if the exchange is not very honest, it is always easy for them to dump their 8% and lower the exchange rate beneath the threshold of the insurance fund loss.
So the actual costs of an IEO for a project are between 30 and 60% of the money raised.
Now think about it. People are investing in the project thinking that this money will go into development of a product. But instead , it is spent on games and gambling called IEO. The project is left with less than 50% of the funds raised, and I've found several cases where projects spent 80% of the money raised on IEO just for the consequences of said IEO .
What are their chances of developing a good product with 20-40% of what they actually need?