which one is more interesting and more desirable?
I think STO is more desirable. At present this project are more trusted and secure between STO. For that season most of crypto lover choice STO and I also always choose it.
Topic: ICO VS STO (Read 415 times)
I think STO is more desirable. At present this project are more trusted and secure between STO. For that season most of crypto lover choice STO and I also always choose it.
This is something to be expecting, the space needs some real laws to make it less fishy since the sum of SCAMs going on in crypto is unbearable.
I think the Binance platform for ICO seems pretty goo o far, only LEGITIMATE projects will get there since they are using their reputation on the stake.
STO is pretty goo too but the regulations will make it so hard for any FinTech to get there & be admitted as security.
I think the Binance platform for ICO seems pretty goo o far, only LEGITIMATE projects will get there since they are using their reputation on the stake.
STO is pretty goo too but the regulations will make it so hard for any FinTech to get there & be admitted as security.
which one is more interesting and more desirable?
ICO is the initial coin offering, while STO is the security token offering. Due to the ban of ico's on China, Hong Kong, partially on USA made it worse. Particularly more ico's got termed to be scams and ponzi. Few of which were the bitconnect, onecoin and more counts to the list. Regulators are warming to the STOs. This means that companies will have to admit that their tokens represent shares and are meant to pay dividends to shareholders, in the case that they are not a utility token–like most ICO companies.I talk too much and find out about ICO but don't know STO yet.
I will save your thread reply in the bookmark, so that I can learn more for a wider understanding. Thanks bruuhh !
In the past year we know that many people interested in (ICO) of initial coins offering, and now many people starting to vote (STO) of security tokens offering. I think this is something that we need to deal with with challenges. Because it is a good goal, and the aim of investors is to make a profit.
Why not ?? No problem..
Why not ?? No problem..
I think that they are no different, except that regulators are trying to impose it STO. I don't think there is a different security between ICO and STO.
The STO is the upper model of the ICO. As far as I know, STO has been accepted by the SEC and devs can not start selling without their permission. So accordingly it looks more secure.
Why your statement is so stupid? Just because ICO change its name to the STO and it will be automatically accepted by SEC? Stop fool others, SEC has bunch of compliances and this must have filled by an ico that wanna register its ico to the SEC. Stop fool others with your statement dude.
For me, the only difference is that STO is more controllable and regulated, and it is possible that there will be fewer scammers in it than in ICO.
STO will take over ICO in near future..
And I think it is better. STO will give some kind of security to investors, while ICO is like russian roulette - lucky game. Every 6 project scam
And I think it is better. STO will give some kind of security to investors, while ICO is like russian roulette - lucky game. Every 6 project scam
I think IEO ( Initial Exchange Offering ) like Bittorrent did on binance exchange will take over . Kinda easy for project to list your tokens for sale on exchange and you don't even need to worry about KYC , cus exchange will sort it out for you . The problem with Security tokens in USA is that you need to wait 6 months -1 year to list on exchanges per SEC Rules .
STO it is a company with available assets and it opens the IPO. but 100 projects are probably a project with money available. ICO compared to STO is stuck with a pile of legal frameworks so it is not as robust as ICO
STO is more trusted than ICO. And I will prefer STO, ICO have shown me too many red eyes. But STO needs full regulatory compliance. I just hope STO don't turn to shit after much trust might have been built. In all, market will still determine the value of any project.
Initial coin offering versus security coin offering.
Well we have see much of the former than the latter.
Back in 2017 initial coin offering where the real deal and really impacted positively into the cryptocurrency space but since then it's been bad. May be is time for a change to security token offering
Well we have see much of the former than the latter.
Back in 2017 initial coin offering where the real deal and really impacted positively into the cryptocurrency space but since then it's been bad. May be is time for a change to security token offering
Ico are intial coin offering and Sto are security token offering. From.the ban of ico and its restriction in some countries it seems that STO are in vogue now. STO tokens also perform well on exchange than most of its ICO counterparts
which one is more interesting and more desirable?
No special difference. One is just a continuation of the other. Take it from me, all those currently shifting their investment to STO projects will still start the same complaints currently experienced with ICOs. People are still going to abuse the STOs as they have done to the ICOs. which one is more interesting and more desirable?
I think STO is more useful investment in today situation more than investing and ICO because when you had lots of scam project in ICO then how we can invest and test that so probably is STO best for me 
which one is more interesting and more desirable?
obviously STO is more interesting and desirable. It means Security token offering so much likely that your investment on that token is safe and secure.
on the other hands lots of altcoins offer ICO and it is more accessible.
If Project makes profit and tokens are security (sto) you will get part of the profit.
On the other hand if Project makes profit but tokens are utility (ico) maybe token value rise but not for sure.
So i would prefer sto!
On the other hand if Project makes profit but tokens are utility (ico) maybe token value rise but not for sure.
So i would prefer sto!
I think ICOs time has passed since 99% of them are scammers. STOs is much safer for the investor as they are regulated by laws.
I do not think that today there is a huge difference that could really make the projects in STO begin to have fewer scammers. This is not true. In general, nothing has changed for developers. Therefore, I do not see the point, only HYIP.
The STO is the upper model of the ICO. As far as I know, STO has been accepted by the SEC and devs can not start selling without their permission. So accordingly it looks more secure.
ICO still more usual to me. I think that STO will gain popularity now, but it is very difficult to surpass such a popular direction. Still, I think that after the return of the market, the situation with the ICO will also become much better.
Jump to: