Topic: ICO will have a huge impact - page 4. (Read 820 times)
In my opinion, the ICO brings a huge impact on the development of cryptocurrency and changes in people's lives. for example when people join and invest in the crypto world, then they will get a satisfying income. so does the number of ICOs that have sprung up, so that the development of crypto will progress and everyone will get to know crypto.
ICOs are a great thing to really get a project going. But in the long run, a lot of them show signs of weakness or even fail. There are good and well thought ICOs that have been really successful but this has often come down to the market condition.
When developers really make the right decisions and aren't greedy, an ICO has a great chance to succeed.
When developers really make the right decisions and aren't greedy, an ICO has a great chance to succeed.
Yes, but by what I have seen and seen at the ICO, you and I have seen many of its projects are deceptive and have not taken any measures for this. We continue to invest, work together with the good things of the ICO and look forward to the year 2019, there will be new developments in the series of exceptions for fraudulent projects
. I think crypto In order to remain the currency market, it will be set to set the limits for ico.
Which tools? By who? And we are in crypto world, who has the right or power to limit ICOs? In my opinion, we should protect ourselves before someone do it for us.
No need to do that.
People are wise enough now and learned from this thing. I doubt it that many are still going to buy with these ICOs. Learning on how big they can lose with these ICOs is enough for them to stay away from it and just start buying coins directly to exchanges.
People are wise enough now and learned from this thing. I doubt it that many are still going to buy with these ICOs. Learning on how big they can lose with these ICOs is enough for them to stay away from it and just start buying coins directly to exchanges.
People are wiser, however, the scammers are also more cunning. Let do more research before joining any ICOs. Better safe than sorry.
limits on the number of projects or limits on the amount of fees?
I, too, sometimes the amounts seem exorbitant, for example, when they collect 100 million.
If you count on the growth of the price of tokens, then the starting amount should not be space, I think that 15-25 million is more than enough. and even less, depending on the project’s goals.
When there will be government regulation of the activities of the ICO, the states will also set the maximum amount of funds raised. The draft law, which is being prepared in Russia, provides for such a maximum amount.I, too, sometimes the amounts seem exorbitant, for example, when they collect 100 million.
If you count on the growth of the price of tokens, then the starting amount should not be space, I think that 15-25 million is more than enough. and even less, depending on the project’s goals.
As for the possibility of limiting the number of ICOs, it is unlikely to be. This restriction is not necessary.
indeed, the impact of fraud is increasingly rapid making the ICO a little trusted, while the dynamics of the market keep moving, so the project does not dare to register for the time being, for fear that their products will immediately fall down
I do not agree with you. Now a lot of fraudulent projects appear on the market that do not help with anything
It’s only about this that the market is now full of projects that today are not working in the right direction, because the market is definitely in a weak state today, so people just don’t understand where to invest because they want to make money. 
ICOs are a great thing to really get a project going. But in the long run, a lot of them show signs of weakness or even fail. There are good and well thought ICOs that have been really successful but this has often come down to the market condition.
When developers really make the right decisions and aren't greedy, an ICO has a great chance to succeed.
When developers really make the right decisions and aren't greedy, an ICO has a great chance to succeed.
So far, I have seen, there has been no action on this matter, every day new ICO have sprung up with various kinds of concepts that they have adopted for each project.
and I read the road map and the purpose of the new project was not at all convincing that even some projects were clearly fraudulent, we must really be able to distinguish between fraudsters and not.
and I read the road map and the purpose of the new project was not at all convincing that even some projects were clearly fraudulent, we must really be able to distinguish between fraudsters and not.
limits on the number of projects or limits on the amount of fees?
I, too, sometimes the amounts seem exorbitant, for example, when they collect 100 million.
If you count on the growth of the price of tokens, then the starting amount should not be space, I think that 15-25 million is more than enough. and even less, depending on the project’s goals.
I, too, sometimes the amounts seem exorbitant, for example, when they collect 100 million.
If you count on the growth of the price of tokens, then the starting amount should not be space, I think that 15-25 million is more than enough. and even less, depending on the project’s goals.
The impact of the growing ICO on the crypto currency market is so great that the impact on the currency market is huge. There are a few trillions of trillions to go to the value of coins created by several groups. Again, looking back on the year of year, a number of failed projects can be seen. I think crypto In order to remain the currency market, it will be set to set the limits for ico.
Firstly, the blockchain network which crypto currency project rely is a broad network and all blockchain/crypto enthusiast have different kind of idea and vision concerning the way they view the advantage of blockchain/crypto curency so it will be hard to limit the number of ICOs. Instead of that what we ought to discuss about is the solution what make ICOs fail and how to stop fake ICOs. 
Actually the presence of ICO is very good for the development of crypto currencies. due to the impact of the growth in the number of ICOs that emerged, people were able to compete in advancing their ICO, and the condition of the crypto market remained alive and many carried out buying and selling transactions.
Although the ICO is going through difficult times, this activity has had and will continue to have a significant impact on the development of the cryptocurrency as a whole. ICO needs to be regulated by government agencies in order to reduce or completely eliminate the problem of fraud in this type of activity. There is no need to restrict the holding of ICOs, and we are still not able to do this.
I do not agree with you. Now a lot of fraudulent projects appear on the market that do not help with anything
The impact of the growing ICO on the crypto currency market is so great that the impact on the currency market is huge. There are a few trillions of trillions to go to the value of coins created by several groups. Again, looking back on the year of year, a number of failed projects can be seen. I think crypto In order to remain the currency market, it will be set to set the limits for ico.
The impact is good for some people because they could really get a lot of money from ICOs. But in the end some of them turns into a useless project.
As a rule, this happens only with those projects that from the very beginning behave like projects that will soon close or simply open money collections in order to simply collect money and run away with them, that is, these are scammers.
The impact of the growing ICO on the crypto currency market is so great that the impact on the currency market is huge. There are a few trillions of trillions to go to the value of coins created by several groups. Again, looking back on the year of year, a number of failed projects can be seen. I think crypto In order to remain the currency market, it will be set to set the limits for ico.
The impact is good for some people because they could really get a lot of money from ICOs. But in the end some of them turns into a useless project.
ICO is changing a lot. and how it will be in a year while you can only guess. probably not correct to make an analogy with the projects that were last year.
Agreed! ICO's are changing a lot especially this year. I have seen a lot of projects which applies blockchain technology even if it doesn't need to. They are using the blockchain technology to improvise the legibility of their product in order for them to get a lot of money from these ignorant investors.I dont think that ICO will make a huge impact in the cryptospace today. Probably existing platforms is much better than ICO's
Now it’s hard to talk about ICO restrictions, I think you shouldn’t limit the funds that they want to get projects, they themselves know how much money they need, but it is necessary to enforce compliance with the ICO against fraud, so that they all undergo quality control or something else spirit and the team is subject to their identity. We know that because of the fraud, the market feels very bad. And many people lose confidence and something must be done about it.
The impact of the growing ICO on the crypto currency market is so great that the impact on the currency market is huge. There are a few trillions of trillions to go to the value of coins created by several groups. Again, looking back on the year of year, a number of failed projects can be seen. I think crypto In order to remain the currency market, it will be set to set the limits for ico.
I have a very similar opinion, but I believe that no limits will be set, and many participants in the stock market will start investing in the cryptocurrency sector, because so many bans today work precisely in the stock market, which is falling today. 
ICO is changing a lot. and how it will be in a year while you can only guess. probably not correct to make an analogy with the projects that were last year.
No need to do that.
People are wise enough now and learned from this thing. I doubt it that many are still going to buy with these ICOs. Learning on how big they can lose with these ICOs is enough for them to stay away from it and just start buying coins directly to exchanges.
People are wise enough now and learned from this thing. I doubt it that many are still going to buy with these ICOs. Learning on how big they can lose with these ICOs is enough for them to stay away from it and just start buying coins directly to exchanges.
Jump to: