Pages:
Author

Topic: [IDEA] Anti-Arrest Vest (Read 5218 times)

legendary
Activity: 980
Merit: 1003
I'm not just any shaman, I'm a Sha256man
August 02, 2012, 04:19:12 PM
#53
I'd love to watch this in action-- especially when the wearer finally gets tasered, the darts contact the vest wires, and the vest continues to taser the wearer for another ten minutes.  Tongue

"He's finally stopped flopping around the ground!  Someone install new batteries!!!"
Its lined with rubber and tasers can only penetrate so far into clothing so nothing will happen to the wearer
sr. member
Activity: 285
Merit: 250
Turning money into heat since 2011.
August 02, 2012, 04:09:47 PM
#52
I'd love to watch this in action-- especially when the wearer finally gets tasered, the darts contact the vest wires, and the vest continues to taser the wearer for another ten minutes.  Tongue

"He's finally stopped flopping around the ground!  Someone install new batteries!!!"
legendary
Activity: 1795
Merit: 1208
This is not OK.
August 02, 2012, 01:03:21 PM
#51
Sooooooooooo behind the times...
legendary
Activity: 980
Merit: 1003
I'm not just any shaman, I'm a Sha256man
August 02, 2012, 12:20:33 PM
#50
Just noticed this thread.  Surprised you didn't know these already existed, or that there are tools called "search engines" that will do your market and competitive landscape research for you.

http://www.no-contact.com/index-4.html
Thank you soo much, I knew i couldn't have been the first to think it up Smiley
legendary
Activity: 980
Merit: 1003
I'm not just any shaman, I'm a Sha256man
August 02, 2012, 11:12:24 AM
#49
So I need to buy a bullet proof vest and attach 1000 leds (with battery and 555 timer(for christmas tree effect))
A sniper can't pick off what is too hard to look at
legendary
Activity: 1493
Merit: 1003
July 25, 2012, 01:33:48 AM
#48
You could also kill all electronic appliance in his building.

It would suffice to kill the stereo. I don't want to start a fire by frying all of his appliances! (not even mine, after all, I live on the top floor, right above him)
Once I came across with this one and thought: hell, it must be fun! (but... expensive... Sad)
hero member
Activity: 793
Merit: 1026
July 24, 2012, 10:48:20 PM
#47
sounds good but the vest is too heavy and i just found a trunk with 100 bottles of nuke cola.  off goes the vest
legendary
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1570
Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending
July 24, 2012, 09:09:38 PM
#46
Another tool to use is to project 100's of holographic images of yourself surrounding the officers, thus enabling you to make a run for it.
legendary
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1032
RIP Mommy
July 24, 2012, 07:05:46 PM
#45
LOL
legendary
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1004
July 24, 2012, 04:44:59 PM
#44
I wonder if a portable Faraday cage would protect against microwaves. This coupled with an anti-noise cancellation system could be an interesting addition to the anti-arrest vest.

http://physicsb-2009-10.wikispaces.com/file/view/Tesla18Dalek10003Ft.jpg/126371831/Tesla18Dalek10003Ft.jpg
Not a cage in the standard sense, but you could use fine mesh such as screen wire to get the desired effect, assuming the microwaves are in the 2.4Ghz range.

For those experimenting with microwave oven parts, the recommended protection is a suit made of screen wire for your body, and a tin can with the sharp edges trimmed off and lined in soft fur to contain your man parts.


Microwave cannon

This thing can do cool stuff like light up fluorescent bulbs from upwards of 10 feet away.

How I'm devilishly thinking on microwaving my neighbor's stereo when it's late in the night and he decides to play music to the building across the street with the windows closed...
You could also kill all electronic appliance in his building.



http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/3890127.stm

Lame. Corrections:

1: Police driver flicks dashboard switch to signal 50 cal turret in boot.
2: 50 cal BMG bullets direct at 3000ft/s towards suspect's car.
3: Suspect car is disabled.
vip
Activity: 756
Merit: 503
July 24, 2012, 04:13:23 PM
#43
I wonder if a portable Faraday cage would protect against microwaves. This coupled with an anti-noise cancellation system could be an interesting addition to the anti-arrest vest.

http://physicsb-2009-10.wikispaces.com/file/view/Tesla18Dalek10003Ft.jpg/126371831/Tesla18Dalek10003Ft.jpg
Not a cage in the standard sense, but you could use fine mesh such as screen wire to get the desired effect, assuming the microwaves are in the 2.4Ghz range.

For those experimenting with microwave oven parts, the recommended protection is a suit made of screen wire for your body, and a tin can with the sharp edges trimmed off and lined in soft fur to contain your man parts.


Microwave cannon

This thing can do cool stuff like light up fluorescent bulbs from upwards of 10 feet away.

How I'm devilishly thinking on microwaving my neighbor's stereo when it's late in the night and he decides to play music to the building across the street with the windows closed...
You could also kill all electronic appliance in his building.



http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/3890127.stm
legendary
Activity: 1493
Merit: 1003
July 24, 2012, 03:32:08 PM
#42
I wonder if a portable Faraday cage would protect against microwaves. This coupled with an anti-noise cancellation system could be an interesting addition to the anti-arrest vest.

http://physicsb-2009-10.wikispaces.com/file/view/Tesla18Dalek10003Ft.jpg/126371831/Tesla18Dalek10003Ft.jpg
Not a cage in the standard sense, but you could use fine mesh such as screen wire to get the desired effect, assuming the microwaves are in the 2.4Ghz range.

For those experimenting with microwave oven parts, the recommended protection is a suit made of screen wire for your body, and a tin can with the sharp edges trimmed off and lined in soft fur to contain your man parts.


Microwave cannon

This thing can do cool stuff like light up fluorescent bulbs from upwards of 10 feet away.

How I'm devilishly thinking on microwaving my neighbor's stereo when it's late in the night and he decides to play music to the building across the street with the windows closed...
legendary
Activity: 980
Merit: 1003
I'm not just any shaman, I'm a Sha256man
July 24, 2012, 11:54:18 AM
#41
If you have that many lazes I'd assume they don't need to be high powered because all of them combined will be low powered.. I've stared at low powered lasers as a kid no harm done Tongue
Do you have any idea how powerful 1.8 watts of concentrated laser energy is? For comparison, a cheap laser pointer will be between 3 and 5 milliwatts. 1800 milliwatts will burn on contact with a variety of materials, including skin, rubber, wood, and more.

Isn't it more accurate to use amps instead of watts? watts is a meta-measurement Tongue
Nnnnooo...... No. Amps is watts divided by volts, and light doesn't have "volts" as such.
What if i have low amps and high volts? or high volts and low amps? I'm saying watts is too ambiguous to use as a measurement tool, im almost not sure why anyone still uses it as a measurement.

Watt is the SI unit of power, regardless of whether it is electricity, light, or heat. When a laser is rated at 1.8W, that is the actual power output in light, which means that at 445nm there are 4x10^18 photons leaving the laser diode each second each with an energy of about 4.46x10^-19 J. I don't know where you're getting your information from, but it's not correct.

Edit: Rereading I think I get what you're saying, which is that the watt is a derived unit and not a base unit, while the amp is. That doesn't mean the amp is a more accurate or better way of rating the light output though, any more than you would rate a 5000W propane heater in amps instead of watts.

Okay i see what i missed, I assumed we are discussing electricity but you are acknowledging that the actual light output it self can be measured in jouls which can apparently be measured in watts of light as well. I had assumed we were talking about electrical outputs i didn't know that’s how lazers were rated in terms of power(light).

Learn something new every day!
legendary
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1004
July 24, 2012, 11:38:45 AM
#40
If you have that many lazes I'd assume they don't need to be high powered because all of them combined will be low powered.. I've stared at low powered lasers as a kid no harm done Tongue
Do you have any idea how powerful 1.8 watts of concentrated laser energy is? For comparison, a cheap laser pointer will be between 3 and 5 milliwatts. 1800 milliwatts will burn on contact with a variety of materials, including skin, rubber, wood, and more.

Isn't it more accurate to use amps instead of watts? watts is a meta-measurement Tongue
Nnnnooo...... No. Amps is watts divided by volts, and light doesn't have "volts" as such.
What if i have low amps and high volts? or high volts and low amps? I'm saying watts is too ambiguous to use as a measurement tool, im almost not sure why anyone still uses it as a measurement.

Watt is the SI unit of power, regardless of whether it is electricity, light, or heat. When a laser is rated at 1.8W, that is the actual power output in light, which means that at 445nm there are 4x10^18 photons leaving the laser diode each second each with an energy of about 4.46x10^-19 J. I don't know where you're getting your information from, but it's not correct.

Edit: Rereading I think I get what you're saying, which is that the watt is a derived unit and not a base unit, while the amp is. That doesn't mean the amp is a more accurate or better way of rating the light output though, any more than you would rate a 5000W propane heater in amps instead of watts.
rjk
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
1ngldh
July 24, 2012, 11:10:43 AM
#39
What if i have low amps and high volts? or high volts and low amps? I'm saying watts is too ambiguous to use as a measurement tool, im almost not sure why anyone still uses it as a measurement.
You can't measure light with amps, it doesn't work. You could measure the amount of power it takes to drive the laser diode, but that isn't necessarily relevant.
They are different units, used in different applications. Amps is a measure of current, which is a rate of flow, and exists as an effect of voltage (electromotive force).

A watt is a measurement of energy, which is power (one joule) over a period of time (one second).
legendary
Activity: 980
Merit: 1003
I'm not just any shaman, I'm a Sha256man
July 24, 2012, 10:49:52 AM
#38
If you have that many lazes I'd assume they don't need to be high powered because all of them combined will be low powered.. I've stared at low powered lasers as a kid no harm done Tongue
Do you have any idea how powerful 1.8 watts of concentrated laser energy is? For comparison, a cheap laser pointer will be between 3 and 5 milliwatts. 1800 milliwatts will burn on contact with a variety of materials, including skin, rubber, wood, and more.

Isn't it more accurate to use amps instead of watts? watts is a meta-measurement Tongue
Nnnnooo...... No. Amps is watts divided by volts, and light doesn't have "volts" as such.
What if i have low amps and high volts? or high volts and low amps? I'm saying watts is too ambiguous to use as a measurement tool, im almost not sure why anyone still uses it as a measurement.
hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 1002
July 24, 2012, 10:40:17 AM
#37
Pizza Delivery Man Fitted With A Collar Bomb

Why not use a real bomb?

Mutually assured destruction saved the world a lot of headaches. Yes, early adopters would perish, but once it gets wide acceptance, I bet it would statistically be less harmful than getting arrested.

I can imagine a peaceful world where everyone has a fission bomb attached to their necks.
rjk
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
1ngldh
July 24, 2012, 10:29:38 AM
#36
If you have that many lazes I'd assume they don't need to be high powered because all of them combined will be low powered.. I've stared at low powered lasers as a kid no harm done Tongue
Do you have any idea how powerful 1.8 watts of concentrated laser energy is? For comparison, a cheap laser pointer will be between 3 and 5 milliwatts. 1800 milliwatts will burn on contact with a variety of materials, including skin, rubber, wood, and more.

Isn't it more accurate to use amps instead of watts? watts is a meta-measurement Tongue
Nnnnooo...... No. Amps is watts divided by volts, and light doesn't have "volts" as such.
legendary
Activity: 980
Merit: 1003
I'm not just any shaman, I'm a Sha256man
July 24, 2012, 10:15:07 AM
#35
If you have that many lazes I'd assume they don't need to be high powered because all of them combined will be low powered.. I've stared at low powered lasers as a kid no harm done Tongue
Do you have any idea how powerful 1.8 watts of concentrated laser energy is? For comparison, a cheap laser pointer will be between 3 and 5 milliwatts. 1800 milliwatts will burn on contact with a variety of materials, including skin, rubber, wood, and more.

Isn't it more accurate to use amps instead of watts? watts is a meta-measurement Tongue
rjk
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
1ngldh
July 24, 2012, 09:53:14 AM
#34
If you have that many lazes I'd assume they don't need to be high powered because all of them combined will be low powered.. I've stared at low powered lasers as a kid no harm done Tongue
Do you have any idea how powerful 1.8 watts of concentrated laser energy is? For comparison, a cheap laser pointer will be between 3 and 5 milliwatts. 1800 milliwatts will burn on contact with a variety of materials, including skin, rubber, wood, and more.
Pages:
Jump to: