idea: Merit source could have a negative smerit balance - page 2.

UserU

hero member

Activity: 2128

Merit: 532

FREE passive income eBook @ tinyurl.com/PIA10

Quote from: suchmoon on January 23, 2020, 11:01:26 PM

If you were allowed to go negative you'd be kicking the can down the road but it wouldn't help you in the long run. You would still run out of merits and assuming you'd have to pay the "loan" back you could end up being out of merits even longer.

Can he "pause" his Merit status? Like saying, "I've run out of Merits until (date)".

Jet Cash

legendary

Activity: 2800

Merit: 2472

https://JetCash.com

Going into debt is never a good idea. If you are spending too much, then cut back on your spending. Insteaf of awarding 2-4 sMerit, then award 1-3. That way you can keep up the distribution.

suchmoon

legendary

Activity: 3654

Merit: 8909

https://bpip.org

Quote from: bitmover on January 23, 2020, 10:45:52 PM

Because I found good posts now, which I can't merit. :/

Bookmark those posts and merit them when you're refilled.

If you were allowed to go negative you'd be kicking the can down the road but it wouldn't help you in the long run. You would still run out of merits and assuming you'd have to pay the "loan" back you could end up being out of merits even longer.

bitmover

legendary

Activity: 2352

Merit: 6089

bitcoindata.science

Since I became a merit source I am trying to spend all my smerits, using 2-4 to good posts.
I am lacking smerit now.

As a source, I think it would make sense to have a negative smerit balance until the next cycle. For example, if I receive 200 smeirts per month, it would be nice to be able to "borrow" about 100 smerits. This way I could spend 300 and I would pay those when my source merit is refilled.

Because I found good posts now, which I can't merit. :/

Topic: idea: Merit source could have a negative smerit balance - page 2. (Read 495 times)