Topic: IEO is much effective than ICO nowadays. - page 2. (Read 2509 times)
IEO is more effective for keeping investors funds safer is all I see here, when it comes to higher ROI ICO is or was more effective in this part, IEO is less Profitable than ICO and that's why I missed those ICO days, I'm still looking forward to a new crowdfunding idea that will do better than IEO, it seems that MakerDao fundraising is making lot of sense lately
IEO sensation is happening in 2019 and now we are in 2020 where most of the Defi market is entering the cryptoqurrency space and it is also full of scams. Defi has attracted a huge market sensation as well as gross profits from its investors. ICO still exists, IEO also still exists but be careful with Defi too.
IEOs are much better compared to the ICO's for different reasons. Here one thing need to be discussed is the profiting. Out of ICO the cryptocurrency users made a big profit, but the same isn't possible with IEO. This is all because of the investment opportunity. Most of the time IEO investment gets limited. So everyone won't be getting the opportunity, only the few with the highest investment ability profit out of it.
This IEO seems to be designed only for those who make big investments so they deserve a big profit, it doesn't seem like this applies to bounty hunters. So there are positive and negative sides to the IEO and it depends on us seeing from which point of view is the best
Claimed IEO more safety than ICO because have guarantee with exchange for listing only and not give guarantee how price will be above IEO or lower than IEO, just the opinion why many investors look interested with update time when listing and how long IEO running, positive points from IEO because they can sold coin just few time not the same with ICO waiting more than one or two week to sold out coin and some time have added with ICO time selling because coins not sold out, just the positive side from ICO and IEO but now both investment way IEO and ICO have ended with always failed listing on higher price.
IEO is currently claimed to be safer than ICO and of course more effective than ICO, for large exchanges such as the Launchpad IEO binance it is more recommended than Latoken, which in fact has a small trading volume.
Of course they are effective since there is a guaranteed exchange for the token holders unlike ICO when it was not listed on exchange you just wasted your money to it but if you invest on IEO at anytime you can liquify your tokens.
In 2017 almost all ICO projects raised money because too much money keeps flowing into ICO projects at the time, it's just a shame that many projects turned out scam after ICO hype was over, If IEO came out before ICO I'm sure we will still have millions of investors in crypto space today because IEO did maintain it's reputation through top exchanges
Yes, that is if the IEOs that are on the top exchanges will obviously maintain their reputation to defend themselves, but if the IEOs that are on the exchanges are scam, I don't think they will maintain their reputation through the exchange, because their goal is to take away all the money from investors. 
The inefficiencies with ICOs led to IEOs and since then investors have been making good returns or at least a greater number. One thing about IEO that makes it stand out is the fact that there is no need to worry about scam because the exchange will ensure their integrity is kept intact by ensuring the team is legit.
That's true most of the time unless the exchange is some obscure exchange which none of us know its credibility.IEO is good only if it comes out of reputable exchange otherwise it's the same as ICO which may have some risks.
However, ICO if could get listed to reputable exchange despite having no partnership or relation with the exchange means it could make it really big compared to IEO.
Yes that's right. There was a time when people liked the ico investment. But for many reasons icos went straight dead. The reasons were scamming investors, less development sometimes devs leave the project in midway. So investors nstarted to back off from this kind of investment. Son in 2018-2019 the whole iconic thing is kind of dead. Then from mid 2019 there comes a new investment strategy undated ico uts called ieo. The risk factors in iros are very less. If you invest in right ieos. The ieos started to give good profits mostly those which are offered by the big exchanges like binance.
Every years have new way with investment and only get success in short time, when the era or ICO or IEO have end you need looking for new way how to get faster rich in cryptocurrency, right now many time investor get lucky with new coin listing on UNISWAP, they can take profit more than 300% when buying coin above $5 and sell it above $20 and reach above $100, but when late for investing they will get loss because coin on uniswap is not guarantee for higher price in long term, just few days price could be drop more than 40% and any coin drop above 300%.
In 2017 almost all ICO projects raised money because too much money keeps flowing into ICO projects at the time, it's just a shame that many projects turned out scam after ICO hype was over, If IEO came out before ICO I'm sure we will still have millions of investors in crypto space today because IEO did maintain it's reputation through top exchanges
IEOs are much better compared to the ICO's for different reasons. Here one thing need to be discussed is the profiting. Out of ICO the cryptocurrency users made a big profit, but the same isn't possible with IEO. This is all because of the investment opportunity. Most of the time IEO investment gets limited. So everyone won't be getting the opportunity, only the few with the highest investment ability profit out of it.
This IEO seems to be designed only for those who make big investments so they deserve a big profit, it doesn't seem like this applies to bounty hunters. So there are positive and negative sides to the IEO and it depends on us seeing from which point of view is the best
Yes that's right. There was a time when people liked the ico investment. But for many reasons icos went straight dead. The reasons were scamming investors, less development sometimes devs leave the project in midway. So investors nstarted to back off from this kind of investment. Son in 2018-2019 the whole iconic thing is kind of dead. Then from mid 2019 there comes a new investment strategy undated ico uts called ieo. The risk factors in iros are very less. If you invest in right ieos. The ieos started to give good profits mostly those which are offered by the big exchanges like binance.
Of cos IEO is more reliable, the only thing that can make investors lose money when investing in IEO projects is to choose projects from small exchanges like P2PB2B or Latoken, these type of small exchanges always have bad results on projects, it's better to stay away from such exchanges if you want good results
p2pb and latoken are not that small and if investing in ieo in bigger exchange cant guarantee a loss, all of the ieo trader must be rich now but why ieo are less heard ? and there are still poor investors/traders and most of them are also involved in ieo before . its not in the exchange but its how you chose an ieo project because if you didnt know how to choose a good ieo you will still loose even if you only pick ieo in good exchange but success rate of ieo can be better than ico
I don't think about the dealers/speculators since I don't accepting any new IEO ventures and I would prefer not to hazard my cash to put resources into the new task. We will imagine that this coin will be intrigued, promising, or beneficial or not seen by the improvement of the exchanging volume on the trade. In any case, it isn't sufficient.
Of cos IEO is more reliable, the only thing that can make investors lose money when investing in IEO projects is to choose projects from small exchanges like P2PB2B or Latoken, these type of small exchanges always have bad results on projects, it's better to stay away from such exchanges if you want good results
p2pb and latoken are not that small and if investing in ieo in bigger exchange cant guarantee a loss, all of the ieo trader must be rich now but why ieo are less heard ? and there are still poor investors/traders and most of them are also involved in ieo before . its not in the exchange but its how you chose an ieo project because if you didnt know how to choose a good ieo you will still loose even if you only pick ieo in good exchange but success rate of ieo can be better than ico
Of cos IEO is more reliable, the only thing that can make investors lose money when investing in IEO projects is to choose projects from small exchanges like P2PB2B or Latoken, these type of small exchanges always have bad results on projects, it's better to stay away from such exchanges if you want good results
If there is no any misunderstanding between the project owner and the exchange conducting the IEO, I have not seen an IEO being conducted on any exchange any will not be tradeable on that exchange, infact that is the ONLY advantage that IEO have over the traditional ICO. Investors are not guaranteed not to be waiting for long before the token get listed as it is mostly tradeable immediately after the end of IEO. It could have been better if there is a reference of any project that have performed IEO in any exchange and not get listed.
Agree that being listed in the first place opens up opportunity and bigger chance of making profits for the investors.With ICO usually you never think about making profit first because getting listed into an exchange is already hard but with IEO we got that guarantee by the exchange.
We should still not underestimate ICO though as some of them still turns out to be better than the IEO. Not partnering wtih exchange doesn't automatically make it bad.
We as a whole realize that IEO is more compelling and more secure these days than ICO but we need more than IEO crowdfunding in crypto space, presently I haven't seen any new IEO from binance exchange or other top exchanges, it's irritating, new projects that can't bear to utilize top exchanges for crowdfunding are still forgotten about, it wasn't like for this when ICO was still here, there was no difference between enormous or little projects, they all similarly raise money effectively.
IEO just guarantee with exchange listing only but not giving perfect promise with coin have value above IEO price, look how many IEO coins scam on Binance after listing lower price than IEO price. Did you remember with PERLIN coin was listed as IEO on binance, what happen next after coin listing and available to trade on Binance price is dump from 0.2$ as IEO price bit when trading PERL have lower price and dump to be 0.0318$, lest imagine which have have most safety IEO than ICO with price most extremely dump and how much developer and exchange owner get much money from investor.
We as a whole realize that IEO is more compelling and more secure these days than ICO but we need more than IEO crowdfunding in crypto space, presently I haven't seen any new IEO from binance exchange or other top exchanges, it's irritating, new projects that can't bear to utilize top exchanges for crowdfunding are still forgotten about, it wasn't like for this when ICO was still here, there was no difference between enormous or little projects, they all similarly raise money effectively.
In some aspects this is true that IEO is much better and more effective than ICO knowing that there is a very bad reputation of mostly several ICO from the previous years however even IEO cannot really gave assurance for the investors that they can gain and earn.
Jump to: