Pages:
Author

Topic: IEO is much effective than ICO nowadays. - page 7. (Read 2524 times)

hero member
Activity: 2660
Merit: 551
October 01, 2019, 05:48:18 AM
IEO has become a real alternative to ICO. IEOs provide an increased level of confidence in cryptocurrency projects, so I truly believe that IEOs can become the standard model for fundraising in the crypto space and, possibly, even create the next fundraising boom.


Again, it's because we need to evolved and that's why the IEO business model is born. But make no mistakes about it, IEO can still be prone to manipulation and can be delisted anytime soon. Even Binance delisted some of it's IEO being launch on their platform.

https://cointelegraph.com/news/binance-delists-trading-pairs-some-include-tokens-from-its-launchpad

So it's not an assurance that they are going to remain in the cryptosphere and not to be used as pump and dump as well.
sr. member
Activity: 742
Merit: 329
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
October 01, 2019, 05:46:19 AM
I have to agree with this. IEO is very efficient compare to ICO because you don't need to spend more money to just spread awareness about your ICO because when you do IEO you just need to contact an exchange and do some contract and they will do the speaking for you. You will get benefit from the popularity of the exchange and it is also fast since after the IEO it is already there in the exchange, waiting for the traders to buy and sell.
sr. member
Activity: 1540
Merit: 420
www.Artemis.co
October 01, 2019, 05:40:39 AM
The model has just been changed but investors should always check what they are buying even if the projects are listed on top exchanges. Because after you got your coins your on your own and exchanges have no direct responsibility of every projects they lists.
hero member
Activity: 1820
Merit: 537
October 01, 2019, 05:37:51 AM
I can say that IEO is the trend now i like it compare to ICO because it gives much assurance to traders the 99% return of investment
but it seems that IEOs raised smaller amounts than what ICOs did raised during its peak. EOS was the most successful ICO producing $4 Billion.
hero member
Activity: 868
Merit: 500
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
October 01, 2019, 05:36:31 AM
Very very effective, Investors are not throwing any money to ICO as there is so many scams in the community.
IEO will give assurance that the money is safe and there will be exchange after the sales.
IF the IEO will place in a big exchange another percentage will add to victory.
I think that it is not that effective because people are used to doing the ICO not IEO.
hero member
Activity: 1666
Merit: 453
October 01, 2019, 05:35:25 AM
Very very effective, Investors are not throwing any money to ICO as there is so many scams in the community.
IEO will give assurance that the money is safe and there will be exchange after the sales.
IF the IEO will place in a big exchange another percentage will add to victory.
hero member
Activity: 868
Merit: 500
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
October 01, 2019, 05:31:38 AM
true just go look ieo on binance they always old out the ieo and its more effective to gather funds than ico i think almost all investors invest on ieo rather than ico nowdays
I would trade at the older exchanges because some places don't like to payout their coins immediately.
hero member
Activity: 983
Merit: 502
October 01, 2019, 05:27:46 AM
In modern days modern system is effective than oldest. IEO is very effective because instantly get listed this exchange
At the moment there are very few ICOs that can appeal to investors, most people have a negative attitude to ICOs because there are so many junk ICo and scams.
IEO is a good investment channel right now, but you should only invest in IEOs at reputable exchanges, not invest IEO in exchanges that are too small.
hero member
Activity: 1470
Merit: 509
October 01, 2019, 05:18:08 AM
Indeed, big investors prefer to investing in IEO than ICO to avoid scam projects.
Whether it is IEO on LATOKEN or other top exchange like Binance, we still need to learn about the project before investing on it so we know what we buy.
Not only big investors but almost all investors prefer IEO. Actually there is no big difference but the small difference has caused the majority to choose it. Rather than small differences, it is the reason IEO is preferred because it makes good profits at exchanges like Binance. IMO if Binance had offered ICO instead of IEO, it would have been successful too.
sr. member
Activity: 728
Merit: 250
October 01, 2019, 04:30:31 AM
IEO has become a real alternative to ICO. IEOs provide an increased level of confidence in cryptocurrency projects, so I truly believe that IEOs can become the standard model for fundraising in the crypto space and, possibly, even create the next fundraising boom.
member
Activity: 746
Merit: 10
https://axiomapay.com/
October 01, 2019, 12:00:29 AM
IEO is really effective now for the inveators to gain money and I prove that because Im a IEO imvestors and becaus eof this I recover my lost from what I lost in the ICO investment that I made last year 2018. I will not considered ICO as effective way for earning money but it can harm only the investors because of the scam project created last year upto this now.

yes, I agree with you, as we have seen since the emergence of IEO has attracted the attention of investors, especially ICO investors have started to switch to investing in IEO which is listed on large exchanges. but I wouldn't say ICO is bad, it's just that now ICO's reputation has collapsed and there are a lot of fraud in ICO. and that starts from 2018 until this year
legendary
Activity: 2394
Merit: 2223
Signature space for rent
September 30, 2019, 11:53:48 PM
There is token sale for example on LATOKEN exchange, That exchange (LATOKEN) sell the token (IEO) but in the end they will not list on their exchange so for me that is not good. What if the token is sold out? And its not listed on that exchange mentioned. So how the traders/investors will get the profit? Also very risky right? What do you think guys?
There is terms & conditions for every exchange about IEO. They state about IEO that might or might not list token after IEO sell. For example Binace doesn't give any guaranty that they will list token after IEO sell. But usually they are listing them, otherwise investors will not buy token for next IEO. Yes, there is some exchange who guaranty that they will listed for trading. I don't see any point why an exchange should launch IEO if they don't like to list coin. Users should avoid such as exchange, they will not loss their funds.
hero member
Activity: 1274
Merit: 500
September 30, 2019, 09:37:42 PM
I see that many teams first conduct ICOs, and after some time they systematically conduct IEOs on the stock exchange. Thus, these two types of activities are combined and the result is not bad. The situation with the collection of funds for the initial issue of coins is relatively gloomy due to the fall in the price of altcoins, which for almost two years have actually been in the bear market. However, in any case, all bad periods end sooner or later.
Now that ICO are no longer encouraged in investment and current ICO projects have very little investment capital, this will greatly affect that project. I think by the end of this year we will end the period of ICO dominance and enter another form of investment. IEO is currently a new trend for all investors and these projects always have great guarantees at the exchanges that the project lists.

Of course IEO still has its own risks if the project is a poor project and the only reason IEO fails is that they are not eligible to be listed at a big exchange. At this point only 5% IEO helps you make good profits and the remaining 95% are all projects with no clear development plans.
full member
Activity: 1526
Merit: 111
Pepemo.vip
September 30, 2019, 09:20:17 PM
Its true, IEOs are better because they sell tokens or coins quicker and they list right away which attracts more investors. When you invest in ICOs, you have to wait for exchange agreements as well and it is really annoying for investors and also bounty hunters as well. I prefer IEOs to be honest even if they are not as profitable as before.
even safer we buy tokens on the exchange, indeed this means not waiting for an agreement for the listing. and many large exchanges directly participate. and finally this can be proven from the number of investors who have moved on IEO investments at this time

sr. member
Activity: 1092
Merit: 254
September 30, 2019, 04:46:18 PM
Its true, IEOs are better because they sell tokens or coins quicker and they list right away which attracts more investors. When you invest in ICOs, you have to wait for exchange agreements as well and it is really annoying for investors and also bounty hunters as well. I prefer IEOs to be honest even if they are not as profitable as before.
hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 501
September 30, 2019, 11:55:34 AM
The ICO bubble of 2017 has lost it stands to IEO for ever Grin. Many investors got scammed with projects that had no use case but was just based on pump and dumps. The worst part is that, most of these ICOs even fail to list unto exchanges after the ICO but with IEOs investments are opened to traders on the exchange and the tokens or coins are listed quite early to get more investors on board. These days i would prefer IEO to any ICO.
hero member
Activity: 1274
Merit: 513
September 30, 2019, 11:33:06 AM
IEO is really effective now for the inveators to gain money and I prove that because Im a IEO imvestors and becaus eof this I recover my lost from what I lost in the ICO investment that I made last year 2018. I will not considered ICO as effective way for earning money but it can harm only the investors because of the scam project created last year upto this now.
legendary
Activity: 3416
Merit: 1225
September 30, 2019, 11:29:41 AM


Quote
There is token sale for example on LATOKEN exchange, That exchange (LATOKEN) sell the token (IEO) but in the end they will not list on their exchange so for me that is not good. What if the token is sold out? And its not listed on that exchange mentioned. So how the traders/investors will get the profit? Also very risky right? What do you think guys?

Don't support this exchange when they launched their IEO, this is like deceiving their investors, the investors are confident that the coin will have an automatic listing, if they don't do that then we don't have a reason why we should buy the token on their IEO platform.
Investors are attracted to IEO because it guarantees listing if they broke that guaranty, they will lose supporters.
full member
Activity: 854
Merit: 104
September 30, 2019, 11:25:06 AM
I see that many teams first conduct ICOs, and after some time they systematically conduct IEOs on the stock exchange. Thus, these two types of activities are combined and the result is not bad. The situation with the collection of funds for the initial issue of coins is relatively gloomy due to the fall in the price of altcoins, which for almost two years have actually been in the bear market. However, in any case, all bad periods end sooner or later.
hero member
Activity: 2814
Merit: 734
Bitcoin is GOD
September 30, 2019, 11:03:04 AM
ICOs will always be more effective than IEOs. Just recently IEOs came to play, there isn't much hype about IEOs again. Unlike how long ICOs lasted, IEOs were short lived.
The truth is that any attempt to raise money from investors is going to face the same problems, altcoin developers have lost the confidence of those that they need the most to develop their projects, and while trust can take a lot of time to build it doesn't really take long to destroy it and that is what they have done, many people blame scammers for the poor situation in which altcoins find themselves to be in and they are correct.

But the developers of most coins are also guilty of losing the trust of investors, after all how many coins do you see in the market? And how many of them have any real chance to challenge one of the major altcoins in the market? Once you answer yourself those questions you understand why altcoins do not seem to recover.
Pages:
Jump to: