Pages:
Author

Topic: If Satoshi Nakamoto wanted to collect his keys, how would he do it? (Read 2578 times)

tss
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 500
But Satoshi was just a boy and he didn't take the key with him.

The key, huh?

Bitcoiners better hope that "key" isn't lost. That would make Satoshi's stash value-less, wouldn't it?

If the key is lost and Satoshi's million-BTC stash becomes value-less, Bitcoiners will be more than happy.

In Satoshi's own words, it makes everyone else's Bitcoins more valuable. Think of it as a donation to everyone else.
It also rules out the possibility of Satoshi disrupting the market with his holdings in future.


i would love to see a million coins in 1BitcoinEaterAddressDontSendf59kuE
sgk
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1002
!! HODL !!
why would you expect a retard to make any sense?

Come on now

I might even start trolling him now...  an eye for an eye
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
But Satoshi was just a boy and he didn't take the key with him.

The key, huh?

Bitcoiners better hope that "key" isn't lost. That would make Satoshi's stash value-less, wouldn't it?

If the key is lost and Satoshi's million-BTC stash becomes value-less, Biycoiners will be more than happy.

In Satoshi's own words, it makes everyone else's Bitcoins more valuable. Think of it as a donation to everyone else.



Think about the apple and the tree. If the tree doesn't have any value, then the apples won't have value. "Value" is a made up thing, it's pure perception. If people found out Satoshi's cache was value-less, perception-wise, then Bitcoin is value-less.

Losing private keys to Satoshi's coins do not make them value-less. It only makes them inaccessible.


Tomato / tomato.... 


I know, but the OP doesn't make any sense when he says "If people found out Satoshi's cache was value-less, perception-wise, then Bitcoin is value-less."




Perception is everything.
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 500
But Satoshi was just a boy and he didn't take the key with him.

The key, huh?

Bitcoiners better hope that "key" isn't lost. That would make Satoshi's stash value-less, wouldn't it?

If the key is lost and Satoshi's million-BTC stash becomes value-less, Biycoiners will be more than happy.

In Satoshi's own words, it makes everyone else's Bitcoins more valuable. Think of it as a donation to everyone else.



Think about the apple and the tree. If the tree doesn't have any value, then the apples won't have value. "Value" is a made up thing, it's pure perception. If people found out Satoshi's cache was value-less, perception-wise, then Bitcoin is value-less.

Losing private keys to Satoshi's coins do not make them value-less. It only makes them inaccessible.


Tomato / tomato.... 


I know, but the OP doesn't make any sense when he says "If people found out Satoshi's cache was value-less, perception-wise, then Bitcoin is value-less."


why would you expect a retard to make any sense?

Come on now
sgk
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1002
!! HODL !!
But Satoshi was just a boy and he didn't take the key with him.

The key, huh?

Bitcoiners better hope that "key" isn't lost. That would make Satoshi's stash value-less, wouldn't it?

If the key is lost and Satoshi's million-BTC stash becomes value-less, Biycoiners will be more than happy.

In Satoshi's own words, it makes everyone else's Bitcoins more valuable. Think of it as a donation to everyone else.



Think about the apple and the tree. If the tree doesn't have any value, then the apples won't have value. "Value" is a made up thing, it's pure perception. If people found out Satoshi's cache was value-less, perception-wise, then Bitcoin is value-less.

Losing private keys to Satoshi's coins do not make them value-less. It only makes them inaccessible.


Tomato / tomato.... 


I know, but the OP doesn't make any sense when he says "If people found out Satoshi's cache was value-less, perception-wise, then Bitcoin is value-less."
legendary
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1000
Si vis pacem, para bellum
But Satoshi was just a boy and he didn't take the key with him.

The key, huh?

Bitcoiners better hope that "key" isn't lost. That would make Satoshi's stash value-less, wouldn't it?

If the key is lost and Satoshi's million-BTC stash becomes value-less, Biycoiners will be more than happy.

In Satoshi's own words, it makes everyone else's Bitcoins more valuable. Think of it as a donation to everyone else.



Think about the apple and the tree. If the tree doesn't have any value, then the apples won't have value. "Value" is a made up thing, it's pure perception. If people found out Satoshi's cache was value-less, perception-wise, then Bitcoin is value-less.

Losing private keys to Satoshi's coins do not make them value-less. It only makes them inaccessible.


Tomato / tomato.... 
sgk
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1002
!! HODL !!
But Satoshi was just a boy and he didn't take the key with him.

The key, huh?

Bitcoiners better hope that "key" isn't lost. That would make Satoshi's stash value-less, wouldn't it?

If the key is lost and Satoshi's million-BTC stash becomes value-less, Biycoiners will be more than happy.

In Satoshi's own words, it makes everyone else's Bitcoins more valuable. Think of it as a donation to everyone else.



Think about the apple and the tree. If the tree doesn't have any value, then the apples won't have value. "Value" is a made up thing, it's pure perception. If people found out Satoshi's cache was value-less, perception-wise, then Bitcoin is value-less.

Losing private keys to Satoshi's coins do not make them value-less. It only makes them inaccessible.
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
But Satoshi was just a boy and he didn't take the key with him.

The key, huh?

Bitcoiners better hope that "key" isn't lost. That would make Satoshi's stash value-less, wouldn't it?

If the key is lost and Satoshi's million-BTC stash becomes value-less, Biycoiners will be more than happy.

In Satoshi's own words, it makes everyone else's Bitcoins more valuable. Think of it as a donation to everyone else.



Think about the apple and the tree. If the tree doesn't have any value, then the apples won't have value. "Value" is a made up thing, it's pure perception. If people found out Satoshi's cache was value-less, perception-wise, then Bitcoin is value-less.
sgk
legendary
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1002
!! HODL !!
But Satoshi was just a boy and he didn't take the key with him.

The key, huh?

Bitcoiners better hope that "key" isn't lost. That would make Satoshi's stash value-less, wouldn't it?

If the key is lost and Satoshi's million-BTC stash becomes value-less, Bitcoiners will be more than happy.

In Satoshi's own words, it makes everyone else's Bitcoins more valuable. Think of it as a donation to everyone else.
It also rules out the possibility of Satoshi disrupting the market with his holdings in future.
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
But Satoshi was just a boy and he didn't take the key with him.

The key, huh?

Bitcoiners better hope that "key" isn't lost. That would make Satoshi's stash value-less, wouldn't it?
legendary
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1000
Si vis pacem, para bellum
Satoshi was the core team at the beginning! Lmao! You have no idea how bitcoin works do you?

Satoshi and Hal were the first two miners, their computers made coins and the clients they used, the only 2 clients on the network at the time were making coins. Satoshi's and Hal's wallets stored the private keys to each of their coins that they mined. No core dev team has the keys. This core team you made up out of thin air did not mine a bunch of coins and then said "hey Satoshi, these are for you, let me know when you want them!" After Satoshi and Hal mined a little while a third miner started mining, then the fourth and so on. The first bitcoin transaction ever was from Satoshi to Hal, which proves that Satoshi had his keys the whole time! So quit trolling and go educate yourself, all you are doing is proving to everyone that you are an idiot.

The first million or so btc have never been touched or moved or traded so maybe satoshi never bothered to keep the keys because this was a year or two before 10,000btc for a pizza time......

Its possible he didn't bother to save them since it was just an experiment and btc had no monetary value back then.... Or he could be dead and the are lost forever...
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
Satoshi was the core team at the beginning! Lmao! You have no idea how bitcoin works do you?

Satoshi and Hal were the first two miners, their computers made coins and the clients they used, the only 2 clients on the network at the time were making coins. Satoshi's and Hal's wallets stored the private keys to each of their coins that they mined. No core dev team has the keys. This core team you made up out of thin air did not mine a bunch of coins and then said "hey Satoshi, these are for you, let me know when you want them!" After Satoshi and Hal mined a little while a third miner started mining, then the fourth and so on. The first bitcoin transaction ever was from Satoshi to Hal, which proves that Satoshi had his keys the whole time! So quit trolling and go educate yourself, all you are doing is proving to everyone that you are an idiot.

LOL. Were you there?

Bitcoin was implemented by Hal Finney and "The New Kids on the Block", a group of boys. But Satoshi was just a boy and he didn't take the key with him. One of the other boys has it.
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 1000
Satoshi was the core team at the beginning! Lmao! You have no idea how bitcoin works do you?

Satoshi and Hal were the first two miners, their computers made coins and the clients they used, the only 2 clients on the network at the time were making coins. Satoshi's and Hal's wallets stored the private keys to each of their coins that they mined. No core dev team has the keys. This core team you made up out of thin air did not mine a bunch of coins and then said "hey Satoshi, these are for you, let me know when you want them!" After Satoshi and Hal mined a little while a third miner started mining, then the fourth and so on. The first bitcoin transaction ever was from Satoshi to Hal, which proves that Satoshi had his keys the whole time! So quit trolling and go educate yourself, all you are doing is proving to everyone that you are an idiot.
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
just send an email to the core devs.  they should be able to help you get all of satoshi's keys

What's their contact info?
tss
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 500
just send an email to the core devs.  they should be able to help you get all of satoshi's keys
sr. member
Activity: 469
Merit: 250
J
Satoshi was never in possession of the keys. Therefore, the original team still has them (unless they destroyed them).

Then he never "owned" any bitcoins and these "original team" members are the actual "owners".

I'm certain I'm responding to nonsense though.


It's a matter of principle. You take someone's work and make money off it and he doesn't get his cut. That's called stealing, isn't it? Now apply that to how the entire operation works. I'm sure people are going to use technicalities, but that goes against their entire mission statement of trust-this and trust-that. Then the whole thing is a sham.

Hah, I like you lol.
legendary
Activity: 2506
Merit: 1030
Twitter @realmicroguy
trustless means you dont have to trust core developers.

If they have the power to fork, trust might be good.  Cool
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 500
Hahahah, ppl still reply to dumbfcks ?

I thought my post was obvious enough.
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
Satoshi was never in possession of the keys. Therefore, the original team still has them (unless they destroyed them).

Then he never "owned" any bitcoins and these "original team" members are the actual "owners".

I'm certain I'm responding to nonsense though.


It's a matter of principle. You take someone's work and make money off it and he doesn't get his cut. That's called stealing, isn't it? Now apply that to how the entire operation works. I'm sure people are going to use technicalities, but that goes against their entire mission statement of trust-this and trust-that. Then the whole thing is a sham.
full member
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
OP is a troll and has no idea what he is saying.

Please stop feeding the Trolls by answering any of his statements.



What if I said I was Satoshi Nakamoto, then would you still have more credibility than me?
Pages:
Jump to: