Pages:
Author

Topic: If war starting soon where is the safest locations - page 2. (Read 431 times)

hero member
Activity: 1960
Merit: 547
Vave.com - Crypto Casino
The war between Russia and Ukraine alone shows the terrible impact of the war and if the war between great powers breaks out and they use more modern weapons, I don't think there will be any safe place for us to stay. If we are lucky not to be affected by bombs and bullets, we are also affected by the lack of food, daily food… just thinking about it makes me feel scared. Never expect another great war to happen, it will be the end of the earth.

I think you are right. If a global war happens, there will be no place to hide. It's an illusion that places like Argentina and Chile will be safe. True, they were during the World War II, but not now. The world today is too interconnected and interdependent to have a hope of hiding in some safe place during a global crisis.

World War 2 is just a war of guns and fairly rudimentary weapons, but while World War 3 will be a war with biological, chemical and nuclear bombs. Only a virus like covid can threaten the life of the whole world, it is really impossible to imagine all the other weapons activated at the same time, and what will be left of us as a species.

Anyway, we also hope that the war between Russia and Ukraine will only stop in the two countries, and not spread to other regions like the EU, otherwise, it will undoubtedly spark a third world war.
legendary
Activity: 3374
Merit: 2198
I stand with Ukraine.
The war between Russia and Ukraine alone shows the terrible impact of the war and if the war between great powers breaks out and they use more modern weapons, I don't think there will be any safe place for us to stay. If we are lucky not to be affected by bombs and bullets, we are also affected by the lack of food, daily food… just thinking about it makes me feel scared. Never expect another great war to happen, it will be the end of the earth.

I think you are right. If a global war happens, there will be no place to hide. It's an illusion that places like Argentina and Chile will be safe. True, they were during the World War II, but not now. The world today is too interconnected and interdependent to have a hope of hiding in some safe place during a global crisis.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373

...

The problem with Mauritius is it is a smaller Island and if shit really got bad it may suffer food issues.

...


Right. And nobody wants to eat fish out of the ocean any longer. Too much plastic pollution in it.

Cool
member
Activity: 868
Merit: 38
Join hands and help me to grow everybody...
i once watched a movie, it was said that one of the safest places in the world is around south africa because the area is quite high and also free from geopolitics.  but seeing from the magnitude of the impact from the nuclear bomb (if war really occurs) then I doubt that in real life there will be a safe place, because the effects and radiation that are caused must have a big impact and spread evenly.
What did you call it, it is called a movie so is trying to tell you that it is a story compose by someone to imagine nation so it is not real that is the safest place is located in South Africa so can I say that it is that person's theory and the way 80 understand that particular environment before let it go collection it has not gone round the world to know the particular place that is the safest place someone can live or can they wear I don't to buy on that idea
legendary
Activity: 4256
Merit: 8551
'The right to privacy matters'
 Well Argentina , Chile and Mauritius all come to mind.

Most likely Argentina.

The problem with Mauritius is it is a smaller Island and if shit really got bad it may suffer food issues.

Both Argentina and Chile grow a lot of food.  Also Buenos Aires is a very nice City with good weather and food.

All three countries do not have strong ties to east or west. All three are south of the Equator.

member
Activity: 868
Merit: 38
Join hands and help me to grow everybody...
If I were should start today it's not all the countries that will be among of the world so the best place to go is to the country that is not what is pectin for the wall but only protecting the 10 to come into their country so that is the safest place that someone can go but if there is no need for you to go there will be another alternative in your country that the war is happening for you to serve yourself because there were many people survive and the mini dies
full member
Activity: 1148
Merit: 151
Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com
i once watched a movie, it was said that one of the safest places in the world is around south africa because the area is quite high and also free from geopolitics.  but seeing from the magnitude of the impact from the nuclear bomb (if war really occurs) then I doubt that in real life there will be a safe place, because the effects and radiation that are caused must have a big impact and spread evenly.
legendary
Activity: 2884
Merit: 1115
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
The war between Russia and Ukraine alone shows the terrible impact of the war and if the war between great powers breaks out and they use more modern weapons, I don't think there will be any safe place for us to stay. If we are lucky not to be affected by bombs and bullets, we are also affected by the lack of food, daily food… just thinking about it makes me feel scared. Never expect another great war to happen, it will be the end of the earth.
sr. member
Activity: 700
Merit: 270
If for any reason war breaks out, I think there will be no safe place, because in one way or the other, you will be affected in any country you find yourself. Currently there is some form of hyper inflation on goods and services and also short supply of Gas in Europe due to the current crisis between Ukraine and Russia.
So have this in mind, if for any eventuality, that if the war breaks out, it doesn't matter the first world country you find yourself, the war will have a great effect on the country.
legendary
Activity: 2184
Merit: 1024
Vave.com - Crypto Casino
If you're talking about world war 3, nuclear and chemical warfare, then I don't think we can avoid that war anywhere. Maybe the country you and I live in has nothing to do with the war between the great powers, but once the nuclear warhead is activated, I think it will destroy the whole earth and leave no place intact. Just remember the two atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki showed its destructive power and now nuclear bombs are a hundred times more powerful, surely nothing would exist on this earth if they were activated at the same time.
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 633
Any nations and country has their own problem, if the country has low chance if war will happen, but the country could suffer other problem like lack of technology, lack of internet, poor, high natural disasters etc. This mean there's no country is safe at all.
hero member
Activity: 882
Merit: 578
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Heaven is the safest location, just wait for the war to catch up with you and when you are killed,you go to heaven according to the bible there is everything we want in heaven luxurious life and the rest.

Is the war coming close to your country or you are expecting the war to extend more than its boundaries, you can go to Dubai and live a luxurious life there or go to Suadi Arabia, Qatar.
legendary
Activity: 3374
Merit: 2198
I stand with Ukraine.
Switzerland is historically a neutral country, you might try there.

But understand -- if the world bursts into a nuclear war there is no safe place but an underground bunker with a large food supply. It's not that you would be killed by a nuke or the nuclear radiation necessarily, it's that global supply chains would be disrupted and your local grocery store has less than a week of supplies before the shelves are empty. If people panic buy, than the shelves empty out in less than a day. Under this scenario, there is no safe location where you live in luxury. The world turns to hell and you're along for the ride whether you want to be or not.

In my opinion, living in an underground bunker with lots of food in it is not a good option for most of the people. You will go mad quite soon with this kind of living because we, humans, were not evolved for that. We are social creatures. Hell, even pigs are social creatures, let alone we.

These days all of us should think of how to prevent Russia from starting a nuclear war, rather than what to do when it starts.
legendary
Activity: 4690
Merit: 1276
You can choose New Zealand or Australia!  Best place to stay safe!

'Staying safe' means entirely different things to different people.  New Zealand has been considered a potential 'safe haven' for the 0.001% for forever, and said have made major investments there for a long time.  The question is 'safe for who?'  Most of people who think they might be 'stay safe' there are the enemy to those who call the shots.  Yes, said 0.001% have use for a certain number of pets and sex toys, the there is a vast over-supply world wide.  Fool yourself into thinking that by unquestionably chowing down on their globalist bullshit you will be somehow favored for that reason alone at your peril.

Australia is among the biggest theoretical risks to post-reset New Zealand.  Relatively close by sea, and a technologically advanced people with a potential for a cultural understanding of New Zealand elite.  I conjecture that it is why Australia eclipses even Canada in terms of totalitarian crackdowns and burgeoning human degradation/depopulation programs, and Freemasons are good at such things.  I'm going to laugh loudly when the real powers in New Zealand slams the door in their face after doing Yeomans work in mitigating the future Australian threat.  Most of the current globalist minions will be fed to the wolves in a giant and very bloody sacrifice.

Now, every post-great-reset power center does need a supply of 'clean' children and body tissues.  Looking at the gene therapy de-pop shot uptake charts, I'm going to guess that the Globalist enclaves situated in N. America are going to use Haiti as their little private garden plot and New Zealand will use Papua New Guinea.

sr. member
Activity: 756
Merit: 454
War is something that we don't have to pray for, back then in those days people lost their lives, properties, loved ones e.t.c.
With all these being said I never wish for it to happen because nowhere is safe for anybody, where you think is going to be safe would be the hide out of the enemy. The major thing is that we should pray for a better world not a world with war.
sr. member
Activity: 1232
Merit: 379
If your country is at war, you can relocate to a safer region where the crisis hasn't yet spread. Beg your government not to intervene if two strong nations are at war with one another in order to protect your nation. If there is a third world war, take up arms and fight until you are dead. There is nowhere to hide. That's what I would suggest.
hero member
Activity: 1680
Merit: 845
As someone whose hometown has a NATO military base, I'd say anywhere else there isn't one. Austria, Switzerland, and New Zealand are a few great examples of non-NATO and neutral countries that are prosperous enough. I'd also steer clear of ex-Soviet countries such as the Baltic States, Poland, Moldova, etc. On the one hand, I don't believe that we'll have another world war, but on the other hand, there are increased tensions between countries (see Kosovo and Serbia, Armenia and Azerbaijan).
newbie
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
You can choose New Zealand or Australia!  Best place to stay safe!
sr. member
Activity: 1470
Merit: 428
Where is the safest locations?
I do not want a very serious war to begin please, but if it turns out like that, relocating to an island country that is safe with little population may be good. A country that no affiliation with either the United states or Russia incase the war concerns them. If it is a full scale war, many countries will feel the effects, It is a matter of the side where the effect of the war will not be most deadly. You can find a list of the best 20 islands you can relocate to for privacy and peace here.

legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1277
I've remembered St. Helena and I thought of it as one of the safest locations if ever a war will start but it's far from the main land. It's a remote island and has got mountains on it.

But, it's surrounded by bodies of water so, let's say you're safe from war but you're not safe from natural calamities.

Well, I just want to visit there someday.  Roll Eyes


St Helena is a British territory, and not far from Ascension Island, which has a joint UK/US military presence... so even tropical islands can be military targets.
Pages:
Jump to: