Pages:
Author

Topic: In the future, will fiat currencies be necessary in the world? - page 34. (Read 35816 times)

full member
Activity: 546
Merit: 100
There must be one currency in all countries, so that there are no discrepancies in the price.  It will greatly simplify your life.

Unfortunately, it will never happen. It could be possible only in the perfect world, and this world will be never ideal. Fiat will exist always but the cryptocurrencies should be also used.
member
Activity: 392
Merit: 10
WPP ENERGY - BACKED ASSET GREEN ENERGY TOKEN
Also, you never clarified what you meant that bitcoin is inflationary. I have never seen this argument made anywhere, except as I mentioned, to mean that the supply is currently increasing.
In fact, cash is still widely circulated and needed. Its main purpose is to promote the flow of economic. It needs to be replicated to meet the needs of life.
newbie
Activity: 98
Merit: 0
I disagree that fiat currencies are not necessary. Since time memorial, fiat currencies are the basis of trade and making payment. the are the most convenient asset that allows all individual, from the poorest person to the richest. Without fiat currency most people can not conduct simple buy and sell. not to taught about pay for services and goods. As much as digital currency is revolutionizing the world, we can not say that fiat currency are now irrelevant.
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 515
The references were for your benefit. I am extensively read in economics and I studied it in school. I chose those 3 references to address the 3 specific points that you made. What is the source of your knowledge, your own mind? If you have references for any of those points (or even discussions on this forum which you mentioned in passing), I would take a look at them.

Your references are irrelevant as well as your being "extensively read in economics and I studied it in school". If you can't explain things how you understand them, how can you know that you truly understand what someone else is saying or writing, Nobel prize winners included? This is not a pissing contest, anyway. If you can prove your point, go for it. I gave you an example from real life, and anyone who is actually versed in economics, who understands how deflation and inflation work on the level of separate companies and households, that is at the lowest possible level, knows that deflation is not inflation mirrored. Why should I care about your Nobel prize winners if you can't even answer a very simple question, which reveals your true knowledge and understanding of the matter (or rather lack thereof)?
legendary
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1004
first of all, I would like to point to a topic that digital payment is not a new thing to the world or any governments, Why does it did not conquer over faint currency. It's only because not everyone has access to the internet or maybe a smartphone and they person having those facility has no experience or maybe even worse they are not even aware of it. Let's think everyone gets the awareness but still, the capability and affordability plays a very important role in this decision. But till then I see a lot of need of faint currency as it can be used offline without any disturbance.
newbie
Activity: 46
Merit: 0
I do not think fiat is necessary for the world to keep economic stabilisation, However Fiat money is currency that a government has declared to be legal tender, but it is not backed by a physical commodity. The value of fiat money is derived from the relationship between supply and demand rather than the value of the material from which the money is made so i think they can not deceive people any more so sooner or later it is going to be collapse.



I think if Bitcoin is never found, but someone like Paypal has implemented blockchain technology first, then we will not be in the competitive scenario we are facing now.
Fiat currencies are obviously not needed, there is an increasing trend towards currency digitization, and the blockchain-based currency is just the next generation of this. The problem is that Bitcoin comes out, and everyone treats it as a substitute for fiat currency, rather than a gradual increase in digital currencies like Paypal and Skrill.
sr. member
Activity: 503
Merit: 286
Also, you never clarified what you meant that bitcoin is inflationary. I have never seen this argument made anywhere, except as I mentioned, to mean that the supply is currently increasing.
sr. member
Activity: 503
Merit: 286

So am I and no, it is not economically viable. If Bitcoin was to completely replace fiat somehow one day and we discard all possible transitory effects as well as Bitcoin's current shortcomings (like transaction costs, confirmation times, etc) as inconsequential, the current level of economic cooperation and development mediated by fiat won't be sustainable, end of story. In effect, that would mean that the world economies would collapse in no time, and given that there are over 7B people now living, the things will quickly develop according to the Mad Max scenario, if not worse than that. Let's assume that the use of Bitcoin is forced upon humans by an almighty entity (or aliens) and there is no way back to fiat money. Just in case, you can substitute any other hard asset for Bitcoin in this hypothetical environment. It will still end in a disaster.


While many countries have reserves in another currency, countries are predominantly using different fiat currencies in international commerce. How is economic cooperation and development mediated by fiat? Economic cooperation and development can be mediated by any currency, or currencies, as it is now. Cooperation and development occurs through trade negotiations, international law, governmental and non-governmental organizations, etc. I'm not talking about anyone forcing the use of bitcoin, eg I mentioned above the possible combination of cryptocurrency and gold. Eg, governments may be using a decentralized cryptocurrency, but gold might still be used by individuals, and in some retail transactions.

To use deflation to mean anything else is just wrong. You say "deflationary in a broader sense of not being able or sufficient to satisfy the needs of a growing economy". That is a very common misconception in economics. "That there should be enough monetary supply to support such growth at all times" is flat out wrong. Economic growth is based on productivity and is not held back by monetary supply. This specific argument you make was analyzed in great detail and refuted in Rothbard's book The Mystery of Banking. I'm sure you will find the refutation in many other books/places as well.
Producers profits are not dependent on inflation rates. I'd like to know what your source on that is. And any references on this forum I'd be happy to look at. Inflation/deflation are monetary phenomenon. Have you studied Nobel Prize winner Milton Friedman's books/discussions on monetary policy and inflation?
Quote
The fact that you need sources and cling to sources yourself says pretty much all. You are on your own here (and there).

The references were for your benefit. I am extensively read in economics and I studied it in school. I chose those 3 references to address the 3 specific points that you made. What is the source of your knowledge, your own mind? If you have references for any of those points (or even discussions on this forum which you mentioned in passing), I would take a look at them.
sr. member
Activity: 503
Merit: 286
lol . what kind of question is this ?

Of course yes. Fiats currency or money , is verry essential and necesary to use since it is the first known legal currency before other payment method exists .

Fiats are verry important and should not be questioned by any other means .

Without fiat , do you think your so called cryptocurrency will have thier own value ? no right ?

fiats will always remain the number currency because majority of people will still stick using it , as it is more easier than cryptos and other medium .

Ha, this is completely false. Fiat is not the first known legal currency. What kind of answer is this? You need to study the history of money.
member
Activity: 756
Merit: 12
Fiat money or paper money needed in the world. Beside more flexible, many country dont have good internet infrastructure and paper money very usefull on that area. But many weakness on fiat money thats why cryptocurrency created to fill that holes
hero member
Activity: 1092
Merit: 523
As of now fiat currencies are still necessary in the world because it is the usual currency and if time will come cryptocurrency will be implemented and accepted and use all over the world ,but still fiat currency could still be of use, for the reason that there are places which are not yet digital access or internet acessessibility.
Yes.You have your point too.It's not easy to replace fiat currency with cryptocurrency because there are some people particularly living in the provinces who don't even know what cryptocurrency is since they have no internet connections in their area.Fiat currency will still be of high necessity for them.
For government to feel they are in control, fiats would still remain necessary and since it is not everyone in the world that would just hop into the crypto space, then, it is obvious fiat would still remain relevant whichever way.

Like you said, in most of the third world countries and even in some underdeveloped or developing countries, their exposure to new technologies can be quite low and would simply not have any other means than fiat currencies which obviously shows, we will just end up seeing this space as another means of payment and not the only means of payment.
sr. member
Activity: 672
Merit: 271
in the future, will there really be a need for fiat currency? Government can collect taxes in crypto, determine how to allocate it, and spend it in crypto. Ppl can receive salaries and do all commerce using crypto. Loans can be done in crypto. Fundraising can be in crypto. Sure, problems have to be worked out in terms of scalability, does it have to be completely decentralized, etc, the value has to become more stable. But theoretically, is there any reason to have fiat in the future?

It has been established that governments can now do taxation without representation by printing more money (which is a tax on everyone holding the currency), instead of trying to get a bill passed that allows it to increase the tax rate. With crypto this would be no more. All increased taxation would have to pass a vote.

From an economic standpoint, the idea that a country can stimulate its economy by adjusting interest rates is tenuous. There is just as strong an argument that lowering interest rates has caused speculation and bubbles, with calamitous results. In a crypto market economy, capital will flow from where it is needed less to where it is needed more.
Yes, without any doubt I would say that fiat currencies are absolutely necessary. I mean think about the poor people and the illiterate ones. How would they buy things if fiat currencies would be eliminated? The cryptocurrencies need a smart phone and a strong internet connection to operate. How the people living in rural areas and those who cannot afford digital devices and internet connection will live? So fiat will not be eliminated at least till the illiteracy rate and poverty rate ends.
hero member
Activity: 3052
Merit: 606
Fiats are just a leftover of the times when there was no Internet, so different economics and societies can easily deal with them.
The process of transition from fiat money to digital currencies could take up to several decades and will be connected with a lot of problems, but the benefits will definitely be worth that.
I know fiat currency will be in less necessity in the years to come knowing we are heading into a more digital world.If all of the  transactions will be successfully done with digital currencies,so more people will be exposed on using it making the use fiat currency left behind.
newbie
Activity: 60
Merit: 0
You need one or two currencies around the world, but not more.
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
bvo.trybravo.com
Fiats are just a leftover of the times when there was no Internet, so different economics and societies can easily deal with them.
The process of transition from fiat money to digital currencies could take up to several decades and will be connected with a lot of problems, but the benefits will definitely be worth that.
newbie
Activity: 108
Merit: 0
There must be one currency in all countries, so that there are no discrepancies in the price.  It will greatly simplify your life.
legendary
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1000
Cryptocurrencies certainly offer some advantages that are absent with fiats, however, fiats play another role for government as it is a tool to control the supply of money and as such control the economy, that will be difficult to replace with crypto in the future
Fiat currency are as much as need like crypto currency. crypto currency are not a stable currency and fiat currency is the base of any currency system. Cryptocurrency is not globally accepted and its is only use digitally. But their are many places in the earth where Internet is not present, because of this cryptocurrency at that place is not usable. Cryptocurrency is a complex digital currency because of this many people still doesn't believe on this. Where as fiat currency are simple to use and everyone know about it. In many Place and country cryptocurrency is not directly  use. It is converted into fiat currency then it is used. So fiat  currency is a necessary to the world economy.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 1165
www.Crypto.Games: Multiple coins, multiple games
Fiat currencies are necessary in the world, for crypto now is not yet ready to be worldwide currency because there are many countries that are not in favor of cryptocurrency , so fiat money is still needed for the medium of exchange in the market.
Obviously not ready. Considering the fact that due to its deflationary characteristics, a lot of people still prefer to keep hoarding what they have than spending it and that is one thing that would be a lot difficult when coming to terms with the idea of its currency usage making it impactful.

For now, I know things may change eventually, but we are not yet even close to it, and even if crypto becomes a more deserving or interesting space to use as means of payment, it still does not mean it would rid fiat completely since not everyone will have access or will be willing to want to stress themselves to the level of utilizing the space and would rather stick with fiat, most especially in countries that are less developed.
legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1000
If in the future digital era dominated people life then gradually fiat will be eliminated and for the exact example that i heard China has been starting it that people at there currently not necessary to bringing money if they want to buy daily life that they can use digital money and scanned their smartphone for every transactions and following it too i think it will comes that fiat eventually will be eliminated by digital money someday
full member
Activity: 887
Merit: 100
maybe effective for developed countries that are very familiar with the internet, but developing countries and so on will experience difficulties, especially the role of their government in educating them. Fiat is still the most important, but crypto can be guided from now on to be actively traded, the government does not have to give up because crypto will be the answer to a more efficient budget.
Pages:
Jump to: