Increase in stable coins adoption might just be the key to crpyto dominance. - page 3.

avp2306

sr. member

Activity: 966

Merit: 340

Quote from: justdimin on August 29, 2023, 04:46:23 AM

Quote from: m2017 on August 28, 2023, 12:06:03 PM

How is your country's currency different from stablecoins? Nothing, damn it! What could be a positive trend in this for currency users? Nothing. If the currency of your country is controlled by the government (central bank), but the stablecoins are controlled by a certain company, which, in both cases, can do whatever they want with their stablecoins, whether it be endless emission, and therefore inflation. Stablecoins are a very, very poor alternative for storing value, only valid for a short period of time. Stablecoins has the same disadvantages as any money - depreciation and unsuitability for storage. Stablecoins can't help countries beat inflation in any way, even though it is better than the national currency. Here need completely different tools.

The problem with stablecoins is that there are already several options on the cryptomarket, and new ones will be created. There was something similar in America, when each state had its own dollar. Which of stablecoins will win is unknown, but the losers will be useless to anyone.

Make a mistake with an investment of stablecoin and you are a beggar.

That is %100 true and this is why I do not use stablecoins at all. People who think that stablecoins are fine are people who are just kidding themselves. I just put my money in fiat and wait for the price to drop if that's what I want to do, which is rarely what I want to do to be fair because I keep all my investments in bitcoin and nothing else, but in rare cases that I rather have dollars, I do not use usdt, I just use usd and that way I know that it's the same thing.

Most places have a withdraw option to your bank, and in order to do that you need to have fiat, and then fiat in your account could stay there without you withdrawing it and then you could reinvest it. USDT has nothing over USD at all and people will eventually realize it.

Maybe some think about they are safe from more dumps but they don't realize that their ability gor regaining back what they lose is gone by exchanging their holdings to stable coin. So maybe they should forget about that stable coin option since this is actually not a safe crypto to have whatever scenario we are facing on and this is also not the strongest reason why adoption will possibly happen since they already have those bank provided payment gateway and I think this is more better than stable coins so government will just likely ignore the possibilities of adoption due to those matters. Bitcoin still the strongest currency to have and for sure this is the main reason why the adoption happen.

DanWalker

hero member

Activity: 1904

Merit: 544

We are all the pieces of what we remember.

Quote from: KiaKia on August 28, 2023, 03:10:53 PM

If CBDC does very well many stablecoins won't survive because there will be no need to use them, but I think that's not completely true, because CBDC seems like something that the government will use to monitor people, which can result in less adoption of CBDC, but if the government sees stablecoins to be a threat they can successfully kill each and everyone stable coins available, it will be easier because they aren't Bitcoin.

Even Visa and Mastercard payments are doing fine than stablecoins, the majority of people are used to real-world payment solutions, not stable coins, This is why I believe that CBDC will do very well in the real world, people care less what the government plan might be introducing CBDC, they are going to use it, only Bitcoin maxis won't.

The future of stablecoins will be shaken if the government rolls out CBDC and forces people to use it so they can easily control us. One more thing, if cryptocurrencies are widely recognized and the government requires exchanges to cooperate with local banks to create a gateway for direct trading in local currency, then the stable future of money cents would also be a question.

To answer what the OP is referring to, I don't think increased adoption of stablecoins will be the key to crypto dominance. In my opinion, bitcoin represents cryptocurrency and only when bitcoin is widely accepted and used can it be said that cryptocurrency will dominate.

Synchronice

hero member

Activity: 854

Merit: 772

Watch Bitcoin Documentary - https://t.ly/v0Nim

Quote from: Thehallows on August 27, 2023, 03:47:17 PM

Personally, this development brings me a lot of satisfaction, particularly because my home country's currency faces significant challenges, making stablecoins an attractive alternative for storing value.

You probably don't know what stablecoins are. Stablecoins, like USDT and BUSD represent American dollar in crypto world and to be frank, god knows whether they are really backed by dollar or not. So, one day, you met get surprised when you see your USDTs and they'll be 0.19238 in value.
Stablecoins don't keep the purchasing power at stable level, don't expect that if you were able to buy cookies for 1 USDT yesterday, don't expect that you'll pay 1 USDT tomorrow. They are just dollars, nothing else. If dollar gets inflated and purchasing power decreases, your USDT will also gets less purchasing power.

justdimin

hero member

Activity: 2968

Merit: 670

www.Crypto.Games: Multiple coins, multiple games

Quote from: m2017 on August 28, 2023, 12:06:03 PM

How is your country's currency different from stablecoins? Nothing, damn it! What could be a positive trend in this for currency users? Nothing. If the currency of your country is controlled by the government (central bank), but the stablecoins are controlled by a certain company, which, in both cases, can do whatever they want with their stablecoins, whether it be endless emission, and therefore inflation. Stablecoins are a very, very poor alternative for storing value, only valid for a short period of time. Stablecoins has the same disadvantages as any money - depreciation and unsuitability for storage. Stablecoins can't help countries beat inflation in any way, even though it is better than the national currency. Here need completely different tools.

The problem with stablecoins is that there are already several options on the cryptomarket, and new ones will be created. There was something similar in America, when each state had its own dollar. Which of stablecoins will win is unknown, but the losers will be useless to anyone.

Make a mistake with an investment of stablecoin and you are a beggar.

That is %100 true and this is why I do not use stablecoins at all. People who think that stablecoins are fine are people who are just kidding themselves. I just put my money in fiat and wait for the price to drop if that's what I want to do, which is rarely what I want to do to be fair because I keep all my investments in bitcoin and nothing else, but in rare cases that I rather have dollars, I do not use usdt, I just use usd and that way I know that it's the same thing.

Most places have a withdraw option to your bank, and in order to do that you need to have fiat, and then fiat in your account could stay there without you withdrawing it and then you could reinvest it. USDT has nothing over USD at all and people will eventually realize it.

KingsDen

legendary

Activity: 1078

Merit: 1022

Hello Leo! You can still win.

Quote from: Solosanz on August 28, 2023, 01:29:22 AM

The adoption of stable coins are already big, you can check in CMC where the top 6 trading volumes are dominated by 4 stable coins, the rest is BTC and ETH. This means most people use it for trading, but I don't think it's related to crypto dominance since no one want to hold stable coins where it's centralized, not making any profit and there's a risk of the project turn to be scam. Don't forget about UST and LUNA.

I was thinking the OP is saying about the adoption of CBDCs of different countries and not stable coins. Although CBDCs are stable coins but they are more of fiat than crypto. The government who is avoiding or fighting crypto is still in the crypto space. Whether with or without facilitation, crypto must be widely adopted and it will have high level of dominance.

KiaKia

sr. member

Activity: 658

Merit: 384

If CBDC does very well many stablecoins won't survive because there will be no need to use them, but I think that's not completely true, because CBDC seems like something that the government will use to monitor people, which can result in less adoption of CBDC, but if the government sees stablecoins to be a threat they can successfully kill each and everyone stable coins available, it will be easier because they aren't Bitcoin.

Even Visa and Mastercard payments are doing fine than stablecoins, the majority of people are used to real-world payment solutions, not stable coins, This is why I believe that CBDC will do very well in the real world, people care less what the government plan might be introducing CBDC, they are going to use it, only Bitcoin maxis won't.

STT

legendary

Activity: 3878

Merit: 1411

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

I'd rather bet all stable coins are due to fail, unless they are making enough money in the good times to cover the possible failures in their attempts to peg value to dollar or anything else. They are using leverage and reliant on factors external to themselves, when volatility occurs its likely they are unable to stay perfectly stable.
My number one prediction is volatility is increasing every year, if true stable is a failed meta imo. The actual news headlines do not matter as much ultimately I presume we lead upto the failure of a major currency standard and/or fiscal budget with its national debt; much like Greek debt crisis but on a escalating scale nobody can catch its fall.

tjtonmoy

sr. member

Activity: 1008

Merit: 366

Stablecoins are pegged with physical money (Mostly USD). It's the same as using that physical money. Just a fancy and more centralized way. You can somewhat cover your footprints by using physical assets. But with a stable crypto coin, you are creating more footprints. It is much more complicated than using traditional money. For this reason, I don't think stablecoins adoption alone will do a thing. Trust me, I came to know about it just because I saw your post here.
It's not a major thing that will shake the whole world and start an evolution. I don't use it myself. So what should I say to you? Stick to the OG crypto. Only those will be able to start a thing. If they become accepted, others will follow no matter what.

Also, crypto is not here to dominate. It's a way of making life easier, giving freedom to people, and getting the best of the future world. It doesn't need to dominate anything. It can co-exist with the existing system. That way we can get the best of both worlds. Individuals should be able to choose what they like. It's a free choice.

m2017

legendary

Activity: 1792

Merit: 1296

keep walking, Johnnie

Quote from: Thehallows on August 27, 2023, 03:47:17 PM

~snip

How is your country's currency different from stablecoins? Nothing, damn it! What could be a positive trend in this for currency users? Nothing. If the currency of your country is controlled by the government (central bank), but the stablecoins are controlled by a certain company, which, in both cases, can do whatever they want with their stablecoins, whether it be endless emission, and therefore inflation. Stablecoins are a very, very poor alternative for storing value, only valid for a short period of time. Stablecoins has the same disadvantages as any money - depreciation and unsuitability for storage. Stablecoins can't help countries beat inflation in any way, even though it is better than the national currency. Here need completely different tools.

The problem with stablecoins is that there are already several options on the cryptomarket, and new ones will be created. There was something similar in America, when each state had its own dollar. Which of stablecoins will win is unknown, but the losers will be useless to anyone.

Make a mistake with an investment of stablecoin and you are a beggar.

ultrloa

legendary

Activity: 2702

Merit: 1220

Quote from: Thehallows on August 27, 2023, 08:14:08 PM

Quote from: hatshepsut93 on August 27, 2023, 06:50:27 PM

What value stablecoins settle? Go to any supermarket in the world and you'll see people paying with Visa or Mastecard every single minute. But where are the stablecoin payments? I never encountered a business, even a small one, that accepts stablecoins.

My guess is that most of the activity on stablecoin network is speculative trading, especially by bots. If someone shut down stablecoins tomorrow, the world wouldn't notice. If someone shut down Visa tomorrow, that would be Armageddon.

Many countries are actually adopting crypto as a legal means of payment the only reason visa is still more in use is because many firms are not accepting crypto payments yet and I mean your supermarkets and other physical business that uses faits. And for now there isn't much demand for crypto payments for offline vendors. And I think you haven't read the article yet to see what I'm really talking bout

Just don't expect to much about adoption since if we talk about payment terms which is more secured then banking system can offer something more reliable and trusted than those stable coins in the market.

And I don't think its adoption will gain anything positive to the whole crypto since we cannot see some great price change with those type of coins. That's why we hear a lot of noise about bitcoin since it has a potential to rise up and can multiply the earnings of each holder so I guess that condition attract many people including those institutional investors adopt bitcoin.

stompix

legendary

Activity: 2828

Merit: 6108

Jambler.io

Quote from: Thehallows on August 27, 2023, 03:47:17 PM

The total value settled through stablecoins last year approached that of Visa's $11.6 trillion figure.

Comparing apples and socks, not even oranges!

Those settlements you and the author talk about are the sum of moved coins, that's the lamest indicator of all, I can move $1000 from my exchange account to my address, then split it in $500, see a dip on the market move back to an exchange and there you have it, $2500 of volume without "settling" a thing.
Visa is strictly for payments, you go buy a can of soda you pay, and the money leaves one person's account and ends up in another, with coins, it can be none, even if we compare it with banking volume, which even for Europe alone stands at 800 billion a day, that's 30x all the volume of stablecoins transaction and it's still not a fair comparison.

Tron has 1700000 transactions a day, Visa has 150 million a day, roughly as much as all USDT trasnctosn on eth in history!

Quote from: hatshepsut93 on August 27, 2023, 06:50:27 PM

What value stablecoins settle? Go to any supermarket in the world and you'll see people paying with Visa or Mastecard every single minute. But where are the stablecoin payments? I never encountered a business, even a small one, that accepts stablecoins.
My guess is that most of the activity on stablecoin network is speculative trading, especially by bots. If someone shut down stablecoins tomorrow, the world wouldn't notice. If someone shut down Visa tomorrow, that would be Armageddon.

The funny part is that Visa shutting down would kill a ton of so-called crypto cards, including Binance, thus cutting a huge chunk of stable coins' usefulness. As for the supermarket stuff, yeah, I haven't managed to get close to 100:1 when it comes to Visa vs BTC , when it's Vis vs stablecoins is 1000:0.

stadus

legendary

Activity: 3080

Merit: 1292

Hhampuz for Campaign management

Quote from: yhiaali3 on August 28, 2023, 07:04:18 AM

This is the direction that governments want people to go, moving towards centralized stablecoins and leaving Bitcoin and the decentralized privacy-preserving cryptocurrencies.

I somewhat agree with you on that point. Cryptocurrency was originally designed to be decentralized, offering genuine privacy. Unfortunately, government interventions are altering the fundamental nature of crypto through regulations. In my opinion, stablecoins should primarily be reserved for trading, while transactions outside of exchanges should involve decentralized coins, allowing us to maintain a degree of anonymity.

It's difficult to determine how we can preserve the anonymity we seek, especially since exchanges are also becoming regulated. The potential for enjoying the benefits of cryptocurrency and its anonymity might only become feasible when it gains widespread acceptance. However, this raises questions about whether such acceptance can occur while governments are closely monitoring our activities.

yhiaali3

legendary

Activity: 1680

Merit: 1853

#SWGT CERTIK Audited

Unlike you, I am not optimistic about the spread of stablecoin payments around the world. Stablecoin is no different from fiat, and may even be worse.

Most of the Stablecoins are centralized and against privacy, unlike Bitcoin, so you see that governments condone them and may sometimes encourage them, as happened with the Paypal Stablecoin PYUSD recently.

This is the direction that governments want people to go, moving towards centralized stablecoins and leaving Bitcoin and the decentralized privacy-preserving cryptocurrencies.

davis196

hero member

Activity: 2954

Merit: 906

Centralized companies like Paypal, VISA and Mastercard being positive towards stablecoins? I wonder why? Grin

Maybe the reason why such centralized companies are positive towards stablecoins is because the stablecoins are a centralized payment system.
The issuer behind the stablecoins holds a certain reserve of fiat currency, which is backing the value of the coin. What if this reserve doesn't exist? Can a stablecoin survive without being backed by anything?
Why would you use stablecoins backed by USD for buying goods and services, when you could simply use USD?

Texac

hero member

Activity: 2086

Merit: 513

Degens.bet - On-chain 1000x Futures

Stable coin does not represent the entire cryptocurrency industry and it is no different from currency in its digital form. so I don't think that proves crypto dominance or that cryptocurrencies are being used more than other traditional means. even if people use more stablecoins than fiat or banks, I don't see that having any positive effect on making bitcoin more popular.
Ultimately, what is happening with stablecoin usage proves only one thing, people still prefer centralized systems and services over decentralized ones.

_act_

hero member

Activity: 868

Merit: 1094

If there are no stable coins, there would be increasing crypto adoption. Without any cryptocurrencues, including stable coins, there is nothing that can stop bitcoin adoption.

Quote from: Thehallows on August 27, 2023, 03:47:17 PM

Increase in stable coins adoption might just be the key to crpyto dominance.

Bitcoin does not depend on stable coins.

Quote from: Thehallows on August 27, 2023, 03:47:17 PM

I stumbled upon a captivating news piece online titled 'Stablecoins Settled as Much Value as Visa in 2022.' It's quite intriguing. Lately, I've been engaged in discussions with my friends about the implications of the growing adoption of stablecoins as a payment option in the current global landscape. To me, it appears to be a positive trend for the world of cryptocurrenciesand us crypto users. More individuals are becoming acquainted with crypto, and it's increasingly becoming a preferred choice for many.

Most stable coins are pegged with United States dollar which is why some countries will not accept it. What I think would be common that is digital are CBDCs. CBDCs are also still fiat.

For payment, I will prefer to use bitcoin if it is cryptocurrencies that you are talking about.

noorman0

hero member

Activity: 1764

Merit: 694

[Nope]No hype delivers more than hope

Since its introduction, crypto has been synonymous with decentralization and it should stay that way. While it is very central in nature, the presence of stablecoins actually only supports the needs of speculators for trade, they do not affect this type of financial revolution.

As for dominance, I don't think there has been any change due to the fact that fiat money had dominated before the crypto era. Sablecoins are just another representation of fiat.

coupable

hero member

Activity: 2338

Merit: 757

Quote from: Solosanz on August 28, 2023, 01:29:22 AM

The adoption of stable coins are already big, you can check in CMC where the top 6 trading volumes are dominated by 4 stable coins, the rest is BTC and ETH. This means most people use it for trading, but I don't think it's related to crypto dominance since no one want to hold stable coins where it's centralized, not making any profit and there's a risk of the project turn to be scam. Don't forget about UST and LUNA.

What I don't understand in the OP's position is that he is trying to connect the dominance of stablecoins in the digital asset market with the dominance that crypto will have as a direct result of that. This assumes that stablecoins are considered cryptocurrencies when they are just another form of digital fiat currencies. These stable currencies derive their value from the fiat currency (mainly the dollar), and this also represents their biggest problem at the same time, since most of them are issued without sufficient dollar reserve cover.
As for the uses, the most important areas of using stable currencies is in the field of trading to freeze the price in cases of a sharp decline, and I have not heard that these currencies are used in shops and commercial exchanges in general.

Thehallows

newbie

Activity: 17

Merit: 0

Quote from: dothebeats on August 28, 2023, 01:23:51 AM

The reality is stablecoins are not being adapted the way we all wish they would be. Yes, there may be some stores and organizations supporting it as a means of payment, but in what percentage does that just fall? It is nothing compared to the dependency of people on Visa and Mastercard payments. Heck, even small boutiques post signs that state that they accept those two means of payment because they know people dominantly use it. If stable coins disappear, the majority of the world will not care about it; remove Visa and Mastercard and there will be a big problem that will lead to debates and international discussions.

Yeah i do understand your point of view about visa and Mastercard. But you said if 'stablecoins disappear nobody will care' but that's not true. How would you sell your crypto assets . Would you take your bitcoin to a bank in exchange for fait . The entire world of crypto exchange and its value in a way or two rest upon the presence of stablecoins as a currency. Stablecoins have proven to be a very important part of the crypto ecosystem iss the only save heaven in a extreme volatile market , other crypto assets like BTC can not be used for everyday transactions because their price fluctuations, the use of stablecoins as an exchange means has increased vastly in recent years .
Stablecoins are really that important for the crypto ecosystem

Kakmakr

legendary

Activity: 3430

Merit: 1957

Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

The thing about stablecoins is this.... it was developed to mimic fiat currencies and that is it's ultimate downfall. Other Crypto coins have good volatility and that help people to make good profits, if they use Crypto currency as an investment. (A lot of them even beat inflation)

The stablecoins are used to park money, when there are too much volatility and that does not increase it's utility. There are also more benefits to other Crypto currencies, like Smart contracts and side chain developments.

Topic: Increase in stable coins adoption might just be the key to crpyto dominance. - page 3. (Read 522 times)