Topic: India-China border tensions - page 5. (Read 1159 times)

It has started and sadly, there's this news.

LAC face-off: 20 soliders die in worst China clash in 53 years

---

But I don't understand but this news tells that it's 45 years.

20 Indian soldiers killed in first deadly clashes with Chinese troops in 45 years

This is true but I also don't think that there will be an affection for cryptocurrency with this tension. Meanwhile, most of the countries are dealing with Covid19 and are still in recovery with the damage that it has brought economically. Then this tension has come up.

Look at how quiet everyone's being compared to when India and Pakistan kick off. All parties know this is one fight they don't want to escalate. This is will be a sad footnote that'll be buried rapidly. There'll be plenty more in future. None of them will lead to anything further.

As we know that the Indian conflict in China is only a form of showing off the power between the two and will not affect war. The latter is due to India carrying out infrastructure development in areas close to the demarcation line or known as the actual control line (LAC). The China-India conflict will not extend to a two-state war or a nuclear war where there is no fundamental ideological cross between India and China, besides that the two countries enjoy mutual economic relations as trading partners.

The escalation of tension between China and India is not solely the desire of the two countries but rather because it is driven by the interests of other parties. India is used as a proxy by the United States to be present in the Asian region especially Southeast Asia which is the center of China's foreign interests in the future as an energy self-sufficiency country. So the Indian conflict in China is an extension of competition between China and America.

The success of 5.0 colonialism that was used by China, openly disrupted the American hegemony that was finally fought by Trump. Economically, China's position is more needed in Asia than in America. China is seen as having slightly more political power and influence than Americans in Southeast Asia today and far more power compared to America.

The reason cryptocurrency is mentioned here is because it is 65% of Global Bitcoin Hashrate Concentrated in China.
The United States has blamed China for the origin and spread of the coronavirus, Since the US has good relations with India, the US would like to join hands with other countries and try to corner China.
My guess is that if China is cornered in any way, it will have an impact on the overall trade and commerce, so it will have an impact on cryptocurrency as well.

It's more of a geopolitical issue, what has cryptocurrency has to do with it? If there is an impact, it will be minimal, perhaps just a couple of days of uncertainty again, but it doesn't mean that we are going to be affected long term. On the contrary, we may have to see bitcoin on the headline again and being promoted as a good asset to hedge Chinese or Indian wealth of the looming war (I hope not!)

I think the reason that there is a tension between these two nuclear nation is that China is paving a new Silk Road, it is called Belt Road Initiative and I think that India will be in the path so they have to negotiate terms with these nuclear nation without escalating a possible war, I do not say that it is the objective truth but I think that China's project to reach out the world through trade is very ambitious and promising at the same time. The economic stability of a country does not shake that much when there is a tension but I think it will show its cracks sooner or later.

I think China now has a well developed standard for building up tensions between other countries like the others have said, it could be a negotiation tactic or something if India are showing similar tensions. I also don't think Indias army is anywhere close to the strength of China (but I might be wrong on this as I haven't studied the two). There may already be tensions due to china's cover-up of the virus and a lot of people seem to think they weren't badly affected by it which could be a stance a lot of governments take (even though a lot of sources have proven China took quite a hit to its economy and population).

China is facing or has created a tense atmosphere across her borders. It has territorial disputes with Japan, Taiwan, Vietnam, Malaysia, Indonesia, and so on. Not to mention the countless other disputes unrelated to territory. But still China is the largest trading nation in the world. It is the largest exporting country in the world.

So I would say that the China-India border issue is not much of an issue unless it escalates into a full blown war. For the meantime, international trade will be business as usual.

Cryptocurrency is out of that picture.

Its always about making money when it comes to making negotiations with China. If they see they can generate income for partnership instead, they'd push it for both countries to benefit. Weren't they the ones who also funded the trains along Himalayas mountain?

India could take this as an opportunity to hang with great countries like their neighbor who isn't very much affected by the ongoing crisis.

China is also a friendly country most especially if all about business transaction. I think this is a symbolism of a system to principle on both country of INDIA and CHINA against with consistent power and beside it is basically part of their business strategy even the real border law is oppositely enforce ,and I respectfully believe that someday the proper face-off has actually happen and unity.

The way the two countries are facing each other on the China-India border is creating a tense atmosphere. If the conflict escalates, I think it will have an impact on international trade and cryptocurrency, what do you think?