Topic: InflationCoin - IFLT - 4% POS - SourceForge Project of the week 2018 - page 37. (Read 96986 times)
December 06, 2017, 02:04:34 AM
That is great news, DarkStar! Looking forward to the next leap for mankind
December 05, 2017, 11:32:56 PM
Yes, absolutely agree to this. The volume is basically gone as nobody wants to sell for subSatoshis and rather sit on their stash of coins. It would go hand in hand, price moves, trading moves the price and vice versa.
Just need to get this started somehow and make it interesting. Could be connected do a project, for instance micropayments. But this needs a huge effort as it would mean real world deployment, not just playing around online with some artificial coin with no use.
Integration with TOR may be something that could be done, people are interested in such things, look at the DeepOnion hype. And they did not really anything else than copying code from BitcoinPlus and some others. Could also be done for IFLT.
Just need to get this started somehow and make it interesting. Could be connected do a project, for instance micropayments. But this needs a huge effort as it would mean real world deployment, not just playing around online with some artificial coin with no use.
Integration with TOR may be something that could be done, people are interested in such things, look at the DeepOnion hype. And they did not really anything else than copying code from BitcoinPlus and some others. Could also be done for IFLT.
DeepOnion hype is real! I feel like I only see it because I'm super into it, but it feels good to see it being talked about elsewhere! However, it is full of features... I don't think TOR alone would save IFLT. The strength of IFLT is the wallet! I'd love to see more wallet features and upgrades.
You should already be able to use the InflationCoin client with TOR or VPN through standard software. The Bitcoin wiki also gives instructions here on how to connect to an enabled TOR server connection through the proxy settings for running your client/node as a hidden service.
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Tor
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/tor.md
That's interesting! Good to know.
I appreciate that it is built in to Onion, but it is certainly neat that you can add it yourself to things!
Which brings me to IFLT again, I appreciate its wallet and I see a lot of people here liking it too! I like the idea of tweaking the wallet and making it better all the time. What wallet features does IFLT lack that you'd like to see?
For next generation features if possible, we're looking to upgrade to the new Litecoin wallet after it's released. Here is the concept design overview by Franklyn.
https://medium.com/litecoin-foundation/redesigning-litecoin-core-with-lightning-capabilities-3a8ebbea590a
For the standard wallet that's out right now, we're looking implement a transaction mixer for more confidential or private operations. The current mobile wallet also has some cosmetic issues that are going to be ironed out in future versions.
Thank you for the update
December 05, 2017, 04:04:52 PM
Yes, absolutely agree to this. The volume is basically gone as nobody wants to sell for subSatoshis and rather sit on their stash of coins. It would go hand in hand, price moves, trading moves the price and vice versa.
Just need to get this started somehow and make it interesting. Could be connected do a project, for instance micropayments. But this needs a huge effort as it would mean real world deployment, not just playing around online with some artificial coin with no use.
Integration with TOR may be something that could be done, people are interested in such things, look at the DeepOnion hype. And they did not really anything else than copying code from BitcoinPlus and some others. Could also be done for IFLT.
Just need to get this started somehow and make it interesting. Could be connected do a project, for instance micropayments. But this needs a huge effort as it would mean real world deployment, not just playing around online with some artificial coin with no use.
Integration with TOR may be something that could be done, people are interested in such things, look at the DeepOnion hype. And they did not really anything else than copying code from BitcoinPlus and some others. Could also be done for IFLT.
DeepOnion hype is real! I feel like I only see it because I'm super into it, but it feels good to see it being talked about elsewhere! However, it is full of features... I don't think TOR alone would save IFLT. The strength of IFLT is the wallet! I'd love to see more wallet features and upgrades.
You should already be able to use the InflationCoin client with TOR or VPN through standard software. The Bitcoin wiki also gives instructions here on how to connect to an enabled TOR server connection through the proxy settings for running your client/node as a hidden service.
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Tor
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/tor.md
That's interesting! Good to know.
I appreciate that it is built in to Onion, but it is certainly neat that you can add it yourself to things!
Which brings me to IFLT again, I appreciate its wallet and I see a lot of people here liking it too! I like the idea of tweaking the wallet and making it better all the time. What wallet features does IFLT lack that you'd like to see?
For next generation features if possible, we're looking to upgrade to the new Litecoin wallet after it's released. Here is the concept design overview by Franklyn.
https://medium.com/litecoin-foundation/redesigning-litecoin-core-with-lightning-capabilities-3a8ebbea590a
For the standard wallet that's out right now, we're looking implement a transaction mixer for more confidential or private operations. The current mobile wallet also has some cosmetic issues that are going to be ironed out in future versions.
December 05, 2017, 02:30:13 PM
Yes, absolutely agree to this. The volume is basically gone as nobody wants to sell for subSatoshis and rather sit on their stash of coins. It would go hand in hand, price moves, trading moves the price and vice versa.
Just need to get this started somehow and make it interesting. Could be connected do a project, for instance micropayments. But this needs a huge effort as it would mean real world deployment, not just playing around online with some artificial coin with no use.
Integration with TOR may be something that could be done, people are interested in such things, look at the DeepOnion hype. And they did not really anything else than copying code from BitcoinPlus and some others. Could also be done for IFLT.
Just need to get this started somehow and make it interesting. Could be connected do a project, for instance micropayments. But this needs a huge effort as it would mean real world deployment, not just playing around online with some artificial coin with no use.
Integration with TOR may be something that could be done, people are interested in such things, look at the DeepOnion hype. And they did not really anything else than copying code from BitcoinPlus and some others. Could also be done for IFLT.
DeepOnion hype is real! I feel like I only see it because I'm super into it, but it feels good to see it being talked about elsewhere! However, it is full of features... I don't think TOR alone would save IFLT. The strength of IFLT is the wallet! I'd love to see more wallet features and upgrades.
You should already be able to use the InflationCoin client with TOR or VPN through standard software. The Bitcoin wiki also gives instructions here on how to connect to an enabled TOR server connection through the proxy settings for running your client/node as a hidden service.
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Tor
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/tor.md
That's interesting! Good to know.
I appreciate that it is built in to Onion, but it is certainly neat that you can add it yourself to things!
Which brings me to IFLT again, I appreciate its wallet and I see a lot of people here liking it too! I like the idea of tweaking the wallet and making it better all the time. What wallet features does IFLT lack that you'd like to see?
December 05, 2017, 01:02:59 PM
I'm still testing, it has a number of SD read/write accesses, which I don't really like. I just see the blinking LED. It's not swapping though. So maybe the Pihole reading from its database. Anyways, SD cards are cheap.
I can upload the iflt daemon, the headless one. I run it on DietPi, that is Debian and should also work on the Raspberry.
I can upload the iflt daemon, the headless one. I run it on DietPi, that is Debian and should also work on the Raspberry.
December 05, 2017, 11:49:55 AM
Excellent update. I have a few rpi3's sitting around and its been months ive been thinking about running them for staking.
December 05, 2017, 05:40:13 AM
The blockchain download on the OrangePi finally completed after some days. Seems what takes time is the computing of the data, not the data itself, at least my impression. Importing the private key also took a while. But I guess that is normal on such limited hardware.
Good news is, staking is finally up and running, I try with 5m IFLT first, should throw something out tomorrow I hope.
Memory usage ~60% from 512MB. This is shared with Pi-Hole and running DHCP server. Probably could get another wallet staking too before memory is used up.
Good news is, staking is finally up and running, I try with 5m IFLT first, should throw something out tomorrow I hope.
Code:
~$ ifltd getstakinginfo
{
"enabled" : true,
"staking" : true,
"errors" : "",
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 589.57079088,
"search-interval" : 1,
"weight" : 14692242,
"netstakeweight" : 43266497758,
"expectedtime" : 176691
}
{
"enabled" : true,
"staking" : true,
"errors" : "",
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 589.57079088,
"search-interval" : 1,
"weight" : 14692242,
"netstakeweight" : 43266497758,
"expectedtime" : 176691
}
Memory usage ~60% from 512MB. This is shared with Pi-Hole and running DHCP server. Probably could get another wallet staking too before memory is used up.
December 04, 2017, 11:23:28 PM
@Darkstar, please, what is the latest source? Simple question.
The hub mode version has some additional seed nodes added besides the main changes but besides that, on the main source code page https://github.com/FermiGBM/inflationcoin had the latest qt version updated and cryptochat's nodes hardcoded in from the developer's original repository. I also already answered this question earlier in the thread.
December 04, 2017, 06:57:32 PM
@Darkstar, please, what is the latest source? Simple question.
The hub mode version has some additional seed nodes added besides the main changes but besides that, on the main source code page https://github.com/FermiGBM/inflationcoin had the latest qt version updated and cryptochat's nodes hardcoded in from the developer's original repository. I also already answered this question earlier in the thread.
December 04, 2017, 04:45:35 PM
The reduction of the reward has not reactivated this currency. It seems clear that there is not too much demand. A pity we will see if there are new developments to come.
could have little patience on devs and procress.
Agreed. I think staking and waiting for 2018 and its new cycle is the best answer.
I agree with that. I will just keep staking and hope for the best. Even at such a low price i don't see this coin dying because of the active community and so many people staking, keeping the chain alive. I think for this reason exchanges don't unlist the coin, because they do see a future for it.
We also have to remember with the rise of Bitcoin its hard for a coin like this to gain momentum with the current market prices.
I only stake about 5500000 million coins and even at 80% i still get great staking rewards and its a fun coin to stake no matter what.
I don't get discouraged when devs are silent for a little while either because it could tell us that they are working on future developments for this coin. So we'll just have to wait and see but i will remain a dedicated Inflationcoin fan
December 04, 2017, 03:05:56 PM
The reduction of the reward has not reactivated this currency. It seems clear that there is not too much demand. A pity we will see if there are new developments to come.
could have little patience on devs and procress.
Agreed. I think staking and waiting for 2018 and its new cycle is the best answer.
December 04, 2017, 02:58:22 PM
The reduction of the reward has not reactivated this currency. It seems clear that there is not too much demand. A pity we will see if there are new developments to come.
could have little patience on devs and procress.
December 04, 2017, 10:30:19 AM
The reduction of the reward has not reactivated this currency. It seems clear that there is not too much demand. A pity we will see if there are new developments to come.
December 04, 2017, 09:39:20 AM
I would certainly support a coin burn, to reduce the supply a little bit, attracting additional investors. I feel like there is so much more we could do here thought...maybe a tether to an actual currency?
I don't get it, the big supply is actually what would make IFLT applicable to the real world, small transaction, active trade, not a limited value storage vehicle like Bitcoin. But people like to do this in Satoshis, lol, it only complicates things, use full coins. Like NEO does.
December 04, 2017, 06:24:42 AM
I would certainly support a coin burn, to reduce the supply a little bit, attracting additional investors. I feel like there is so much more we could do here thought...maybe a tether to an actual currency?
December 03, 2017, 10:27:43 PM
@Darkstar, please, what is the latest source? Simple question.
December 03, 2017, 07:48:18 PM
Yes, absolutely agree to this. The volume is basically gone as nobody wants to sell for subSatoshis and rather sit on their stash of coins. It would go hand in hand, price moves, trading moves the price and vice versa.
Just need to get this started somehow and make it interesting. Could be connected do a project, for instance micropayments. But this needs a huge effort as it would mean real world deployment, not just playing around online with some artificial coin with no use.
Integration with TOR may be something that could be done, people are interested in such things, look at the DeepOnion hype. And they did not really anything else than copying code from BitcoinPlus and some others. Could also be done for IFLT.
Just need to get this started somehow and make it interesting. Could be connected do a project, for instance micropayments. But this needs a huge effort as it would mean real world deployment, not just playing around online with some artificial coin with no use.
Integration with TOR may be something that could be done, people are interested in such things, look at the DeepOnion hype. And they did not really anything else than copying code from BitcoinPlus and some others. Could also be done for IFLT.
DeepOnion hype is real! I feel like I only see it because I'm super into it, but it feels good to see it being talked about elsewhere! However, it is full of features... I don't think TOR alone would save IFLT. The strength of IFLT is the wallet! I'd love to see more wallet features and upgrades.
You should already be able to use the InflationCoin client with TOR or VPN through standard software. The Bitcoin wiki also gives instructions here on how to connect to an enabled TOR server connection through the proxy settings for running your client/node as a hidden service.
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Tor
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/doc/tor.md
December 03, 2017, 01:28:58 PM
Who is in charge now?
December 03, 2017, 09:17:29 AM
@Darkstar
Just to confirm this again, what is the latest source. I took that hub version. May play around with the TOR code a bit, maybe it works, maybe it's complicated, but would be a cool feature to have, no?
Just to confirm this again, what is the latest source. I took that hub version. May play around with the TOR code a bit, maybe it works, maybe it's complicated, but would be a cool feature to have, no?
December 03, 2017, 04:30:48 AM
DeepOnion hype is real! I feel like I only see it because I'm super into it, but it feels good to see it being talked about elsewhere! However, it is full of features... I don't think TOR alone would save IFLT. The strength of IFLT is the wallet! I'd love to see more wallet features and upgrades.
Well, I'm very critical on that. They don't have any real features besides TOR, but they brag about whatever should come in the future without implementing it. Up to you if you fall for marketing gimmicks .But for IFLT, that could really be implemented, starting with TOR and then coin mixing and ring signatures. The code is already there. Look at PIVX. That would make a huge differentiator, and given the high supply of coins it could work out in the real world. But for this we'd need some dedicated developers.
Jump to: