Topic: InflationCoin - IFLT - 4% POS - SourceForge Project of the week 2018 - page 38. (Read 96986 times)

Rebranding would be a good idea, the name is not good and carries some negative message.

I would however not change the amount of coins or burn them. It's good to have a lot of them if you want to do the micropayment stuff. So more so better. Look at IOTA, they have Mega and Giga IOTA. And they target a similar thing, internet of things with micro transactions. Does not need to be monetary, your coffee machine wont pay your waterfilter, but some tiny transaction is still there.

So maybe a step forward would be a new name, and a name for the commas, like 1000000 IFLT become 1 . Or maybe 1000 IFLT become something whatever. Keep the actual coins, no need to burn them.

Yes, absolutely agree to this. The volume is basically gone as nobody wants to sell for subSatoshis and rather sit on their stash of coins. It would go hand in hand, price moves, trading moves the price and vice versa.

Just need to get this started somehow and make it interesting. Could be connected do a project, for instance micropayments. But this needs a huge effort as it would mean real world deployment, not just playing around online with some artificial coin with no use.

Integration with TOR may be something that could be done, people are interested in such things, look at the DeepOnion hype. And they did not really anything else than copying code from BitcoinPlus and some others. Could also be done for IFLT.

Yes, absolutely agree to this. The volume is basically gone as nobody wants to sell for subSatoshis and rather sit on their stash of coins. It would go hand in hand, price moves, trading moves the price and vice versa.

Just need to get this started somehow and make it interesting. Could be connected do a project, for instance micropayments. But this needs a huge effort as it would mean real world deployment, not just playing around online with some artificial coin with no use.

Integration with TOR may be something that could be done, people are interested in such things, look at the DeepOnion hype. And they did not really anything else than copying code from BitcoinPlus and some others. Could also be done for IFLT.

The coin already has plenty of momentum to last for years and more to come in my opinion if not as long as the timecycles of BTC, with more implementations and adaptations in the works while the current team is here. The information has been healthily updated over time and will continue that way. Sidechains to introduce more functionality such as Smart Coins and instant transactions on the Ripple, Stellar, and Bitshares networks seem like a more viable option currently that don't require hard forks, and the basic foundations have already been created. We would like to do something more original then masternodes on the main chain unless a viable service that actively uses them becomes available. Right now cross chain atomic swaps are already compatible on the main chain via BlocknetDX, and are also interested in adapting to new versions of wallets such as Litecoin's when it's finally released.

Besides that, we'd like to see a mixer for confidential transactions implemented in a future version of the wallet which won't require a hard fork, as private transactions seem to be a basic function of all the major cryptocurrencies available. Dash also utilizes a mixer, Zk-snarks are being implemented on Ethereum, and mixing services are already available for Bitcoin and Litecoin on various websites. As cryptocurrency becomes more valuable, these types of things should become standard practice to protect users and also lower chances of central failure. Youtuber Trevon James was also recently hacked and robbed of 111 BTC from one of his main cryptocurrency addresses, but was also dealing giveaways on every video directly from his main account address which isn't very wise, and also storing his wallet with a 3rd party (Exodus) that has access to more information that puts him in more risk or danger of attacks/schemes. A private light client or full node core wallet for him to store his funds on would've been a better option.

We believe the inflation rate with sharp yearly deflation over 4 years is working well, as it introduces the elements of dependency into asset's system compared something that starts out with no users using a coin's utility. The Android wallet still needs a bit more cosmetic work and improvements will be done in the future as more time and funding becomes available.



It's under review of investment performance right now in additional hedges, and other alternate plans are in the works as we monitored the asset performance on their website versus the costs. The cryptocurrency targets may reach extreme levels in the future that would scare away the usual typical investors especially one managed by a small community starting out, so a smaller hedge such as IFLT/USD managed by private investors with long term plans and regulated funding pools may be a better option. Coinexchange.io has already offered a more reasonable price earlier this year and is aimed to be released on for certain within the reasonable price ranges.

atomic swap i think is good idea for this coin

Yes, I know that. I however need the daemon, not the qt version. I'm trying now with the FermiGBM sources. They seem to be the latest available.

Found this one: https://github.com/FermiGBM/inflationcoin

Not the hub mode, the master. Is that the latest source for the standard wallet? Thanks!

this coin is on coinsmarket, and available in doge market.

when there were sales only for satoshi, the price was always higher than the current one. but as soon as you opened the opportunity to buy for other coins, the price immediately dropped below. so make your own conclusions.but as soon as yobit was opened the opportunity to buy for other coins, the price immediately fell below. so make your own conclusions.And while the price will be below 1 satoshi no one will buy it.