In promoting the ICO, there are some elements. One of them is through the bounty program. I will try to answer the questions based on my personal opinion.
1. Yes, it will give influence to the new ICO. At least, in promoting the ICO. Bounty aims for promoting the new projects through some campaigns. Commonly the most influence is through the signature program (posting in the forum Bitcointalk). But there are also other ways to promote the ICO : Social media, youtube, blog or web, mand others.
2. If the bounty participant is restricted, I think that it will be very nice for the participants itself. SO, they will compete to be the early participant to promote the ICO.
Topic: Influence of Bounty Participants - page 18. (Read 35540 times)
Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.
I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?
I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?
The bounty participants are the most important success factors for ICOs
This method is also the most suitable for the owners of the project
- Because they will pay only in the case of the success of the sale
- as the owners of the project are those who determine the value of the bonuses.
- as the payment by the project Token .
All of these factors make the option of bounty participants better than advertising companies
The restriction of participation is subject to the campaign manager and his vision.
I think that the more advertizing, the it will be better for the project. The small number of participants limits the project in advertizing. It is also necessary to consider that not all advertizing of the accepted participants will be effective.
Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.
I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
Only projects can answer that. We really don't know the numbers because I haven't seen any ICO acknowledging that bounty participants really bring investors on their project.
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?
Hard to say but for sure exposure will be limited, imagine hundred of bounty hunters promoting your project as compare to 50? Of course more is better. As for dumping, its been a practice ever since, I don't know how's its a problem now. The issue is that we're in the bear market that's why we're seeing it. But last year, no one was complaining about this practice.
Bounty hunters are the back bone of all project , just like making a press release about a project and creating awareness to many people about the project which go a long way for the success of the project .
But on the aspect of dumping I totally disagree with that cause most of the hunters are the holder we have and more so if s token sold 70mln token and just 1mln was giving to bounty hunters tell me how that will affect the dip, investors are the major dumper , who bought at bonus rate and have many ico to buy will surely dump to move on to another token cause all ico buyer are in cause of bonus to have profit and once it hit exchange they dump and move on.
I have a project that lock hunters token for 90days after listing on exchange and during these time the token dump 95% and hunter are yet to receive their token then who dump and am sure if they distribute to hunter before now , everyone will claim they are the cause if the price dip but here they are without token and it dump like something else.
But on the aspect of dumping I totally disagree with that cause most of the hunters are the holder we have and more so if s token sold 70mln token and just 1mln was giving to bounty hunters tell me how that will affect the dip, investors are the major dumper , who bought at bonus rate and have many ico to buy will surely dump to move on to another token cause all ico buyer are in cause of bonus to have profit and once it hit exchange they dump and move on.
I have a project that lock hunters token for 90days after listing on exchange and during these time the token dump 95% and hunter are yet to receive their token then who dump and am sure if they distribute to hunter before now , everyone will claim they are the cause if the price dip but here they are without token and it dump like something else.
The success of the project does not depend on the number of participants in the bounty program. a greater number of participants only affect the fact that payments are getting smaller and bigger for nothing 
Bounty participants are the most important characters that can not be fililtered out cause they hold the marketing section in ICOs so it will be very difficult to do without them but sometimes they get dissatisfied cause of payments
key participants there were not too make the project could be said to be successful. Indeed it will expand its marketing but which will still determine whether worth to invest is the investor itself. When this restricted certainly also not be a problem because it will certainly have an impact both for the bounty hunter because of the results they will get a large can.
I think that bounty participants are very important for project marketing. They help project grow and almost for free. You dont have to pay them in real money, you will pay them in tokens and you can create as many tokens as you want.
Bounty hunting and in essence bounty hunters play a key role to the publicity and establishment of any serious project. This is why 90% of projects reserve special funds for engaging the services of hunters. Hunters help a lot in propagating the news about these projects and at a cheaper fee than traditional advertising methods. The success of any project depends a great deal on marketing and advertising which hunters are known for. Even established projects do find it necessary sometimes to run a post ico bounty just to boost awareness. Concerning dumping, Bounty hunters get paid for services done and it is their right to dump at whatever price they deem fit and recoup some profits for job done which is normal.
In my opinion, bounty participants make a significant contribution to the development of the project and its community. But I think a lot depends on the bounty of the Manager and its terms. Of course, bounty campaigns with participant limits look much more attractive, than campaigns with a number of participants. The success of the project is influenced by the team, the idea, its implementation and application.
Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.
I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?
I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?
Participants in the bounty campaigns can be considered investors of a new project, only they invest not their money but their time. All of them want to make good money just like other investors.
Unfortunately, many of the bounty hunters are ready to sell their tokens at any price, so often after paying them rewards, the token rate drops in price.
Personally I think that the amount of participants should be limited till that amount where they may really do their best for the developing of the project, and to make the participants being happy with good rewards. And the work of the participants should be of good quality.
Well, how I did the bounty I remembered a pattern that usually if there are many participants in the bounty it is possible to tell more likely to have been successful , and when not a lot of people often turned out to be a Scam!
bou tu campaigms have their right to exist but you need to remember that they aee just one of the possible varienr for you Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.
I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?
there arr a lot of good bounty ca,paigns butbyou can not be sure that you have chosen the right one so you shoyld better be careful I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?
Well, how I did the bounty I remembered a pattern that usually if there are many participants in the bounty it is possible to tell more likely to have been successful , and when not a lot of people often turned out to be a Scam!
bounty hunters really do big job - it is advertisement for projects also very often bounty hunters investing in projects
Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.
I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?
The influence of bounty hunters and participants can not be over emphasised as it has greatly been a contributing factor to the success of projects it has been contracted for. The sourcing of funds has been a great deal for project team and that has been the need for the raising of funds through the hunters and the industry of hunting and also kept its own part of the bargain. I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?
full member
Activity: 294
Merit: 101
Lead generation one-stop shop platform powered AI
I think that the number of bounty participants does not affect the success of the project. This only determines the amount of rewards that can be obtained (the more people the less reward for each)
In my opinion, it is clear that without the participants of the ICO generosity campaign, no one ICO project will be able to raise the necessary funds, because potential investors will not be aware of such a project. Therefore, the participants of the ICO generosity campaign play a very large role. Further, it depends only on the prospects of the ICO project whether the ICO team will raise funds or not.
Jump to: