Topic: Influence of Bounty Participants - page 21. (Read 35515 times)
The most important thing in the project is an interesting and new idea and not participants of the bounty companies on which everything is dumped when the project failed.
Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.
I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?
The bounty participants were spreading the massage anywhere and this gives a lot of influence to the demand of the platform itself. marketing is a key remember the bounty participants can help the project to get a lot of vote to be listed on the big exchange site too. AFAIK the restriction will be created to make the participants will do something that will give a bad impact to the project., I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?
Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.
I just came to realized that most of the bounty tokens pool isn't that much because its only around 1% so they shouldn't be blamed if these bounty participants are dumping those tokens.I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
It gives exposure to the project having it on their tweets, posts and signature and other means of advertisement.1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?
There are projects that didn't even conduct a bounty so contribution to success of a new project depends really on the development. 
dumping is not a problem for a good project. if they have strong idea. team and enough money, investors will buy cheap bounty coins with pleasure.
Bounty participants are really important for the new project, it spread awareness to the public and could attract more investors, the more nuber of participants will be good for the project because it can advertise at wider range, but it won't benefit the participants because the earning will be less
Surely there is a lot of influence about the participants, and this will be a good progress for the future. A project that can achieve success and achieve goals will require participants to help. This is one influence that is able to make the project successful.
Bounty participants can give a greater impact to a project, it increase its publicity and engagements with investors not only that but they can also help give activity to the project when its already on the market, Two things that are not good about some bounty hunters is not having any knowledge about the project their promoting and dumping the coin after the release, but we can't avoid that cause some bounty hunters only join campaigns for a money to spend and not for an investment.
Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.
I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?
I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?
Bounty participants are beneficial to the projects. They are the one who influence the projects success by publicity and this can encourage investors also. It is not good to limit participants since most of them can be an investors.
Bounty hunters greatly influence ICO projects. The more people will promote the ICO project, the more the project will be more popular and it will attract many more investors.
I think bounty hunter is take big part for the project, advertising in every single thread make more investor come. If the project got a lot bounty participant they will be know better than the project that have less bounty participant
If someone tell bounty participant must be limited, then he is a greedy person (he want get more stakes). Project don't care about how many participant they more care about the project crowdfunding itself. They only spend about +-2% for bounty participant
If someone tell bounty participant must be limited, then he is a greedy person (he want get more stakes). Project don't care about how many participant they more care about the project crowdfunding itself. They only spend about +-2% for bounty participant
It's better to limit bounty hunters, and oblige KYC! Because there are so many bounty hunters who cheat. So that makes the Bounty Manager trouble.
Some only copy work from other participants. Some also use the names of other participants.
KYC verification is not suitable for ICO generosity campaigners. She, in fact, has the task of preventing the laundering of dirty money and only investors should pass it. On the other hand, in order to filter out multiple accounts, to violate the right of everyone to confidential information - this is not an option. In addition, anyone who wants can have many different accounts and bypass this KYC check. You can use a laptop, tablet and mobile phone, which will have different IP-addresses, use different phone numbers and email addresses, as well as use the data of your family members and relatives. All this makes it possible for many accounts to be tested KYC without any problems. So why is this circus needed at all? In general, the ICO team needs it in order not to pay parts to the bounty hunters of the tokens they earned and no more. We are deceiving ourselves and those who believe that KYC verification is necessary for bounty hunters, help fraudsters from the ICO team. Some only copy work from other participants. Some also use the names of other participants.
Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.
Bounty reward is fixed so that doesn't take effect. More participants, less rewards for each participant. If number of participants is limited, this is for ensured that bounty hunters will receive high amount of tokens.I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
Bounty participant is a core part of a project, they help the project to reach as more people as they can and some of those people will become investors.1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?
If number of participant is limited, there will be less people know about the project.
In my views, I think that bounty participants are important to any new ICO projects since they are the frontliners of the ICO to dessiminate the project using it's avatar. If people will be able to notice about the ICO project, that could urge the people from searching and understanding about the project. Bounty hunters are the ones helping the ICO project to become successful through sjgnature campaign and social media campaigns.
Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.
I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?
I have not seen one project that succeeded without bounty participants, the duty of bounty participants is to promote and enhanced awareness of the project, yes you can get an advertising firm to do that, but there's a very little possibility that they are going to accept tokens that the ICO will offer they want upfront payment and they want bitcoin and ethereum. I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?
Bounty hunters play significantly in promoting the ICOs. They are ones making the project attractive to the investors. But, these bounty hunters, experts saying, are also the ones pulling the project to go down once paid by dumping all the tokens without considering the effect on the token price. It's really hard to control these bounty hunters nowadays because there is a lot of newcomers here that the only purpose of staying here is to earn right away. Sad to say but this is the reality right now.
It's better to limit bounty hunters, and oblige KYC! Because there are so many bounty hunters who cheat. So that makes the Bounty Manager trouble.
Some only copy work from other participants. Some also use the names of other participants.
Some only copy work from other participants. Some also use the names of other participants.
Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.
I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?
1. I'm pretty sure that the bounty participant has a great amount of role, especially when spreading the news about the project. What other tools can be used to spread the word about crypto if it's not the social media?I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?
2. It depends on how the bounty manager filters the participant by increasing the rule levels. Here's the example, which one do you prefer, a blogging participant with 1000+ daily views and influence or a participant with only little of viewers, in terms of spreading the news about your project?
Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.
I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?
I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?
Bounty participants are important to project since participants plays important role in dissiminating about the campaign. Like for example in twitter , in facebook, in youtube and of course here in BCT. Investors may attract the post so they may participate.
Many / too much participants is not good since some accounts have only owner, the shared stakes are too small even though the allocation is big simce too many participants will be dividing in it, the manager can't handle it so very well, some are shit participants and not doing anything good.
Yes, bounty hunters can greatly influence the new ico project. On the one hand, it’s good that there are a lot of participants and there will be strong marketing, but even that can scare some away. But there should be at least some restriction, because at the end of the bounty there can be very small payments and many will simply not be satisfied. There, the bounty manager must find a middle ground for everyone to win.
Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.
I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?
I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?
Jump to: