I missed that one; I'll also comment if I find some time.
Thank you, because I asked for your input specifically as well.
Edit: I removed red trust from users I'd left it for, for suspected merit abuse
only. That doesn't include the bounty cheaters or members who'd committed some other offense concurrently. I'm still in the process of removing all those negs for shitposters. I thought I'd gotten them all, but it seems there's always more.
Can we expect you to return a neutral trust to me and my friends? We are ready to provide any evidence that we dont sell merit and that we are not Alt. We can go through the KYC.
fully support Malevich. I'm not alt and did not deal with the sale of merit. any evidence can also be provided
The way you both reply here with a few minutes of interval is really suspicious. Even though you provide both KYC to prove that you are a different entity then it might not help you since it was easy to fake it and also the proof on your negative rating seems valid. You must gain your merit base on a quality post. This merit system is still has flaws tho.
Agree that is very foolish on our part would be to kick up a fuss when we Alt. If we were Alt and sold merit, then we would not have so openly to do it,you will agree that it's ridiculous. But we do not do such and still assure you that we are different people and that we are not doing anything illegal on the forum.
Why on such a large forum there is a system of KYC which is so easy to fake? If the system is inefficient for what then does it exist?
How to act to people who were accused of fraud, to the end did not justify, painted the trust, and people were not to blame and no longer prove the truth?
In this topic everyone is talking about the fact that we are a Scam,but no one suggested it as now we have to prove the opposite.
I realized that I will have to provide proof of our innocence,as you say the forum is not an adequate system of KYC, and there is no one to do with our problems.
