I'm adding a tag for you too. I'll wait for his response and see if he deserves one as well.
Retaliatory feedbacks is very wrong, you don't leave a feedback because you were left one. The exchange you are accused of shilling appears in almost all of your post, isn't that suspicious? Of course you can talk about what interests you in this forum, but when yourself and a lot of other users just show up and start mentioning the name of one company in all posts that you all make, then that is shilling. 
Topic: Innovative Bitget Shilling [Compliation] - page 2. (Read 979 times)
Obviously, some people don't mind spam and shills, the only thing that matters is that the daily quota of posts can be fulfilled - even if that means that you participate in a topic with made-up stories that aim to promote some shady company. If you were a moderator on this forum, shills would enjoy it because you wouldn't delete their posts - as long as the storyline is imaginative enough.
Who is this? Someone has already added a neutral tag on you, stating that you are making false claims about something they never said. You claimed I shill different companies without evidence.~snip~
Anyone can write whatever they want in someone's trust feedback, but it is important that there are facts behind it, and not vengeful feedback that has no basis in fact. My feedback to you is the result of your activity that was detected even before, and the only reason why I didn't write the name of the company you shill is that I don't want to mention that name at all. In addition, all of you who shill one company will sooner or later shill another, so sooner or later that feedback will probably be completely accurate.
Add whatever you wanna add. Its your problem. You can add as many tags as you want. Doesn't "Bitget drop" sound like a typo error and a mistake to you? It's obviously a typo error and a mistake. But you are just eager to make show off 
Also, he said I shill for different companies. Don't you understand simple English? Show the different company proofs. Well, I can understand you and your friend.
I'm adding a tag for you too. I'll wait for his response and see if he deserves one as well.
Also, he said I shill for different companies. Don't you understand simple English? Show the different company proofs. Well, I can understand you and your friend.
I'm adding a tag for you too. I'll wait for his response and see if he deserves one as well.
Its pretty obvious you're part of the Bitget spam campaign. You've been called out on it at least a few times in the past.
I've seen different kinds of tags on me about this. I had to ignore them cos thats the only exchange I use. And I research, read news and try to know more about them everyday than other exchanges. So, I mostly prefer to include what I know in my posts or conversation just like anyone would love to do.
Yes, but the word Bitget is present on every page of your posts, which is not normal.
I searched for it here
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?Aaction=profile;u=2809031;Sa=showposts;Start=120
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?Aaction=profile;u=2809031;Sa=showposts;Start=100
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?ective=profile;u=2809031;Sa=showposts;Start=80
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?Aaction=profile;u=2809031;Sa=showposts;Start=60
https://bitcontalk.org/index.php?ective=profile;u=2809031;Sa=showposts;Start=40
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?ective=profile;u=2809031;Sa=showposts;Start=20
this is not a normal behavior for an account that wants to discuss, not promotion
I don't understand what you're complaining about -- that the wording of your second neutral isn't 100% accurate? The point is this: you're shilling a questionable exchange by spamming the forum with useless posts. Neutral tag is pretty fair for a relentless spammer of your nature.
Who is this? Someone has already added a neutral tag on you, stating that you are making false claims about something they never said. You claimed I shill different companies without evidence.
What more evidence do you need?It's there in the reference links
Look at another post of yours two days later, what the hell does it even mean
Alticoins might pump fastet than Bitcoin earlier. But when Bitcoin drops, altcoins drops more than 10x of Bitget drop. So, if you are able to make profit in any altcoins, the best decision is to swap to Bitcoin back so that you can still keep on with the game.
Quote
I agreed with people who said I mention Bitget too much, and I've reduced that.
You clearly haven't done so, even after getting called out by nutildah. I don't think you will change.I might add my tag too.
Add whatever you wanna add. Its your problem. You can add as many tags as you want. Doesn't "Bitget drop" sound like a typo error and a mistake to you? It's obviously a typo error and a mistake. But you are just eager to make show off
Also, he said I shill for different companies. Don't you understand simple English? Show the different company proofs. Well, I can understand you and your friend.
I'm adding a tag for you too. I'll wait for his response and see if he deserves one as well.
Who is this? Someone has already added a neutral tag on you, stating that you are making false claims about something they never said. You claimed I shill different companies without evidence.
What more evidence do you need?It's there in the reference links
Look at another post of yours two days later, what the hell does it even mean
Alticoins might pump fastet than Bitcoin earlier. But when Bitcoin drops, altcoins drops more than 10x of Bitget drop. So, if you are able to make profit in any altcoins, the best decision is to swap to Bitcoin back so that you can still keep on with the game.
Quote
I agreed with people who said I mention Bitget too much, and I've reduced that.
You clearly haven't done so, even after getting called out by nutildah. I don't think you will change.I might add my tag too.
~snip~
But it's hard to consider this spam as the content does not revolve around the mentioned product but around the storyline.
But it's hard to consider this spam as the content does not revolve around the mentioned product but around the storyline.
Obviously, some people don't mind spam and shills, the only thing that matters is that the daily quota of posts can be fulfilled - even if that means that you participate in a topic with made-up stories that aim to promote some shady company. If you were a moderator on this forum, shills would enjoy it because you wouldn't delete their posts - as long as the storyline is imaginative enough.
I agreed with people who said I mention Bitget too much, and I've reduced that. But why are you adding a false tag on me as if you're the perfect one? Do you mean I shouldn't talk about any platform here? Bro, chill. You aren't going to gain anything from adding false tags on people. Lucius, you should stop it. Lying against people isn't a good way to have a good reputation anywhere. You could also mind your own business and help others while you have a good reputation. Please remove your neutral tag on me. It's false.
Hmmmm, if someone has some example of sentences they frequently use I can definitely help clean up. They are clearly breaking our rules by having users spam their crap.
I have been tracking every post created with the phrase 'Bitget' since I created this thread via ninjastic bot and as far as I can see they are not using any common sentences in their posts and the most resemblance I found is they use the term Binance and Bitget or Bitget and (another exchange's name) to make it look like they are not shilling even though it's obvious.
Hmmmm, if someone has some example of sentences they frequently use I can definitely help clean up. They are clearly breaking our rules by having users spam their crap.
If the mods aren't seeing anything wrong with their activities, then why should you? If they were spamming the forum with 1000 different replies and opening hundreds of new threads to shill, then I'm sure the mods would take some action. Just a few little posts is not enough to warrant any action ATM.
It's not just "a few little posts", I just added it to my spam keyword page. Starting from January 24, this keyword wasn't posted in the first 3 months. After that, in just 1.5 months, it was posted 646 times.Let's notify @Mitchell, see if MindlessElectron can wipe those posts.
As I was reading through some posts on the trading discussion board. I found another shilling post by a notorious shill who is even already neutral tagged about the same thing. The content of the post has nothing to do with the title...lol
Title: Having a Decentralized Derivative Exchange Problem, and I Found Aark Digital
It's looks like they have resurrected yet again
Title: Having a Decentralized Derivative Exchange Problem, and I Found Aark Digital
I have been using centralized exchanges (CEX) to trade for years. So, I later decided to try a decentralized one. I switched to Cardence on the Canto network and longed some Canto because I'm a holder. It dumped, and when it got back to my entry price after a few weeks, the fee to close the position was huge, almost $100 USD.
Now, I found another one from this listing notification (<--- Links to the shilled site) on my phone. Because I want to join the futures trade to earn some, I decided to read more about it and I see in their documentation that they offer an Insurance Fund feature: "This safeguards users against unforeseen failures, covering negatively valued accounts using an external liquidity pool replenished by a portion of liquidation bonuses."
I've never heard of this kind of feature. What do you think about this feature, decentralized exchanges in general and about Aark Digital?
Now, I found another one from this listing notification (<--- Links to the shilled site) on my phone. Because I want to join the futures trade to earn some, I decided to read more about it and I see in their documentation that they offer an Insurance Fund feature: "This safeguards users against unforeseen failures, covering negatively valued accounts using an external liquidity pool replenished by a portion of liquidation bonuses."
I've never heard of this kind of feature. What do you think about this feature, decentralized exchanges in general and about Aark Digital?
It's looks like they have resurrected yet again
I encountered this type of marketing years ago and many are still doing its subtle marketing part of it is content marketing where instead of direct advertising they create a storyline that is relevant to what the audience wants to read of course they mention the platform they are promoting in their storyline.
You are right you have to be innovative to do this and you need engagement, some forums accept this, and some forums don't allow this, and some forums encourage this as long as there are no links in the post.
But it's hard to consider this spam as the content does not revolve around the mentioned product but around the storyline.
You are right you have to be innovative to do this and you need engagement, some forums accept this, and some forums don't allow this, and some forums encourage this as long as there are no links in the post.
But it's hard to consider this spam as the content does not revolve around the mentioned product but around the storyline.
But if you checked recent post history of user mentioned by OP, you'll find out that they frequently mention word "bitget" on majority of their post. So it's not subtle marketing and IMO should be considered as spam.
This is why I posted some forums that accept this some forums don't allow this and some forums encourage this as long as there are no links in the post.
When I still had my forum we had some members who created a discussion about current events and they managed to mention the name of the product in a subtle way focusing on the storyline, we sometimes deleted the part that mentioned the service and retained the discussion.
It's really up to the moderators they have full discretion on this as they are guided on what action to take.
I encountered this type of marketing years ago and many are still doing its subtle marketing part of it is content marketing where instead of direct advertising they create a storyline that is relevant to what the audience wants to read of course they mention the platform they are promoting in their storyline.
You are right you have to be innovative to do this and you need engagement, some forums accept this, and some forums don't allow this, and some forums encourage this as long as there are no links in the post.
But it's hard to consider this spam as the content does not revolve around the mentioned product but around the storyline.
You are right you have to be innovative to do this and you need engagement, some forums accept this, and some forums don't allow this, and some forums encourage this as long as there are no links in the post.
But it's hard to consider this spam as the content does not revolve around the mentioned product but around the storyline.
But if you checked recent post history of user mentioned by OP, you'll find out that they frequently mention word "bitget" on majority of their post. So it's not subtle marketing and IMO should be considered as spam.
~snip~
But it's hard to consider this spam as the content does not revolve around the mentioned product but around the storyline.
But it's hard to consider this spam as the content does not revolve around the mentioned product but around the storyline.
Obviously, some people don't mind spam and shills, the only thing that matters is that the daily quota of posts can be fulfilled - even if that means that you participate in a topic with made-up stories that aim to promote some shady company. If you were a moderator on this forum, shills would enjoy it because you wouldn't delete their posts - as long as the storyline is imaginative enough.
I encountered this type of marketing years ago and many are still doing its subtle marketing part of it is content marketing where instead of direct advertising they create a storyline that is relevant to what the audience wants to read of course they mention the platform they are promoting in their storyline.
You are right you have to be innovative to do this and you need engagement, some forums accept this, and some forums don't allow this, and some forums encourage this as long as there are no links in the post.
But it's hard to consider this spam as the content does not revolve around the mentioned product but around the storyline.
Reference to this
The Art of Subtle Marketing: Making Marketing Invisible
You are right you have to be innovative to do this and you need engagement, some forums accept this, and some forums don't allow this, and some forums encourage this as long as there are no links in the post.
But it's hard to consider this spam as the content does not revolve around the mentioned product but around the storyline.
Reference to this
The Art of Subtle Marketing: Making Marketing Invisible
If the mods aren't seeing anything wrong with their activities, then why should you? If they were spamming the forum with 1000 different replies and opening hundreds of new threads to shill, then I'm sure the mods would take some action. Just a few little posts is not enough to warrant any action ATM.
I think like yahoo
it depends on how the shilling is done, if it is done aggressively and spamming then you will be punished, like any spam is done
introducing banned words can make sense but we risk making it too big and then having false positives
in the examples proposed in the first post it doesn't seem to me that there is such exaggerated spam
I am not sure how many of you have noticed this, but I have seen many threads created by newbies and Jr.Members for a while with innovative ways to shill the name Bitget, which is a relatively new exchange.
But, I will not call this is innovative because they are simply copying those ugly methods. I am sure there had been other businesses/services which already attempted this kind of methodology to promote across this forum. If I remember correctly, fastdice was the one who started a topic on buying high rank forum accounts to promote themselves by early 2016 or around.You are able to spot those things because they are new topics by newbies but I am sure there should be other accounts who might be spamming across the forum by including above exchange names in replies of existing topics started by other people. I could recall a scenarios where some high rank accounts (above newbie accounts) do mix up some casino name in their each and every post in gambling discussion sub and that continued for considerable amount of time as well (not sure that they stopped themselves or mods took action).
Overall, always some affiliate do spam here on their business somehow. Obviously they are spamming this forum but not explicitly violating any forum rules which is the reason they are enjoying their longer stay.
~snip~
It is annoying, and such posts can often be reported as spam, especially if they have little to nothing to do with the topic of discussion.
It is annoying, and such posts can often be reported as spam, especially if they have little to nothing to do with the topic of discussion.
If there is more than an obvious intention (and here it is undoubted), then reporting a post for spam/shilling is not something that will solve the problem, at least not within a normal time frame. BG shills also appeared on the ATT forum, but their admin reacted literally in a few minutes after the report and cleaned them from the system. Some obviously disagree with such actions, but is there any logic in letting someone make a few hundred spam posts in order to be punished?
Late last year, Nutildah created a thread about this behavior: what's up with all the Bitget shills?, and tagged some of these shillers, you can find more names in that topic. It is a very bad behaviour and since they are paying newbies/Jr members for this, they wouldn't mind if they are tagged or if their posts are removed, they'd just continue doing what they are paid to do.
Looks like they reopened their shill campaign that started on what appears to be their Discord:
Yes, look at this event below, even though they didn't state Bitcointalk, but they wrote "crypto community with at least 10K members", this forum is also crypto community and the total members are higher than that.
...
...
It is annoying, and such posts can often be reported as spam, especially if they have little to nothing to do with the topic of discussion.
Is it? It was established in 2018, not so new.
It is a very bad behaviour and since they are paying newbies/Jr members for this, they wouldn't mind if they are tagged or if their posts are removed, they'd just continue doing what they are paid to do.
It is a very bad behaviour and since they are paying newbies/Jr members for this, they wouldn't mind if they are tagged or if their posts are removed, they'd just continue doing what they are paid to do.
I see the name of the exchange only from last year so I assumed that they are new and also they ran an actual signature campaign on the forum last year for just two weeks then they came back to their shilling campaign.
Likely they won't care about deleting the posts or even banning them cause they will just pop out with new accounts again and do this again and again so the possible solution for stopping them is to put a word filter on Bitget for low-ranked members as hugeblack suggested.
I am not sure how many of you have noticed this, but I have seen many threads created by newbies and Jr.Members for a while with innovative ways to shill the name Bitget, which is a relatively new exchange.
Is it? It was established in 2018, not so new.Many more can be added here...
Late last year, Nutildah created a thread about this behavior: what's up with all the Bitget shills?, and tagged some of these shillers, you can find more names in that topic. It is a very bad behaviour and since they are paying newbies/Jr members for this, they wouldn't mind if they are tagged or if their posts are removed, they'd just continue doing what they are paid to do. Jump to: