The big take-away, is (for the umteenth time) if you give someone the ability to take your money, there is every possibility that they will do so. In Bitcoin-land it is a near certainty.
Why do you linger in bitcoinland then ? Why don't you tvbcof travel off to your paracoinland (Note: paracoin, strangely an anagram for paranoic, is tvbcof brainfart )?
Boussac serves tybcof.
tvbcof leaves.
Was out for the weekend. Got another saw mill so I can have old barn wood in about 50 years. Band-mill to augment my swing-blade mill. Anyway...
The etymology of 'para' is outlined in unnecessary detail front and center on the web site. 'paranoid' must be related to the Greek 'para' root but I'm not exactly sure how.
It is true that I tend to be 'paranoid' about a lot of things. To use one example, I was paranoid that the government was inflating and inventing evidence of 'weapons of mass destruction' to seek justification for war on Iraq. I've also been highly paranoid about the kinds of dossiers which are being compiled about individuals by our version of the STASI here in the US. In short, an impressive percentage of the things I've been paranoid about, and which have made my friends believe that I am a bit wacko, have turned out to be at least partially true, and in some cases more true than I even feared.
I actually don't have many theories, but do have multiple simultaneous hypothesis for almost everything. Again, in the case of Bitcoin-Central, it is at this point completely possible that Boussac-n-co cleaned up to the tune of millions of USD by 'borrowing' our funds while the value fell by half or so. As always I welcome any solid information which can either lend strength or argue against this hypothesis. So far Bitcoin-Central has not seen fit to produce much by way of verifiable information, but things are still in flux to it is currently understandable.