Topic: Instawallet claim process - page 2. (Read 79281 times)

If that's how people here feel, why not use the forum "Trust" feature to indicate your trust or the lack thereof? Sure, many choose to scoff at it for this or that, but hey, it's there for a reason.

so, according to this post:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.6126415

And the following comment:

Davout removes posts from a french thread requesting nothing else than a neutral moderator and sticks those removed posts in a new thread which gets labeled as off-topic.
These 'removed posts' are specifically related to Instawallet, Bitcoin ! and Davout and adds even more grounds to requesting a neutral moderator in the first place.

Attention Davout: Are these allegations correct and does this portray an accurate picture of your character?

Thank you

Did not get my deposit back as I did not have sufficient proof of making my claim in the first place.

To paraphrase a little piece from the french section,
Is there a count of how much BTC got reimbursed vs the total reported in instawallet before the show started?

lmao those bastards! keep the digging phin!

a recent comment of mine about your ongoing work in a french thread urging for a neutral moderator got "burried" in the french off-topic section by that very same moderator, who is, well, you know..

Ongoing list of InstaWallet wallets of interest. (even named the title of this post such for easy recovery down the road)

https://blockchain.info/address/1uKVtMUK7E2CkVynYa7ytnTu6wGqFTxUV

Let's visualize InstaWallet's Cold Storage wallets, shall we, prior to them finding a new home here: https://blockchain.info/address/1LrPYjto3hsLzWJNstghuwdrQXB96KbrCy, for perhaps there's something we can glean.

https://blockchain.info/tx/996b0e98db80b20516313cd32920e7c8093a8a5bf1e1b1887747338a49052ce5


http://web.archive.org/web/20130601082205/http://paytunia.com/

I have two theories as to where/what happened with my 1,132 BTC.

One is that it's located in here somewhere: https://blockchain.info/tx/5d8579d0c992188eec9c3057ccde4be7349c000946e44ad9e72857542372314c

The other is that it never hit InstaWallet's Cold or Hot Wallet, instead stored, like others, on wallets used for Bitcoin-Central or Paymium, or some other, pulling from such when needed, for that would explain why just prior to the hack my two wallets in questioned showed a 0 balance on blockchain.info when I clicked on it.

I just thought of something else. If I still had my old laptop that went kaputski, hence tossing, I possibly could retrieve the URL that was clicked to discovered at least the last bitcoin wallet address I was assigned.

The other thing is that I could (even have since, but to no avail) search the Google chrome history, but that's predicated on which account I was logged into at the time, if I was even logged in, for for (I meant to type that twice for grammar purposes) a period of time (months), somehow Google Chrome would log me out, and I wouldn't know it till I returned to my Google homepage of which was, and still is Google News.

Ironically, this is what transpired the very next day, ~12 hours later: https://blockchain.info/tx/f0dba606f4d245c49a165035eabe3457949b8c04f33b0af53b17ffece01e9176



Why would InstaWallet need to transfer out bitcoins to wallet https://blockchain.info/address/1BcCo1dNztEjMtzxFTbtQuZEuK1NkvN8q5 that was later transferred to claims payout wallet?: https://blockchain.info/address/1LrPYjto3hsLzWJNstghuwdrQXB96KbrCy

https://blockchain.info/tx/4cf56d0c1566778030095925328f4bc7ae988657bd62fe8bc05ac67302d32b4c



With apologies for showing the value in $ oppose to BTC, which was my intent to remain consistent, this wallet - https://blockchain.info/address/1HEVQNxwuKx2nXdyqF86nAf49Epx5jS2Vk - was Bitcoin-Central's claims/unification wallet, and not InstaWallet's.

https://blockchain.info/tx/14a5adce82fecf976f9ec963c86a051d363ad7301bf96b055364de7a27b3bfee


Following pic depicts the same as above, but in dollars to show that it's the same as the first pict further above.

InstaWallet's Claims Wallet: https://blockchain.info/address/1JwXxGessiou1WaUaWXuttzkqnXFEbc4ZB

Bitcoin-Centrals Customer's Wallet: https://blockchain.info/address/1HEVQNxwuKx2nXdyqF86nAf49Epx5jS2Vk and possibly https://blockchain.info/address/1uAcfMBjRNZeQZumRhuyTLQskbUVgzkJm



I'm confident that MAC's post about InstaWallet being a fractional reserve bank through is what started the wheels in motion to orchestrate the supposed "HACK".

---

Revisiting this wallet https://blockchain.info/address/1LrPYjto3hsLzWJNstghuwdrQXB96KbrCy we learn from http://thebitcoinnews.co.uk/2013/04/13/bitcoin-central-and-instawallet-hacked/

Quote

Bitcoin-Central reports that all 41,854.5915 BTC of customer funds (some $5,315,951.67 USD at today’s rates) is stored in bitcoin address 1LrPYjto3hsLzWJNstghuwdrQXB96KbrCy and is fully under control by them.  They also report that “Due to the recent and important price fluctuations we will cancel some outstanding orders before reopening. For example if the average price stays above 100 EUR/BTC we will cancel all asks below 110 EUR/BTC. No trades will be reversed.”

But, of that 41,854.5915 BTC, 14,319.9 BTC of it stemmed from InstaWallet's Cold Storage, whereupon it was transferred to https://blockchain.info/address/1JwXxGessiou1WaUaWXuttzkqnXFEbc4ZB on April 8, 2013.

On May 10, 2013, the above wallet was moved to https://blockchain.info/address/1FvMVtzxACJejfZvqtiSsTrUCpR2HYveB6 consisting of 14,329.9 BTC.

On July 19, 2013, the first batch of claims were processed, leaving a balance of 11,509.82549641 BTC that was transferred to https://blockchain.info/address/1HAo32apFqzKcSBkXVHR5vLnnFuuFoxzFU

On July 26, 2013, the next batch of claims were processed, leaving a balance of 7,323.12048901 BTC that was transferred to https://blockchain.info/address/19vZF13np1n33xBBxw6v2vbnC37P1UXpGN, then moved to https://blockchain.info/address/1AGbFkrQPuRHLSU3FNLpdkBvcXBuyZjJWn on the same day.

On August 1, 2013, the next batch of claims were processed, leaving a balance of 6,459.55705531 BTC that was transferred to https://blockchain.info/address/13j3Hqq2H5F8dP1UbXWKFP9h6JohjdNim5, then moved to https://blockchain.info/address/1BNZxywLJNkBAivqRZfvVGSnLf6JdcefXr on the same day.

On August 9, 2013, the next batch of claims were processed, leaving a balance of 5,283.01032861 BTC that was transferred to https://blockchain.info/address/1PSuJQjccfDGjopXYUQnof7b3KeeN8wZLy, then moved to https://blockchain.info/address/1DSQSZujNWvjHTTzuwjDgaHjMNKojSg3Nbon the same day.

On August 20, 2013, the next batch of claims were processed, leaving a balance of 4,970.80156601 BTC that was transferred to https://blockchain.info/address/17Mhe6FKxGQto3a3BgY7ugtLcaMNQwTLUD, then moved to https://blockchain.info/address/1DFX3PwMuiuQJTzAT4kJMpokfXoEquJBss on the same day.

On August 31, 2013, the next batch of claims were processed, leaving a balance of 4,096.70590951 BTC that was transferred to https://blockchain.info/address/19fr8eSramPNTdx53CfgBTveEdrkQWPHZc, then moved to https://blockchain.info/address/1GjZuMW2kpY8jchyNsgeeHusRouPvCdtC4 on the same day.

On September, 21, 2013, the next batch of claims were processed, leaving a balance of 3,421.80247781 BTC that was transferred to https://blockchain.info/address/16bNW7aFNsPCuZ4G4aDzQxbAoJKASFebDJ, then moved to https://blockchain.info/address/1JFnEKDNPCvGTzX4CPec9WzA5mieUsxiVc on the same day.

On October 7, 2013, the next batch of claims were processed, leaving a balance of 2,686.95105901 BTC that was transferred to https://blockchain.info/address/19qB4iJAs4BYwYfXzWrWmTiSAnwsHCufDV, then moved to https://blockchain.info/address/1Kk8rWQGX87pc15J3J6ehzFfkC5y7dG1Nr on the same day.



On November 11, 2013, the next batch of claims were processed, leaving a balance of 2,477.44025106 BTC that was transferred to https://blockchain.info/address/1EBbWFi8ociPACJTWHxsG1xsSYCT6oxGof, then moved to one main wallet and a currently unspent wallet as seen in the following tx: https://blockchain.info/tx/83611cbdc7b461d8e355342075d32bff9978e42f3eaacaa6b97555d498920e9d

Quote

1BgfFs9L16RjG45n5AipYCsLE3sPht7USn - (Unspent) 248.77082436 BTC
16EoVcokYrSDHu4i26vR2h69Y8VtPLEyyf - (Spent) 2,228.6694267 BTC

Thus, 2,228.6694267 BTC was transferred from https://blockchain.info/address/1EBbWFi8ociPACJTWHxsG1xsSYCT6oxGof to https://blockchain.info/address/16EoVcokYrSDHu4i26vR2h69Y8VtPLEyyf on the same day.

Still on November 11, 2013, according to tx https://blockchain.info/tx/d3b20dcdca7c3ed8709bf03c09138a690ed1ae6a7d6a8c21f1d3b35162545ae3, another 250 BTC was transferred and currently unspent to https://blockchain.info/address/18QQAfHJ5jx6drHapCKY4791LtvwMZEFfy, with the bulk totally 1,978.6694267 BTC moved to https://blockchain.info/address/1Ln1VirN3aGUh5xvbS6oRVKkX41G9GJ5ZV (again, on the same day).

Still on November 11, 2013, another 250 BTC was peeled off and currently unspent according to tx https://blockchain.info/tx/81798aab88fa2e35ace1b7ef105e185b7dedebeb4f251e853eaf5ca8f2bd35bb, with the bulk totally 1,728.6694267 BTC moved to https://blockchain.info/address/17McuH2qWo4BU9Sf2QdM23zbLqQbB7H5cC

Yes, again, still on November 11, 2013, another 250 BTC was peeled off and currently unspent according to tx https://blockchain.info/tx/171891497886b4903ef00ac035c043b3091d68f5e24ff8917903cc5ba0874b37, with the bulk totally 1,478.6694267 BTC moved to https://blockchain.info/address/15U1EdLjh5wHPgxaChVyjqH5bQVs96MbYY

LOL, HaHaHa, Fuck Me In The Ass, guess what? (unless you're an idiot, you should know what's coming next) Yes, again, still on November 11, 2013, another 250 BTC was peeled off and currently unspent according to tx https://blockchain.info/tx/0e56ed15efe125590112727872ec4b6371885acc72faf9561e34db7021907736, with the bulk totally 1,228.6694267 BTC moved to https://blockchain.info/address/1AnzZ889ZndDLfwEiKzKPSou1JzjxJxWy

As if you didn't see this coming, still on November 11, 2013, another 250 BTC was peeled off and currently unspent according to tx https://blockchain.info/tx/20f4cbe736be54f835b55d1cb0c6fce2141a94061df3674ca0a57ec6196ad50d, with the bulk totally 978.6694267 BTC moved to https://blockchain.info/address/17ffqaEXgzAYww5U4PwXBLVDHBu4b5jJM8

Looking forward, I see a pattern here, so I'll abbreviate my paragraphs.

Still on November 11, 2013, another 250 BTC was peeled off and currently unspent according to tx https://blockchain.info/tx/19a5bfc6c35986f06b0addec245bf6b45f09a4e9e7baff57f350e045f262d35d, with the bulk totally 728.6694267 BTC moved to https://blockchain.info/address/1Lkdr6JHEmo4xwPnMHVvpWfGAMREVptN7D

Still on November 11, 2013, another 250 BTC was peeled off and currently unspent according to tx https://blockchain.info/tx/9ba783d9f9788b107bee4fb3c78c4063b60b8dda0653022ed4505ed2315c0fde, with the bulk totally 478.6694267 BTC moved to https://blockchain.info/address/1JMeWJKdrFho1mvcZsahcxWyBxRJ9rc1wA

Still on November 11, 2013, another 250 BTC was peeled off and currently unspent according to tx https://blockchain.info/tx/12949fe6e6419c400d11c8c7b8c5a7b15bb839cc93a28061540ce372c0de664b, with the remainder totally 228.6694267 BTC moved to https://blockchain.info/address/14GNRm8iqwg7em7yqdz4gYPA1MvyvdA41P

Now, this is where is gets very interesting. Remember what I penned above (in pink) about revisiting a certain wallet?



When I penned the above, I seriously didn't believe that I would be revisiting said address anytime soon, let alone in this thread, but that's exactly what I'm about to do.

Prior to the November 11, 2013, claims payout, the previous claims payout date was October 7, 2013. On October 12, 2013, this tx occurred: https://blockchain.info/tx/578f144c14a9eab939949ba9fbf655bbe52dcc83ee9340d307cd0c8ae43ee37f

Note the 21.3305733 BTC that went into the bitcoin wallet address 1Kk8rWQGX87pc15J3J6ehzFfkC5y7dG1Nr. It just so happens to be the exact - to the satoshi - amount needed to be added to the 228.6694267 BTC in bitcoin wallet address https://blockchain.info/address/14GNRm8iqwg7em7yqdz4gYPA1MvyvdA41P to become another perfect 250 BTC, currently unspent and sitting in https://blockchain.info/address/126hEMN9C1s6fXRifvaR41euW7oy3pnLXW

That's a pretty amazing feat considering we're talking about ~30 days in between said two wallets. In case there's a mistake on my part, allow me to check the math: 228.6694267 + 21.3305733 = 250. Yep! No mistake, and I even highlighted it because that's the way Davout likes things of importance shown on this thread.

But, I'm not done yet. This was so interesting to me, albeit probably not to others, that I couldn't but help myself to uncover how, and from where, that 21.3305733 BTC was derived. Boy, was I ever in a shock, as I'm sure the reader of this post will be once it's revealed to them.

https://blockchain.info/tx/578f144c14a9eab939949ba9fbf655bbe52dcc83ee9340d307cd0c8ae43ee37f



In the above pic, note the two addresses:

https://blockchain.info/address/1FQ3zjPAvCNFHAWijc7XhywJMHQxh9N27n
https://blockchain.info/address/1QriNzDX5dv3JtP5ome7fd9YACv4whN5J

Following back on the second one first, we have...

1FQ3zjPAvCNFHAWijc7XhywJMHQxh9N27n (1.2092733 BTC - Output)
https://blockchain.info/address/1NShJuJmhAEGxrtcfAhYgYKK16isqyzRdA
https://blockchain.info/address/1QriNzDX5dv3JtP5ome7fd9YACv4whN5J

That's odd: 1QriNzDX5dv3JtP5ome7fd9YACv4whN5J funded 1FQ3zjPAvCNFHAWijc7XhywJMHQxh9N27n utilizing an added hop. Why would address 1NShJuJmhAEGxrtcfAhYgYKK16isqyzRdA need to be introduced at all? Perhaps, https://blockchain.info/tx/d954cb43d625612cc214b977782d3d1c16d8e90a0fbd63cb80144f5adb2b356c holds a clue.



I see! Some bitcoins needed to be moved to some other wallet, namely...

Quote

1Paymium35iCpZjP6zeiRF1UNxzZY9vbha - (Unspent) 0.2 BTC

Sadly, there's no way in hell to figure out who that wallet belongs to, or even if they still have access to it, for it's been since last October when it was funded. As a PSA, if anybody recognizes the wallet address, please inform its owner that there's bitcoins awaiting them. I'm sure they'll love to know.

Now, let's explore bitcon wallet address https://blockchain.info/address/1QriNzDX5dv3JtP5ome7fd9YACv4whN5J, shall we. Perhaps, there within provides a clue as to where that magic 21.3305733 BTC derived from. We can only hope.

For starters, the wallet was created on 2013-10-01 21:17:52.

The first tx is the following: https://blockchain.info/tx/efc6a4ce37c63f8ba7ddc19ffcb74aafc0dd20594574150f5b55e749eb1acfd8



After doing a little Googling, I discovered that some dude named Jan Vornberger owns bitcoinmonitor.com and bluetile.org.

Question: Why would some dude named Jan Vornberger fund an InstaWallet claims wallet, especially aiding (and abetting(?)) by creating a bitcoin wallet address with exactly 21.3305733 BTC that's going to be needed ~30 days down the road to fund an exact 250 BTC bitcoin wallet? My guess is that we'll never know who owns the 1Paymium... wallet I mentioned above, only Jehovah (Jav for short) is in the know.

Wait, there's more! The wallet where my February 11, 2014, baby claim payout stemmed from https://blockchain.info/tx/f4dae89782552df4c15f1dcd9c82a199ea756579245a38c1c97ec4d4f6993eff was created on...wait for it...August 1, 2013, the day the third claims payout was dispersed.

After https://blockchain.info/address/1NfRQpRSrCztyxeHkwp3YAyA6yJGBCbUE paid out claims, there still remained 51.79075967 BTC in wallet https://blockchain.info/address/1AmTeTpMC777yH1SJENhH4zzArwqg2qi8P, currently unspent.

Thus, at this penning, I've uncovered 2,477.44025106 BTC + 51.79075967 BTC = 2529.23101073 BTC that InstaWallet still has control of and belongs to its non-customers unless, of course, it's mostly theirs and still going through the spin cycle. Heaven forbid I discover more bitcoins deposite via some dude named Jan Vornberger, but phrase Jav that that won't be the case, otherwise I may have to hunt down this Jan dude to see what's what.

~Bruno Kucinskas

As you're well aware, when InstaWallet came back online for those of us to submit claims, the wallet addresses were missing, not having a reason to copy & paste said addresses into some folder prior to the supposed "hack". Besides, the account amounts were moved at least twice prior to the supposed "hack" stemming from about mid-December, 2012. This is what I was trying to get at/resolved starting back in April, 2013, after the supposed "hack", but thanks to the principal's infinite wisdom, they felt it best to put me on ignore, and even go as far as to make fun of my name, of which I'm not ill about, albeit it did bring back memories of when I was picked on as a kid, and it was done so in spit (meant spite, but spit works well here) of...



Apologies for not expressing your respect earlier, not being versed in how the French treat their customer or, in InstaWallet's case, non-customer base.

Thanks to InstaWallet's Fractional Reserve Bank Through & Mixing Service, the current tools available to me makes it difficult to hunt InstaWallet's hot wallet, though an attempt will be made, concentrating instead first on the Cold Wallet(s) and claim payouts doled out to date to show that some claims weren't claims at all, but simply moving your funds out to a safe haven prior to, and after the supposed "hack", for the police and for the two banking institutes backing Bitcoin-Central to read. And, I will make sure that my posts are read by them, willing to go the extra mile to get the media to look into your affairs, for we all know how they love Bitcoin, and would also love nothing more than to do a follow-up for their readership that can't seem to get enough of the Mt Gox fiasco, of which all I'm about to expose goes hand-in-hand. Newsweek comes immediately to mind.

On March 19, 2013, 08:14:56 PM, two minutes, max, prior to sending 0.105 BTC, I PM'ed the following to the recipient of said coins, of which can easily be requested from theymos to prove that the following PM was not altered in any way:


According to the following screenshots from blockchain.info, this is how the transaction is seen to the entire world:

https://blockchain.info/address/13wVc8gyoBSeTGmc7Abz3xtJ5QYRjWenTC



https://blockchain.info/tx/cb32e5147c0510a3423a9b9c57a90fa949a3960422563bf8ade5a621a0939cec

https://blockchain.info/address/1JppeHVdYQEBGR4uHVTqLQsb2FY1wUTziH



I have to admit that's some pretty damn good algorithm you guys devised, enabling the world to see a receiver of bitcoins ~7 minutes prior to them being sent from the original sender, all the while mixing the transaction through a whole slew of wallets, of which I'm still having trouble untangling. You fuckers were good, but sadly it's all going to come to an end, for I've only begun to untangle this web you weaved back in the day.

One or two hops from 1JppeHVdYQEBGR4uHVTqLQsb2FY1wUTziH to 13wVc8gyoBSeTGmc7Abz3xtJ5QYRjWenTC may be excusable, but dozens sans a clue as to how such was accomplished within a ~7 minute time frame is fuckin' nuts. Worst yet, it doesn't even show that the former wallet, mine, had a remaining balance of 0.835 BTC, an issue I, among others, brought to InstaWallet's attention, among other concerns, days prior to the supposed "hack", further cementing my claim that they needed to get out from underneath it while the getting out was good, thus time for Davout to take a vacation to do his magic, if he was the main or sole culprit, of which I firmly believe.

Currently, InstaWallet is still holding a helluva lot more coins than what's owed me, and none of them are suppose to be their's, because according to their own words one, they didn't have any customers, hence didn't supply a billable service, and two, only an idiot would store insane amounts on InstaWallet, including themselves, both statements I've already proven to be false, sans the billing of services part.

Now that blockchain.info is back up and my not-so-insane-amount-of-bitcoins have all been accounted for, I can get back to work, continuing where I left off last night.

Since, I didn't see anywhere in your reply to me a request for my bitcoin wallet address, as promised: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ

Here's the fun part: If the principals of InstaWallet, Paymium, Bitcoin-Central, et al. have honestly operated on the up-and-up, then they have nothing to fear. BUT, if they were not or still are, then they have everything to fear from Camp Phinnaeus Gage/Bruno Kucinskas, and anybody using any of your current services now better really consider how much longer they're going to be viable, for, like I said, I'm now in the process of making a shitload of noise via shooting shit into a fan using a cannon.

For what it's worth, my word against their word is helluva stronger, and WILL get much stronger as this ordeal is carried forward to the nth degree.

~Bruno Kucinskas

PS: Don't forget that in your next reply to me, please include asking what bitcoin wallet address I desire to have my settlement sent to, otherwise it's Rick Roll'ed city again with my follow-up reply.

PSS: You may have the option of suing my ass for libel and defamation of character, but bear in mind you sorta missed that boat considering I penned dozens, if not hundreds of posts stating in no uncertain terms the sentiment echoed above. But, if you feel so incline to still do such, quite frankly it'll be welcomed, remembering that when you loose, you'll be paying my expenses, will be exposing transactions we both know you don't want exposed, plus get counter-sued, of which I would easily win. Not to mention filling out a false police report, but then again since I'm not French, thus that may not even be a crime in France, albeit leaning toward that it is.

I'll go one step further and state that you and I both know that there's more actors involved here than just the principals and their employees, most all of which don't desire this to continue as you seem to firmly believe you have this under control and can easily win. Far from it! I'm sure you're in discussion with the yet undisclosed distant actors wondering what you should do with me, of which I have a solution: Request a bitcoin wallet address of me.

To be clear, again, this is not a threat or some sort of extortion, for how does one extort their own money? I was adamant prior to the supposed "hack" as well as after the supposed "hack", and said adamancy wasn't based on ~$83 USD at the time, but more like ~$100K+ USD, worth $1,405,944 USD at one time at bitcoins' peek rate of exchange, currently valued at $498,861.08, and I'll even let you keep the 8 cents because...wait for it...I'm a nice guy.

Add an exception for this particular certificate so you can access the interface and PM what you see, I'll have a look.

I don't believe I ever got my meagre 0.3Bitcoins nor any response.
Is there still a way for me to move forward with this ?

Not quite the level of Bruno. You seem to have been on this topic from the beginning.

Not having read everything Bruno, but regarding


Was the copy of the receipt you received  this ?
Did you address the question about any transactions funding your IW addresses ?

You quoted 2 IW URLs, surely the gang in this forum can at least point to the validity of the URL structure no?
 

Well then, maybe you'll be able to show me your 1000 BTC going into Instawallet, like I requested a while ago.

blockchain.info is back up, but I'm a tad tire to continue where I left off, with the except of leaving this here: https://blockchain.info/tx/578f144c14a9eab939949ba9fbf655bbe52dcc83ee9340d307cd0c8ae43ee37f

This truly is an amazing tx, ain't Davout? Bear in mind, when I get done exploring EVERY transaction of InstaWallet after, and just prior to the suppose "hack", I'll be a 'blockchain' expert.

~Bruno Kucinskas

Revisiting this wallet https://blockchain.info/address/1LrPYjto3hsLzWJNstghuwdrQXB96KbrCy we learn from http://thebitcoinnews.co.uk/2013/04/13/bitcoin-central-and-instawallet-hacked/


But, of that 41,854.5915 BTC, 14,319.9 BTC of it stemmed from InstaWallet's Cold Storage, whereupon it was transferred to https://blockchain.info/address/1JwXxGessiou1WaUaWXuttzkqnXFEbc4ZB on April 8, 2013.

On May 10, 2013, the above wallet was moved to https://blockchain.info/address/1FvMVtzxACJejfZvqtiSsTrUCpR2HYveB6 consisting of 14,329.9 BTC.

On July 19, 2013, the first batch of claims were processed, leaving a balance of 11,509.82549641 BTC that was transferred to https://blockchain.info/address/1HAo32apFqzKcSBkXVHR5vLnnFuuFoxzFU

On July 26, 2013, the next batch of claims were processed, leaving a balance of 7,323.12048901 BTC that was transferred to https://blockchain.info/address/19vZF13np1n33xBBxw6v2vbnC37P1UXpGN, then moved to https://blockchain.info/address/1AGbFkrQPuRHLSU3FNLpdkBvcXBuyZjJWn on the same day.

On August 1, 2013, the next batch of claims were processed, leaving a balance of 6,459.55705531 BTC that was transferred to https://blockchain.info/address/13j3Hqq2H5F8dP1UbXWKFP9h6JohjdNim5, then moved to https://blockchain.info/address/1BNZxywLJNkBAivqRZfvVGSnLf6JdcefXr on the same day.

On August 9, 2013, the next batch of claims were processed, leaving a balance of 5,283.01032861 BTC that was transferred to https://blockchain.info/address/1PSuJQjccfDGjopXYUQnof7b3KeeN8wZLy, then moved to https://blockchain.info/address/1DSQSZujNWvjHTTzuwjDgaHjMNKojSg3Nbon the same day.

On August 20, 2013, the next batch of claims were processed, leaving a balance of 4,970.80156601 BTC that was transferred to https://blockchain.info/address/17Mhe6FKxGQto3a3BgY7ugtLcaMNQwTLUD, then moved to https://blockchain.info/address/1DFX3PwMuiuQJTzAT4kJMpokfXoEquJBss on the same day.

On August 31, 2013, the next batch of claims were processed, leaving a balance of 4,096.70590951 BTC that was transferred to https://blockchain.info/address/19fr8eSramPNTdx53CfgBTveEdrkQWPHZc, then moved to https://blockchain.info/address/1GjZuMW2kpY8jchyNsgeeHusRouPvCdtC4 on the same day.

On September, 21, 2013, the next batch of claims were processed, leaving a balance of 3,421.80247781 BTC that was transferred to https://blockchain.info/address/16bNW7aFNsPCuZ4G4aDzQxbAoJKASFebDJ, then moved to https://blockchain.info/address/1JFnEKDNPCvGTzX4CPec9WzA5mieUsxiVc on the same day.

On October 7, 2013, the next batch of claims were processed, leaving a balance of 2,686.95105901 BTC that was transferred to https://blockchain.info/address/19qB4iJAs4BYwYfXzWrWmTiSAnwsHCufDV, then moved to https://blockchain.info/address/1Kk8rWQGX87pc15J3J6ehzFfkC5y7dG1Nr on the same day.



On November 11, 2013, the next batch of claims were processed, leaving a balance of 2,477.44025106 BTC that was transferred to https://blockchain.info/address/1EBbWFi8ociPACJTWHxsG1xsSYCT6oxGof, then moved to one main wallet and a currently unspent wallet as seen in the following tx: https://blockchain.info/tx/83611cbdc7b461d8e355342075d32bff9978e42f3eaacaa6b97555d498920e9d


Thus, 2,228.6694267 BTC was transferred from https://blockchain.info/address/1EBbWFi8ociPACJTWHxsG1xsSYCT6oxGof to https://blockchain.info/address/16EoVcokYrSDHu4i26vR2h69Y8VtPLEyyf on the same day.

Still on November 11, 2013, according to tx https://blockchain.info/tx/d3b20dcdca7c3ed8709bf03c09138a690ed1ae6a7d6a8c21f1d3b35162545ae3, another 250 BTC was transferred and currently unspent to https://blockchain.info/address/18QQAfHJ5jx6drHapCKY4791LtvwMZEFfy, with the bulk totally 1,978.6694267 BTC moved to https://blockchain.info/address/1Ln1VirN3aGUh5xvbS6oRVKkX41G9GJ5ZV (again, on the same day).

Still on November 11, 2013, another 250 BTC was peeled off and currently unspent according to tx https://blockchain.info/tx/81798aab88fa2e35ace1b7ef105e185b7dedebeb4f251e853eaf5ca8f2bd35bb, with the bulk totally 1,728.6694267 BTC moved to https://blockchain.info/address/17McuH2qWo4BU9Sf2QdM23zbLqQbB7H5cC

Yes, again, still on November 11, 2013, another 250 BTC was peeled off and currently unspent according to tx https://blockchain.info/tx/171891497886b4903ef00ac035c043b3091d68f5e24ff8917903cc5ba0874b37, with the bulk totally 1,478.6694267 BTC moved to https://blockchain.info/address/15U1EdLjh5wHPgxaChVyjqH5bQVs96MbYY

LOL, HaHaHa, Fuck Me In The Ass, guess what? (unless you're an idiot, you should know what's coming next) Yes, again, still on November 11, 2013, another 250 BTC was peeled off and currently unspent according to tx https://blockchain.info/tx/0e56ed15efe125590112727872ec4b6371885acc72faf9561e34db7021907736, with the bulk totally 1,228.6694267 BTC moved to https://blockchain.info/address/1AnzZ889ZndDLfwEiKzKPSou1JzjxJxWy

As if you didn't see this coming, still on November 11, 2013, another 250 BTC was peeled off and currently unspent according to tx https://blockchain.info/tx/20f4cbe736be54f835b55d1cb0c6fce2141a94061df3674ca0a57ec6196ad50d, with the bulk totally 978.6694267 BTC moved to https://blockchain.info/address/17ffqaEXgzAYww5U4PwXBLVDHBu4b5jJM8


DAMN!


I was just gettin' warmed up.

I'm not done with this post yet, but suffice to say that somebody at InstaWallet has skimmed off my 1,132 BTC, and then some. But, it's worst than that! I will show some fat-ass wallets moved just prior to the suppose "hack" and also some disguised as claims still unspent. With a few other surprises thrown in for good measures.

I'm 99.99% confident that those controlling InstaWallet, Paymium, and Bitcon-Central don't want certain parties snooping around their playground: http://mineforeman.com/2012/12/07/bitcoin-central-begins-operating-as-a-bank-sort-of/


It's a shame that Davout and Boussac both have me on ignore, especially if I'm not quoted, for it may be days before they see this post and realize what shit I'm about to unleash.

To be clear, I showed grave concern about InstaWallet prior to the suppose "hack", but my concerns were laid to rest by Davout in a thread that laid out that InstaWallet needed to revise their business model, namely in the security department. Then, Davout took a vacation, of which he better have some damn convincing proof as to where he was, hoping that the locale doesn't coincide with where the suppose "hacker" may have been located, for the timing sure does look suspicious.

Ironically, the suppose "hacker" broke into InstaWallet, Paymium, and Bitcoin-Central, all of which were supposedly über-secure. I firmly believe that InstaWallet was purposely "hacked" so that the principals can get out from underneath it, having their personal bitcoins (stemming from where, not sure, but may stumble upon the answer) washed along the way, taking my bitcoins, and perhaps others, as an added prize, somehow clearly their tracks along the way. Remember, servicers were switched after the initial claim process was in place, but people, including myself, were having issues. I'm not verse much in the back end of websites, but I'm pretty sure that info could've been gleaned, then cleansed, prior to the server change. At least that's how I would do it if I knew how and wanted to make a score.

Far-fetched? From what I've only shown above, to date, I, among others, now, think not. Those 250 BTC transfers were not, I repeat, were not part of any claims, but either my 1,132 BTC or part of some money laundering scheme, or a combination of both. I have several more examples to show prior to, and after the suppose "hack", all of which I can't wait till blockchain.info is back up.

Speaking of blockchain.info being currently down: You guys ain't going to believe which online wallet service I've been using since InstaWallet was so kind to watch over my 1,132 BTC since last April (a year ago). Don't worry, it's not an "insane" amount like I and a myriad others kept on IW.

It still gets my goat that InstaWallet claims that they couldn't find my three claims, and even after showing them mega proof of the smaller one several times, they denied it, but finally came around. It's like in their mind if they honored the smallest one, they would have to honor the two larger claims, for they were submitted at exactly the same time.

It's also a shame that they've opted to withhold the names of the independent auditors. Yes, more than one, for Boussac said such in the OP of this  thread. But, no problem, for when I get done, some French banking institute, or two, will whip out their microscope(s) and see what the hell is really going on over at Bitcoin-Central. I'm not just some fuckturd here in Sandwich, IL, tossing shit into a fan because I like it.

Remember, Davout and Boussac, don't bother replying to my posts unless you're asking me what wallet I'll be using for you kind folks to send me the settlement, otherwise the following will be part of my reply: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHg5SJYRHA0.

More to come, a promise or a threat, however you desire to perceive it.

~Bruno Kucinskas

Well, ain't this special! Looks like a lot of interesting transactions transpired prior to the creation of https://blockchain.info/address/1LrPYjto3hsLzWJNstghuwdrQXB96KbrCy, namely InstaWallet's Cold Storage wallet https://blockchain.info/address/1FrtkNXastDoMAaorowys27AKQERxgmZjY, moreover during the time frame that Davout had the following in his signature prior to InstaWallet going dark and not returning to this forum until April 18, 2013, 17 days after the supposed "hack" occurred, last seen on March 21, 2013, in sprite of InstaWallet's customers (of which Boussac claimed InstaWallet didn't have any customers) demanding where Davout was.


From the looks of it, I'm pretty sure I'm on Boussac and Davout's ignore list, of which is fine with me, because as soon as I'm quoted and they start seeing tx from the 'blockchain' on this thread, they'll be singing a different tune. The only tune I want to hear is what address of mine can they send my settlement to, otherwise this is the tune I WILL link to: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ (think meme, not its title).

Here's my promise or threat, however its perceived: I will be dedicating the next few days to this thread, linking and discussing a myriad transactions that transpired prior to, and after the supposed "hack". When I get done, this thread is going to look like a mini blockchain, for I've already uncovered a slew of bitcoins moved outta InstaWallet's cold storage to fat-ass wallets, and they're still unspent. Likewise, I found fat-ass wallets as part of settlements that they too are unspent. Looks to me that InstaWallet had/has control of said wallets and possible was using InstaWallet as their own personal laundry money service. YOU'RE GODDAMN RIGHT I SAID IT AND I WILL NOW GO ABOUT PROVING IT. I'm 100% certain that they don't want others looking into their affairs, for it'll cost them more than just those coins when the authorities start digging. I promise you that.

I'm sure that if I'm a nutcase, then the bank backing Bitcoin-Central will pay this nut-job's action no mind. But, if what I'm about to unleash is true, then I'm pretty sure Bitcoin-Central's customers (if Boussac deems them to be such, for according to him InstaWallet didnt' have any) will soon be making a mass exodus, for I'm about to make some fucking noise, whereupon the principals WILL be in some serious damage control mode. These fuckers weren't playing fair from the get-go, and they sure the hell aren't playing fair now.

Again, take it as a threat or promise, either way I'm about to toss shit into the fan and there's only one way to stop me from doing such, otherwise you get Rick Roll'ed.

~Bruno Kucinskas
406 W. Center St.
Sandwich, IL  60548

815-508-1668

PS: For the record, everybody reading this knows more about me and where I live then of any one of the principals of InstaWallet, Paymium, or Bitcoin-Central, and they're in control of millions of dollars in BTC of fellow bitcoiners.

That narrowed it down: It's a well-know French IT-security firm.

Glad to see you filed it with LE. Sadly, I haven't a clue as to who or what LE is.

So, we're not getting the name of the security firm eh? I'm pretty sure they're some big outfit that has a website for everybody on the planet to see and inquire about, but you opt not to give us their name. I'm going to take a stab in the dark and state THERE IS NO SECURITY FIRM THAT CONDUCTED AN AUDIT OTHERWISE YOU WOULD HAVE GIVEN US A NAME. This is not privileged information we're seeking. Besides, it's not like the outfit is going to offer up information to some Joe Blow. But, at least they'll be able to confirm that an audit did take place.

One more thing. You said: It is a well-known French IT-security firm.

Kinda negates:


Plural > Singular

Meanwhile, while you're huntin' those fathom INDEPENDENT AUDITORS, I'm goin' be doin' some BLOCKCHAIN FORENSIC ANALYSIS on my own.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.1809889


https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.1818944


Guess what? 11 months later is the next scheduled payout.