What the OP is doing, in my opinion, actually has good intentions to improve the economy of the people around where OP lives, but in my opinion, the way she does it and his understanding of Bitcoin are still not quite right.
OP hopes that the people in his place can be successful and improve their economy by trading Bitcoins. I think this is a very inaccurate understanding. Bitcoin investment or trading will not quickly recover their economy.
In reality it will not be that easy to succeed in investing or trading Bitcoin.
It's good that you like your community to be knowledgeable in crypto,but it is too risky to start investing even trading if you don't have stable source of income or job. It is better to establish job first that can hire the people in the community and teach them the value of budgeting and saving.
What you say is absolutely true, in my opinion, the conditions experienced by the community where the OP lives are more important to focus on increasing their job or income before suggesting and introducing them to try investing or trading crypto.
Because it's true that if you introduce investment or crypto trading to the public, but those people don't have a stable income, of course that will make it more difficult for them or maybe even lead them in the wrong direction and add to their burdens of life.
I hope that OP can gradually improve the economy of the community and maybe have to focus more first on creating or initiating a business, for example maybe OP can create a business that also empowers the surrounding community such as making any innovation to be sold so that people who engaged have a better income.
Then after the community is a little more prosperous, then gradually introduce them to the concept of investing or saving, only then introducing cryptocurrency.
I hope that the OP will be more careful and wise in introducing Bitcoin so that his good intentions do not backfire against himself.