~snip~
Some people cannot invest into bitcoin for longer periods, and it partly depends on your age and other possible factors that you might foresee that might cause you to have a lower timeline.. so if you are in your late 60s you might start to get concerned about how many years that you have to live and how many expenses that you might have, including that you might be starting to live off of your investments rather than being able to put more money into investments through earned income that might go up.. but fixed income does not tend to go up and fixed income might seem like it is shrinking with the passage of time because prices go up but the fixed income does not go up as rapidly as the prices of goods and services.
However, it is possible for older people to still invest in bitcoin but it depends on the purpose.
Some people (especially young people) are definitely investing in bitcoin for their old age to make their lives more secure, some others are investing in bitcoin for the future of their young children, and it is also possible for people to invest in bitcoin with the aim of passing it on to their heirs.
Yes I understand when talking about the needs they will spend while they can no longer work. But on the other hand we know that most bitcoin investors are entrepreneurs who ensure that they will get income even if they just sit idle, in short the money works for them.
Including myself, if I can and am able I have a desire to give my inheritance one of them in the form of bitcoin. Of course it will be a long process to realize it all, including I have to educate my family (children especially) about bitcoin, so that they are not confused later what they should do with the bitcoin they have from inheritance.
Of course people can choose whatever goals that they want, and even if they do not reach something like "fuck you status," a long term investment into bitcoin is still likely to give a lot more options rather than not having had invested into bitcoin or perhaps investing into some inferior fiat-based investment that ends up not necessarily appreciating in value or perhaps even losing value in comparison to the cost of living.
So the general idea of fuck you status is to try to bring yourself (and perhaps your family) to a status of income (or investment and/or income off of the investment) in which you can stop working and to still be able to sustain your standard of living, and to the extent to which you consider paying for the education of your kids as being part of what "you need to do," then that is your choice... there can be ways that you establish your budget, including considering a variety of expenses that you have to help you to determine how much wealth (or size of an investment portfolio) that you believe that you need in order that you may well be able to stop working and to allow the income from your investment portfolio to be enough to support the standard of living that you are accustomed to or that you determine would be sufficient in order to make you feel content with your status of your life and your decisions to stop having to work for a living (besides perhaps jobs that are completely - or mostly - at your discretion) rather than being a kind of grind on yourself.
I go over quite a few of these ideas of fuck you status in
my thread that attempts to cover my various ideas related to investing.
I think investing in Bitcoin is very beneficial in student life. Because the importance of Bitcoin is essential to keep pace with today's world. If you have something left over from your student income after spending the household, or trying to save it, it is possible to become very financially independent by investing in Bitcoin. I invested some money in Bitcoin a few days ago and made some profit from it. I am very satisfied with that. I earned 40 dollar per month, from that I spent 20 dollar in household and invested 20 dollar in Bitcoin. I have benefited a lot from it. This achievement is very big for me in my student life.
Bro are you serious? I'm not trying to patronise you on investment here but $40 per month and $20 for investment and $20 for family needs. Is that really enough?
I think this is too much, although indeed bitcoin has a decent place for investment but when looking at the financial division that you do indirectly it makes you divide 50/50 in all your income and I think it's not very ethical. at least think about your family in a month $20 is in my opinion too small.
Bitcoin is indeed very good to be used as an investment material but there is no need to sacrifice other things and I still feel that if indeed it is your entire income for one month then it is better to use it for daily needs first until you get more money because this is an investment not for the betting arena by putting half of what you have in finances for one month.
Surely everyone's situation is going to be different, but I agree with the general idea that it may well take quite a bit of increase in income before most normal people are going to be able to get to such higher level of investments that allow 50% of their income to go into investments.
But surely there may be guys/gals that ONLY have their own expenses to worry about and they are able to cut their expenses to minimum levels and perhaps without being leaches upon society.
Usually there seems to be some kind of obligation to not be mooching off of others and making sure that you are sufficiently paying your own fair share, but at the same time, there could be ways that guys/gals contribute to their families in non-financial ways, so they might reasonably consider themselves in a position in which they do not necessarily need to make family financial contributions.
But yeah, everyone should attempt to consider what are his fair monthly expenses for housing, food, utilities, transportation, entertainment, miscellaneous and even emergency expenses... and then whether his/her income is consistent or not, there would be some abilities to figure out how much is left, and frequently normal people may well have troubles saving anything, and they may well be doing quite well in their savings/investing if they are able to get over 10% and even better the higher percentage that they are able to put away.. so long as they do not overdo such matters, and they are able to sustain that they have not overly invested in such a way that they have not adequately accounted for their own expenses, including emergency expenses.
On to the subject of discussion: Bitcoin wasn't invented to be an investment first and foremost. It was invented to be a new form of currency which has superior aspects over traditionally currency. If you actually use Bitcoin for what its for you may end up saving and potentially making more money than if you were to have invested in it.
Sure, historically speaking its a great investment, but if everybody who bought it only ever used it as a profit-making mechanism it would be no different than any Ponzi scheme.
You seem to be too smart for your own good nutildah.
Of course, bitcoin can be an investment, and your assertion regarding what is supposedly a "ponzi scheme," or how merely focusing on investing into bitcoin would narrow it into being a ponzi scheme (or close to a ponzi scheme or whatever it is that you are striving to say) comes off as a wee bit patronizing.. as if you really know how bitcoin should be used, considered or promoted by others in order for bitcoin to be legit. ... or how people should think about bitcoin in order for their ideas about bitcoin to be valid.
Let's see how it plays out.
I will concede that people have all kinds of ideas about bitcoin, yet many of us likely can appreciate that bitcoin is for everyone, whether you like them or not and/or whether they are going to try to manipulate bitcoin or try to find ways to profit unfairly from their involvement in bitcoin - and "we" get into dangerous territories when we try to be too prescriptive about how other people need to be thinking about or talking about bitcoin, even if they might end up being wrong in terms of how they think about bitcoin or how they talk about bitcoin.
Do you have the keys or not? Do you engage in critical thinking in regards to your own decisions to invest or not? Do you take responsibility over your own decisions regarding whether to invest and if you do decide to invest how much - and how aggressive or whimpy are you going to be? Did someone persuade you in regards to how you think about bitcoin or how you invest? Who's fault is that?
Remember that we are in a public thread, so all of my references to "you" would not necessarily be referring to uie-pooie.
Not many people can wait for years, especially those who may enter and then the bear market arrives, it will certainly take a longer time than we buy now that the market is moving up slowly but surely.
Your timeline should well end up affecting the size of your position... so frequently if you are entering into a volatile investment like bitcoin, then you would lower your investment amount if you are concerned about the volatility.. rather than raising it and hoping that you are able to take advantage of the volatility.. but sure some people do gamble with bitcoin (rather than investing) and sometimes it can end up paying off for them in the short term
What I caught in this is that it indirectly shows that the level of aggressiveness is also affected by this because indeed seeing from what you said about the timeline, then indirectly this has also been tried and invested several times regardless of whether the market conditions are good or not it will determine different results from the level of aggressiveness of existing investments because the benchmark may be two in this case if they invest at a time that is actually quite good with the DCA pattern or buy on the dip then it is possible that they will increase the proportion to be in bitcoin because they have felt the impact before but when they are in a high enough buying condition and a crash like before this can make the level a little reduced even if they add a good load there will definitely be concerns that occur when continuing to take positions for investment.
It is very difficult to figure out how to buy on dips in any kind of an aggressive way that does not end up causing frustration due to running out of money when the BTC price continues to dip and dip and to dip more, even after you have made several buys on dip.
Personally, I believe a mostly DCA strategy with perhaps some modest attempts to buy on dips will allow more aggressiveness overall without necessarily causing as much stress as trying to figure out how much of a dip is a good dip, so in that regard, I consider DCA way better in terms of figuring out how aggressive that you might want to be without necessarily devolving into being too aggressive.
I think that if you fuck around too much with attempting to figure out dips and being aggressive about the dips, then you are more likely to get yourself into trouble rather than trying to be more conservative in terms of your mostly trying to figure out your DCA amount and sticking mostly with being aggressive in regards to DCA.. and maybe once you have built your investment portfolio up to several years worth of income, then maybe at that point, you might start to feel that you can afford to be more aggressive, but if you find that you have spent several years building up your investment portfolio to be worth several years of your income, you might be a wee bit reluctant to become overly aggressive, and your years of experience of building up your investment portfolio in such a way will teach you how to limit your aggressiveness in such a way that you are mostly preserving ammunition.. even while you are DCAing from time to time too.
I can say that people who invest in bitcoin are people who have a great sense of patience, because again the time they wait is not a short time. Maybe it can be said that waiting for 4 or 5 years is also a short time.
Some people cannot invest into bitcoin for longer periods, and it partly depends on your age and other possible factors that you might foresee that might cause you to have a lower timeline.. so if you are in your late 60s you might start to get concerned about how many years that you have to live and how many expenses that you might have, including that you might be starting to live off of your investments rather than being able to put more money into investments through earned income that might go up.. but fixed income does not tend to go up and fixed income might seem like it is shrinking with the passage of time because prices go up but the fixed income does not go up as rapidly as the prices of goods and services.
That's one possibility because even in this forum I found several people who were older than I imagined and it's also possible that they thought of this so they stopped faster but for other conditions sometimes there are also several other references such as starting to introduce their children so they can continue what what they did before.
This also makes a bit more sense but the ones doing this are those who truly believe that the offspring can do well because if they can't then the first option as you said is the most likely thing to do.
They also realize that old age is actually their time to relax with their family and enjoy the rest of life in comfort.
It seems to me that people do want to help their children, but surely not in any kind of way that would screw up the kids own abilities to find themselves, so frequently the parent might not need to finance the kid as much as what might be presumed, but instead attempt to lead by example, and to be somewhat moderate in terms of the amount of finances to provide the kid.. I know that people are going to vary in regards to how much they feel that they might need to dig into their own finances or to budget their own finances for the needs of their kids.