If you want more BTC, then you need to figure out various ways to buy more rather than selling in order to try to buy lower... and also fuck shitcoins, if you are suggesting to get involved in some kind of a shitcoin in order to increase your BTC stash.. that would mean that you are distracted, and you probably would be better off figuring out various side hustles to earn more money in order to buy more bitcoin to get yourself up to buying $100 per week of bitcoin rather than $10 per month of bitcoin.
An ideal investor never invests in Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies at the same time.
People have to choose for themselves, and we are in a bitcoin section (thread), so we are focusing on bitcoin here... but yeah, people will frequently get distracted by shitcoins, and they might not even know what bitcoin is.. so they study shitcoins and they believe that bitcoin is part of what they are studying
In this case, however, if one tries to invest in multiple currencies at the same time, then the investor's attention will be lost and he will not be able to make the right decision when investing in Bitcoin.
Sounds like you are just saying the same thing that I already said, but yeah nothing wrong with putting into your own words.
But an investor must invest a certain portion of his income on Bitcoins every month or every week. In this case, he must decide when to invest in Bitcoins and he must wait when the market goes into a dumping situation.
It is good to establish a budget, and frequently normies have bills coming due on a monthly basis, so frequently, there will be ways to structure your cashflow and your budget on a monthly basis. Some people will choose to invest into bitcoin once a month, but it seems to me that if there are some serious goals to reach bitcoin accumulation levels, then there might be some preferences to invest every week.. rather than monthly, and of course some people might choose a compromise approach of investing every two weeks.
There are different ways to manage getting to BTC accumulation target levels that likely would depend upon whether someone is starting from the beginning as a no coiner or if they are a low coiner, but then after they spend some time accumulating BTC, they can tailor their approach to maybe have less urgency in terms of at least building some kind of an initial meaningful stake, and a person who is able to lump sum into bitcoin is going to have had built a meaningful stake much faster than someone who might have a way smaller budget such as someone who ONLY has $10 per month, it will take a few years for the person with a low budget to have had built any meaningful amount of value into bitcoin.
DCA technique must be important for an investor because when one wants to employ without knowing the investment risk management then he must reduce the risk by applying DCA technique. But an investor must not invest all his dollars at once but must apply the dollar cost averaging system.
DCA is likely the best approach, but it is not the ONLY approach, and it is not the best for every person.
Part of the reason that DCA tends to be the best is because most people do not have any lump sum amounts that they can invest, and even if they do have lump sums, they might be feeling somewhat leary (or skeptical) about bitcoin as an investment, so DCA allows them to mentally and financially get used to bitcoin as part of their investment portfolio (even if bitcoin might be the ONLY thing in their investment portfolio - especially if they are a new investor).
There is nothing wrong with lumpsum investing into BTC or even buying on dips, but generally speaking there are a lot of people that might also want to include a DCA approach -either as their primary approach or a way that they supplement those other approaches.. even if someone might perform lump sum investments on a quarterly basis as a way to work towards establishing their BTC allocation target, that still might be considered as a kind of DCA, depending on how it is structured...
For example, if someone has a $100k investment portfolio that they have built over 10 years, and they have a job that pays them around $50k per year, so they are accustomed to investing around 10% of their income (that would be around $100 per week), then maybe they had ONLY invested around $50k into their investment portfolio, but the value of their investment portfolio has doubled over the past 10 years. So if they want to get into bitcoin, they might target anywhere between 1% and 25% of the value of their investment portfolio to end up into bitcoin, so they have options to divert value from their investment portfolio into bitcoin or they could divert their current investment straight into bitcoin, and if they continue with $100 per week into bitcoin, it may well take them a bit longer than 2 years to reach a target level of having invested 10%-ish of the value of their investment portfolio into BTC - so there is not necessarily a need for DCA or a need for an all or nothing approach in terms of picking which strategies to follow or within what kind of proportion to solve the investment, but a person who has already been somewhat successful in terms of investing for 10 years is going to have more options than someone who is brand new to investing.
Part of the reason that I suggest to focus ONLY on investing in 1 or two investments when you are early in your getting into investing and early into building your investment portfolio, is that sometimes it can take many years to get into a meaning amount of value such as somewhere between $20k and $50k before even wanting to start to diversify.. and the threshold for diversification is going to be a personal discretionary matter, but still may well not be necessary or even advantageous in the first few years of building an investment portfolio.
though 10k bdt (90 usd) is not big amount in a year but as a student it's enough investing. i don't appreciated that you invested all of your hard income in one basket, holding money in online it has risk so you should deposit some in offline in bank, there your money will safe.
You are correct that there is likely a need for anyone who is engaging in any kind of investing to have cash reserves, too.. So OP had suggested that he completely put money into bitcoin without even having cash reserves, and likely it means that he is not really even in a position to invest into any kind of a volatile asset such as bitcoin, because he does not have enough money to cover any emergency expense that might come at any time, and therefore it is not even really advisable that anyone should make any investment if they might end up having to cash out of their investment (because they have to cover some kind of an emergency expense) at a time that is other than their own choosing... so it may well be the case that OP is engaged in gambling rather than investing because he has not sufficiently/adequately thought through various emergency scenarios that might happen.. so in that regard, maybe he ONLY has enough of a budget to invest half of what he is investing into bitcoin and the other half should be kept for emergency expenses.. (he likely needs to either increase his income or decrease his expenses so that he can actually afford to invest into bitcoin without devolving into gambling behaviors).