Pages:
Author

Topic: Investors are getting smarter but why not developers???? (Read 756 times)

sr. member
Activity: 882
Merit: 260
Indeed that investors are really getting smarter that is maybe triggered to come out as a adaptation mechanism due to the recent scams they have been through that costs them a lot of money from their accounts and no feedback have been able to come back from their investments to profit. Investors have already learned from their past experiences making them a wiser individual to be able not to be fooled by random people that just aims to scam them. Well, that was just normal for an individual to develop and improve his instincts specially with regards to earning money which involves strategies that will help them to succeed in the path they wish to get imto. As investors get smarter, developers must always do the same thing to be able to get into the trend so that projects they wish to launch will gain the interest of the potential investors.
full member
Activity: 644
Merit: 127
★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!
It is hard to say what is the scam projects and what is not. Those heads of the project is creating a beautiful whitepaper that is why developers thought that this is gonna be a successful project. All we can do is to report someone who leads the said project so that they cannot advertise their project here anymore.
sr. member
Activity: 980
Merit: 255
Yeah investors are getting smarter day by day. It is obvious that many of these project are just there to scam innocent investors by luring them in investing in fake project. Developers also are just in for the money and not thinking about the effect to investors
I think there is another reason why investors seems to have gotten smarter, investors that are not smart are not going to survive for too long in the market, they are going to lose their money and most likely after that happens they will never invest in the market again.

During that time scammers got a lot of money but now the investors that remain are smarter, they have a lot more knowledge about the markets and about the history of cryptocurrencies and they are not going to be so easily deceived as the average investor of the past.
legendary
Activity: 1568
Merit: 1002
I guess they looking an exchanges that has low listing fees and they don't want to list in reputable exchanges because the listing fee there is too high for them so they prefer a small exchanges and I think they don't know if that exchange is a scam. We should tell them before they get listed a scammy exchanges.

developers certainly know about the reputation of each of these exchanges and again, they don't want to spend a lot of money just on exchange fees because maybe they realize the potential of the tokens they release won't last long. i think that is part of the reason why they are ready to take the risk when listing coins on the exchange that do not have a good reputation in the community
full member
Activity: 1344
Merit: 102
I guess they looking an exchanges that has low listing fees and they don't want to list in reputable exchanges because the listing fee there is too high for them so they prefer a small exchanges and I think they don't know if that exchange is a scam. We should tell them before they get listed a scammy exchanges.
jr. member
Activity: 338
Merit: 1
The Decentralized TCP/IP Internet Protocol
The truth is that developers needs to think of something new, the space is getting boring because almost all the developers are focused on creating the same thing no vision no development.
hero member
Activity: 1386
Merit: 503
If an exchange listing a coin for free then its probably a scam exchange,just see how much it will cost to list on reputed exchange like Binance.

But if developers looking for much cheaper option means they did't have enough money or trading volume to list on the better exchange.

None of them are smart here,everyone running behind more profits.
for example like this, for large exchanges such as binance, large fees and they are reluctant to enter there. means that they don't have enough money and means the project isn't working. they chose an exchange with a cheap or even free fee, instead it became a boomerang because it was prone to price scams and quiet of demand.
Well, if they knew that it would be a boomerang for them, I think they were really not serious about developing their projects. yes, it's good enough if the not-so-bad exchanger starts. but, some projects even put their tokens in a really bad exchanger. it's the same as turning off their own project.'
thinking about this, I sometimes only see projects that have a good market.
Some projects put a bad exchange and maybe it's a way to shut down their project or maybe they don't have enough funds to put in a good exchange and it's true what you say sometimes I rate a project that has a good market, but for now this if we see new projects as less profitable because most of them end in failure and perhaps lack of funding is the reason that developers choose to list their tokens in bad exchange.

That would be the main reason, due to financial reasons, they will choose to put their coin in a not so good exchange.
They focus more on things to benefit themselves and just let the project to die. And create another project just to repeat what they just did.

Agreed and a very good reason. and indeed the fact from what we know is like that, devs do not really care where the listing exchange place, if the project is already listed after that is abandoned and create new projects again. in other words, the devs who make projects and do things like this are a scammer, he said investors are getting smarter but in fact are still being fooled by devs of this kind.
sr. member
Activity: 1260
Merit: 315
www.Artemis.co
If an exchange listing a coin for free then its probably a scam exchange,just see how much it will cost to list on reputed exchange like Binance.

But if developers looking for much cheaper option means they did't have enough money or trading volume to list on the better exchange.

None of them are smart here,everyone running behind more profits.
for example like this, for large exchanges such as binance, large fees and they are reluctant to enter there. means that they don't have enough money and means the project isn't working. they chose an exchange with a cheap or even free fee, instead it became a boomerang because it was prone to price scams and quiet of demand.
Well, if they knew that it would be a boomerang for them, I think they were really not serious about developing their projects. yes, it's good enough if the not-so-bad exchanger starts. but, some projects even put their tokens in a really bad exchanger. it's the same as turning off their own project.'
thinking about this, I sometimes only see projects that have a good market.
Some projects put a bad exchange and maybe it's a way to shut down their project or maybe they don't have enough funds to put in a good exchange and it's true what you say sometimes I rate a project that has a good market, but for now this if we see new projects as less profitable because most of them end in failure and perhaps lack of funding is the reason that developers choose to list their tokens in bad exchange.

That would be the main reason, due to financial reasons, they will choose to put their coin in a not so good exchange.
They focus more on things to benefit themselves and just let the project to die. And create another project just to repeat what they just did.
sr. member
Activity: 1372
Merit: 252
If an exchange listing a coin for free then its probably a scam exchange,just see how much it will cost to list on reputed exchange like Binance.

But if developers looking for much cheaper option means they did't have enough money or trading volume to list on the better exchange.

None of them are smart here,everyone running behind more profits.
for example like this, for large exchanges such as binance, large fees and they are reluctant to enter there. means that they don't have enough money and means the project isn't working. they chose an exchange with a cheap or even free fee, instead it became a boomerang because it was prone to price scams and quiet of demand.
Well, if they knew that it would be a boomerang for them, I think they were really not serious about developing their projects. yes, it's good enough if the not-so-bad exchanger starts. but, some projects even put their tokens in a really bad exchanger. it's the same as turning off their own project.'
thinking about this, I sometimes only see projects that have a good market.
Some projects put a bad exchange and maybe it's a way to shut down their project or maybe they don't have enough funds to put in a good exchange and it's true what you say sometimes I rate a project that has a good market, but for now this if we see new projects as less profitable because most of them end in failure and perhaps lack of funding is the reason that developers choose to list their tokens in bad exchange.
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 1
Yeah investors are getting smarter day by day. It is obvious that many of these project are just there to scam innocent investors by luring them in investing in fake project. Developers also are just in for the money and not thinking about the effect to investors
sr. member
Activity: 966
Merit: 250
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
investors are invading some exchanges why not developers? i know listing fee can be huge but few exchanges are just scam practitioners, developers should take their time to check out scam accusation thread on this forum and see how many people are been ripped off by these so called exchanges e.g idax p2pb2b among others

I think the difference is obvious here. Investors draw with their own funds, which means they try to more carefully study projects for investment. Developers simply do the work and get rewarded for it, while their risk is much less than that of investors. So it turns out that the investor is better versed in crypto projects than developers.
I don't think so, because the experience that developers have is also needed to be able to develop the projects they have. Because for me the developer plays an important role for the success of a project but developers cannot do it themselves and they need the role of investors to be able to carry out plans that have been prepared so that the project can run smoothly and successfully.
sr. member
Activity: 914
Merit: 250
Making Smart Money Work
Raising fund with top exchange surely makes a new project reach hardcap easily, why not come to agreement with top exchanges instead? Many developers don't bother to do research on exchanges before listing on them, few small exchanges are still good too
Do you mean IEO? I don't think it's easy to launch IEO on large exchanges because besides the cost of the exchange, the team of exchange have to be more careful in choosing projects to launch. And the developer mistake is to force the collection of funds on an exchange that has a bad reputation so that investors are not interested.
hero member
Activity: 1624
Merit: 791
Bitcoin To The Moon 📈📈📈
I think not all boils down to fees, back in the good old days, a project could list in a shit exchange and it would still get a very huge volume upon listing, but it's different these days but some developers are just too low budget to afford listing in better exchanges even if they want to, so they instead go to the shit exchanges in the hopes that their listing fees could be affordable.
that's the real problem, the inability of developers to strengthen all funding capability structures before actually introducing projects to the public sphere, and the majority eventually become trends that affect their quality, in this case developers don't think at all about how investors can support the stability of their projects, only around how the project can make money as soon as possible.
full member
Activity: 229
Merit: 108
investors are invading some exchanges why not developers? i know listing fee can be huge but few exchanges are just scam practitioners, developers should take their time to check out scam accusation thread on this forum and see how many people are been ripped off by these so called exchanges e.g idax p2pb2b among others
The main reason is that they don't risk any money. They are just execpting every opportunity that knocks to them without considering its effect to their clients. On behalf of that, investors are getting smarter because they are risking their money. Unlike developers, if they accept every opportunity that knocks to them, there is a huge possibility that they ended up being scammed rather than making a profit.
sr. member
Activity: 1274
Merit: 252
investors are invading some exchanges why not developers? i know listing fee can be huge but few exchanges are just scam practitioners, developers should take their time to check out scam accusation thread on this forum and see how many people are been ripped off by these so called exchanges e.g idax p2pb2b among others
Being a developer is not easy, as an investor experience and determine which is more profitable and convincing can be supported by several things and what developers provide. while developers have to think about how to fulfill the wishes of the investors (profits) with what they will get. I have had experiences that are not much different from this, but this is indeed difficult for developers, especially with investor pressure. in my opinion this is not a matter of smarter or not but rather the personal developer itself.
sr. member
Activity: 1078
Merit: 250
Raising fund with top exchange surely makes a new project reach hardcap easily, why not come to agreement with top exchanges instead? Many developers don't bother to do research on exchanges before listing on them, few small exchanges are still good too
True, but making deals with top exchanges does seem easier, but project developers are troubled by the conditions they must fulfill in order for their cooperation with exchanges to be established.
member
Activity: 462
Merit: 19
Exchanges cannot run on their own without any fees from the projects. If somebody is claiming for free, then probably they are going to runaway with most of the money from the traders. We have to extremely careful with such exchanges.
Raising fund with top exchange surely makes a new project reach hardcap easily, why not come to agreement with top exchanges instead? Many developers don't bother to do research on exchanges before listing on them, few small exchanges are still good too
K4C
full member
Activity: 448
Merit: 103
$CYBERCASH METAVERSE
I think not all boils down to fees, back in the good old days, a project could list in a shit exchange and it would still get a very huge volume upon listing, but it's different these days but some developers are just too low budget to afford listing in better exchanges even if they want to, so they instead go to the shit exchanges in the hopes that their listing fees could be affordable.
full member
Activity: 266
Merit: 100
i think its the otherwise..
investors are not getting smarter, most of them leave or make same mistakes
new comers investors coming and making same mistakes the old did + they think its a competition and shitting on projects in social media and make people run away from this space.
in other hand developers are getting smarter, because they kept building for the last few years and learned from their mistakes
the ecosystem is growing technically but not monetary
full member
Activity: 546
Merit: 100
Very nice title. Investors are becoming smarter. That's why they don't bring money into the market. There is no reason for new investors to come. Developers are announcing new agreements with Exchange instead of new products. Everything depends on the price!
Pages:
Jump to: