Pages:
Author

Topic: IOTA - Unmoderated thread - page 42. (Read 70768 times)

hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 1000
March 16, 2016, 09:57:35 AM

CFB worked hard for over a decade. Developing, researching and funding his own new hardware program in the hopes of revolutionizing the modern computing world. Completely redesigning the classic architecture ...


LoL

Plus, his Java software provided solution for virtually all major issues of our age including but not limited to curing cancer, creating AIDS vaccine, solving global warming and regulating the rigged Wall Street economy. Even the Belarusian Communist Party was providing free speech and press to the fan-boys of Lukashenko via the infinitely scalable IOTA tokens.

Fellow software engineers pointed out that his software is a shamble: there are hard coded configuration settings, serious design flaws and security concerns, there is no error handling, no proper exception handling, the object oriented design is inconsistent, there are no comments not even unit tests, etc. However, CfB refuted those concerns by pointing out that in order punch an IOTA token into a black hole via a time machine, he must implement a reference design, which of course is asynchronous and object oriented, in fact the polymorphism implements the interfaces of world domination and infinite richness. He said such programming nuances and consequently greatness can’t be learned in college.
Fellow software engineers pointed out that the whole talk about reference design does not make sense at all and of course he talks bollocks, but the IOTA investors’ fate in CfB was unshaken - he collected another few hundreds BTC from the crowd – which has absolutely no idea what he is talking about when bullshitting with the reference design – by promising that if he can get a bit more money from the idiots, then he will be able to punch the IOTA tokens into the black hole in an asynchronous manner, while a remotely controlled IoT device will be jerking off the IOTA investors in real time.

Indeed, the IOTA investors are very lucky.
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 1000
March 16, 2016, 09:51:12 AM

Such revolutionary products don't come often.


Warning, IOTA sockpuppet/shill alert!

legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
March 16, 2016, 08:22:00 AM
Not bad  Grin
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
March 16, 2016, 08:08:33 AM
Also, can the trolls please up the quality and post some facts for a change.

Today the trolls are not that funny as in good ole days.

Let's play a game, it may improve the percentage of funny posts:

As we all know altcoinUK claims that Iota team has no experience in a lot of things. Let's take one of Jinn USPs - distributed computing. This article of mine dated by July of 2002 - http://www.nestor.minsk.by/kg/2002/07/kg20708.html - scratches the problem of distributed computing. It's in Russian, titled "Distributed computations with minimal expenses". It indicates that 13+ years ago I was already interested in DC. After a decade even a very stupid person would get some experience in what s/he is interested in.

The task of the game: Find a good excuse why I wouldn't get more experience since that.

Example: Soon after the article publication CFB quitted programming to make career of a strip dancer.

PS: Try to be original.

CFB worked hard for over a decade. Developing, researching and funding his own new hardware program in the hopes of revolutionizing the modern computing world. Completely redesigning the classic architecture of cpu, ram, hdd, gpu and motherboard.

One day in the shower, he slipped and hit his head. He was fine and got up and continued to work like normal. Upon walking outside he realized he wasn't wearing his aluminium hate. By now it was too late. The government wiped his mind through beams from a satellite.

The next day he started Jinn. Cfb literally has no idea what he is doing. SCAMMM!

Edit: 'he' is referring to cfb.
legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
March 16, 2016, 06:19:48 AM
Also, can the trolls please up the quality and post some facts for a change.

Today the trolls are not that funny as in good ole days.

Let's play a game, it may improve the percentage of funny posts:

As we all know altcoinUK claims that Iota team has no experience in a lot of things. Let's take one of Jinn USPs - distributed computing. This article of mine dated by July of 2002 - http://www.nestor.minsk.by/kg/2002/07/kg20708.html - scratches the problem of distributed computing. It's in Russian, titled "Distributed computations with minimal expenses". It indicates that 13+ years ago I was already interested in DC. After a decade even a very stupid person would get some experience in what s/he is interested in.

The task of the game: Find a good excuse why I wouldn't get more experience since that.

Example: Soon after the article publication CFB quitted programming to make career of a strip dancer.

PS: Try to be original.
legendary
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1000
March 16, 2016, 05:49:41 AM
I don't understand ETH succes

Ethereum became successful because its team got an obvious thing - the world outside of this forum doesn't care about BTT and its users opinion. At all.

hahahahahahaha! Exactly! Which is why I find this Trollpit amusing sometimes too!
Yes, but the amusement value is limited when the same regurgitated blah blah, is posted over and over. Also, can the trolls please up the quality and post some facts for a change.
Bring back crumbs/NLC !   
legendary
Activity: 1181
Merit: 1018
March 16, 2016, 04:57:52 AM
I don't understand ETH succes

Ethereum became successful because its team got an obvious thing - the world outside of this forum doesn't care about BTT and its users opinion. At all.

hahahahahahaha! Exactly! Which is why I find this Trollpit amusing sometimes too!
legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
March 16, 2016, 04:30:17 AM
I don't understand ETH succes

Ethereum became successful because its team got an obvious thing - the world outside of this forum doesn't care about BTT and its users opinion. At all.
sr. member
Activity: 249
Merit: 250
March 16, 2016, 04:19:31 AM
I'am nobody and not connected with anyone here.  I admit I am a bit stupid, for example I don't understand ETH succes. In spite of everything I invested a little in these ICO. It was easy to find and has lasted more than enough to make my decision.
hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 500
March 16, 2016, 04:15:57 AM
Tim: feel free to engage him if you want, it can be hilarious entertainment to talk with trolls, but just making sure that you understand that he's 100% just a troll. None of his concerns are legit. He's just pissed he missed out on the ICO, nothing else.
legendary
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1000
Reality is stranger than fiction
March 16, 2016, 03:51:07 AM
I just stated that it was also mentioned elsewhere, where's the problem with that?

The ICO was clearly visible, whoever visits alt threads in BTT or reads news articles in big crypto sites had a big chance to see it and learn it. Nothing was hidden.

Honestly, I wouldn't think someone would complain about IOTAs IPO and distribution. It has gained a lot of participants and BTCs than many other IPOs (eg Qora).

Also I am not saying that all IPOs should be banned..IPOs are useful and exist for a purpose. I was just saying that it is not logical to use this kind of logic as an argument and rush into wrong conclusions.

Also, it seems that you regret not participating in it..well, you still can!

Such revolutionary products don't come often.
legendary
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG
March 16, 2016, 03:35:21 AM
.......
......
Oh really? No meaning at ALL? to you perhaps because you want to see no meaning.

How many BTC did MAID raise? How many did ethereum raise?  

ALthough if you insist we can only add that comparison as an additional foot note. We will compare how many people were aware of the LISK ico at the time it happened to those that were aware of the IOTA Ico.

Because it has no meaning to an Iota investor does not mean it will have no meaning to someone who had LISK in their face on every page for weeks before and during the ICO and has only ever seen IOTA mentioned the day MS added a mention on its page.... 5 seperate threads on the same main page saying the same thing. Then a buy and sell thread appearing on the main section.

It shouldn't take a wizard to see that surely?



IOTA was mentioned at a lot of places. Do you remember the DAG thread?? (https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/dagcoin-a-cryptocurrency-without-blocks-1177633). So what you say is not the truth (it has not only been mentioned the day MS added it).

Comparing any IPO with another won't lead you to a conclusion regarding fairness. First of all noone can prove how many different individuals (and not accounts!) have participated in any of the IPOs, thus your statement is invalid.


Edit: correct typo

So the only thread you provide as your counter is not even a thread started by the IOTA team. That is quite alarming.

That thread was not even started by Iota. They just jacked some other guy that is using DAG too?

PROVE??  look the onus is not on me to prove anything. bAlthough I have already showed within reason other ICO's have done a far better job or advertising their ICO before and during the ICO phase. The onus should be on ICO's to prove they are not gaming the distribution. Or to reasonable steps to avoid looking like they are doing a stealth ico. Like lisk is doing.
Not letting it get to the point where it looks 100% gamed then saying hey you can't prove anything because there could be just two members on this board with 20k sock puppets each. That does not work.

What you are saying is all ICO's should be banned from this board because fairness can not be proven even if user account names were listed.

This point was covered up thread. If a large proportion of this board voted or relayed their experiences with other ICOS then you are saying the amount of puppets is so large the entire sample must be ignored/trashed. That is far less likely than Iota being an stealthy insta ico. Although what you are saying favours POW only and banning ICO altogether because if a transparent (by the boards standards of using usernames) ICO is still highly open to scams by the dev team then one like iotas with no investor information is even more  open to being a scam.


legendary
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1000
Reality is stranger than fiction
March 16, 2016, 03:03:10 AM
.......
......
Oh really? No meaning at ALL? to you perhaps because you want to see no meaning.

How many BTC did MAID raise? How many did ethereum raise?  

ALthough if you insist we can only add that comparison as an additional foot note. We will compare how many people were aware of the LISK ico at the time it happened to those that were aware of the IOTA Ico.

Because it has no meaning to an Iota investor does not mean it will have no meaning to someone who had LISK in their face on every page for weeks before and during the ICO and has only ever seen IOTA mentioned the day MS added a mention on its page.... 5 seperate threads on the same main page saying the same thing. Then a buy and sell thread appearing on the main section.

It shouldn't take a wizard to see that surely?



IOTA was mentioned at a lot of places. Do you remember the DAG thread?? (https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/dagcoin-a-cryptocurrency-without-blocks-1177633). So what you say is not the truth (it has not only been mentioned the day MS added it).

Comparing any IPO with another won't lead you to a conclusion regarding fairness. First of all noone can prove how many different individuals (and not accounts!) have participated in any of the IPOs, thus your statement is invalid.


Edit: correct typo
legendary
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG
March 16, 2016, 03:00:43 AM



I don't want to see your point or any point that points away from my 3000% markup on my stealth insta ico tokens.

I'm sorry Sad
legendary
Activity: 1181
Merit: 1018
March 16, 2016, 02:52:28 AM
legendary
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG
March 16, 2016, 02:49:31 AM

......

I notice now LISK have raised nearly 7000BTC and still lot's of time left?

How many BTC did iota raise?

I am awaiting their final total to allow a more fair comparison with IOTA in the main forum thread.

......


Comparing the two IPOs does not have a meaning at all..

Lisk IPO was after the ETH pump and many whales (also small ETH initial investors) could participate in LISK to diversify. Can't see why comparing the total BTC sum will lead to any conclusion



Oh really? No meaning at ALL? to you perhaps because you want to see no meaning.

How many BTC did MAID raise? How many did ethereum raise?  

ALthough if you insist we can only add that comparison as an additional foot note. We will compare how many people were aware of the LISK ico at the time it happened to those that were aware of the IOTA Ico.

Because it has no meaning to an Iota investor does not mean it will have no meaning to someone who had LISK in their face on every page for weeks before and during the ICO and has only ever seen IOTA mentioned the day MS added a mention on its page.... 5 seperate threads on the same main page saying the same thing. Then a buy and sell thread appearing on the main section.

It shouldn't take a wizard to see that surely?

legendary
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG
March 16, 2016, 02:39:06 AM
NXT

You has ignored my requests not to derail the thread several times already. I can play the same game. I'm pressing [Ignore] button, good bye.

Oh no!  I bet you pressed the delete button first but forgot this is the thread where that option is blanked out?

Never mind I'm betting you'll take me off delete in the near future.
legendary
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1000
Reality is stranger than fiction
March 16, 2016, 02:38:22 AM

......

I notice now LISK have raised nearly 7000BTC and still lot's of time left?

How many BTC did iota raise?

I am awaiting their final total to allow a more fair comparison with IOTA in the main forum thread.

......


Comparing the two IPOs does not have a meaning at all..

Lisk IPO was after the ETH pump and many whales (also small ETH initial investors) could participate in LISK to diversify. Can't see why comparing the total BTC sum will lead to any conclusion

legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
March 16, 2016, 02:36:55 AM
And that's not even counting software licenses that can be resold for a higher price.

Interesting if the companies which released that software were reported to SEC Smiley
legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
March 16, 2016, 02:25:10 AM
NXT

You has ignored my requests not to derail the thread several times already. I can play the same game. I'm pressing [Ignore] button, good bye.
Pages:
Jump to: