Topic: IOTA - Unmoderated thread - page 45. (Read 70768 times)

It is not for me to define - it is for the board to define it it meets their classification of a scam/non scam.

To me anything ... innovative or otherwise can still be a scam if the distribution does not meet certain criteria.

That criteria is my own. Others will have their own.

All ICO should meet fair release criteria just like POW releases were at one time expected to.

You should have made far more effort with ICO advertising before and during the ICO after your experience with NXT.

NXT pulled this self enrichment scheme once before. The same people can not expect to pull it again.

The fact you may have 0.25% or less of the board with you now to afford a slight protection will certainly not be enough.

ICO here with no regulation and no transparency is open to huge manipulation. The onus should be on you and those running the ICO to show willing and desire to give open and fair opportunity to both examine and have time to digest the proposal and decide on investment.

It is impossible such a tiny distribution can succeed to persuade the rest of the board that a fair and open opportunity was given to all within reason.

You saying that about purchased accounts used for the ICO being of no consequence was a big mistake. The reason you gave or justification was an admission of guilt. You simply can't say it does not matter because the wider world will not find out and BTT does not matter. That is both incorrect and unethical.

I enjoy the profanity and silly pictures uploaded by your puppets but they will neither be able to change the facts nor will they help you and your scheme look any more professional. Only actions on your part can help your project now.

Hahaha, good one. It's exactly altcoinUK's case.

Scam - an opportunity to make money which I missed.

Define "scam", please. Is it the classical "an innovative project" used on this forum or your own made-up definition?

Aye, this is true. Why don't we start a thread on the main section? this will increase popularity much more!
You start one asking is IOTA a scam? then we can all join in and start discussing on there?
Your popularity and that of all of your previous scams/not scams will rocket.
Yes or no?

I like the part on tptbnw's thread where you said it doesn't matter if most of the accounts used for the ICO were bought sock puppet accounts because outside of BTT nobody will know or care.

That is at least a very honest statement. Although I think that you will find you could be wrong on that.

Aye, today was a good day, nothing increases the popularity as much as constant bumping of threads. Sadly, altcoinUK takes too long breaks that last several days.

Still not that much as towards Ethereum. Luckily, Ethereum community doesn't use BTT so we stole some attention.

lol yea right not gonna happen. mo money mo trollin.

Gotta say though, haven't seen such anger for a while.

Trolls have found each other! Congratulations 

WOW so many trolls shit. It stinks.

Hey wanker you have found each other Love of trolls

@CIYAM old pathetic piece of shit, asshole licking

@altcoinUK dick licking

It's all the same old song. PM me after you update the repertoire, please.

It would be impolite to ignore such questions. This is kinda obvious, no?

Really, who would thought that?

Just as I explained this to the IOTA "investors" several times in this thread, Microsoft accepts anybody to the Azure program. Of course, it was clear MSFT is selling Azure and sign-up virtually anybody who can submit a 10 lines description of their software. Finally, the IOTA "investors" who believed in David boy's lies & hypes about the MSFT partnership realize it as well.

Trying to divert the course of this to alcohol or spelling is very telling. Your paragraph is riddled with errors. Nobody cares. That is not important right now.

There needs to be no creativity. You need the only the facts.

Bring this to the main section. All this typing is wasted here. On the main section you will get more interest. Here you will spark only the interest of hardcore sock puppets since they are the only ones with a vested interest at this point.

At this point the weakness is that only a very very % of the board are invested. Once that changes scams are difficult to bring down.

The true nature of the scammers always shown up. At least we understand better why their JINN scam delivered nothing, generated zero revenue and yielded no dividends for the shareholders.

Wah? No 'international communist' comments today? ;\ Oh well, will be checking back in a couple of weeks to check if IOTA's success has become too much to bare for you.

This thread is a fantastic display of the non existent personal qualities and professionalism of the IOTA scammers. Thanks David boy and CfB for demonstrating with your attacks, lies, personal insults and trolling what a fine business and technology professionals you are. (The IOTA crowd must be happy that they invested in these two wankers)

haha, I just love trolls. But damn man you're english, how can you spell 'lose' as 'loose' ? Seems you've run out of lies about scam and track record. i'll give you something: Just watched Bernie Sanders' townhall from yesterday while eating dinner, do something with that again, just so we don't run out of creativity here.

LoL Again, you feel that you have to explain your track record for us. LoL  I told you son, this is not the battle you can win. Scammers always lose.