Topic: Iraq Isis Crisis: Medieval Sharia Law Imposed on Millions in Nineveh Province - page 3. (Read 6663 times)

Quote from: sana8410 on June 16, 2014, 11:34:23 AM

There are a lot of Christians who would disagree with you. Once again, the interahamwe were perfectly content to both see themselves as soldiers of God and as good Christians, while simultaneously engaging in genocide. The same could be said of the Chetniks in Bosnia, or the NLFT in India, etc.

But the point still stands, these are perversions that ignore the teachings. On the Islam side, they are following the playbook. Mohammad was a General while Jesus was the complete opposite.

Once again, they would completely disagree with you. Just like you and radical Muslims ignore Islamic scholars who call groups like Boko Haram un-islamic.

But the core of Islam is in full support of ISIS, which this thread is about.You don't see the Pope or any other prominent christian leader supporting warfare or genocide in today's world. Imam's around the world are in support of what is happening right now

I would strongly disagree, hell even Al Qaeda would disagree with you on that note. The ISIS is one of those organizations that even makes other Salafi radicals cringe theologically.

ISIS is a Wahhabist based movement, which is one of the strongest branches of Islam in that area. Saudi's, Qataris, and Emirates are large portions of these and they have DEEP pockets.

Not really. That's a pretty shallow classification of the organization. Al Baghdadi himself isn't a very strong theological leader and has had trouble organizing a coherent theological policy. They are much more so focused on the fighting and pillage of war, as well as power grabbing. It's one reason why they broke with al-Qaeda in the first place. They've never been particularly pious which caused Osama bin Laden to regret allowing them into Al Qaeda pretty much as soon as AQI was formed.

But, a couple of other points:

1.) The vast majority of the world's Muslims are not Wahhabi, so your notion that it is a fundamental aspect of Islam is a bit off.

2.) Being able to secure money from Wahhabis or gulf actors doesn't make their organization Wahhabi. that just means that gulf actors are interested in utilizing them to check political rivals in the region, which isn't a heavenly concern, it's an earthly political one.

zolace

sr. member

Activity: 364

Merit: 250

Quote from: zolace on June 16, 2014, 11:32:19 AM

Quote from: zolace on June 16, 2014, 11:32:19 AM

There are a lot of Christians who would disagree with you. Once again, the interahamwe were perfectly content to both see themselves as soldiers of God and as good Christians, while simultaneously engaging in genocide. The same could be said of the Chetniks in Bosnia, or the NLFT in India, etc.

But the point still stands, these are perversions that ignore the teachings. On the Islam side, they are following the playbook. Mohammad was a General while Jesus was the complete opposite.

Once again, they would completely disagree with you. Just like you and radical Muslims ignore Islamic scholars who call groups like Boko Haram un-islamic.

But the core of Islam is in full support of ISIS, which this thread is about.You don't see the Pope or any other prominent christian leader supporting warfare or genocide in today's world. Imam's around the world are in support of what is happening right now

I would strongly disagree, hell even Al Qaeda would disagree with you on that note. The ISIS is one of those organizations that even makes other Salafi radicals cringe theologically.

ISIS is a Wahhabist based movement, which is one of the strongest branches of Islam in that area. Saudi's, Qataris, and Emirates are large portions of these and they have DEEP pockets.

umair127

sr. member

Activity: 378

Merit: 250

Just heard CNN say that the US and Iran might have to work TOGETHER to protect Baghdad.

sana8410

sr. member

Activity: 448

Merit: 250

There are a lot of Christians who would disagree with you. Once again, the interahamwe were perfectly content to both see themselves as soldiers of God and as good Christians, while simultaneously engaging in genocide. The same could be said of the Chetniks in Bosnia, or the NLFT in India, etc.

But the point still stands, these are perversions that ignore the teachings. On the Islam side, they are following the playbook. Mohammad was a General while Jesus was the complete opposite.

Once again, they would completely disagree with you. Just like you and radical Muslims ignore Islamic scholars who call groups like Boko Haram un-islamic.

But the core of Islam is in full support of ISIS, which this thread is about.You don't see the Pope or any other prominent christian leader supporting warfare or genocide in today's world. Imam's around the world are in support of what is happening right now

I would strongly disagree, hell even Al Qaeda would disagree with you on that note. The ISIS is one of those organizations that even makes other Salafi radicals cringe theologically.

zolace

sr. member

Activity: 364

Merit: 250

There are a lot of Christians who would disagree with you. Once again, the interahamwe were perfectly content to both see themselves as soldiers of God and as good Christians, while simultaneously engaging in genocide. The same could be said of the Chetniks in Bosnia, or the NLFT in India, etc.

But the point still stands, these are perversions that ignore the teachings. On the Islam side, they are following the playbook. Mohammad was a General while Jesus was the complete opposite.

Once again, they would completely disagree with you. Just like you and radical Muslims ignore Islamic scholars who call groups like Boko Haram un-islamic.

But the core of Islam is in full support of ISIS, which this thread is about.You don't see the Pope or any other prominent christian leader supporting warfare or genocide in today's world. Imam's around the world are in support of what is happening right now

bryant.coleman

legendary

Activity: 3766

Merit: 1217

There are a lot of Christians who would disagree with you. Once again, the interahamwe were perfectly content to both see themselves as soldiers of God and as good Christians, while simultaneously engaging in genocide. The same could be said of the Chetniks in Bosnia, or the NLFT in India, etc.

1. Again, the Interahamwe targeted people belonging to the Tutsi ethnic group (Christian or non-Christian, it doesn't matter). Religion was not used to distinguish the victims.

2. Chetniks / Ustaše also killed people based on ethnicity. The Ustaše were even collaborating with the Muslims, to fight against the Serbs.

3. NLFT of India. Yes... it is a religious driven group. Receives a lot of funds from the Southern Baptists in the United States, and use them to forcibly convert the tribal population to Christianity.

sana8410

sr. member

Activity: 448

Merit: 250

There are a lot of Christians who would disagree with you. Once again, the interahamwe were perfectly content to both see themselves as soldiers of God and as good Christians, while simultaneously engaging in genocide. The same could be said of the Chetniks in Bosnia, or the NLFT in India, etc.

But the point still stands, these are perversions that ignore the teachings. On the Islam side, they are following the playbook. Mohammad was a General while Jesus was the complete opposite.

Once again, they would completely disagree with you. Just like you and radical Muslims ignore Islamic scholars who call groups like Boko Haram un-islamic.

zolace

sr. member

Activity: 364

Merit: 250