The bitcoin vs gold debate has raged on in investment circles since bitcoin has entered mainstream discussion among increasingly interested investors. Gold has been used as a form of currency and trade for thousands of years, and certainly has a track record for reliability and preservation of wealth. However, as the newcomer onto the scene, bitcoin may be the kind of financial and technological breakthrough to to challenge gold as the monetary kingpin.
Early on in its life cycle, seasoned investors began questioning the legitimacy of bitcoin value and debating how such a commodity could hold intrinsic value. What differentiates bitcoin from a mere collectible and what makes it similar to precious metal assets such as gold or silver? Among many circles, especially gold bugs and older-generation investors, bitcoin was not considered a valid investment up until very recently.
Which factors of bitcoin instill this validity of investment?
Watch VideoComparing gold with bitcoins is absolutely valid as the prices of both keep on changing.
If one day it's more the other day it might be less. But no doubt gold is always a better option.
As you can sell it and get paper currency which is widely used. Whereas bitcoin is used only in some places (sites).
See I don't think that comparing bitcoin with gold is,
at all a valid comparison.
I mean they are two totally different forms of investment.
Even though they are similar ,
But they are altogether different.
So you can't compare bitcoin with gold at any case.
Gold cam be used as a physical resource but bitcoin can't .
Whereas the rate of growth of gold is not as fast as That
Of bitcoin.
So bitcoin and gold are two totally different things with different assets and liabilities.
So they can't be compared.