Topic: Is cryptohunter spamming forum? - page 2. (Read 1010 times)

Lovely...

How about this....?

Too Lame , Definitely Retarded

Wait lauda worships me now?.... well that would not surprise me at all.

can't you stop spamming sigs you broke ass bum loser whilst promulgating per drivel. Yes I can provide in depth examples of several observable instances and their implications into a sentence or two. ahah  I don't know why I just dont do that?? thanks for the tip though.

You guys can put your posts into one or two words because they contain nothing but false accusations lol

Sorry but the only scammers here that I see are the ones you are felching pal.

NOW present some evidence for all of your claims please if that is not too much trouble.

Can't you see how NONE of your can present ONE shred of evidence to substantiate your claims. Do you not feel pathetic?  while one person just crushes you over and over.

The thread has already been debunked by the OP ..... why continue looking more stupid.

Imagine you dumbos trying to read a book if you struggle with a tiny page of text. haha

I see this thread just crashed into a pile of false allegations and my own legitimate, truthful, list of observable events that demonstrate what a bunch of losers in all conceivable ways you all are. haha

Let me have another sip of this very expensive wine and sit back and wait for more of the toothless hags here with no substance behind their shrill shrieks to  start crying to the mods to delete ONLY my posts. Oh wait the mods are here already all squeaking and spamming false accusations.

This thread could not have worked out more nicely to demonstrate the need for the debate of my 3 threads in the OP.

I sometimes wonder if it is one big troll where you all pretend to hate me and set up these threads pretending to oppose me but then gradually all debunk and contradict each other and yourselves until you just end up being on my side. hah its great though...you had me going for a while but it is getting too obvious now.

You guys...

Talking Drunk?
Truly Deranged?
Totally Drab?
Typically Dreck?
Tattle Dork?

Running out of ideas here.

Judging by your trust ratings you are an inspiration too.



For plagiarists & scammers

Jesus christ you pathetic little shit... Can't you just articulate your points in a couple sentences instead of entire essays.

You've really mastered the argumentum ad nauseam, rambling about non-existing crap. Jesus man, atleast get yourself a signature so you'll get some moola for your time here.



HAHHAHA.

Of course Cryptohunter is worshipped by scammers, plagiarists, and outright liars.

Can you demonstrate the crazy things that I am saying so I don't just view you as a bias mod trying to silence free speech here?

I mean I have seen you accused of trying to silence open discussion before by other people. I hope there is no truth to it because already this board looks like it is sliding into biased moderation that are on the make.

I also notice you are a fellow fortune jack sig  spammer? I wonder if you are pals with the others like lauda, TMAN and the other PROVEN untrustworthy scum that spam that everywhere?

Sorry if that seems off topic but since you find it on topic to accuse me of being crazy with no EVIDENCE then I think It is only fair that I point out possible reasons for your sudden appearance and more false allegations. The same allegations TMAN seems to try and rely on when all other allegations fail.

I notice you did not object to the politically delivered 20 merits you got for sniping at me in my other thread where you basically admitted you wished I would leave the forum?  from your pal TMAN...... hmmmmm?? 20 merits for a post that was just a biased and invalid piece of net negative dirt 1 line trash.

Or perhaps all just coincidence? I wonder.

long posts = crazy ....haah okay.


@moron bozo  - you have failed to present any evidence of myself presenting false information so we must conclude that I am presenting the TRUTH and observable events. Thanks for creating a thread that demonstrates that my 3 sensible polite and important threads are very useful and demonstrate the need for such a debate on all 3 scenarios.
Same for all the other false accusers here.....NOTHING being presented.

flyinghellfish -  Please present the statements in my post that demonstrate I am crazy. I am waiting. Or recant your false allegations.

Mods here are openly biased it would seem? That is like admitting you are the wrong person for the job. Don't worry I will take your position for free and won't need to spam gambling sigs everywhere. The more mods that openly come out in support of proven scammers, trust abusers, liars, probable extortionists, proven sock puppet racist sig spammers..... most sharing the same sigs. The more you  just look corrupt and self serving. Keep it up.

When your TLDR is still TOO FUCKING LONG...

You need good points for that.

2 more false accusations.... getting a bit light on the evidence I asked you to present suchmoron. Like you have not presented any you toothless hag. All bark and snitch with no bite yourself   wassup can't find ANYTHING to bolster your lies? keep begging more to get me banned snitchy you look more pathetic daily.

I guess you learned better than to debate with me in public...

I know you don't probably have real friends who would be willing to come and join to continue your net negative work. I do however have many great and real friends who will gladly do follow on from me and continue to post observable events to aid the person of this board to regain freedom of speech.

I want you to present evidence of these consistent false accusations ....admit you can not?

@darklus123

Good points do not become less valid because they are repeated.

Sometimes one must repeat things until the issue is resolved.

that last part was me being sarcastic - that is NOT the definition it is what they are claiming is the definition.

CryptoHunter, I am "AMAZED" and "THRILLED" after reading your views, it's sad that people like "YOU" are "DISRESPECTED" who are genuinely trying to give this forum "SUPER" ideas and making it better.

But like I said, these are "JEALOUS" people, so they can "NEVER". Or in fairness, they do "UNDERSTAND" but they will "NOT" accept because they are "JEALOUS".

Please continue with your ideas, If I have time, I will create E-Books out of your views and send it as a "GIFT" to the Admin.

At first I really thought that he is giving good points to discuss but when i saw that his been posting a lot for me having the same context is sometimes really annoying.

Sorry I still can't find this definition from my dictionary. I've done it before ranting about something and I swear it is really not working dude unless you do it in a more appropriate approach.

If CH gets banned and continues to troll using his friends alts we're gonna need a dedicated moderator just to nuke them 24/7.

sorry guys gang just been beating some one 3-0  with far less skill at tennis.... kind of like meta board. But they don't cry and snitch and try to get your tennis racket taken away because ............. well false allegations and lies.

Let's answer each person that has replied since I've been away. You know I like to treat you all equally and fairly. Even though you do not deserve it.

Take your time and digest all of the information that I kindly provide.

If it is too much for you to cope with then don't attempt to read such long posts without your mommies and daddies to help you with it all. Sorry that somethings require more than 10 words to answer ,especially to multiple people.
Just read the little bit with your name next to it if you like. It is more manageable that way.




Moronbozo - sorry.. I meant clear examples of spamming or trolling. I mean even you ask "is" crypto hunter spamming. Since I see that even you are in clear doubt over the matter I hardly thought those would be the strongest examples you could find to demonstrate clearly that ............you are a full retard.

 I have just told you WHY they required separate threads because of how easily confused you all are, and  having 3 different conversations with you all at the same time would be distressing and confusing for you guys. Even when I try and make things easy for you then I am the bad guy

Why should loyceV not be asked to merge all of his stats raw data puke on to one thread. I have seen 8 or 9 or more of his stats sharts taking up the nearly entire frontpage of meta? Is he not spamming?? Is this off topic to draw a comparison with someone who opens tons more threads on his fav stats topics? I am interested to know genuinely.


Please bring some examples of the "obviously incorrect information" that I am promulgating all over the place after it has been clearly debunked, and my "trolling" we can then compare it to the financially motivated sneaky greedy racist trolling sig spam of your sock puppeting pal the pharmacist aka huge black woman. Who you must want banned right away...right? who himself is calling for a ban on the same grounds? double standards or is that off topic and not allowed??


As  I have said this thread serves as a perfect example of the why we need a sensible debate on what is permitted natural flow in all the scenarios that I kindly provided in 3 separate topics for open debate. It seems you all start crying whenever I try to bring discussion forth to establish some transparent and objective solid rules we can ALL follow. Not subjective chasms from which you all derive your own sets of rules that you all get to flout and then snitch on others for lesser evils and try to get them banned. LOL this is toooo easy.


@Joseph R. Cord

Thanks for the support. I am certain all persons that would like a transparent, fair and equal system for all would also view my posts in the same light. I mean who would not support this kind of system for which I am fighting for.

@oeioeio - "amongst screeds of rambling nonsense and abuse. "

present evidence of the nonsense OR the unwarranted abuse (I will demonstrate clearly it is called the truth in the face of an attack) .  Hurry up I lose patience with dregs like you. Ass kissers are more sickening than the untrustworthy scum they fluff in public view.

Present some examples of this incorrect nonsense... I mean obviously if you are full retard as you clearly are, then things above your own comprehension may appear to make no sense to you. Sorry that's your parents merging their dna. You will be one of the orcs I'm afraid.

@suchmoron "obvious false nonsense, and notbatman and a few others are "habitually" posting that shit however I can't imagine them getting banned any time soon. Cryptohunter is firmly in that same category"

false accusation again from the dumbo as usual. Bring the evidence of the "obviously false nonsense" NOW or I want you banned for continuous false accusations. This is now promulgating lies over and over and then complaining about me presenting the truth lol . This is surely far more of a crime than presenting the truth ??

I crushed your feeble mind in front of the entire board several times. The more I read over my initial merit cycling threads the more I notice you are forced into making more and more stupid statements that now make you a laughing stock. The best one of the lot is after all your advocating merit as some useful reliable and fair non cycled metric  you go and debunk  your entire own argument by saying "good post" and "bad post" are meaningless terms without clear definition and criteria.... haha that is what I was pushing for in the merit system all along. Thanks suchmoron. What about "most" premerit legends are spammers, or the another hilarious one......nope I can't do it to you all over again your poor wretch.
 

You are respected only by greater fools.  What about your other stupid statements .... I could post them here but I feel like a bully keep bitch slapping you around with them in public. I crushed you too many times already and your mind imploded like a rotten pumpkin and now you are bitter and your pride is damaged. Get over it.. You are simply inferior to me and once you know your place in the pecking order you can be content and show me my rightful respect.

Sorry but never dig your heels in against a superior opponent especially when they are armed with observable events and factual information and all you have is the company of a bunch of fellow scumbags whom are mostly even more stupid than yourself.

 Lauda knows to hide away from me because once I drag that scum bag into an open debate about his past he will be crushed like an ant. You are no better, I feel you are just the front man for that gang.  You are like grima worm tongue in this play. Actually from now on I will refer to you as snitchmoon or grima worm tongue. You will answer only to those from now on until further notice. I let the others fight it out for saruman and sauron, lauda clearly needs to be melkor so I can not leave that open to the lower level dregs.

This is how I feel when I (gandalf) enter this god forsaken place sometimes....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iQExgALv9wI

As for destroying gandalf it is apparently impossibly by any means known to man. He is simply reborn until his task is completed. I found that an interesting fact.

Feel free to break that post down and prove me wrong and bring the examples of your false accusations else I will open a thread here asking for you to refrain from lying and making these false allegations or face the ban you snitching scum bags are trying to set me up with.

I noticed the vast vast majority of my deleted posts are actually legit and truthful defences with the observable evidence to substantiate my claims... posted usually in defence of attacks from scumbags like you OR presenting valuable background material in discussions regarding TRUST. Hence why we need to debate is it optimal or even irresponsible to hide relevant facts when discussing TRUST. This is especially important when people make false allegations or even statements that they offer no grounding for when discussing trust or the actions to be taken for people considered "by them" to be untrustworthy or deserving of punishment. Surely we can not allow people to tell lies and make false allegations without being able to challenge them. I don't want to have turn into a snitch yuck.

You guys then report my posts and because I never bother reporting your attacks and lies, I stack up a ton of deleted posts and you guys then think those "numbers" illustrate I an honest member presenting only the truth and observable events should be banned whilst a bunch of proven untrustworthy scum with observable dirty deeds get to red trust me and try 2x now to get me banned.

 You are only fueling my desire to crush you all with each disgusting tactic you pull to shut me up. A ban will simply allow my very good friends to join and they will rightfully talk about the true legend cryptohunter and all of his PROVEN and observable great and illustrious deeds, his constant fight for fairness and equality even for new people and those with little crypto worth even at his own cost, and his constant helping of those that are getting bullied. Actually this is how it all started when you were bullying some other noob around trying to get him banned on FALSE allegations. They will obviously keep telling the truth whenever it is on topic and relevant. They can not be banned for that until they are. Then their friends may choose to  join. Who can say what friends I have already on this board ready to start defending my good name and telling the truth about you guys. I have been here years and made many great friends.

I will gladly sacrifice my account to present the truth, fight for a fair and equal environment for all and the right to free speech. If this board seeks to shut down cryptohunter under false pretense then that is there in history for people to examine and that is fine. Many great people have to sacrifice things for the greater good that is bigger than themselves. Once again demonstrating how selfless and fair and good cryptohunter was.  The only person ever banned for telling the truth and fighting for a transparent fair environment for all and for those being bullied by power hungry, greedy and untrustworthy scum.

@Quickseller

Yes there could be some debate that 2 and 3 could be merged. I had considered this. However I want to draw a distinction between double standards (people who are knowingly advocating different actions for the same "crimes") and those that are not knowingly doing so because they are not privy to prior instances that have set a precedent.   If they must be merged then that is fine but I feel that there could be lots of discussion to drill down on both scenarios and the appropriate natural flow. There needs to be clear definition and guidelines. Where clarity is of paramount importance then eliminating any elements that could cause confusion is important. If someone feels the need to merge them then I will not fight it since there is a slight crossover.

It should be noted that my hostility or politeness depends on if I am being attacked or sworn at/ disrespected myself or people are supporting those attacking me and egging them on and meriting their groundless false accusations. I would not believe you would find me being super hostile to anyone that had not first been super hostile to me or had tried to join in with others that are falsely accusing me of being in the wrong when their arguments will not stand up to scrutiny and they know this.

TheNewAnon135246

Your fantasies are you own to enjoy. However, they are off topic and irrelevant and serve no real purpose. What you happens in your bedroom stays in your bedroom. Please remember that in future.


TLDR??

I see no evidence/examples of any of these false allegations or trolling or spamming??

 I see 3 very interesting and polite threads that were not personal that sought clarity,  and to see people claiming these are "deranged rants" or some threads jammed full of spamming and trolling is nothing short of laughable. These  are the actions of desperate and untrustworthy scum bags who start to realise they just fucked with the wrong account.  

Get my scam tags removed and anyone else that is not a proven scammer or STRONGLY intending to scam because until you do then I will insist on presenting on topic and relevant facts regarding YOUR PROVEN and clearly OBSERVABLE untrustworthy deeds..

It will NEVER stop until the abuse stops and free speech in no longer under threat here. Sorry if that is blackmail to you but ALICE will keep insisting the police do something about this crime until her phone is returned and she will insist that the police act like the police not just have the power of the police but act like criminals and support their criminal pals whilst making the victims pay and receive punishment.

Actually I am going to  approach this with from an angle with far more leverage soon, totally within the board rules and you're not going to like that one bit. Don't believe me? well you soon will. I really have nothing better to do than fight for fairness and equality. Satoshi would want that, so no more centralised colluding control systems abusing their powers. Since satoshis work has enriched me to levels I never dreamed about it is only fair that I fight to keep his forum as he would intend it to be.

I await the examples I have requested. If you fail to present them ( i mean there are about 20+ scum bags making these false allegations) surely you guys will together be able to find LOTS of examples right?

1. examples of obviously false information that has been debunked.
2. any examples of me fighting for anything else other than a transparent and fair system for all.

Like you say it's only 1500 posts or so since  I found meta you can't have that much issue finding me some examples if ALL of my posts are trolling, proliferating false information, lies, nonsense, ??  

PRESENT IT YOU Dirty Turds. Or quit your crying and snitching and hide away in your self moderated rep section. I own meta now, this my board. You have no power here any longer to lecture others and call them out for lesser foul deeds than your own, you gave it all away by being observably untrustworthy or by openly supporting those that are openly untrustworthy.  The rest of the DT's are snivelling cowards that will not even DARE look at evidence I present to them. In debate the great qwk (one more capable than most dummies here) even says

" the truth does not interest me"

" it is good when innocent people get red trust because it makes others more wary of scams"

NO, that is not how it is going to work.

The truth is of paramount importance and very interesting.  The innocent will not be punished.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I always imagine him wheezing like a pug while typing those long rants.

The second two threads can probably be merged into one, and or the last two be locked.

If you don’t want to read what he says, then you can use the ignore button, or simply ignore his posts.

Edit: if anyone has any questions as to what constitutes a low value post, see below:

The “value” of a post is less about your opinion of the content or your opinion of the person writing, and is more about if there can be a discussion, or a response to what is being said (ignoring the reputation of the author).

LOL, busted. Yes, there is a definition. Let me rephrase my statement. I don't see it being consistently enforced so I don't bother reporting under that rule.

For example flat earth is obvious false nonsense, and notbatman and a few others are "habitually" posting that shit however I can't imagine them getting banned any time soon. Cryptohunter is firmly in that same category but as long as he veils it in some sort of "fight for freedom of speech" BS - he's probably immune too.


Now if we could get CH to start posting on the Russian board...

I personally think he’s spamming, at the very least he should have his ability to create new threads in Meta removed. It’s the same old shit all the time.

I made this post almost 3 months ago (when he had already been spamming for 2 months), and it is just as true today as it was then:


Every time I make the mistake of clicking the show/hide button on one of his posts, I might as well be reading the same post every time. Since I made the post above, he's averaged 100 posts/week, all saying the same thing in amongst screeds of rambling nonsense and abuse. We have now put up with this derailing and off topic trash for 5 months. Given that pretty much every one of his posts breaks the 3 rules above, and he has posted almost 1500 times in the last 5 months, he has been given more leeway than any user in any online forum or discussion board I have ever seen.