Pages:
Author

Topic: Is Hillary Clinton Trustworthy? - page 26. (Read 234741 times)

legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon
April 30, 2016, 12:03:20 AM



Loretta Lynch: No Deadline For Clinton Email Probe






Attorney General Loretta Lynch said there’s no deadline for concluding the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s email server, and said setting a deadline would only make the probe less thorough.

“People have to have confidence that we treat every case the same, no matter who’s last name is involved, no matter how much publicity it gets,” Lynch said in an interview on PBS’ “Charlie Rose.”



http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/lynch-no-deadline-for-clinton-email-probe/article/2589902



legendary
Activity: 2310
Merit: 1028
April 29, 2016, 10:58:48 AM
There's no such thing as a "trustworthy" politician
So it's a nope nope nope nope
you are completely right .. on earth, there wont be a trustworthy politician. never.. every politician is liar and double-dealer.. so nobody represents the truth in politics..
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon
April 28, 2016, 11:18:09 AM



WATCH: Trailer for ‘Clinton Cash’ Movie Premiering During Cannes Film Festival






http://www.breitbart.com/video/2016/04/28/watch-trailer-clinton-cash-movie-premiering-cannes/


legendary
Activity: 1134
Merit: 1000
Soon, I have to go away.
April 28, 2016, 03:18:28 AM
It is better to trust Hillary Clinton rather
than Donald Trump.

The both of them will set you on the path to war, and expect Europe to join in.
hero member
Activity: 3136
Merit: 635
DGbet.fun - Crypto Sportsbook
April 28, 2016, 01:46:47 AM
It is better to trust Hillary Clinton rather
than Donald Trump.
hero member
Activity: 785
Merit: 502
April 28, 2016, 12:52:01 AM
When the Clintons rose to political power alot of people mysteriously disappeared around them. People who knew too much about all their financial scandals. It's a terrible idea to put another Clinton in power. 
legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1393
You lead and I'll watch you walk away.
April 28, 2016, 12:14:12 AM
I don't trust any animal that bleeds for five days and doesn't die.



hero member
Activity: 3024
Merit: 745
Top Crypto Casino
April 27, 2016, 09:28:36 PM
There's no such thing as a "trustworthy" politician
So it's a nope nope nope nope
I agree with you but I would rather choose Clinton than other candidates. I'm trusting Clinton to be the next president of USA.
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
April 27, 2016, 06:44:12 PM
There's no such thing as a "trustworthy" politician
So it's a nope nope nope nope
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon
April 27, 2016, 12:06:18 AM
Maybe if she gets the support of members of this forum, she will be happy to spend a little money to get vote.

She would have tried, but the demographics of this forum are not that attractive. Of the American users, more than 95% are white males, who are likely to support either Trump or Sanders. And most of them are ideologically-motivated. That means that even if Hitlery spends quite a bit of money, she won't be able to win any significant number of votes.

Plus $1 million doesn't go that far, most of it will have been spent on Facebook.

Meanwhile Bernie's campaign was airing television ads in Baltimore, not only after the polls closed, but after the results had come in showing he'd lost. He's just berning through all that money on pointless ads anyway. The man is a fool.


I don't think bernie is a fool. Rather his followers, going broke for this chimera, are. Fragile, dangerous mental state for a lot of them even.





Well yes, his followers are foolish. But so is the Sanders campaign team, booking ads for after the polls have closed and the results announced! You can control which time slots your ad airs! All I can think of is that his campaign manager gets commission for placing those ads and doesn't care as long as it is making him money, and Sanders is too stupid to realize what is going on.


He is not in charge of his own campaign. They are burning cash like there is no tomorrow, that statement is true. But I believe to keep the sheep alive and hoping, they need to see his face and message, even if it does not matter anymore. It is illogical for you and I, until you see this as a cult leader/blind followers relation instead. As long as they see him on TV, no matter when and why, there is still hope until next time, until the next phone bank, until... Etc, etc.





legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1088
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
April 26, 2016, 11:54:57 PM
Maybe if she gets the support of members of this forum, she will be happy to spend a little money to get vote.

She would have tried, but the demographics of this forum are not that attractive. Of the American users, more than 95% are white males, who are likely to support either Trump or Sanders. And most of them are ideologically-motivated. That means that even if Hitlery spends quite a bit of money, she won't be able to win any significant number of votes.

Plus $1 million doesn't go that far, most of it will have been spent on Facebook.

Meanwhile Bernie's campaign was airing television ads in Baltimore, not only after the polls closed, but after the results had come in showing he'd lost. He's just berning through all that money on pointless ads anyway. The man is a fool.


I don't think bernie is a fool. Rather his followers, going broke for this chimera, are. Fragile, dangerous mental state for a lot of them even.





Well yes, his followers are foolish. But so is the Sanders campaign team, booking ads for after the polls have closed and the results announced! You can control which time slots your ad airs! All I can think of is that his campaign manager gets commission for placing those ads and doesn't care as long as it is making him money, and Sanders is too stupid to realize what is going on.
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon
April 26, 2016, 11:46:34 PM
Maybe if she gets the support of members of this forum, she will be happy to spend a little money to get vote.

She would have tried, but the demographics of this forum are not that attractive. Of the American users, more than 95% are white males, who are likely to support either Trump or Sanders. And most of them are ideologically-motivated. That means that even if Hitlery spends quite a bit of money, she won't be able to win any significant number of votes.

Plus $1 million doesn't go that far, most of it will have been spent on Facebook.

Meanwhile Bernie's campaign was airing television ads in Baltimore, not only after the polls closed, but after the results had come in showing he'd lost. He's just berning through all that money on pointless ads anyway. The man is a fool.


I don't think bernie is a fool. Rather his followers, going broke for this chimera, are. Fragile, dangerous mental state for a lot of them even.



legendary
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1088
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
April 26, 2016, 11:34:02 PM
Maybe if she gets the support of members of this forum, she will be happy to spend a little money to get vote.

She would have tried, but the demographics of this forum are not that attractive. Of the American users, more than 95% are white males, who are likely to support either Trump or Sanders. And most of them are ideologically-motivated. That means that even if Hitlery spends quite a bit of money, she won't be able to win any significant number of votes.

Plus $1 million doesn't go that far, most of it will have been spent on Facebook.

Meanwhile Bernie's campaign was airing television ads in Baltimore, not only after the polls closed, but after the results had come in showing he'd lost. He's just berning through all that money on pointless ads anyway. The man is a fool.
newbie
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
April 26, 2016, 11:33:38 PM
how evil is she compared to bush?  Wink

They are joined at the hip bro...and she is even more nefarious if you could imagine that.

It all goes back to Mena Arkansas and the cocaine pipeline into America ran by the CIA aka as the Bush dynasty.

Prediction = wait till you see this version of the hanging chad!
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon
April 26, 2016, 11:12:36 PM
how evil is she compared to bush?  Wink








A prominent Ku Klux Klan leader says that the group has raised thousands of dollars for Hillary Clinton’s campaign and that the Klan is officially endorsing the Democratic frontrunner for president—a claim the Clinton campaign vigorously denies.

Shortly after setting a giant cross on fire with dozens of other members of various white nationalist groups in Georgia on Saturday, Will Quigg, a Grand Dragon in a California branch of the KKK, sat down with Vocativ—which was there for a larger reporting trip about the modern state of the hate group—to talk about the 2016 election. According to Quigg, “For the KKK, Clinton is our choice.”

“She is friends with the Klan,” Quigg said. “A lot of people don’t realize that. She’s friends with Senator Byrd. He’s been an Exulted Cyclops in the Klan. He’s been King Kleagle.” (King Kleagle is another KKK title for the leader of an entire “realm,” or state. Quigg is the King Kleagle for California.) Quigg was referring to the late U.S. senator Robert Byrd from West Virginia, who organized and served as the leader of a West Virginia Klan chapter in the 1940s. In 2005, Byrd publicly disavowed the Klan and called his involvement “wrong.” Upon the senator’s death in 2010, Hillary Clinton called Byrd a “friend and mentor.”

Quigg said that he and other Klan members have raised more than $20,000 for the Clinton campaign and donated it anonymously.

“In the Bible, it says when you pray, pray in a closed, dark place by yourself,” Quigg said. “Do not pray on the street corners where people can see you … that’s why I got $20,000 together and sent it to Hillary Clinton’s campaign anonymously.”

The Clinton campaign strongly denies receiving any donations from the Ku Klux Klan and rejects the organization’s endorsement. “This is completely false,” Clinton campaign spokesman Josh Schwerin told Vocativ. “We want no part of them or their money and vehemently reject their hateful agenda.”

It’s possible for the Klan to have donated the money without the Clinton campaign knowing —Federal Election Commission rules allow for small anonymous donations. And members of the Klan wouldn’t need to disclose their affiliation with the group if they did donate to Clinton’s campaign—only their names would appear on Clinton’s campaign finance filings.

According to Schwerin, the campaign has “not received anywhere close to $20,000 in anonymous donations in total, [so] it is impossible that they are telling the truth.” Vocativ independently verified this through FEC filings.

The endorsement seems a clear attempt to mar Clinton’s reputation—or perhaps a backhanded way to push voters towards Donald Trump, the GOP frontrunner whose stance on issues like illegal immigration falls more in line with the KKK’s. But Quigg denies this. Trump “couldn’t run this country more than he could run a county,” he says. “He knows nothing about politics, or about foreign affairs. He went to Israel and almost got thrown out.”

Former Klan leader David Duke previously endorsed Trump in the 2016 presidential campaign—an endorsement Trump didn’t immediately disavow. Duke, however, does not speak for the Klan, according to Quigg.

As for Clinton, “All the stuff she’s saying now, she’s saying so she can get into office, okay? She doesn’t care about illegal immigrants—she’s acting like she does so she can get into office. Once she’s in office, then she’ll implement her policies. She’s a Democrat. The Klan has always been a Democratic organization,” Quigg said.


http://www.vocativ.com/312479/kkk-endorses-hillary-clinton-for-president/


hero member
Activity: 882
Merit: 500
April 26, 2016, 09:41:16 AM
how evil is she compared to bush?  Wink
newbie
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
April 25, 2016, 11:27:27 PM
i think she is trustworthy and will work for betterment of country and people  Smiley
xht
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
hey you, yeah you, fuck you!!!
April 25, 2016, 07:03:51 PM
She shall work for her country as well as for the all world. She will desire peace and prosperity of Muslim Ummah. 


Hillary Is the Candidate of the War Machine



There's no doubt that Hillary is the candidate of Wall Street. Even more dangerous, though, is that she is the candidate of the military-industrial complex. The idea that she is bad on the corporate issues but good on national security has it wrong. Her so-called foreign policy "experience" has been to support every war demanded by the US deep security state run by the military and the CIA.

Hillary and Bill Clinton's close relations with Wall Street helped to stoke two financial bubbles (1999-2000 and 2005-8) and the Great Recession that followed Lehman's collapse. In the 1990s they pushed financial deregulation for their campaign backers that in turn let loose the worst demons of financial manipulation, toxic assets, financial fraud, and eventually collapse. In the process they won elections and got mighty rich.

Yet Hillary's connections with the military-industrial complex are also alarming. It is often believed that the Republicans are the neocons and the Democrats act as restraints on the warmongering. This is not correct. Both parties are divided between neocon hawks and cautious realists who don't want the US in unending war. Hillary is a staunch neocon whose record of favoring American war adventures explains much of our current security danger.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jeffrey-sachs/hillary-is-the-candidate_b_9168938.html



All Democrats claim that they want to reign in Wall Street greed in fact they still vote for a candidate who is obviously bought by Wall Street.
legendary
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
minds.com/Wilikon
April 24, 2016, 11:11:20 PM
If she wins I hope she makes it okay for women to go around without any shirts on and use any bathroom they want.  I think she will get back at USA for what they did to her with the Lewinsky deal.







 Smiley

Pages:
Jump to: