Topic: Is Hillary Clinton Trustworthy? - page 34. (Read 234741 times)

I too support Hilary, she is a woman who is capability to handle everything in a better way than the other candidates. From her early life as a part in the politics her creative policies had succeeded a lot with peoples support. She is one who fought from the start to end for woman equality in the corporates.

Can you list 3 things she did you really loved?

that the Devil you know, may be better than the Devil you don't know. We know enough about Hillary on the surface to know she is scary!

I think Yes. She is more trustworthy compared to other candidate as she has proven herself for a long time in government service.Though she is a woman but she is more competent.

“It may be hard for your viewers to remember how difficult it was for people to talk about HIV/AIDS in the 1980s. And because of both President and Mrs. Reagan, in particular, Mrs. Reagan, we started national conversation when before no one would talk about it, no one wanted to do anything about it, and that too is something that really appreciated, with her very effective, low-key advocacy, but it penetrated the public conscience and people began to say ‘Hey, we have to do something about this too.’” ---Hillary Clinton

It´s not sarcasm, this woman is nuts, out of touch with reality. As if any new confirmations have been needed for the last decades.

People can do something about it but won't because they're too comfortable in their daily lives and unwilling to sacrifice. Join a militia movement, become active in the tea party, join the free state project, march on Washington or simply refuse to participate in anything the government wants you to do. I've learned over the years that most Americans are all farts and no shit. They blow a bunch of hot air around but never produce anything.

Loretta Lynch is on the payroll then, why are these type of horrible people in authoritive office.
From the Oval office right down to your local mayors, all seem to do nothing (They dont give a shovel of ****)

I get really mad sometimes, then think "hey" I cannot do a thing about it.

Less and less so every single day. Too bad all of her supporters are too blind to see it.

Hillary Clinton Says She’s Confident if She Did Not Send or Receive Classified Information. Attorney General Loretta Lynch faces potential minefield with Hillary Clinton email investigation.

I'll predict it again just so I can come back and do a victory lap latter on:

 - Clinton finds herself running against Trump (only):  Charges move forward (briefly) so Clinton has an excuse to drop out and the Dems put in someone who might have a chance against Trump.  Biden's name has been floated.

 - Repubs figure out a way to get rid of Trump and put in another 'choke artist':  Lynch does nothing.

AG Loretta Lynch: DOJ Not Required To Charge Hillary Clinton, Even If FBI Recommends…






Attorney General Loretta Lynch indicated Wednesday that the law doesn’t require the Justice Department to pursue criminal charges against Hillary Clinton for her use of a private email system, even if the FBI recommends criminal charges.

Lynch was asked in a hearing by Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, what her department would do if the FBI were to recommend that step. “If the FBI were to make a referral to the Department of Justice to pursue a case by way of indictment and to convene a grand jury for that purpose, the Department of Justice is not required by law to do so, are they — are you?” Cornyn asked.


http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/article/2585342/



----------------------------------------------------
Absolute corruption. Do not forget: the same exact laws will send you to jail for years.

I wonder who would win in a fight between Hilary and Monica LOLssss

Who Won the Debate? Hillary Clinton Is Given the Edge

Hillary Clinton and Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont faced off in a Democratic presidential debate in Flint, Mich., on Sunday night, and after finding some early agreement over the state’s mishandling of the water crisis there, the two clashed for the rest of the night on questions including campaign finance, gun control and the auto bailout.

Commentators and pundits shared the opinion that there were no campaign-altering moments, though Mr. Sanders, who was on the attack throughout, occasionally seemed to lose his cool and stumbled a bit when discussing race. Mrs. Clinton managed to stay on her game and stirred excitement by taking some shots at Donald J. Trump. In the end, Democrats were most satisfied that their candidates mustered more decorum than the Republicans.

“I think Hillary Clinton got the better of it tonight. Counterpunched better in key moments. Sanders better on God, fracking and closing statements.” — Dante Atkins, contributing editor to the liberal website Daily Kos

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/08/us/politics/who-won-the-debate.html?_r=0

No! No! No! She lies like all politician but in her case it's particularly troubling the degree to which she lies and the frequency and severity of it.

This sounds … expensive: Hillary vows to remove lead from ‘everywhere’ #DemDebate

Twitchy  by gpollowitz 1:36 am

As we told you earlier, tonight’s Democratic debate is being held in Flint, Michigan and the first topic of the night was understandably on the city’s water crisis. Hillary Clinton, however, one-upped Bernie Sanders by vowing to remove lead from “everywhere” if elected:

.@hillaryclinton: "I want us to have an absolute commitment to getting rid of lead, wherever it is." #DemDebate

— Elite Daily (@EliteDaily) March 7, 2016

Hillary's a little off her game tonight, maybe?

"…we will remove lead from everywhere."

— Nick Capozzoli (@NickCapozzoli) March 7, 2016

"I want to get rid of all lead everywhere"-Hillary
Um… Are you going to just remove it from the periodic table?

— Joe Freiert (@Stugots24) March 7, 2016

No, not that extreme … but still … pretty extreme:

Hillary pledges to remove lead "from everywhere" — water, soil, systems — in 5 years.

— David Catanese (@davecatanese) March 7, 2016

Flint, Michigan is not the only city with a lead problem. Which means, to remove lead from everywhere — including water systems that have lead pipes — will be incredibly expensive.

She’s going to need to follow-up and explain just what she means on this one.

***

Related:

#DemDebate preview: Michael Moore (!) reminds us who was in charge of Flint for ‘84 straight years’

 

The post This sounds … expensive: Hillary vows to remove lead from ‘everywhere’ #DemDebate appeared first on twitchy.com.

Oh who the hell cares who's going to be president. Life will be the same. Paycheck will just as small.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-dY77j6uBHI

Let it Bern or Trump it!

Well, most assuredly he didn't get all that fortune without cutting a few corners.

This alone prooves the state this world is in, one of the most powerfull (which is a farce) people in the world, arent trusthworthy and prooven sellouts and liars...