Pages:
Author

Topic: Is IEO not becoming to be worst than ICO, any future for bounty hunters? - page 2. (Read 320 times)

legendary
Activity: 2492
Merit: 1001
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
for some of the IEOs I witnessed in the popular market, the prices actually went up very high. but, if it has decreased a few months after that, it looks like the project has experienced a downtrend. ICO / IEO is only a sales technique, not to make the project a success. however, when the project was running, it was successful, but to maintain it, it was not the effect of ICO, or IEO anymore. other than that, IEO sales techniques are pretty good at the moment, it's just that many use them for their personal needs.
legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 2100
Marketing Campaign Manager |Telegram ID- @LT_Mouse
Why would you participate in a bounty where bounty reward is not escrowed? If the rewards were escrowed, you would certainly got your rewards on due time. Most of the projects now lock some part of the bounty rewardstill a certain date and the project owner dump their bag during that time, for bounty hunters, nothing remain anymore.
hero member
Activity: 3010
Merit: 629
There's nothing much difference between ICO and IEO, the fact that if you end up in a legit project then you'll be rewarded otherwise its a lesson learned. Bounty hunters should not rely on their income in ieo or as a bounty hunter, there are other ways to earn decent money like investing in top coins, trading or getting a real job. Gone are the days when bounty hunting is still profitable.
member
Activity: 728
Merit: 11
https://streamies.io/
You should know that IEO and ICO are both capital calls but different forms. there will be no better one, we need to choose potential projects to invest, if we choose wrong we have to pay dearly.
Especially for IEO, if you choose to have one of the bad exchanges like Yobit, Latoken, P2PB2B, Vindex or Probit, you will definitely lose money. because the projects listed there are all shit projects and have no future.
legendary
Activity: 2982
Merit: 1069
Probit has became just another paid to list site. Probit did had a spectacular growth in the past and was a bit selective on hosting IEOs but with the increased volume, they are giving more and more unsuccessful IOEs. The IEO business might be good for porbit at the time but it's going to hurt the reputation of Probit for a long time if they don't stop promoting anything and everything that provides them money.
legendary
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1253
So anyway, I applied as a merit source :)
We can't blame IEO fundraising for everything that's happening around bounty hunters maltreatment, in fact it has nothing to do with IEOs, IEO is nothing but a project marketing strategy, scammers are to be blame for everything, they create fake projects and use bounty hunters to promote their fake projects
These methods of fundraising are not legal securities and so even if they are scam there is no authority to punish them. People who never realized this have been fooled into buying them and so did the bounty hunters.

The idea of "maltreatment" comes from contempt of the hunters and is a wrong term. It is wrong because the hunter were never actually promised anything. It is a fundraising that too in a fake manner, do you expect to get paid if they fail? If you think yes, then you are also being fooled.

In other words, the days of bounty hunting is long gone. If you want to invest money, buy bitcoin and also invest in sectors other than cryptocurrency because the markets are bearish now. But of course if you have money at hand enough to spend and invest during the crisis.
full member
Activity: 1848
Merit: 158
Bounty season will still return but no one knows when, that's why it's not always good to give up, scam projects are many than good projects for sure but it doesn't make sense to give up
Im not surw if there is a trivial season for bounty. Its like an on/off button, there are particular times when the bounty campaign are good and there is also a period where everything does not have any worth to promote. But majority is on the negative part cause we can see how those new process IEO depicts the picture of a unsucessful way to give hunters some precious rewards. Most of hunters doing campaign are not being paid even with the success of the project promoted means that team are just playing dumb on them. Example of this is the latest project of digital bits that dont pay the hunters and just keep delaying the promised payment.

that's why bitcoin paying campaigns are better than most token or coin paying campaigns. from those hundreds of projects in the bounties section running various bounty programs, you can only count on your fingers how many of them will be valuable in the market or projects that will make it to the exchange. IEOs fate are becoming like ICOs already. the only thing sure about IEOs is the listing in the exchange right after the sale.
sr. member
Activity: 644
Merit: 257
Worldwide Payments Accepted in Seconds!
Bounty season will still return but no one knows when, that's why it's not always good to give up, scam projects are many than good projects for sure but it doesn't make sense to give up
Im not surw if there is a trivial season for bounty. Its like an on/off button, there are particular times when the bounty campaign are good and there is also a period where everything does not have any worth to promote. But majority is on the negative part cause we can see how those new process IEO depicts the picture of a unsucessful way to give hunters some precious rewards. Most of hunters doing campaign are not being paid even with the success of the project promoted means that team are just playing dumb on them. Example of this is the latest project of digital bits that dont pay the hunters and just keep delaying the promised payment.
member
Activity: 1540
Merit: 68
On a rather honest basis, the future of bounty hunters is not dependent on ieo or ico or any form of crowdfunding events.
The core problem faced by bounty hunters this days is from insincere, non transparent and scam project team/developers.

If you look across bounty programs this year from Hybrix, to Hydax, to Gold, to trading bounties, you will realize that marketers (bounty hunters) effort are needed for massive promotion of projects irrespective of crowdfunding status
member
Activity: 252
Merit: 15
Sovryn - Brings DeFi to Bitcoin
We can't blame IEO fundraising for everything that's happening around bounty hunters maltreatment, in fact it has nothing to do with IEOs, IEO is nothing but a project marketing strategy, scammers are to be blame for everything, they create fake projects and use bounty hunters to promote their fake projects
member
Activity: 655
Merit: 10
as I know that both IEO and ICO are forms of project marketing, they launch a project through IEO & ICO as well as assistance from project promoters such as prize hunters. and the worst in a project when the product is not going well.
copper member
Activity: 966
Merit: 5
Truthfully, the way I see it, there is no much difference between ICO and IEO because a team working for themselves alone will always show up; its just that IEO gives that assurance that once the sale is over trading starts which isn't seen in ICO. Also, for IEO, one can easily invest in whichever project he finds worthy although that is not always the case after the trading starts.
Now for projects having 100% bonuses shows how desperate they are to attract investors, that's how I see it and which is why many of them, the price doesn't stand for long. Bounty will always be needed but yet there is need to be careful of every bounty from most projects, a project with 100% bonus, who knows the value the token will be at when the bounty hunters receives it, yet when they sell, they will still be blamed even though the reward is now less due to low price.
sr. member
Activity: 1435
Merit: 250
PredX - AI-Powered Prediction Market
as I said before that IEO is just a project trend and not much different from ICO. it's just that some developers do IEO as a new strategy to attract ICO investors. but to be honest, I personally don't like the IEO listed on shady exchanges, they always manipulate the volume of coins or prices to attract investors.
hero member
Activity: 1456
Merit: 501
DGbet.fun - Crypto Sportsbook
The IEO will be no worse than the ICO because the IE ensures that the token or project is listed in its market, so it is an advantage in this market condition.
whereas the ICO will be less desirable because the IEO is more promising.
anything that comes out later should be better than the current IEO system.
But after being listed, the price dropped many times compared to IEO price, so it's no different from ICO. If you join IEO at large exchanges, the token collapse rate will decrease and you will have a better chance of getting profits.
The result is obviously as you say, IEO is just following the initial stages of the ICO, reaping a lot of success with the first projects but this ratio will start to decline with a not so good market condition, combined with people's needs and many other factors but the most fortunate thing is that we won't lose all our assets for a bad IEO project, it's just a part of the assets. The future of the hunter may only change with the trends of the projects, if the project offers good methods in the future, bounty hunters will receive corresponding benefits and vice versa
sr. member
Activity: 1372
Merit: 261
As i understand Bounty is kind of marketing, if there have no IEO or ICO, projects still can do Bounty for their project publicity. So, Bounty will alive till project owners findout another easy or low cost way to publicity their product and project.
But bounty is the only low fee publicity that they could have in just a low investment they would have so many people who would promote their project in so many ways like social media , Youtube and even here on the forum where there are so many crypto enthusiast.
So what more they could wish for? it is only a low investment for a huge publicity unless they really want to invest big time for their projects publicity then they wouldn't go out for bounty and would go directly for other types of marketing strategy.
full member
Activity: 615
Merit: 105
arcs-chain.com
not all losses are caused by the Bounty hunter, when the project enters exchange there are certain losses and benefits, but there are times when the Bounty hunter has not been paid but the price on the project entering the Exchange is down 50% from the price of IEO and ICO Is this the Bounty hunter's fault? Of course not, it was the fault of their project that didn't want to buy back the tokens to raise prices again
hero member
Activity: 2282
Merit: 589
Those who blame bounty hunters for the dumping and prize crash - they probably don't know much about bounties. Usually 3% - 5% of total coin supply is distributed to bounty hunters. If dumping of that minuscule amount of tokens drags down the price of the token and never comes back to track, then you have to understand that this is the fate of the token.

Just one pro tip- don't invest in any IEOs for a long term. Just invest and get out as soon as the trading commences. You will usually see profit.
Usually the 70% allocation is for investors, but the bounty only gets the smallest distribution of 1% -5% of the total of all token allocations, if the bounty allocation dumps on the market will not have any effect if the real trading volume, but will affect when the team manipulates the token sale with reached very high and usually low-volume demand.
hero member
Activity: 2702
Merit: 510
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
STO not really that interesting, there is reason why IEO could succeed when it first got introduced you know  Roll Eyes which is certainty that the token will be listed to that exchange and to be frank there are many STO out there already and they perform just like ICO or IEO. I'm not putting too much hope to STO.
full member
Activity: 1820
Merit: 107
Your OP has two questions that need to be answered, first question "Is IEO not becoming to be worst than ICO" I think it's not! because IEO is more secure compare to an ICO since the transaction was done inside the crypto-exchange that acts like escrow service. While in ICO the funding transaction was directly sent to the founder's position and without any third party Audit, it is prone to corruption that later on becomes an exit scam. The second question "Any future for bounty hunters?" I think bounty campaigns are here to stay because it is the cheapest form of marketing and advertising strategy. where on earth you can find any advertising agency that accepts a native token without value as a form of payment? all of it was only exists in the forums and other bounty and marketing platforms etc. But we must admit that the budget or allocation in the most bounties nowadays are sinking and also we must face the new normal in our payments scheme because bounty tokens are locked in different periods but depend on the project. ranging from 2-,6 months up to a year.
hero member
Activity: 812
Merit: 512
Bounty season will still return but no one knows when, that's why it's not always good to give up, scam projects are many than good projects for sure but it doesn't make sense to give up
Bounty will only be good if the altcoin season returns like 2017, where many new projects were created and received investors' attention. But due to the aftermath of having too many scam projects, bounty collapsed like ICOs collapsed. And I think it's too hard for the past to happen again
Pages:
Jump to: