Topic: Is IEO not becoming to be worst than ICO, any future for bounty hunters? - page 4. (Read 320 times)
May 06, 2020, 11:41:06 AM
How is IEO becoming worse than ICO? Past IEO histories shows that top exchanges is the right answer for IEO, as for ICO it depends on raise funds, gathers investors or private investors, with IEO if you go top Exchanges it's certainly to come out with good result unless your project has no use case at all, I bet binance won't even accept such project
May 06, 2020, 11:40:48 AM
The early birds of Binance IEO made pretty well.
They've made a decent profit out of its newness but after that, nothing new is about to be offered anymore. And for the bounty hunters, I think it's already attached to them that they're always blamed for the dumping because they have to dump the token for their profit.
That part is hard to change for the devs and investors.
Dont compared the Binance IEO to the OP's example cause their level of competence has a huge difference. Most IEO held on Binance usually skyrocket unlike these low exchanges that even give 100% bonus. Of course price will tend to dump cause investors will probably takr advantage of their bonuses. So whats more will be left on hunters right? When distribution arrives the price is already at the bottom and the value of it is not as promised like on the bounty budget. But that's a consequence on the life of hunters, what is worse is the blame when the price dump is on hunters that for me is wrong. Only few percentage they allocate to those hunters and yet they complained everytime it happens. It will never end so better ignore those guys. They've made a decent profit out of its newness but after that, nothing new is about to be offered anymore. And for the bounty hunters, I think it's already attached to them that they're always blamed for the dumping because they have to dump the token for their profit.
That part is hard to change for the devs and investors.
May 06, 2020, 11:38:44 AM
Not every IEO is worth to invest, they just launch on random exchange and also will run bounty to make more money, even if they legit they will become useless once they get dumped by the investors and project team so I hope people will not waste their time on promoting such shit projects anymore.
May 06, 2020, 11:30:43 AM
This is similar to the ICO, when early or private investors are bought with huge bonuses, when the coin is sold off and bounty hunters will be blamed.
May 06, 2020, 11:26:54 AM
The early birds of Binance IEO made pretty well.
They've made a decent profit out of its newness but after that, nothing new is about to be offered anymore. And for the bounty hunters, I think it's already attached to them that they're always blamed for the dumping because they have to dump the token for their profit.
That part is hard to change for the devs and investors.
They've made a decent profit out of its newness but after that, nothing new is about to be offered anymore. And for the bounty hunters, I think it's already attached to them that they're always blamed for the dumping because they have to dump the token for their profit.
That part is hard to change for the devs and investors.
Recently also!
Few friends of mine made some good Profit. It was the Cartesi IEO. They were running a bounty program prior to getting listed on Binance Launchpad. That is one reason why they were successfully. Plus the project is also promising. So, yes if Binance list a decent project on their launchpad platform it can be a successful.
Sucess of any IEO or ICO depends a lot on marketing, product and team. If you have all the three it will earn you profit.
May 06, 2020, 11:18:26 AM
IEO is a failed business model. It also doesn't make sense for projects with huge upside to do an IEO, because they have to spend a large portion of what they raised for market-making activities to provide liquidity. Also, they have to obey a certain token-lock schedule which distracts long term investors and causes a non-stop selling pressure for a couple of years.
May 06, 2020, 11:08:25 AM
As i understand Bounty is kind of marketing, if there have no IEO or ICO, projects still can do Bounty for their project publicity. So, Bounty will alive till project owners findout another easy or low cost way to publicity their product and project.
It will last long as long as project owner still get enough money from investors than they use for marketing.It Will only stop if there is no people want to invest anymore in any project instead they are buying a coins directly in exchange. It will also open another opportunity If that's happen another way of advertising will come out surely .
May 06, 2020, 10:56:28 AM
The early birds of Binance IEO made pretty well.
They've made a decent profit out of its newness but after that, nothing new is about to be offered anymore. And for the bounty hunters, I think it's already attached to them that they're always blamed for the dumping because they have to dump the token for their profit.
That part is hard to change for the devs and investors.
They've made a decent profit out of its newness but after that, nothing new is about to be offered anymore. And for the bounty hunters, I think it's already attached to them that they're always blamed for the dumping because they have to dump the token for their profit.
That part is hard to change for the devs and investors.
May 06, 2020, 10:42:36 AM
IEO is just another tag name to represent ICO and it will worst more than the experience we had during the ICO mania in 2017. Those projects that launch IEO and those who were initiated by Binance launchpad are still counting their losses, most of them are down with more than 150% and same applied to other exchanges. Where would someone run into in this crypto space? Would STO be the option and correct all these anomalies?
I can't believe someone is still running those things. I was excited about altcoins and ICOs back in 2017 because it seemed like a good chance for companies with attractive ideas to find investors. Indeed, I've seen many projects that looked promising to me. However, with terrible sums going to scammers and even successful ICOs barely delivering what they've offered, I don't think they have a future. And then came various 'rebranding' options allegedly offering something different but in essence not being much different from ICOs. The era of altcoins and raising money via offerings seems over to me. 
May 06, 2020, 10:18:23 AM
Those who blame bounty hunters for the dumping and prize crash - they probably don't know much about bounties. Usually 3% - 5% of total coin supply is distributed to bounty hunters. If dumping of that minuscule amount of tokens drags down the price of the token and never comes back to track, then you have to understand that this is the fate of the token.
Just one pro tip- don't invest in any IEOs for a long term. Just invest and get out as soon as the trading commences. You will usually see profit.
Just one pro tip- don't invest in any IEOs for a long term. Just invest and get out as soon as the trading commences. You will usually see profit.
May 06, 2020, 09:11:13 AM
As i understand Bounty is kind of marketing, if there have no IEO or ICO, projects still can do Bounty for their project publicity. So, Bounty will alive till project owners findout another easy or low cost way to publicity their product and project.
May 06, 2020, 06:25:41 AM
I received an email today from probit exchange (screenshot 1) and I went to verify this authenticity from their website (screenshot 2). To my amazement, the 100% IEO is true and valid. If this particular project launches a bounty, what will be the expectation of participants? They will not distribute the token to those who make the awareness until it is worthless and useless. Interestingly, all blame is always shifted to the bounty hunters for dumping. How could you run an IEO with 100% bonus and not except a dump when it commences trading, that is double of investment in a short time most often within the same week or month.
IEO is just another tag name to represent ICO and it will worst more than the experience we had during the ICO mania in 2017. Those projects that launch IEO and those who were initiated by Binance launchpad are still counting their losses, most of them are down with more than 150% and same applied to other exchanges. Where would someone run into in this crypto space? Would STO be the option and correct all these anomalies?
IEO is just another tag name to represent ICO and it will worst more than the experience we had during the ICO mania in 2017. Those projects that launch IEO and those who were initiated by Binance launchpad are still counting their losses, most of them are down with more than 150% and same applied to other exchanges. Where would someone run into in this crypto space? Would STO be the option and correct all these anomalies?
Jump to: