Basically Bitcoin is Asperger's currency. "but if I do I'll make it look good Web developers and graphic artists who havent got a clue will complain about simplicity and "ungliness" because those sites that are so popular, probably to pump themselves up and to feel better about not being as successful as those simple ugly websites.
Topic: Is it a Bitcoin web developer's goal to create ugly website? (Read 4880 times)
Haha we're in 2017 and nothing changed 
Something has changed already, we have wordpress and other website builder systems that allow you to set up a decent web page in an hour. What we really need is to create educative websites about bitcoin and send there a lot of people to learn about bitcoin and that will help the mass adoption... Just don't forget to be user friendly and easily understandable
Haha we're in 2017 and nothing changed
September 14, 2017, 08:46:31 AM
amused
Basically Bitcoin is Asperger's currency. "I don't have to make Bitcoin usable, marketable, media friendly or understandable to laypeople- it's just better so people of course people will use it. If the don't it's not my fault they are stupid."
Bitcins is a geek's currency. Geeks don't care for usability, marketability, media friendliness, or lay people. You gotta understand the geek mentality to understand bitcoin and other geek creations.
I'm a geek, but I have to agree with Jessy. We have to make this user friendly for all the stupid people. It's true that geeks only care about facts, but you have to accept that not everyone thinks like we do. And if we want this to succeed we need a stable/predictable market with good solid backing from EVERYONE. Not just geeks...
Basically Bitcoin is Asperger's currency. "I don't have to make Bitcoin usable, marketable, media friendly or understandable to laypeople- it's just better so people of course people will use it. If the don't it's not my fault they are stupid."
Bitcins is a geek's currency. Geeks don't care for usability, marketability, media friendliness, or lay people. You gotta understand the geek mentality to understand bitcoin and other geek creations.
Bullseye! That page design has EVERYTHING!
Love that "Campaign against frames"-button. Oh the old days...
I tried to make BitBid.net as clean and simple as possible. I'll use a lot more animated Gifs and Silverlight next time. 
Looks good. Menus on the top or left tend to convert higher.
http://www.useit.com/alertbox/reading_pattern.html
The fact you can write huge texts with 4 asian characters help a lot...
Simplicity and a clean design is best. Facebook and google have proved that.
Design values are far from universal. Most people when they say "The Web" means "The English Web"- when that is only 42% and dropping quickly.
Chinese and Japanese surfers prefer a much flatter site structure, instead of clicking to drill down sub-page after sub-page they like for the index page to serve as something akin to an index in a book. It looks pretty huge and cluttered to a Western eye, but our print graphic design is often similar.
For the Chinese, this is the high conversion equivalent of Google's English-centric design:
http://www.qq.com/
http://www.sohu.com/
http://www.163.com/
http://www.tudou.com/
http://www.youku.com/
Japan:
http://www.livedoor.com/
Etc.
I tried to make BitBid.net as clean and simple as possible. I'll use a lot more animated Gifs and Silverlight next time.
Simplicity and a clean design is best. Facebook and google have proved that.
Lets be honest and completely fair here. Google is a search engine, I keep hearing people bring it up like it's a website when in reality it's more like a tool. It would be retarded if it were anymore than what it is. Google is a portal to all of their services.
The search is the most predominant because thats what makes them the most money.
Its efficient, clean, and simple because thats what people want.
I absolutely hate pages with 1000 times the crap that I dont need to see or find.
If I need google Analytics, its therer.
If i need Google Earth, its there.
If I need Google Sites, its there.
If I Need Google Code, its there.
If I need Google Voice, its there.
... Images? ... Maps? ... Videos? ... News ... Shopping? ... Gmail? ...
... Translate? ... Books? ... Finance? ... Scholar? ... YouTube? ... Calandar? ...
... Photos? ... Realtime?... Docs? ... Reader? ... Groups? ...
and a TON more all from the simple, clean, and efficient Google portal.
Come on ... Just a Search Engine ?
hardly.
Simplicity and a clean design is best. Facebook and google have proved that.
Design values are far from universal. Most people when they say "The Web" means "The English Web"- when that is only 42% and dropping quickly.
Chinese and Japanese surfers prefer a much flatter site structure, instead of clicking to drill down sub-page after sub-page they like for the index page to serve as something akin to an index in a book. It looks pretty huge and cluttered to a Western eye, but our print graphic design is often similar.
For the Chinese, this is the high conversion equivalent of Google's English-centric design:
http://www.qq.com/
http://www.sohu.com/
http://www.163.com/
http://www.tudou.com/
http://www.youku.com/
Japan:
http://www.livedoor.com/
Etc.
Simplicity and a clean design is best. Facebook and google have proved that.
Lets be honest and completely fair here. Google is a search engine, I keep hearing people bring it up like it's a website when in reality it's more like a tool. It would be retarded if it were anymore than what it is. Now I will get 1000 posts from you guys talking about how Yahoo and MSN have cluttered search pages. Well they only started adding content when they saw Google destroying them in the search engine rankings. Those sites all started off pretty simple as well.. And now you see Microsoft trying to move MSN and it's search into different sites e.g."bing.com" just so they can go for the simplicity factor, and be compete with Google. It's nut's where the industry has gone, considering thanose old ugly tiled backgrounds over crappy css and html that we used to see in every other website. The computer world has gotten so much better at computers as a hole and as a consequence quality is the new standard. People expect a fast product, that is reliable, and that isn't completely disappointing to the eyes (Orange and Red Layouts)
Simplicity and a clean design is best. Facebook and google have proved that.
The goal is simplicity, and breath taking design. It can be done...
groupon did a really good job at this.
groupon did a really good job at this.
mtgox had a very nice and professional looking website (when it was up)
I mean, it had colors and everything, also came with matching buy/sell sections.
How many of you accidentally sold coins when you're buying because they all look the same?
I mean, it had colors and everything, also came with matching buy/sell sections.
How many of you accidentally sold coins when you're buying because they all look the same?
If I were to be a critique right now, you could probably make the headers a bit smaller, so they're not the size of the logo.
Smaller in height?
Maybe put a lighter color in the body area and keep the grey of the header.
I'll try it immediately.
Make the input boxes fit the parent box. Or make the parent box a fieldset element (if it isn't already) and add in a legend element instead of a header.
I have not understood this very well. The "box" is a fieldset with no legend. Do you think it's better to put a legend also in the sidebar as in the login page? Maybe, I could increase the legend font size...
And more margin-bottom on the paragraphs.
Yep, I know
Add in some text under the login box to cover up the whitespace.
Yep, there will be the hashrate, round shares number and so on.
Add in labels for the input boxes or use placeholders (HTML5 placeholders would be nice with a JS fallback).
I'll add this right now.
Looks great.
Thanks a lot
Also, I wouldn't reveal your age, it loses trust in potential customers and visitors.
Maybe customers shouldn't really trust us
Ok, I'll change this.
You're off to a great start. There are two basic parts to that page, the design, and the text pitch. The design, you are going to want to do multi-variant testing on. So sign up for Google Analytics and do a split campaign with a few different color backgrounds and text colors. You probably won't have enough signups to do conversion (goal) tracking so what you are going to look at is "Average Time on Site". You'll want to keep the design with the longest time on site- that means they are taking the time to read your text pitch.
I'll try to do that.
Once you have settled on a color scheme that seems to do well, you need to look at your text- or Copy. You need to think like your audience, if you were a miner, coming to this site- what would make YOU sign up? I think it's great that you are doing this at 14- but is that going to scare away some potential sign ups? You can even do multi-variant testing with a few text pitches- just like you did the color scheme, and keep the one that converts (gets the most sign ups) best. The most successful website owners are constantly testing new variations, and trying to tweak their sites for slightly higher conversion ratios.
Good luck!
Good luck!
Right, maybe I'll put "super experienced people working in ibm running aix servers with oracle databases and assembly through cgi code" instead of "14 years old"
However, I'll change the "welcome text" with something better.
Really thanks to both
If someone wants to continue helping me with my project, you can contact me via PM or mail.
P.S.: @Chick, are you @andrew_tian on Twitter?
Google shows how websites should look like:
- White background
- Mostly text
- Colors and images where it actually makes sense
- White background
- Mostly text
- Colors and images where it actually makes sense
No, Google shows what Google's website should look like. They have done tens of thousands of hours of multi-variant testing to get to those colors and that layout. Other sites, offering different products and services if they do the same multi-varient testing will not end up with the same design. that is why every site on the web does not now look like Google.
It is the process Google uses that should be emulated- not the end result. Because that result will depend on your audience and content.
You're off to a great start. There are two basic parts to that page, the design, and the text pitch. The design, you are going to want to do multi-variant testing on. So sign up for Google Analytics and do a split campaign with a few different color backgrounds and text colors. You probably won't have enough signups to do conversion (goal) tracking so what you are going to look at is "Average Time on Site". You'll want to keep the design with the longest time on site- that means they are taking the time to read your text pitch.
Once you have settled on a color scheme that seems to do well, you need to look at your text- or Copy. You need to think like your audience, if you were a miner, coming to this site- what would make YOU sign up? I think it's great that you are doing this at 14- but is that going to scare away some potential sign ups? You can even do multi-variant testing with a few text pitches- just like you did the color scheme, and keep the one that converts (gets the most sign ups) best. The most successful website owners are constantly testing new variations, and trying to tweak their sites for slightly higher conversion ratios.
Good luck!
What do you think about this?
If I were to be a critique right now, you could probably make the headers a bit smaller, so they're not the size of the logo.
Maybe put a lighter color in the body area and keep the grey of the header.
Make the input boxes fit the parent box. Or make the parent box a fieldset element (if it isn't already) and add in a legend element instead of a header.
And more margin-bottom on the paragraphs.
Add in some text under the login box to cover up the whitespace.
Add in labels for the input boxes or use placeholders (HTML5 placeholders would be nice with a JS fallback).
Looks great.
Also, I wouldn't reveal your age, it loses trust in potential customers and visitors.
Jump to: