Most of the time we may not know if it knows.
Topic: Is it legal to give a negative trust to a 'BM' who ended a scam project? - page 2. (Read 361 times)
June 17, 2018, 09:29:59 PM
What you said is true, but I'm curious about how to tell if the reward manager already knows that this project is a scam?
Most of the time we may not know if it knows.
Most of the time we may not know if it knows.
June 17, 2018, 09:29:01 PM
It depends on the situation mate, some campaign managers really don't know that the project that they managed is a scam. But if the campaign manager knows that the project is a scam since then and it's proven, they really deserves to be given a negative trust from DT members.
June 17, 2018, 09:21:47 PM
If the Bounty Manager knew that the project is scam and still promoted it than they deserve a negative trust.
But if they didn't knew about that, they are no different from bounty participants as they get paid to advertise.
But if they didn't knew about that, they are no different from bounty participants as they get paid to advertise.
I agree. The real deal here is how do we differentiate those; who's the all-knowing Bounty Manager or who's not. Although, the OP is somehow right that Bounty Manager do some examination and interrogation, at least, to make sure that a project is not a scam.
June 17, 2018, 09:20:16 PM
To the high members there, who agreed to give also a negative trust to a bounty participant who ended up a scam project. Let me ask you this, me as a jr. rank here, do you think I deserve to waste my time and effort promoting those scam project? What will be my benefits for promoting those scam meme? Can i make money from it? I joined the bounty program to make money not to degrade my name here or to put shame on my record.
My suggestion here is to prevent a wannabe bounty managers so that no one will waste their effort. We don't deserve to be fool by someone.
My suggestion here is to prevent a wannabe bounty managers so that no one will waste their effort. We don't deserve to be fool by someone.
June 17, 2018, 08:55:32 PM
If the Bounty Manager knew that the project is scam and still promoted it than they deserve a negative trust.
But if they didn't knew about that, they are no different from bounty participants as they get paid to advertise.
If bounty manager are to be given negative trust for working on a scam project, bounty participants too deserve one as they too promote for payment.
But if they didn't knew about that, they are no different from bounty participants as they get paid to advertise.
If bounty manager are to be given negative trust for working on a scam project, bounty participants too deserve one as they too promote for payment.
I think the tag should only be limited to the managers and not to the participants because the participants are mostly are innocent to this. Its should be the bounty manager's responsibility who take the lead and guidance to the workers in which they should review it carefully the ICO before accepting it because their reputation is at stakes. I just hope we could provide a list of bounty managers reputation so that the workers specially the new comers could be aware.
June 17, 2018, 08:44:40 PM
If the Bounty Manager knew that the project is scam and still promoted it than they deserve a negative trust.
But if they didn't knew about that, they are no different from bounty participants as they get paid to advertise.
Those statements are true, but I would add that people are free to leave feedback as they see fit in either case. Often you will have no idea whether a manager knew about the project being a scam or not. Look at the case of atriz, who got negative trust only after he admitted to knowing the project whose campaign he was managing was a scam.But if they didn't knew about that, they are no different from bounty participants as they get paid to advertise.
I agree, there is too much BS going on with scam projects and the bounties that advertise for them. I would recommend painting scammers' trust pages liberally with the red paint when you find out about the scam. They deserve it, for one, and it can also warn others not to deal with them.
June 17, 2018, 08:43:13 PM
If the Bounty Manager knew that the project is scam and still promoted it than they deserve a negative trust.
But if they didn't knew about that, they are no different from bounty participants as they get paid to advertise.
If bounty manager are to be given negative trust for working on a scam project, bounty participants too deserve one as they too promote for payment.
It is a bounty managers job to ensure that the project that he/she agreed on handling is a legit project and that it will not turn out to be a scam. A person shold not be eligible to handle campaigns if he/she does not know how to differenciate a good project and what is not.But if they didn't knew about that, they are no different from bounty participants as they get paid to advertise.
If bounty manager are to be given negative trust for working on a scam project, bounty participants too deserve one as they too promote for payment.
I do agree tho it may be best to also tag the participants if a project turned out to be a scam. Maybe that will lessen the account which are solely farmed to get into a bounty without even knowing what project they are advertising.
I have been scammed before by some bounties and it wasn't always the campaign managers fault.
June 17, 2018, 08:37:25 PM
If the Bounty Manager knew that the project is scam and still promoted it than they deserve a negative trust.
But if they didn't knew about that, they are no different from bounty participants as they get paid to advertise.
If bounty manager are to be given negative trust for working on a scam project, bounty participants too deserve one as they too promote for payment.
But if they didn't knew about that, they are no different from bounty participants as they get paid to advertise.
If bounty manager are to be given negative trust for working on a scam project, bounty participants too deserve one as they too promote for payment.
How come that the bounty participant deserve to have a negative trust by participating a scam project? In the first place, participant give their trust on the bounty managers, second, bounty managers must examine their project carefully by conducting a verification on the team members of that project before accepting it and lastly, bounty participant didn't get paid by promoting a scam project.
Same accusations you have given to a bounty manager, tje bounty participants must as well be given negative trust because they've participated in a scam project, they've promoted it and because of that many investors invested a lot. So theres no difference at all between a bounty manager and the bounty hunters, well if thats the case you want to give to a bounty manager then bounty participants too may as well be given a negative trust.
This was just my fair opinion.
June 17, 2018, 08:17:49 PM
If the Bounty Manager knew that the project is scam and still promoted it than they deserve a negative trust.
But if they didn't knew about that, they are no different from bounty participants as they get paid to advertise.
If bounty manager are to be given negative trust for working on a scam project, bounty participants too deserve one as they too promote for payment.
But if they didn't knew about that, they are no different from bounty participants as they get paid to advertise.
If bounty manager are to be given negative trust for working on a scam project, bounty participants too deserve one as they too promote for payment.
How come that the bounty participant deserve to have a negative trust by participating a scam project? In the first place, participant give their trust on the bounty managers, second, bounty managers must examine their project carefully by conducting a verification on the team members of that project before accepting it and lastly, bounty participant didn't get paid by promoting a scam project.
June 17, 2018, 08:03:28 PM
If the Bounty Manager knew that the project is scam and still promoted it than they deserve a negative trust.
But if they didn't knew about that, they are no different from bounty participants as they get paid to advertise.
If bounty manager are to be given negative trust for working on a scam project, bounty participants too deserve one as they too promote for payment.
But if they didn't knew about that, they are no different from bounty participants as they get paid to advertise.
If bounty manager are to be given negative trust for working on a scam project, bounty participants too deserve one as they too promote for payment.
June 17, 2018, 07:54:44 PM
To admins, high rank members and members,
We should have the right to give negative trust to a bounty managers or rate their records. This must be the answer to prevent wasting our time and efforts. In that case this will push them to examine their project carefully before they're going to post their thread here. Or else they will put their name on shame. As what I had experienced as a newbie member here, I had wasted so much time and efforts creating and sharing those project just to promote them but it ended up on nothing. I like what I'm doing but it is very stressful when you ended up on nothing! Maybe some of the Bounty manager here really know from the beginning that their project was really a scam but because of the shares they will have they intended to make a newbie account or use their secondary account just to make money through scamming. For me it is acceptable if the project ended on not reaching their soft cap rather than ended up on a scam project that's hurt a lot!
NO TO SCAM PROJECT!!
PREVENT A SCAM PROJECT!!!
NEWBIE MUST NOT PUT THEIR EFFORT IN VAIN!!!!
We should have the right to give negative trust to a bounty managers or rate their records. This must be the answer to prevent wasting our time and efforts. In that case this will push them to examine their project carefully before they're going to post their thread here. Or else they will put their name on shame. As what I had experienced as a newbie member here, I had wasted so much time and efforts creating and sharing those project just to promote them but it ended up on nothing. I like what I'm doing but it is very stressful when you ended up on nothing! Maybe some of the Bounty manager here really know from the beginning that their project was really a scam but because of the shares they will have they intended to make a newbie account or use their secondary account just to make money through scamming. For me it is acceptable if the project ended on not reaching their soft cap rather than ended up on a scam project that's hurt a lot!
NO TO SCAM PROJECT!!
PREVENT A SCAM PROJECT!!!
NEWBIE MUST NOT PUT THEIR EFFORT IN VAIN!!!!
Jump to: