Is it Merit abuse? - page 2. | Bitcointalksearch.org

Avirunes

legendary

Activity: 3094

Merit: 1472

Quote from: VINSIN on January 26, 2019, 09:14:34 PM

They might be friends, but I don't think it's merit abuse, checked their posts with google translate..i don't think there is some abuse

No, but there is a slight chance there is some abuse going over here. Just found out this report and searching for some regular transactions between these 3 accounts:

Quote from: CaptainLance on August 19, 2018, 01:47:08 PM

Username: fakegurutu
ETH ADDRESS: 0xac454c2e083706f7b85fd5f4ea0748c24c5f8369 | Staked Here | http://archive.is/vdmRO
0x5912b6fdc8ac4015d11456aac786db92fcdfb800 | Staked Here | http://archive.is/d3OlD

Username: kaya11
ETH Address: 0xa79d58b3e4566e57526e40d0844290580b325872 | Staked here | http://archive.is/PkE9l

Connection:

Code:

https://ethplorer.io/tx/0x26d76f32db5e8cdb208c6ecd9ebb55a37d9b2cfb024c24cfcb653b59420bdc9c

Username: hisori
ETH Address: 0x80A8D0DDF75231A04F60B8CbA67802d0815BEF66 | Staked here | http://archive.is/ARSNg

Connection:

Code:

https://ethplorer.io/tx/0x418e80cd4239022092d62498f9db8daf2e6a8aec36a1d0233ef038f801ff3b7f

Archived: http://archive.is/1kxhd

VINSIN

sr. member

Activity: 560

Merit: 286

They might be friends, but I don't think it's merit abuse, checked their posts with google translate..i don't think there is some abuse

Master of Shitcoins

member

Activity: 217

Merit: 10

Quote from: shasan on January 26, 2019, 04:41:17 PM

Edit:
fakegurutu sent 3 merit to sham100899 at 6/6/2018 4:29:58 AM and
sham100899 sent 2 merit to fakegurutu 6/6/2018 4:36:41 AM That means merit exchanged only within 7 merits.
Both are using the same platform of bitcoin wallet. sham100899 and fakegurutu

Quote from: coinlocket$ on January 26, 2019, 05:40:12 PM

Also, they applied to the same campaign

sham100899 https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.49358622 3PJdNRCtsd2jfY82JunoCz5vYC8nLj2dtv http://archive.fo/PdcKX#selection-3867.29-3867.63
fakegurutu https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.49358661 3ERcX6VK2DdvNppxWNFYTyoUWum75sqMQc http://archive.fo/PiQH6#selection-5391.29-5391.63

Thanks, good research. I'll look into it later to find a hard proof of same addresses between fakegurutu and sham100899.

The application for the BitBlender campaign was only 5 minutes difference between both accounts.

EDIT: another coincidence (maybe one too many)

Both accounts edited their messages 30 minutes later:

originally posted:

sham100899: January 22, 2019, 03:01:52 AM
fakegurutu: January 22, 2019, 03:06:36 AM

less than 5 minutes difference

last edited:

sham100899: January 22, 2019, 03:34:39 AM
fakegurutu: January 22, 2019, 03:33:45 AM

less than 1 minute difference

coinlocket$

legendary

Activity: 2534

Merit: 1517

#1 VIP Crypto Casino

I've tried to look at their post history (for the 2 jr members) The only relevant thing found is this one

https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/30a2751bd2aa9ff5979dbb75385562e22bc96d407ea592fee87454b260ca6a25

Their addresses are on this transaction but Is not clear what it is.

Also, they applied to the same campaign

sham100899 https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.49358622 3PJdNRCtsd2jfY82JunoCz5vYC8nLj2dtv http://archive.fo/PdcKX#selection-3867.29-3867.63
fakegurutu https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.49358661 3ERcX6VK2DdvNppxWNFYTyoUWum75sqMQc http://archive.fo/PiQH6#selection-5391.29-5391.63

shasan

copper member

Activity: 2380

Merit: 1302

Playbet.io - Crypto Casino and Sportsbook

Quote from: Master of Shitcoins on January 26, 2019, 04:36:00 PM

Quote from: shasan on January 26, 2019, 04:28:29 PM

I don't think your proof is sufficient. Only giving merit each other can't proof merit abuse or merit trader. I think you should obtain more info if possible.

If they are alts they will be tagged for sending merits to alts. I can't prove yet, that fakegurutu is an alt, but it's very fishy.
At least hisori and sham100899 are alts because they used same BTC address.

Let's wait how DT decides if fakegurutu is another alt of hisori/sham100899.

Okay. I think below information might be helpful for you.
Both are from Pilipinas. Archive: sham100899 and fakegurutu
Also, both person uses all small letters. Which you can see from the above archive.
Edit:
fakegurutu sent 3 merit to sham100899 at 6/6/2018 4:29:58 AM and
sham100899 sent 2 merit to fakegurutu 6/6/2018 4:36:41 AM That means merit exchanged only within 7 merits.
Both are using the same platform of bitcoin wallet. sham100899 and fakegurutu

Master of Shitcoins

member

Activity: 217

Merit: 10

Quote from: shasan on January 26, 2019, 04:28:29 PM

I don't think your proof is sufficient. Only giving merit each other can't proof merit abuse or merit trader. I think you should obtain more info if possible.

If they are alts they will be tagged for sending merits to alts. I can't prove yet, that fakegurutu is an alt, but it's very fishy.
At least hisori and sham100899 are alts because they used same BTC address.

Let's wait how DT decides if fakegurutu is another alt of hisori/sham100899.

shasan

copper member

Activity: 2380

Merit: 1302

Playbet.io - Crypto Casino and Sportsbook

I don't think your proof is sufficient. Only giving merit each other can't proof merit abuse or merit trader. I think you should obtain more info if possible.

Master of Shitcoins

member

Activity: 217

Merit: 10

I just came over two accounts which are using the same BTC addresses to apply for bounty campaigns and I have posted my research in known alts: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.49437820

Accounts: sham100899, hisori, fakegurutu

I digged a bit deeper and found a circle of sending Merits between them, involved another account, fakegurutu:

hisori received his Merit from fakegurutu, who sent also 3 Merit to sham100899 and received 5 Merit from sham100899.

BPIP fakegurutu https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=fakegurutu
BPIP sham100899 https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=sham100899
BPIP hisori https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=hisori

Merit history of fakegurutu:

fakegurutu and sham100899 both applied to join BitBlender signature campaign (only 5 minutes difference between posts):

sham100899: http://archive.is/PiQH6#selection-3915.0-3915.10
fakegurutu: http://archive.is/PiQH6#selection-5285.0-5285.10

It looks like these accounts are trading the Merit and are most likely alts.

Topic: Is it Merit abuse? - page 2. (Read 661 times)