Topic: Is it normal for 1 address to hold 1.7m dust UTXOs? - page 2. (Read 473 times)
Look at OP_RETURN values. It contains "omni", so it is probably related to this: https://www.omnilayer.org/
It seems that bitInfoCharts got interested in analalyzing dust in Bitcoin too, they made this link about
top100 dustiest addresses
https://bitinfocharts.com/top-100-dustiest-bitcoin-addresses.html
In them u can see this first address, with 1,712,706 UTXOs (ins-outs)
https://bitinfocharts.com/bitcoin/address/1HckjUpRGcrrRAtFaaCAUaGjsPx9oYmLaZ
if u had a fast glance at the address I'll find the real operations with real money are very rare compared to the dust.
Is this normal???
Even considering 1 dust UTXO for each lightning TX doesn't explain it.
I have been away from Bitcoin new things for a while, is it possible there is some bug that adversaries use through dust or the side chain for lighting networks?
Or what?
Or u find this normal?
top100 dustiest addresses
https://bitinfocharts.com/top-100-dustiest-bitcoin-addresses.html
In them u can see this first address, with 1,712,706 UTXOs (ins-outs)
https://bitinfocharts.com/bitcoin/address/1HckjUpRGcrrRAtFaaCAUaGjsPx9oYmLaZ
if u had a fast glance at the address I'll find the real operations with real money are very rare compared to the dust.
Is this normal???
Even considering 1 dust UTXO for each lightning TX doesn't explain it.
I have been away from Bitcoin new things for a while, is it possible there is some bug that adversaries use through dust or the side chain for lighting networks?
Or what?
Or u find this normal?
Jump to: